(2468,19,'2012-09-25 01:53:18','2012-09-25 01:53:18','As an undergraduate English major with a concentration in creative writing, I had always regarded books as a portal into the world of fiction, a place where I could study plots and themes, setting and syntax. I had never stopped to consider books as historical objects until my first class in English 241: Archeology of Text. The assignment for the final research paper seemed simple: use what we learned during the semester to explore, analyze, and describe a document of interest from Goucher’s Special Collections.\r\n\r\nI knew from the start that I was intrigued by Goucher’s prolific collection of Jane Austen materials, but needed something specific to spark my interest. Walking around the small Special Collections room in the Julia Rogers Library, my gaze landed on a blue box behind a glass case. I soon learned that inside that box lay the first American edition of <em>Emma</em> (Philadelphia: M. Carey; for sale by Wells &amp; Lilly, Boston, 1816).  Nancy Magnuson, college librarian, told me all about Alberta Burke’s letters and thought that they might contain clues for my research. I have always been fascinated with letters (both reading and writing them), and the process of tracking a specific book through personal correspondences captivated me. I chose to study the 1816 first American edition of <em>Emma</em> and explore the letters that track how it found a home in Goucher’s library.\r\n\r\n<div id=\"attachment_1273\" class=\"alignright right\" style=\"width:320px;\"><img class=\"size-full wp-image-1273\" title=\"goucher_student action photo_kendall\" src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/goucher_student-action-photo_kendall.jpg\" alt=\"Sarah Kendall working with the Burke copy of the American first edition of Austen\'s Emma\" width=\"320\" height=\"375\" style=\" margin-bottom:20px; margin-left: 20px;\" /> <span class=\"wp-caption-text\">Sarah Kendall working with the Burke copy of the American first edition of Austen\'s <em>Emma</em> (Philadelphia: M. Carey; for sale by Wells &amp; Lilly, Boston, 1816).in the former Rare Book Collection Seminar Room (December 2007).</span></div>\r\n\r\nI remain baffled by the amount of information and detailed history I discovered while writing a descriptive bibliography. I wrote detailed accounts of the letters from Alberta Burke and David Gilson, the letters between David Gilson and Henry Burke, and the 1816 first edition of <em>Emma</em>. After seeing the interest that both Alberta Burke and David Gilson had in the first American edition of <em>Emma</em>, I knew that perusing the pages and studying the tome in detail would be essential to revealing the book’s history. Sifting through dozens of letters hoping to find mention of <em>Emma</em> thrilled me to no end. Reading different letters from various sources also illuminated how various people valued the first edition and why they wanted it in their possession. The circuit of corresponding materials proved equally intriguing and helpful for tracking down how the book traveled from Philadelphia to Goucher’s library.\r\n\r\nI learned that by latching on to a specific topic, I could follow a steady thread of conversation about <em>Emma</em>. The experience made me feel like a genuine historian instead of an undergraduate student simply researching journal articles or internet resources. It felt very special and intellectually stimulating to handle history with my own hands! I even discovered two additional letters hidden between the inside cover and the title page of the first volume. Unearthing these two letters felt very encouraging and proved that there is always the possibility of finding something new within the archives.','Sarah Kendall - Commentary','As an undergraduate English major with a concentration in Creative Writing, I had always regarded books as a portal into the world of fiction; a place where I could study plots and themes, setting and syntax. I had never stopped to consider books as historical objects until my first class in English 241: Archeology of Text. The assignment for the final research paper seemed simple: use what we learned during the semester to explore, analyze, and describe a document of interest from Goucher’s Special Collections.','inherit','open','open','','1053-revision-14','','','2012-09-25 01:53:18','2012-09-25 01:53:18','',1053,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/1053-revision-14/',0,'revision','',0),(2469,19,'2012-09-25 01:53:51','2012-09-25 01:53:51','As an undergraduate English major with a concentration in creative writing, I had always regarded books as a portal into the world of fiction, a place where I could study plots and themes, setting and syntax. I had never stopped to consider books as historical objects until my first class in English 241: Archeology of Text. The assignment for the final research paper seemed simple: use what we learned during the semester to explore, analyze, and describe a document of interest from Goucher’s Special Collections.\r\n\r\nI knew from the start that I was intrigued by Goucher’s prolific collection of Jane Austen materials, but needed something specific to spark my interest. Walking around the small Special Collections room in the Julia Rogers Library, my gaze landed on a blue box behind a glass case. I soon learned that inside that box lay the first American edition of <em>Emma</em> (Philadelphia: M. Carey; for sale by Wells &amp; Lilly, Boston, 1816).  Nancy Magnuson, college librarian, told me all about Alberta Burke’s letters and thought that they might contain clues for my research. I have always been fascinated with letters (both reading and writing them), and the process of tracking a specific book through personal correspondences captivated me. I chose to study the 1816 first American edition of <em>Emma</em> and explore the letters that track how it found a home in Goucher’s library.\r\n\r\n<div id=\"attachment_1273\" class=\"alignright right\" style=\"width:320px; margin-left: 20px;\"><img class=\"size-full wp-image-1273\" title=\"goucher_student action photo_kendall\" src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/goucher_student-action-photo_kendall.jpg\" alt=\"Sarah Kendall working with the Burke copy of the American first edition of Austen\'s Emma\" width=\"320\" height=\"375\" style=\"margin-bottom:20px;\"/> <span class=\"wp-caption-text\">Sarah Kendall working with the Burke copy of the American first edition of Austen\'s <em>Emma</em> (Philadelphia: M. Carey; for sale by Wells &amp; Lilly, Boston, 1816).in the former Rare Book Collection Seminar Room (December 2007).</span></div>\r\n\r\nI remain baffled by the amount of information and detailed history I discovered while writing a descriptive bibliography. I wrote detailed accounts of the letters from Alberta Burke and David Gilson, the letters between David Gilson and Henry Burke, and the 1816 first edition of <em>Emma</em>. After seeing the interest that both Alberta Burke and David Gilson had in the first American edition of <em>Emma</em>, I knew that perusing the pages and studying the tome in detail would be essential to revealing the book’s history. Sifting through dozens of letters hoping to find mention of <em>Emma</em> thrilled me to no end. Reading different letters from various sources also illuminated how various people valued the first edition and why they wanted it in their possession. The circuit of corresponding materials proved equally intriguing and helpful for tracking down how the book traveled from Philadelphia to Goucher’s library.\r\n\r\nI learned that by latching on to a specific topic, I could follow a steady thread of conversation about <em>Emma</em>. The experience made me feel like a genuine historian instead of an undergraduate student simply researching journal articles or internet resources. It felt very special and intellectually stimulating to handle history with my own hands! I even discovered two additional letters hidden between the inside cover and the title page of the first volume. Unearthing these two letters felt very encouraging and proved that there is always the possibility of finding something new within the archives.','Sarah Kendall - Commentary','As an undergraduate English major with a concentration in Creative Writing, I had always regarded books as a portal into the world of fiction; a place where I could study plots and themes, setting and syntax. I had never stopped to consider books as historical objects until my first class in English 241: Archeology of Text. The assignment for the final research paper seemed simple: use what we learned during the semester to explore, analyze, and describe a document of interest from Goucher’s Special Collections.','inherit','open','open','','1053-revision-15','','','2012-09-25 01:53:51','2012-09-25 01:53:51','',1053,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/1053-revision-15/',0,'revision','',0),(2470,19,'2012-09-25 01:52:00','2012-09-25 01:52:00','In a world of etiquette and formality, dance cards quickly became indispensable to young women in search of dancing partners. They were a manifestation of etiquette, used to keep social order and help their users follow protocol. Though dance cards are rarely used now, the study of these cards gives a lot of insight into the societies and groups that used them.\r\n\r\nLists of etiquette books remain from all different periods, instructing men and women how to act in each particular circumstance. Dancing claims a large portion of many of these books, as it was considered an elegant pastime and a way to judge one\'s character. Dancing was a sign of culture and social class, as the upper class had formal dance training while they were young.\r\n\r\n<div id=\"attachment_1341\" class=\"alignright right\" style=\"width:209px; margin-left: 20px; margin-bottom:20px;\"><a href=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/goucher_student-work-image3_brand.jpg\"><img class=\"size-medium wp-image-1341\" title=\"goucher_student work image3_brand\" src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/goucher_student-work-image3_brand-209x250.jpg\" alt=\"Scrapbook page showing in situ location of the U. S. Naval Academy June 2, 1921 Farewell Ball dance card \" width=\"209\" height=\"250\" /></a> <span class=\"wp-caption-text\">Scrapbook page showing in situ location of the U. S. Naval Academy June 2, 1921 Farewell Ball dance card with other balls\' cards, press clippings, trolley ticket stubs, and other memorabilia from the scrapbook of Mary Lee Keith.</span></div>\r\n\r\nThe dance card furthered one\'s enjoyment of dancing, as it allowed young women to know who they would dance with; they never needed to worry about procuring a partner for the following dance, because he had already signed her card. A practice known as “dating ahead” became quite common as young women began filling out their dance cards in advance of the evening, to ensure that they would not be without a partner. Many women worried about not being asked to dance, as the most beautiful, best dancers were constantly engaged on the dance floor; the women without partners were often looked down on and pitied. Young women feared not having a partner for every dance, and having a dance card allowed them to make sure they would be busy dancing the entire night.\r\n\r\nDance cards also provided women with a way to gracefully decline a dance invitation. Johnson points out, “a lady must not decline the invitation of a gentleman to dance, unless she is previously engaged, or does not intend to dance any more during the evening” (79). Having a dance card allowed women to fill out their card with men who they would prefer to dance with, and it also allowed them to gracefully decline a dance by saying her card is full, even though this may not be true.\r\n\r\n<!--nextpage-->\r\n\r\nIt was also a way for young women to remember her engagements:\r\n\r\nIn the etiquette of the ballroom young ladies should be very careful to keep their promises to their various partners. Little books are furnished as memorizers, and the same honor is imperative here as in greater things. (American Code of Manners 43)\r\n\r\nThe dance card acted as a reminder of who she was supposed to dance with for each dance, which helped with confusion in promising multiple dances. The dance card also allowed a convenient excuse when a woman accidentally promised the same dance to two men; she could simply claim that her “programme had got into such a state of confusion” and refrain from offending either party involved (Aldrich 113). After the ball has ended, the dance card can serve as a memento of the event, “Each dance is entered on the program—and many a delightful memory is kept alive by glancing at these names days after the dance is held” (Eichler 97). In this way, the card acts as a reminder both at the ball and after the ball is finished.\r\n\r\nDance cards were predominantly used before the 20th century, but certain groups upheld tradition and used them much longer. As Eichler points out in 1922, “The dance program is rarely used now except at college dances, or army and navy dances. It has lost prestige with the passing of the old fashioned ball” (97).\r\n\r\nThe Archives and Special Collections at the United States Naval Academy holds an extensive collection of cards from many different events. The Academy, with its emphasis on tradition, used dance cards at their Winter Hops, the Ring Dance and the Farewell Ball into the 1960s. The USNA Archives provides a wonderful example of the evolution of the dance card, through the cards they have from the Farewell Ball, spanning from 1893 to 1976.\r\n<a href=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/goucher_student-work-image2_brand.jpg\"><img class=\"size-medium wp-image-1344\" title=\"goucher_student work image2_brand\" src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/goucher_student-work-image2_brand-171x250.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"171\" height=\"250\" /></a><span class=\"caption\">Sample dance card page with partners for five dances filled in, from the scrapbook of Mary Lee Keith.</span>\r\n<!--nextpage-->\r\n\r\nThe earliest dance card in the collection is from The Farewell Ball, June 2nd 1893 , donated by Mrs. Elizabeth Galt Welles (13 x 8.5 cm). The card is bound by a ribbon bow on the top vertical edge, with heavy cardstock covers in an ivory color. The cover simply states the dance and date in black ink with gold embellishments. The half-inch wide ribbon is long enough for the card to be carried on a lady’s wrist and holds a small pencil 7 cm in length. Inside the cover were 2 pages containing the list of dances with the song titles and composers. The card had not been filled out by its owner. The simple design creates an elegant card, following the guidelines for cards set by The Ballroom Guide published in the 1860s: “modern taste is inclined to favour plain and chaste designs rather than florid” (Aldrich 117). The contents of the card show that the emphasis of the card was on the order of dances, without much information about the ball.\r\n\r\nUnfortunately, the Academy does not have any cards from the balls in between 1893 and 1906, but the card from the 1906 Farewell Ball provides a beautiful example of a dance card. Donated by Mrs. Bradford Bartlett, the card is 10 x 7.5 cm with a tan leather cover. The cover has two inside pockets and a strap to attach the card to a woman’s wrist. Inside, the card contains three bifolia with much more decoration than the 1893 card. The card begins with a title page, which announces the name, date, and location of the ball. Following the title page are three pages of dances with spaces for 25 dances. For the first two pages of dances, each recto side holds a space for eight dances and on the verso is an illumination of a woman in an evening gown and a woman in a Navy coat and cover, respectively. The third page lists nine dances on the recto side and lists the committee of midshipmen who planned the ball on the verso. After these there are two blank pages with the word “Autographs” printed at the top of each page. This card—also not filled out—demonstrates the shift in focusing on only the dances to a larger focus on the card as a decorative souvenir.\r\n\r\nThe Farewell Ball card from June 5th, 1908 donated by Mary McCarthy is the first in the collection filled out by its original owner. The last names of eight different men are written in pen with a beautiful cursive hand next to the dances. Ms. McCarthy danced 17 of the 25 dances listed and most of them were two steps and waltz, which were especially popular at the time. This card is much like the 1906 card, with a section listing the committee members and blank pages for autographs. Measuring 10 x 7.5 cm, the dark brown suede cover has a Naval Academy insignia blindly stamped in the center, with a dark brown cord and pockets inside the cover. The inside was printed with brown ink and tissue paper protected the pictures from transfer.\r\n\r\nIn 1909, the Farewell Ball dance card, donated by Mrs. Bradford Bartlett, remained much the same. The 10.5 x 8 cm card had a navy blue vinyl cover with pockets inside to hold pictures and gold tooling for decoration. The inside contained the order of dances—not filled out—a supper list, and a committee list. The illustrations were in black and white with a small bit of red as an accent.\r\n\r\nAlso donated by Mrs. Bradford Bartlett, the Farewell Ball, June 3rd 1910 dance card had a dark grey leather cover with a silver cord (10 x 7 cm). A blind tooled ship decorated the front, and white paint accented the moon and water. Inside, black and white illustrations were accented with the use of yellow, red, blue and green and were protected by tissue paper. The order of dances was filled out in sloppy cursive hand in pencil. The autograph section, however, was left blank.\r\n\r\nThe example from the Farewell Ball, June 2nd 1911 provided the most intricate cover. Measuring 11 x 6.5 cm while closed, the tan suede cover folds three times, containing extra pockets. Inside the front cover is one pocket and the small booklet of paper, the back cover extends to twice the front cover’s length, folding in on itself. The right side of the cover has a simple pocket, while the middle of the cover has a more complex pocket. The pocket is vertically arranged, with a flap that closes by inserting the narrow point of the flap into a loop. Naval Academy insignia is stamped onto the inner pockets of the cover. The dance card was attached to the lady’s wrist by a dark brown leather strap, which still holds an 8 cm pencil. Inside contains a title page, pictures with color accents, the committee list, a section for autographs and the order of dances, which is not filled out.\r\n\r\nThe Farewell Ball, June 6th 1919 dance card has a navy blue vinyl cover with blind stamped Naval Academy insignia and date and a blue and yellow cord (10 x 8 cm). The inside contains a title page and the dances listed verso and spaces to fill out engagements listed recto. The card is not filled out and is decorated with black and white illustrations.\r\n\r\n<!--nextpage-->\r\n\r\nBound vertically in a brown leather cover, the Farewell Ball June 3rd 1920 dance card measures 11 x 7.5 cm. The cover is blind stamped with blue and yellow cords. After the order of dances, there is a calendar from June 1920 to May 1921. The months are listed two at a time, with large pictures above them. The stiff cardstock paper has gilt edges.\r\n\r\nThe Farewell Ball June 2nd 1921 dance card has a significantly different cover than the previous cards. The simple 9 x 6.5 cm white cardstock cover has a full color illustration on the cover with an embossed gold Naval Academy insignia. Previously, the covers were made of a more expensive material—usually leather or vinyl. This was the first ball held in Dahlgren Hall, one of the social buildings on the Naval Academy yard. The dances are listed 3 on a page, with no names of the songs, only the types of dances. The dances are not filled out. Next to the type of dance is a space labeled “meet under” and beneath the dances is a space for memories. There is also a different quote at the bottom of each page.\r\n\r\n<a href=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/goucher_student-work-image1_brand.jpg\"><img class=\"size-medium wp-image-1343\" title=\"goucher_student work image1_brand\" src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/goucher_student-work-image1_brand-195x250.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"195\" height=\"250\" /></a><span class=\"caption\">Front cover of the U.S. Naval Academy dance card for the June 2, 1921, Farewell Ball, from the scrapbook of Mary Lee Keith (Class of 1924). Goucher College Scrapbook Collection.</span>\r\n\r\nSimilarly, the Farewell Ball June 2nd 1922 dance card has a white cardstock cover with a color illustration (from Keith Scrapbook, Goucher College Library). The 9 x 6.5 cm cover includes blind stamping and a blue and yellow cord. The layout is very much like the 1921 card, containing a list of dances, with a “meet under” space and space below for memories. This card, however, does not have quotes at the bottom of each page. At the end, there is a committee list. The card is filled out with black pen, and in the “meet under” section, flags are drawn with pen and colored. The ball was held in Dahlgren Hall, like the 1921 card also containing a “meet under” section. Dahlgren Hall is lined with flags on either side of the long, rectangular building. The “meet under” space allowed the women to draw in the flag and know exactly where she was to meet her next dancing partner. This aided even more in making sure that the women had a dance partner for every dance; it ensured that she would always be able to find her intended dance partner even in the crowded room. It is also possible that an escort would fill out the card in advance for his date with the illustrations of flags in order to ensure she danced the night away.\r\n\r\n<!--nextpage-->\r\n\r\nIn 1923, the Academy went back to the leather cover for the Farewell Ball dance card. The cover is Navy blue with a gold tooled insignia, with inside pockets (11 x 8.5 cm). The recto pocket had a clear cut out to hold a photograph. For decoration, there are pictures that are whimsical in nature with tissue paper to protect the pictures from transfer. The dances are filled out in immaculately print black pen with flags drawn and colored next to last names.\r\n\r\nThe Farewell Ball dance card from 1925 has a silver cardstock cover with a picture of the Naval Academy Chapel dome in different shades of blue. Measuring 9.5 x 6.5 cm, the card contains the order of dances and a “meet under” space, but there is no room to record memories or a committee list like in the 1921, 1922, and 1923 cards. The card is filled out in pen with a shaky hand and the flags are drawn and colored next to the names. On the inside cover recto is a hand drawn cartoon of a midshipman.\r\n\r\nThere is a gap until 1942, when the collection resumes with the Farewell Ball, June 18th 1942. It has a white leather cover with stamping and gold accents, measuring 10 x 7.5 cm. The inside is printed in blue and it can be attached to a woman’s wrist by the yellow cord. The card contains a title page and committee list, names the orchestra, and announces that Mrs. John R. Beardall is receiving. The order of dances is filled out in two different shades of blue pen and each name is written in a different style of hand. This indicates another use for the dance card. A woman can hand her card to whoever asks her to dance and have him write in his name. This is very useful, especially if the woman has forgotten his name and can look on the card for a reminder.\r\n\r\nLike the 1942 card, the Farewell Ball, June 5th 1945 card was printed with blue ink and has a yellow cord. The 10 x 7.5 cm card has a dark blue faux leather cover with stamping and gold accents. The inside lists who was receiving, the hostesses, committee members and the orchestra. The dances, which are not filled out, are numbered, but there is no information as to what dance or what song each number will be. This shows the diminishing importance of the dances on the dance card.\r\n\r\nSimilarly, the Farewell Ball, May 31st 1956 dance card only lists numbers for the dances. This 10 x 7.5 cm card has an off-white cardstock cover with blue ink and an off-white cord. Inside, it lists the title page, orchestra, the woman receiving and the hostesses. It also lists the committee list for both the Farewell Ball and for the other hops held throughout the year. It ends with a quote, “Three cheers for/ those who are about/ to leave us—/ Three cheers for/ those we leave behind/ us—” This quote becomes a standard addition to each following card.\r\n\r\nThe card from the Farewell Ball, June 2nd 1959 is much the same as the 1956 card. The 10 x 7.5 cm card has a gold cardstock cover with blue wording and a silhouette of a dancing couple. The cord is also blue. The card lists the orchestra, the woman receiving, the hostesses and the program of dances—numbers only, no types of dances or names of songs. Two of the dances are filled out and the others were left blank. After the dances the card lists the Farewell Ball committee and the Hop committee, which organizes the smaller dances throughout the year. It concludes with the Three Cheers quote found in the 1956 card.\r\n\r\nThe cards from the Farewell Balls in 1964, 1965 and 1966 have almost identical contents, with different covers. The 1964 card is 10.5 x 7.5 cm with a white cardstock cover with blue ink and gold embossing and a blue cord. The 1965 card is 11.5 x 9 cm. It has a light blue cover with black embossing and a dark blue cord. The 1966 card measures 11.5 x 9 cm with a light blue cardstock cover with navy blue ink and a navy blue cord. All the cards contain a title page and list the orchestra, woman receiving, officer representative, social director and hostesses. None of the cards are filled out and they are stapled at the fold.\r\n\r\nWith each consecutive card, the changes are minimal. The 1967 and 1968 Farewell Ball dance cards are exactly the same, with a different date. They are both 11.5 x 9 cm and their covers are light blue with black ink and a blue cord. Neither card is filled out.\r\n\r\n<!--nextpage-->\r\n\r\nThe Farewell Ball June 3rd 1969 card provides a very interesting look at the evolution of the dance card. Very similar to the previous cards, it measures 11.5 x 9cm and lists the title page, orchestra, woman receiving, officer representative, social director, hostesses and committees. It has a white cardstock cover with blue ink and a blue cord. It also includes the Navy “Blue and Gold” song. What it doesn’t include, however, is a program of dances or even a space to write down dance partners. The point of this card is to provide a souvenir of the dance and provide information about it, but it no longer serves a way for women to write down the names of their partners.\r\n\r\nThe cards from 1970, 1971 and 1972 are the same as the 1969 card. However, the 1971 card contains one change: the midshipman’s oath appears after the title page. The all have white cardstock covers, 11.5 x 9 cm, with navy blue ink and navy blue cords.\r\n\r\nThe Farewell Ball, June 4th 1974 card presents another interesting change in the evolution of the dance card. The card no longer has a cord. The 11 x 9 cm card has a white cardstock cover with blue ink, but no cord with which a lady could attach it to her wrist. The cards from the 1975 and 1976 Farewell Balls have all the same internal elements, but measure 13 x 9 cm with a light blue cardstock cover printed in dark blue ink.\r\n\r\nThe progression of the Naval Academy Farewell Ball dance cards shows the decreased emphasis on dance and the move from the dance card as a reminder of the gentleman a woman had promised to dance with to a souvenir and program for the ball. The earlier dance cards contain little information about the ball itself; they focus on the dances, listing the order, the type of dance and the name of the song. Slowly, information is added to the card. In the 1920s, there was a place to write down memories and draw the flag under which the two would meet. These additions keep the focus on the dancing and the use of the dance card as a reminder and as a memento. In the 1940s, the cards begin to list the woman receiving, the committee who planned the ball and other information not directly related to the dancing. Also, the dances are no longer identified by type or name, they are simply numbered. This shows another step away from the focus on dancing. At this stage, the cord also becomes purely decorative. The cords attached to these cards aren’t long enough to secure around a woman’s wrist; they simply add a bit of decoration to the card. By the 1969 and into the 1970s, the dance cards no longer provide space to write the dances. They have transformed into souvenirs from the ball, giving information about the ball and incorporating quotes, song lyrics and lists of the people involved.\r\n<div class=\"footnote\">\r\n<h5>Works Cited</h5>\r\nAldrich, Elizabeth. <em>From the Ballroom to Hell: Grace and Folly in Nineteenth-Century Dance</em>. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1991.\r\n\r\n</div>\r\n<div class=\"footnote\"><em>The American Code of Manners: a study of the usages, laws and observances which govern intercourse in the best social circles, and of the principles which underlie them</em>. New York: W. R. Andrews, 1880.</div>\r\n<div class=\"footnote\">Eichler, Lillian. <em>Book of Etiquette</em>. Oyster Bay: Nelson Doubleday Inc., 1922.</div>\r\n<div class=\"footnote\">Johnson, Sophia Orne. <em>A Manual of Etiquette, with Hints on Politeness and Good Breeding</em>. New York: G.P. Putnam’s Sons, 1885.</div>\r\n<div class=\"footnote\">Goucher College, Special Collections and Archives. Scrapbook Collection, Mary Lee Keith. Farewell Ball Dance Card, 1922.</div>\r\n<div class=\"footnote\">The Nimitz Library, United States Naval Academy, Special Collections and Archives. Student Life, Dance Card Collection.</div>','My Card Is Full: The Evolution of the Farewell Ball Dance Cards ','In a world of etiquette and formality, dance cards quickly became indispensable to young women in search of dancing partners. They were a manifestation of etiquette, used to keep social order and help their users follow protocol. Though dance cards are rarely used now, the study of these cards gives a lot of insight into the societies and groups that used them.\r\n\r\nLists of etiquette books remain from all different periods, instructing men and women how to act in each particular circumstance. Dancing claims a large portion of many of these books, as it was considered an elegant pastime and a way to judge one\'s character. Dancing was a sign of culture and social class, as the upper class had formal dance training while they were young.','inherit','open','open','','1326-revision-41','','','2012-09-25 01:52:00','2012-09-25 01:52:00','',1326,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/1326-revision-41/',0,'revision','',0),(2550,10,'2012-09-28 08:09:16','2012-09-28 08:09:16','<span class=\"post\">Saunders worked on this image for the Southeast Tennessee Digital Archive (SETDA).</span>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<img class=\"size-full wp-image-1368\" title=\"cscc_student work_sample material\" src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/cscc_student-work_sample-material.jpg\" alt=\"Image of James A. Bible (c. 1860) from the Ramsey Family Papers (MS 81).\" width=\"386\" height=\"640\" />\r\n<span class=\"caption\">Image of James A. Bible (c. 1860) from the Ramsey Family Papers (MS 81). Used by permission of Cleveland Public Library.</span>','History Lab: Combining Service Learning, Research Methods, and Digital Archives ','This case study features the work of a student who took History Lab, an introductory history and service-learning course at Cleveland State Community College (CSCC). He researched individual items from a local cultural heritage organization that were then digitized, described, and published online in the <a href=\"http://www.clevelandstatecc.edu/setda/\" target=\"_blank\">Southeast Tennessee Digital Archive</a> (SETDA). Matthew Saunders\' work ended up in the Southeast Tennessee Digital Archive. You can find the whole archive <a href=\"http://www.clevelandstatecc.edu/setda/\" target=\"_blank\">here</a>, and the items Saunders contributed <a href=\"http://csccdigital.cdmhost.com/cdm/singleitem/collection/p4024coll8/id/216\" target=\"_blank\">here</a>.','inherit','open','open','','1018-revision-35','','','2012-09-28 08:09:16','2012-09-28 08:09:16','',1018,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/1018-revision-35/',0,'revision','',0),(2474,19,'2012-07-27 08:20:27','2012-07-27 08:20:27','[caption id=\"attachment_1367\" align=\"alignnone\" width=\"638\"]<img class=\"size-full wp-image-1367\" title=\"cscc_student action photo_saunders\" src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/cscc_student-action-photo_saunders.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"638\" height=\"478\" /> Matthew Saunders exploring the Ramsey Family Papers at the Cleveland Bradley County Library History Branch (CPLHB). Photo credit: Sarah Copeland.[/caption]\r\n\r\nI was one of the first students to take the History Laboratory class at Cleveland State Community College (CSCC). My previous experience during an extra-credit activity in a traditional history course initially sparked my interest. During an American history survey course, Mr. Reed, the CSCC instructor who founded the Southeast Tennessee Digital Archive (SETDA), offered students a chance to digitize historical photographs. He demonstrated how to research a photograph\'s history, starting with the limited information written on the back and clues within the picture itself. I was eager to enroll in a course that was dedicated to digitizing historical photographs.\r\n\r\nFew history majors would turn down the opportunity to go beyond lecture courses and work directly with historical documents, but I never expected a two-year college to offer me this opportunity. The History Laboratory allowed me to gain hands-on experience preserving important records of local history. Moreover, the History Lab transformed how I research. I had to learn to use a library because the most relevant research material was not accessible online. It took a while to get into the groove of picking up a book and reading through the text as opposed to using a search engine to gather information. Using physical books to research is an invaluable experience that I will take with me throughout my future courses and career.\r\n\r\nAnother new experience was the archiving section of the class, in which we digitized photographs and organized the research in a way that would be coherent on the SETDA website. As students, we are accustomed to elaborating and expanding upon our research to produce an essay. The archiving section of the course, instead, forced me to condense my findings into a few concise sentences. The term “metadata” was foreign to me before this class, so working my research into that format was not the easiest task. Entering metadata into ContentDM was a challenge. Nevertheless, this exercise has helped me to convey my thoughts more clearly in other classes.\r\n\r\nOverall, the History Laboratory was a great experience. I had wanted to add some constructive criticism, but after reflecting on my experience I cannot think of any suggestions. The instructors were terrific and the course of study was refreshing. I would recommend this course to history students or any student who is searching for an experience that goes beyond a classroom lecture.','Matthew E. Saunders - Commentary','I was one of the first students to take the History Laboratory at Cleveland State Community College. My previous experience during an extra credit activity in a traditional history course initially sparked my interest. During an American History survey course Mr. Reed, the CSCC instructor who founded the Southeast Tennessee Digital Archive, offered students a chance to digitize historical photographs. He demonstrated how to research a photograph\'s history, starting with the limited information written on the back and clues within the picture itself. I was eager to enroll in a course that was dedicated to digitizing historical photographs.','inherit','open','open','','1040-revision-17','','','2012-07-27 08:20:27','2012-07-27 08:20:27','',1040,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/1040-revision-17/',0,'revision','',0),(2471,19,'2012-09-25 01:58:46','2012-09-25 01:58:46','In a world of etiquette and formality, dance cards quickly became indispensable to young women in search of dancing partners. They were a manifestation of etiquette, used to keep social order and help their users follow protocol. Though dance cards are rarely used now, the study of these cards gives a lot of insight into the societies and groups that used them.\r\n\r\nLists of etiquette books remain from all different periods, instructing men and women how to act in each particular circumstance. Dancing claims a large portion of many of these books, as it was considered an elegant pastime and a way to judge one\'s character. Dancing was a sign of culture and social class, as the upper class had formal dance training while they were young.\r\n\r\n<div id=\"attachment_1341\" class=\"alignright right\" style=\"width:209px; margin-left: 20px; margin-bottom:20px;\"><a href=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/goucher_student-work-image3_brand.jpg\"><img class=\"size-medium wp-image-1341\" title=\"goucher_student work image3_brand\" src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/goucher_student-work-image3_brand-209x250.jpg\" alt=\"Scrapbook page showing in situ location of the U. S. Naval Academy June 2, 1921 Farewell Ball dance card \" width=\"209\" height=\"250\" /></a> <span class=\"wp-caption-text\">Scrapbook page showing in situ location of the U. S. Naval Academy June 2, 1921 Farewell Ball dance card with other balls\' cards, press clippings, trolley ticket stubs, and other memorabilia from the scrapbook of Mary Lee Keith.</span></div>\r\n\r\nThe dance card furthered one\'s enjoyment of dancing, as it allowed young women to know who they would dance with; they never needed to worry about procuring a partner for the following dance, because he had already signed her card. A practice known as &ldquo;dating ahead&rdquo; became quite common as young women began filling out their dance cards in advance of the evening, to ensure that they would not be without a partner. Many women worried about not being asked to dance, as the most beautiful, best dancers were constantly engaged on the dance floor; the women without partners were often looked down on and pitied. Young women feared not having a partner for every dance, and having a dance card allowed them to make sure they would be busy dancing the entire night.\r\n\r\nDance cards also provided women with a way to gracefully decline a dance invitation. Johnson points out, &ldquo;a lady must not decline the invitation of a gentleman to dance, unless she is previously engaged, or does not intend to dance any more during the evening&rdquo; (79). Having a dance card allowed women to fill out their card with men who they would prefer to dance with, and it also allowed them to gracefully decline a dance by saying her card is full, even though this may not be true.\r\n\r\n<!--nextpage-->\r\n\r\nIt was also a way for young women to remember her engagements:\r\n\r\nIn the etiquette of the ballroom young ladies should be very careful to keep their promises to their various partners. Little books are furnished as memorizers, and the same honor is imperative here as in greater things. (American Code of Manners 43)\r\n\r\nThe dance card acted as a reminder of who she was supposed to dance with for each dance, which helped with confusion in promising multiple dances. The dance card also allowed a convenient excuse when a woman accidentally promised the same dance to two men; she could simply claim that her &ldquo;programme had got into such a state of confusion&rdquo; and refrain from offending either party involved (Aldrich 113). After the ball has ended, the dance card can serve as a memento of the event, &ldquo;Each dance is entered on the program—and many a delightful memory is kept alive by glancing at these names days after the dance is held&rdquo; (Eichler 97). In this way, the card acts as a reminder both at the ball and after the ball is finished.\r\n\r\nDance cards were predominantly used before the 20th century, but certain groups upheld tradition and used them much longer. As Eichler points out in 1922, &ldquo;The dance program is rarely used now except at college dances, or army and navy dances. It has lost prestige with the passing of the old fashioned ball&rdquo; (97).\r\n\r\nThe Archives and Special Collections at the United States Naval Academy holds an extensive collection of cards from many different events. The Academy, with its emphasis on tradition, used dance cards at their Winter Hops, the Ring Dance and the Farewell Ball into the 1960s. The USNA Archives provides a wonderful example of the evolution of the dance card, through the cards they have from the Farewell Ball, spanning from 1893 to 1976.\r\n<a href=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/goucher_student-work-image2_brand.jpg\"><img class=\"size-medium wp-image-1344\" title=\"goucher_student work image2_brand\" src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/goucher_student-work-image2_brand-171x250.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"171\" height=\"250\" /></a><span class=\"caption\">Sample dance card page with partners for five dances filled in, from the scrapbook of Mary Lee Keith.</span>\r\n<!--nextpage-->\r\n\r\nThe earliest dance card in the collection is from The Farewell Ball, June 2nd 1893 , donated by Mrs. Elizabeth Galt Welles (13 x 8.5 cm). The card is bound by a ribbon bow on the top vertical edge, with heavy cardstock covers in an ivory color. The cover simply states the dance and date in black ink with gold embellishments. The half-inch wide ribbon is long enough for the card to be carried on a lady’s wrist and holds a small pencil 7 cm in length. Inside the cover were 2 pages containing the list of dances with the song titles and composers. The card had not been filled out by its owner. The simple design creates an elegant card, following the guidelines for cards set by The Ballroom Guide published in the 1860s: &ldquo;modern taste is inclined to favour plain and chaste designs rather than florid&rdquo; (Aldrich 117). The contents of the card show that the emphasis of the card was on the order of dances, without much information about the ball.\r\n\r\nUnfortunately, the Academy does not have any cards from the balls in between 1893 and 1906, but the card from the 1906 Farewell Ball provides a beautiful example of a dance card. Donated by Mrs. Bradford Bartlett, the card is 10 x 7.5 cm with a tan leather cover. The cover has two inside pockets and a strap to attach the card to a woman’s wrist. Inside, the card contains three bifolia with much more decoration than the 1893 card. The card begins with a title page, which announces the name, date, and location of the ball. Following the title page are three pages of dances with spaces for 25 dances. For the first two pages of dances, each recto side holds a space for eight dances and on the verso is an illumination of a woman in an evening gown and a woman in a Navy coat and cover, respectively. The third page lists nine dances on the recto side and lists the committee of midshipmen who planned the ball on the verso. After these there are two blank pages with the word &ldquo;Autographs&rdquo; printed at the top of each page. This card—also not filled out—demonstrates the shift in focusing on only the dances to a larger focus on the card as a decorative souvenir.\r\n\r\nThe Farewell Ball card from June 5th, 1908 donated by Mary McCarthy is the first in the collection filled out by its original owner. The last names of eight different men are written in pen with a beautiful cursive hand next to the dances. Ms. McCarthy danced 17 of the 25 dances listed and most of them were two steps and waltz, which were especially popular at the time. This card is much like the 1906 card, with a section listing the committee members and blank pages for autographs. Measuring 10 x 7.5 cm, the dark brown suede cover has a Naval Academy insignia blindly stamped in the center, with a dark brown cord and pockets inside the cover. The inside was printed with brown ink and tissue paper protected the pictures from transfer.\r\n\r\nIn 1909, the Farewell Ball dance card, donated by Mrs. Bradford Bartlett, remained much the same. The 10.5 x 8 cm card had a navy blue vinyl cover with pockets inside to hold pictures and gold tooling for decoration. The inside contained the order of dances—not filled out—a supper list, and a committee list. The illustrations were in black and white with a small bit of red as an accent.\r\n\r\nAlso donated by Mrs. Bradford Bartlett, the Farewell Ball, June 3rd 1910 dance card had a dark grey leather cover with a silver cord (10 x 7 cm). A blind tooled ship decorated the front, and white paint accented the moon and water. Inside, black and white illustrations were accented with the use of yellow, red, blue and green and were protected by tissue paper. The order of dances was filled out in sloppy cursive hand in pencil. The autograph section, however, was left blank.\r\n\r\nThe example from the Farewell Ball, June 2nd 1911 provided the most intricate cover. Measuring 11 x 6.5 cm while closed, the tan suede cover folds three times, containing extra pockets. Inside the front cover is one pocket and the small booklet of paper, the back cover extends to twice the front cover’s length, folding in on itself. The right side of the cover has a simple pocket, while the middle of the cover has a more complex pocket. The pocket is vertically arranged, with a flap that closes by inserting the narrow point of the flap into a loop. Naval Academy insignia is stamped onto the inner pockets of the cover. The dance card was attached to the lady’s wrist by a dark brown leather strap, which still holds an 8 cm pencil. Inside contains a title page, pictures with color accents, the committee list, a section for autographs and the order of dances, which is not filled out.\r\n\r\nThe Farewell Ball, June 6th 1919 dance card has a navy blue vinyl cover with blind stamped Naval Academy insignia and date and a blue and yellow cord (10 x 8 cm). The inside contains a title page and the dances listed verso and spaces to fill out engagements listed recto. The card is not filled out and is decorated with black and white illustrations.\r\n\r\n<!--nextpage-->\r\n\r\nBound vertically in a brown leather cover, the Farewell Ball June 3rd 1920 dance card measures 11 x 7.5 cm. The cover is blind stamped with blue and yellow cords. After the order of dances, there is a calendar from June 1920 to May 1921. The months are listed two at a time, with large pictures above them. The stiff cardstock paper has gilt edges.\r\n\r\nThe Farewell Ball June 2nd 1921 dance card has a significantly different cover than the previous cards. The simple 9 x 6.5 cm white cardstock cover has a full color illustration on the cover with an embossed gold Naval Academy insignia. Previously, the covers were made of a more expensive material—usually leather or vinyl. This was the first ball held in Dahlgren Hall, one of the social buildings on the Naval Academy yard. The dances are listed 3 on a page, with no names of the songs, only the types of dances. The dances are not filled out. Next to the type of dance is a space labeled &ldquo;meet under&rdquo; and beneath the dances is a space for memories. There is also a different quote at the bottom of each page.\r\n\r\n<div id=\"attachment_1343\" class=\"alignright right\" style=\"width:195; margin-left: 20px; margin-bottom:20px; \"><a href=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/goucher_student-work-image1_brand.jpg\"><img class=\"size-medium wp-image-1343\" title=\"goucher_student work image1_brand\" src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/goucher_student-work-image1_brand-195x250.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"195\" height=\"250\" /></a><span class=\"caption\">Front cover of the U.S. Naval Academy dance card for the June 2, 1921, Farewell Ball, from the scrapbook of Mary Lee Keith (Class of 1924). Goucher College Scrapbook Collection.</span></div>\r\n\r\nSimilarly, the Farewell Ball June 2nd 1922 dance card has a white cardstock cover with a color illustration (from Keith Scrapbook, Goucher College Library). The 9 x 6.5 cm cover includes blind stamping and a blue and yellow cord. The layout is very much like the 1921 card, containing a list of dances, with a &ldquo;meet under&rdquo; space and space below for memories. This card, however, does not have quotes at the bottom of each page. At the end, there is a committee list. The card is filled out with black pen, and in the &ldquo;meet under&rdquo; section, flags are drawn with pen and colored. The ball was held in Dahlgren Hall, like the 1921 card also containing a &ldquo;meet under&rdquo; section. Dahlgren Hall is lined with flags on either side of the long, rectangular building. The &ldquo;meet under&rdquo; space allowed the women to draw in the flag and know exactly where she was to meet her next dancing partner. This aided even more in making sure that the women had a dance partner for every dance; it ensured that she would always be able to find her intended dance partner even in the crowded room. It is also possible that an escort would fill out the card in advance for his date with the illustrations of flags in order to ensure she danced the night away.\r\n\r\n<!--nextpage-->\r\n\r\nIn 1923, the Academy went back to the leather cover for the Farewell Ball dance card. The cover is Navy blue with a gold tooled insignia, with inside pockets (11 x 8.5 cm). The recto pocket had a clear cut out to hold a photograph. For decoration, there are pictures that are whimsical in nature with tissue paper to protect the pictures from transfer. The dances are filled out in immaculately print black pen with flags drawn and colored next to last names.\r\n\r\nThe Farewell Ball dance card from 1925 has a silver cardstock cover with a picture of the Naval Academy Chapel dome in different shades of blue. Measuring 9.5 x 6.5 cm, the card contains the order of dances and a &ldquo;meet under&rdquo; space, but there is no room to record memories or a committee list like in the 1921, 1922, and 1923 cards. The card is filled out in pen with a shaky hand and the flags are drawn and colored next to the names. On the inside cover recto is a hand drawn cartoon of a midshipman.\r\n\r\nThere is a gap until 1942, when the collection resumes with the Farewell Ball, June 18th 1942. It has a white leather cover with stamping and gold accents, measuring 10 x 7.5 cm. The inside is printed in blue and it can be attached to a woman’s wrist by the yellow cord. The card contains a title page and committee list, names the orchestra, and announces that Mrs. John R. Beardall is receiving. The order of dances is filled out in two different shades of blue pen and each name is written in a different style of hand. This indicates another use for the dance card. A woman can hand her card to whoever asks her to dance and have him write in his name. This is very useful, especially if the woman has forgotten his name and can look on the card for a reminder.\r\n\r\nLike the 1942 card, the Farewell Ball, June 5th 1945 card was printed with blue ink and has a yellow cord. The 10 x 7.5 cm card has a dark blue faux leather cover with stamping and gold accents. The inside lists who was receiving, the hostesses, committee members and the orchestra. The dances, which are not filled out, are numbered, but there is no information as to what dance or what song each number will be. This shows the diminishing importance of the dances on the dance card.\r\n\r\nSimilarly, the Farewell Ball, May 31st 1956 dance card only lists numbers for the dances. This 10 x 7.5 cm card has an off-white cardstock cover with blue ink and an off-white cord. Inside, it lists the title page, orchestra, the woman receiving and the hostesses. It also lists the committee list for both the Farewell Ball and for the other hops held throughout the year. It ends with a quote, &ldquo;Three cheers for/ those who are about/ to leave us—/ Three cheers for/ those we leave behind/ us—&rdquo; This quote becomes a standard addition to each following card.\r\n\r\nThe card from the Farewell Ball, June 2nd 1959 is much the same as the 1956 card. The 10 x 7.5 cm card has a gold cardstock cover with blue wording and a silhouette of a dancing couple. The cord is also blue. The card lists the orchestra, the woman receiving, the hostesses and the program of dances—numbers only, no types of dances or names of songs. Two of the dances are filled out and the others were left blank. After the dances the card lists the Farewell Ball committee and the Hop committee, which organizes the smaller dances throughout the year. It concludes with the Three Cheers quote found in the 1956 card.\r\n\r\nThe cards from the Farewell Balls in 1964, 1965 and 1966 have almost identical contents, with different covers. The 1964 card is 10.5 x 7.5 cm with a white cardstock cover with blue ink and gold embossing and a blue cord. The 1965 card is 11.5 x 9 cm. It has a light blue cover with black embossing and a dark blue cord. The 1966 card measures 11.5 x 9 cm with a light blue cardstock cover with navy blue ink and a navy blue cord. All the cards contain a title page and list the orchestra, woman receiving, officer representative, social director and hostesses. None of the cards are filled out and they are stapled at the fold.\r\n\r\nWith each consecutive card, the changes are minimal. The 1967 and 1968 Farewell Ball dance cards are exactly the same, with a different date. They are both 11.5 x 9 cm and their covers are light blue with black ink and a blue cord. Neither card is filled out.\r\n\r\n<!--nextpage-->\r\n\r\nThe Farewell Ball June 3rd 1969 card provides a very interesting look at the evolution of the dance card. Very similar to the previous cards, it measures 11.5 x 9cm and lists the title page, orchestra, woman receiving, officer representative, social director, hostesses and committees. It has a white cardstock cover with blue ink and a blue cord. It also includes the Navy &ldquo;Blue and Gold&rdquo; song. What it doesn’t include, however, is a program of dances or even a space to write down dance partners. The point of this card is to provide a souvenir of the dance and provide information about it, but it no longer serves a way for women to write down the names of their partners.\r\n\r\nThe cards from 1970, 1971 and 1972 are the same as the 1969 card. However, the 1971 card contains one change: the midshipman’s oath appears after the title page. The all have white cardstock covers, 11.5 x 9 cm, with navy blue ink and navy blue cords.\r\n\r\nThe Farewell Ball, June 4th 1974 card presents another interesting change in the evolution of the dance card. The card no longer has a cord. The 11 x 9 cm card has a white cardstock cover with blue ink, but no cord with which a lady could attach it to her wrist. The cards from the 1975 and 1976 Farewell Balls have all the same internal elements, but measure 13 x 9 cm with a light blue cardstock cover printed in dark blue ink.\r\n\r\nThe progression of the Naval Academy Farewell Ball dance cards shows the decreased emphasis on dance and the move from the dance card as a reminder of the gentleman a woman had promised to dance with to a souvenir and program for the ball. The earlier dance cards contain little information about the ball itself; they focus on the dances, listing the order, the type of dance and the name of the song. Slowly, information is added to the card. In the 1920s, there was a place to write down memories and draw the flag under which the two would meet. These additions keep the focus on the dancing and the use of the dance card as a reminder and as a memento. In the 1940s, the cards begin to list the woman receiving, the committee who planned the ball and other information not directly related to the dancing. Also, the dances are no longer identified by type or name, they are simply numbered. This shows another step away from the focus on dancing. At this stage, the cord also becomes purely decorative. The cords attached to these cards aren’t long enough to secure around a woman’s wrist; they simply add a bit of decoration to the card. By the 1969 and into the 1970s, the dance cards no longer provide space to write the dances. They have transformed into souvenirs from the ball, giving information about the ball and incorporating quotes, song lyrics and lists of the people involved.\r\n<h5>Works Cited</h5>\r\n<div class=\"footnote\">Aldrich, Elizabeth. <em>From the Ballroom to Hell: Grace and Folly in Nineteenth-Century Dance</em>. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1991.</div>\r\n<div class=\"footnote\"><em>The American Code of Manners: a study of the usages, laws and observances which govern intercourse in the best social circles, and of the principles which underlie them</em>. New York: W. R. Andrews, 1880.</div>\r\n<div class=\"footnote\">Eichler, Lillian. <em>Book of Etiquette</em>. Oyster Bay: Nelson Doubleday Inc., 1922.</div>\r\n<div class=\"footnote\">Johnson, Sophia Orne. <em>A Manual of Etiquette, with Hints on Politeness and Good Breeding</em>. New York: G.P. Putnam’s Sons, 1885.</div>\r\n<div class=\"footnote\">Goucher College, Special Collections and Archives. Scrapbook Collection, Mary Lee Keith. Farewell Ball Dance Card, 1922.</div>\r\n<div class=\"footnote\">The Nimitz Library, United States Naval Academy, Special Collections and Archives. Student Life, Dance Card Collection.</div>','My Card Is Full: The Evolution of the Farewell Ball Dance Cards ','In a world of etiquette and formality, dance cards quickly became indispensable to young women in search of dancing partners. They were a manifestation of etiquette, used to keep social order and help their users follow protocol. Though dance cards are rarely used now, the study of these cards gives a lot of insight into the societies and groups that used them.\r\n\r\nLists of etiquette books remain from all different periods, instructing men and women how to act in each particular circumstance. Dancing claims a large portion of many of these books, as it was considered an elegant pastime and a way to judge one\'s character. Dancing was a sign of culture and social class, as the upper class had formal dance training while they were young.','inherit','open','open','','1326-revision-42','','','2012-09-25 01:58:46','2012-09-25 01:58:46','',1326,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/1326-revision-42/',0,'revision','',0),(2472,19,'2012-09-25 03:35:05','2012-09-25 03:35:05','In a world of etiquette and formality, dance cards quickly became indispensable to young women in search of dancing partners. They were a manifestation of etiquette, used to keep social order and help their users follow protocol. Though dance cards are rarely used now, the study of these cards gives a lot of insight into the societies and groups that used them.\r\n\r\nLists of etiquette books remain from all different periods, instructing men and women how to act in each particular circumstance. Dancing claims a large portion of many of these books, as it was considered an elegant pastime and a way to judge one\'s character. Dancing was a sign of culture and social class, as the upper class had formal dance training while they were young.\r\n\r\n<div id=\"attachment_1341\" class=\"alignright right\" style=\"width:209px; margin-left: 20px; margin-bottom:20px;\"><a href=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/goucher_student-work-image3_brand.jpg\"><img class=\"size-medium wp-image-1341\" title=\"goucher_student work image3_brand\" src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/goucher_student-work-image3_brand-209x250.jpg\" alt=\"Scrapbook page showing in situ location of the U. S. Naval Academy June 2, 1921 Farewell Ball dance card \" width=\"209\" height=\"250\" /></a> <span class=\"wp-caption-text\">Scrapbook page showing in situ location of the U. S. Naval Academy June 2, 1921 Farewell Ball dance card with other balls\' cards, press clippings, trolley ticket stubs, and other memorabilia from the scrapbook of Mary Lee Keith.</span></div>\r\n\r\nThe dance card furthered one\'s enjoyment of dancing, as it allowed young women to know who they would dance with; they never needed to worry about procuring a partner for the following dance, because he had already signed her card. A practice known as &ldquo;dating ahead&rdquo; became quite common as young women began filling out their dance cards in advance of the evening, to ensure that they would not be without a partner. Many women worried about not being asked to dance, as the most beautiful, best dancers were constantly engaged on the dance floor; the women without partners were often looked down on and pitied. Young women feared not having a partner for every dance, and having a dance card allowed them to make sure they would be busy dancing the entire night.\r\n\r\nDance cards also provided women with a way to gracefully decline a dance invitation. Johnson points out, &ldquo;a lady must not decline the invitation of a gentleman to dance, unless she is previously engaged, or does not intend to dance any more during the evening&rdquo; (79). Having a dance card allowed women to fill out their card with men who they would prefer to dance with, and it also allowed them to gracefully decline a dance by saying her card is full, even though this may not be true.\r\n\r\n<!--nextpage-->\r\n\r\nIt was also a way for young women to remember her engagements:\r\n\r\nIn the etiquette of the ballroom young ladies should be very careful to keep their promises to their various partners. Little books are furnished as memorizers, and the same honor is imperative here as in greater things. (American Code of Manners 43)\r\n\r\nThe dance card acted as a reminder of who she was supposed to dance with for each dance, which helped with confusion in promising multiple dances. The dance card also allowed a convenient excuse when a woman accidentally promised the same dance to two men; she could simply claim that her &ldquo;programme had got into such a state of confusion&rdquo; and refrain from offending either party involved (Aldrich 113). After the ball has ended, the dance card can serve as a memento of the event, &ldquo;Each dance is entered on the program—and many a delightful memory is kept alive by glancing at these names days after the dance is held&rdquo; (Eichler 97). In this way, the card acts as a reminder both at the ball and after the ball is finished.\r\n\r\nDance cards were predominantly used before the 20th century, but certain groups upheld tradition and used them much longer. As Eichler points out in 1922, &ldquo;The dance program is rarely used now except at college dances, or army and navy dances. It has lost prestige with the passing of the old fashioned ball&rdquo; (97).\r\n\r\nThe Archives and Special Collections at the United States Naval Academy holds an extensive collection of cards from many different events. The Academy, with its emphasis on tradition, used dance cards at their Winter Hops, the Ring Dance and the Farewell Ball into the 1960s. The USNA Archives provides a wonderful example of the evolution of the dance card, through the cards they have from the Farewell Ball, spanning from 1893 to 1976.\r\n<div id=\"attachment_1344\" class=\"alignright right\" style=\"margin-left:20px; margin-bottom:20px; width: 171px;\"><a href=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/goucher_student-work-image2_brand.jpg\"><img class=\"size-medium wp-image-1344\" title=\"goucher_student work image2_brand\" src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/goucher_student-work-image2_brand-171x250.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"171\" height=\"250\" /></a><span class=\"caption\">Sample dance card page with partners for five dances filled in, from the scrapbook of Mary Lee Keith.</span></div>\r\n<!--nextpage-->\r\n\r\nThe earliest dance card in the collection is from The Farewell Ball, June 2nd 1893 , donated by Mrs. Elizabeth Galt Welles (13 x 8.5 cm). The card is bound by a ribbon bow on the top vertical edge, with heavy cardstock covers in an ivory color. The cover simply states the dance and date in black ink with gold embellishments. The half-inch wide ribbon is long enough for the card to be carried on a lady’s wrist and holds a small pencil 7 cm in length. Inside the cover were 2 pages containing the list of dances with the song titles and composers. The card had not been filled out by its owner. The simple design creates an elegant card, following the guidelines for cards set by The Ballroom Guide published in the 1860s: &ldquo;modern taste is inclined to favour plain and chaste designs rather than florid&rdquo; (Aldrich 117). The contents of the card show that the emphasis of the card was on the order of dances, without much information about the ball.\r\n\r\nUnfortunately, the Academy does not have any cards from the balls in between 1893 and 1906, but the card from the 1906 Farewell Ball provides a beautiful example of a dance card. Donated by Mrs. Bradford Bartlett, the card is 10 x 7.5 cm with a tan leather cover. The cover has two inside pockets and a strap to attach the card to a woman’s wrist. Inside, the card contains three bifolia with much more decoration than the 1893 card. The card begins with a title page, which announces the name, date, and location of the ball. Following the title page are three pages of dances with spaces for 25 dances. For the first two pages of dances, each recto side holds a space for eight dances and on the verso is an illumination of a woman in an evening gown and a woman in a Navy coat and cover, respectively. The third page lists nine dances on the recto side and lists the committee of midshipmen who planned the ball on the verso. After these there are two blank pages with the word &ldquo;Autographs&rdquo; printed at the top of each page. This card—also not filled out—demonstrates the shift in focusing on only the dances to a larger focus on the card as a decorative souvenir.\r\n\r\nThe Farewell Ball card from June 5th, 1908 donated by Mary McCarthy is the first in the collection filled out by its original owner. The last names of eight different men are written in pen with a beautiful cursive hand next to the dances. Ms. McCarthy danced 17 of the 25 dances listed and most of them were two steps and waltz, which were especially popular at the time. This card is much like the 1906 card, with a section listing the committee members and blank pages for autographs. Measuring 10 x 7.5 cm, the dark brown suede cover has a Naval Academy insignia blindly stamped in the center, with a dark brown cord and pockets inside the cover. The inside was printed with brown ink and tissue paper protected the pictures from transfer.\r\n\r\nIn 1909, the Farewell Ball dance card, donated by Mrs. Bradford Bartlett, remained much the same. The 10.5 x 8 cm card had a navy blue vinyl cover with pockets inside to hold pictures and gold tooling for decoration. The inside contained the order of dances—not filled out—a supper list, and a committee list. The illustrations were in black and white with a small bit of red as an accent.\r\n\r\nAlso donated by Mrs. Bradford Bartlett, the Farewell Ball, June 3rd 1910 dance card had a dark grey leather cover with a silver cord (10 x 7 cm). A blind tooled ship decorated the front, and white paint accented the moon and water. Inside, black and white illustrations were accented with the use of yellow, red, blue and green and were protected by tissue paper. The order of dances was filled out in sloppy cursive hand in pencil. The autograph section, however, was left blank.\r\n\r\nThe example from the Farewell Ball, June 2nd 1911 provided the most intricate cover. Measuring 11 x 6.5 cm while closed, the tan suede cover folds three times, containing extra pockets. Inside the front cover is one pocket and the small booklet of paper, the back cover extends to twice the front cover’s length, folding in on itself. The right side of the cover has a simple pocket, while the middle of the cover has a more complex pocket. The pocket is vertically arranged, with a flap that closes by inserting the narrow point of the flap into a loop. Naval Academy insignia is stamped onto the inner pockets of the cover. The dance card was attached to the lady’s wrist by a dark brown leather strap, which still holds an 8 cm pencil. Inside contains a title page, pictures with color accents, the committee list, a section for autographs and the order of dances, which is not filled out.\r\n\r\nThe Farewell Ball, June 6th 1919 dance card has a navy blue vinyl cover with blind stamped Naval Academy insignia and date and a blue and yellow cord (10 x 8 cm). The inside contains a title page and the dances listed verso and spaces to fill out engagements listed recto. The card is not filled out and is decorated with black and white illustrations.\r\n\r\n<!--nextpage-->\r\n\r\nBound vertically in a brown leather cover, the Farewell Ball June 3rd 1920 dance card measures 11 x 7.5 cm. The cover is blind stamped with blue and yellow cords. After the order of dances, there is a calendar from June 1920 to May 1921. The months are listed two at a time, with large pictures above them. The stiff cardstock paper has gilt edges.\r\n\r\nThe Farewell Ball June 2nd 1921 dance card has a significantly different cover than the previous cards. The simple 9 x 6.5 cm white cardstock cover has a full color illustration on the cover with an embossed gold Naval Academy insignia. Previously, the covers were made of a more expensive material—usually leather or vinyl. This was the first ball held in Dahlgren Hall, one of the social buildings on the Naval Academy yard. The dances are listed 3 on a page, with no names of the songs, only the types of dances. The dances are not filled out. Next to the type of dance is a space labeled &ldquo;meet under&rdquo; and beneath the dances is a space for memories. There is also a different quote at the bottom of each page.\r\n\r\n<div id=\"attachment_1343\" class=\"alignright right\" style=\"width:195px; margin-left: 20px; margin-bottom:20px; \"><a href=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/goucher_student-work-image1_brand.jpg\"><img class=\"size-medium wp-image-1343\" title=\"goucher_student work image1_brand\" src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/goucher_student-work-image1_brand-195x250.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"195\" height=\"250\" /></a><span class=\"caption\">Front cover of the U.S. Naval Academy dance card for the June 2, 1921, Farewell Ball, from the scrapbook of Mary Lee Keith (Class of 1924). Goucher College Scrapbook Collection.</span></div>\r\n\r\nSimilarly, the Farewell Ball June 2nd 1922 dance card has a white cardstock cover with a color illustration (from Keith Scrapbook, Goucher College Library). The 9 x 6.5 cm cover includes blind stamping and a blue and yellow cord. The layout is very much like the 1921 card, containing a list of dances, with a &ldquo;meet under&rdquo; space and space below for memories. This card, however, does not have quotes at the bottom of each page. At the end, there is a committee list. The card is filled out with black pen, and in the &ldquo;meet under&rdquo; section, flags are drawn with pen and colored. The ball was held in Dahlgren Hall, like the 1921 card also containing a &ldquo;meet under&rdquo; section. Dahlgren Hall is lined with flags on either side of the long, rectangular building. The &ldquo;meet under&rdquo; space allowed the women to draw in the flag and know exactly where she was to meet her next dancing partner. This aided even more in making sure that the women had a dance partner for every dance; it ensured that she would always be able to find her intended dance partner even in the crowded room. It is also possible that an escort would fill out the card in advance for his date with the illustrations of flags in order to ensure she danced the night away.\r\n\r\n<!--nextpage-->\r\n\r\nIn 1923, the Academy went back to the leather cover for the Farewell Ball dance card. The cover is Navy blue with a gold tooled insignia, with inside pockets (11 x 8.5 cm). The recto pocket had a clear cut out to hold a photograph. For decoration, there are pictures that are whimsical in nature with tissue paper to protect the pictures from transfer. The dances are filled out in immaculately print black pen with flags drawn and colored next to last names.\r\n\r\nThe Farewell Ball dance card from 1925 has a silver cardstock cover with a picture of the Naval Academy Chapel dome in different shades of blue. Measuring 9.5 x 6.5 cm, the card contains the order of dances and a &ldquo;meet under&rdquo; space, but there is no room to record memories or a committee list like in the 1921, 1922, and 1923 cards. The card is filled out in pen with a shaky hand and the flags are drawn and colored next to the names. On the inside cover recto is a hand drawn cartoon of a midshipman.\r\n\r\nThere is a gap until 1942, when the collection resumes with the Farewell Ball, June 18th 1942. It has a white leather cover with stamping and gold accents, measuring 10 x 7.5 cm. The inside is printed in blue and it can be attached to a woman’s wrist by the yellow cord. The card contains a title page and committee list, names the orchestra, and announces that Mrs. John R. Beardall is receiving. The order of dances is filled out in two different shades of blue pen and each name is written in a different style of hand. This indicates another use for the dance card. A woman can hand her card to whoever asks her to dance and have him write in his name. This is very useful, especially if the woman has forgotten his name and can look on the card for a reminder.\r\n\r\nLike the 1942 card, the Farewell Ball, June 5th 1945 card was printed with blue ink and has a yellow cord. The 10 x 7.5 cm card has a dark blue faux leather cover with stamping and gold accents. The inside lists who was receiving, the hostesses, committee members and the orchestra. The dances, which are not filled out, are numbered, but there is no information as to what dance or what song each number will be. This shows the diminishing importance of the dances on the dance card.\r\n\r\nSimilarly, the Farewell Ball, May 31st 1956 dance card only lists numbers for the dances. This 10 x 7.5 cm card has an off-white cardstock cover with blue ink and an off-white cord. Inside, it lists the title page, orchestra, the woman receiving and the hostesses. It also lists the committee list for both the Farewell Ball and for the other hops held throughout the year. It ends with a quote, &ldquo;Three cheers for/ those who are about/ to leave us—/ Three cheers for/ those we leave behind/ us—&rdquo; This quote becomes a standard addition to each following card.\r\n\r\nThe card from the Farewell Ball, June 2nd 1959 is much the same as the 1956 card. The 10 x 7.5 cm card has a gold cardstock cover with blue wording and a silhouette of a dancing couple. The cord is also blue. The card lists the orchestra, the woman receiving, the hostesses and the program of dances—numbers only, no types of dances or names of songs. Two of the dances are filled out and the others were left blank. After the dances the card lists the Farewell Ball committee and the Hop committee, which organizes the smaller dances throughout the year. It concludes with the Three Cheers quote found in the 1956 card.\r\n\r\nThe cards from the Farewell Balls in 1964, 1965 and 1966 have almost identical contents, with different covers. The 1964 card is 10.5 x 7.5 cm with a white cardstock cover with blue ink and gold embossing and a blue cord. The 1965 card is 11.5 x 9 cm. It has a light blue cover with black embossing and a dark blue cord. The 1966 card measures 11.5 x 9 cm with a light blue cardstock cover with navy blue ink and a navy blue cord. All the cards contain a title page and list the orchestra, woman receiving, officer representative, social director and hostesses. None of the cards are filled out and they are stapled at the fold.\r\n\r\nWith each consecutive card, the changes are minimal. The 1967 and 1968 Farewell Ball dance cards are exactly the same, with a different date. They are both 11.5 x 9 cm and their covers are light blue with black ink and a blue cord. Neither card is filled out.\r\n\r\n<!--nextpage-->\r\n\r\nThe Farewell Ball June 3rd 1969 card provides a very interesting look at the evolution of the dance card. Very similar to the previous cards, it measures 11.5 x 9cm and lists the title page, orchestra, woman receiving, officer representative, social director, hostesses and committees. It has a white cardstock cover with blue ink and a blue cord. It also includes the Navy &ldquo;Blue and Gold&rdquo; song. What it doesn’t include, however, is a program of dances or even a space to write down dance partners. The point of this card is to provide a souvenir of the dance and provide information about it, but it no longer serves a way for women to write down the names of their partners.\r\n\r\nThe cards from 1970, 1971 and 1972 are the same as the 1969 card. However, the 1971 card contains one change: the midshipman’s oath appears after the title page. The all have white cardstock covers, 11.5 x 9 cm, with navy blue ink and navy blue cords.\r\n\r\nThe Farewell Ball, June 4th 1974 card presents another interesting change in the evolution of the dance card. The card no longer has a cord. The 11 x 9 cm card has a white cardstock cover with blue ink, but no cord with which a lady could attach it to her wrist. The cards from the 1975 and 1976 Farewell Balls have all the same internal elements, but measure 13 x 9 cm with a light blue cardstock cover printed in dark blue ink.\r\n\r\nThe progression of the Naval Academy Farewell Ball dance cards shows the decreased emphasis on dance and the move from the dance card as a reminder of the gentleman a woman had promised to dance with to a souvenir and program for the ball. The earlier dance cards contain little information about the ball itself; they focus on the dances, listing the order, the type of dance and the name of the song. Slowly, information is added to the card. In the 1920s, there was a place to write down memories and draw the flag under which the two would meet. These additions keep the focus on the dancing and the use of the dance card as a reminder and as a memento. In the 1940s, the cards begin to list the woman receiving, the committee who planned the ball and other information not directly related to the dancing. Also, the dances are no longer identified by type or name, they are simply numbered. This shows another step away from the focus on dancing. At this stage, the cord also becomes purely decorative. The cords attached to these cards aren’t long enough to secure around a woman’s wrist; they simply add a bit of decoration to the card. By the 1969 and into the 1970s, the dance cards no longer provide space to write the dances. They have transformed into souvenirs from the ball, giving information about the ball and incorporating quotes, song lyrics and lists of the people involved.\r\n<h5>Works Cited</h5>\r\n<div class=\"footnote\">Aldrich, Elizabeth. <em>From the Ballroom to Hell: Grace and Folly in Nineteenth-Century Dance</em>. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1991.</div>\r\n<div class=\"footnote\"><em>The American Code of Manners: a study of the usages, laws and observances which govern intercourse in the best social circles, and of the principles which underlie them</em>. New York: W. R. Andrews, 1880.</div>\r\n<div class=\"footnote\">Eichler, Lillian. <em>Book of Etiquette</em>. Oyster Bay: Nelson Doubleday Inc., 1922.</div>\r\n<div class=\"footnote\">Johnson, Sophia Orne. <em>A Manual of Etiquette, with Hints on Politeness and Good Breeding</em>. New York: G.P. Putnam’s Sons, 1885.</div>\r\n<div class=\"footnote\">Goucher College, Special Collections and Archives. Scrapbook Collection, Mary Lee Keith. Farewell Ball Dance Card, 1922.</div>\r\n<div class=\"footnote\">The Nimitz Library, United States Naval Academy, Special Collections and Archives. Student Life, Dance Card Collection.</div>','My Card Is Full: The Evolution of the Farewell Ball Dance Cards ','In a world of etiquette and formality, dance cards quickly became indispensable to young women in search of dancing partners. They were a manifestation of etiquette, used to keep social order and help their users follow protocol. Though dance cards are rarely used now, the study of these cards gives a lot of insight into the societies and groups that used them.\r\n\r\nLists of etiquette books remain from all different periods, instructing men and women how to act in each particular circumstance. Dancing claims a large portion of many of these books, as it was considered an elegant pastime and a way to judge one\'s character. Dancing was a sign of culture and social class, as the upper class had formal dance training while they were young.','inherit','open','open','','1326-revision-43','','','2012-09-25 03:35:05','2012-09-25 03:35:05','',1326,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/1326-revision-43/',0,'revision','',0),(2473,19,'2012-09-25 03:36:13','2012-09-25 03:36:13','In a world of etiquette and formality, dance cards quickly became indispensable to young women in search of dancing partners. They were a manifestation of etiquette, used to keep social order and help their users follow protocol. Though dance cards are rarely used now, the study of these cards gives a lot of insight into the societies and groups that used them.\r\n\r\nLists of etiquette books remain from all different periods, instructing men and women how to act in each particular circumstance. Dancing claims a large portion of many of these books, as it was considered an elegant pastime and a way to judge one\'s character. Dancing was a sign of culture and social class, as the upper class had formal dance training while they were young.\r\n\r\n<div id=\"attachment_1341\" class=\"alignright right\" style=\"width:209px; margin-left: 20px; margin-bottom:20px;\"><a href=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/goucher_student-work-image3_brand.jpg\"><img class=\"size-medium wp-image-1341\" title=\"goucher_student work image3_brand\" src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/goucher_student-work-image3_brand-209x250.jpg\" alt=\"Scrapbook page showing in situ location of the U. S. Naval Academy June 2, 1921 Farewell Ball dance card \" width=\"209\" height=\"250\" /></a> <span class=\"wp-caption-text\">Scrapbook page showing in situ location of the U. S. Naval Academy June 2, 1921 Farewell Ball dance card with other balls\' cards, press clippings, trolley ticket stubs, and other memorabilia from the scrapbook of Mary Lee Keith.</span></div>\r\n\r\nThe dance card furthered one\'s enjoyment of dancing, as it allowed young women to know who they would dance with; they never needed to worry about procuring a partner for the following dance, because he had already signed her card. A practice known as &ldquo;dating ahead&rdquo; became quite common as young women began filling out their dance cards in advance of the evening, to ensure that they would not be without a partner. Many women worried about not being asked to dance, as the most beautiful, best dancers were constantly engaged on the dance floor; the women without partners were often looked down on and pitied. Young women feared not having a partner for every dance, and having a dance card allowed them to make sure they would be busy dancing the entire night.\r\n\r\nDance cards also provided women with a way to gracefully decline a dance invitation. Johnson points out, &ldquo;a lady must not decline the invitation of a gentleman to dance, unless she is previously engaged, or does not intend to dance any more during the evening&rdquo; (79). Having a dance card allowed women to fill out their card with men who they would prefer to dance with, and it also allowed them to gracefully decline a dance by saying her card is full, even though this may not be true.\r\n\r\n<!--nextpage-->\r\n\r\nIt was also a way for young women to remember her engagements:\r\n\r\nIn the etiquette of the ballroom young ladies should be very careful to keep their promises to their various partners. Little books are furnished as memorizers, and the same honor is imperative here as in greater things. (American Code of Manners 43)\r\n\r\nThe dance card acted as a reminder of who she was supposed to dance with for each dance, which helped with confusion in promising multiple dances. The dance card also allowed a convenient excuse when a woman accidentally promised the same dance to two men; she could simply claim that her &ldquo;programme had got into such a state of confusion&rdquo; and refrain from offending either party involved (Aldrich 113). After the ball has ended, the dance card can serve as a memento of the event, &ldquo;Each dance is entered on the program—and many a delightful memory is kept alive by glancing at these names days after the dance is held&rdquo; (Eichler 97). In this way, the card acts as a reminder both at the ball and after the ball is finished.\r\n\r\nDance cards were predominantly used before the 20th century, but certain groups upheld tradition and used them much longer. As Eichler points out in 1922, &ldquo;The dance program is rarely used now except at college dances, or army and navy dances. It has lost prestige with the passing of the old fashioned ball&rdquo; (97).\r\n\r\n<div id=\"attachment_1344\" class=\"alignright right\" style=\"margin-left:20px; margin-bottom:20px; width: 171px;\"><a href=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/goucher_student-work-image2_brand.jpg\"><img class=\"size-medium wp-image-1344\" title=\"goucher_student work image2_brand\" src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/goucher_student-work-image2_brand-171x250.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"171\" height=\"250\" /></a><span class=\"caption\">Sample dance card page with partners for five dances filled in, from the scrapbook of Mary Lee Keith.</span></div>The Archives and Special Collections at the United States Naval Academy holds an extensive collection of cards from many different events. The Academy, with its emphasis on tradition, used dance cards at their Winter Hops, the Ring Dance and the Farewell Ball into the 1960s. The USNA Archives provides a wonderful example of the evolution of the dance card, through the cards they have from the Farewell Ball, spanning from 1893 to 1976.\r\n\r\n<!--nextpage-->\r\n\r\nThe earliest dance card in the collection is from The Farewell Ball, June 2nd 1893 , donated by Mrs. Elizabeth Galt Welles (13 x 8.5 cm). The card is bound by a ribbon bow on the top vertical edge, with heavy cardstock covers in an ivory color. The cover simply states the dance and date in black ink with gold embellishments. The half-inch wide ribbon is long enough for the card to be carried on a lady’s wrist and holds a small pencil 7 cm in length. Inside the cover were 2 pages containing the list of dances with the song titles and composers. The card had not been filled out by its owner. The simple design creates an elegant card, following the guidelines for cards set by The Ballroom Guide published in the 1860s: &ldquo;modern taste is inclined to favour plain and chaste designs rather than florid&rdquo; (Aldrich 117). The contents of the card show that the emphasis of the card was on the order of dances, without much information about the ball.\r\n\r\nUnfortunately, the Academy does not have any cards from the balls in between 1893 and 1906, but the card from the 1906 Farewell Ball provides a beautiful example of a dance card. Donated by Mrs. Bradford Bartlett, the card is 10 x 7.5 cm with a tan leather cover. The cover has two inside pockets and a strap to attach the card to a woman’s wrist. Inside, the card contains three bifolia with much more decoration than the 1893 card. The card begins with a title page, which announces the name, date, and location of the ball. Following the title page are three pages of dances with spaces for 25 dances. For the first two pages of dances, each recto side holds a space for eight dances and on the verso is an illumination of a woman in an evening gown and a woman in a Navy coat and cover, respectively. The third page lists nine dances on the recto side and lists the committee of midshipmen who planned the ball on the verso. After these there are two blank pages with the word &ldquo;Autographs&rdquo; printed at the top of each page. This card—also not filled out—demonstrates the shift in focusing on only the dances to a larger focus on the card as a decorative souvenir.\r\n\r\nThe Farewell Ball card from June 5th, 1908 donated by Mary McCarthy is the first in the collection filled out by its original owner. The last names of eight different men are written in pen with a beautiful cursive hand next to the dances. Ms. McCarthy danced 17 of the 25 dances listed and most of them were two steps and waltz, which were especially popular at the time. This card is much like the 1906 card, with a section listing the committee members and blank pages for autographs. Measuring 10 x 7.5 cm, the dark brown suede cover has a Naval Academy insignia blindly stamped in the center, with a dark brown cord and pockets inside the cover. The inside was printed with brown ink and tissue paper protected the pictures from transfer.\r\n\r\nIn 1909, the Farewell Ball dance card, donated by Mrs. Bradford Bartlett, remained much the same. The 10.5 x 8 cm card had a navy blue vinyl cover with pockets inside to hold pictures and gold tooling for decoration. The inside contained the order of dances—not filled out—a supper list, and a committee list. The illustrations were in black and white with a small bit of red as an accent.\r\n\r\nAlso donated by Mrs. Bradford Bartlett, the Farewell Ball, June 3rd 1910 dance card had a dark grey leather cover with a silver cord (10 x 7 cm). A blind tooled ship decorated the front, and white paint accented the moon and water. Inside, black and white illustrations were accented with the use of yellow, red, blue and green and were protected by tissue paper. The order of dances was filled out in sloppy cursive hand in pencil. The autograph section, however, was left blank.\r\n\r\nThe example from the Farewell Ball, June 2nd 1911 provided the most intricate cover. Measuring 11 x 6.5 cm while closed, the tan suede cover folds three times, containing extra pockets. Inside the front cover is one pocket and the small booklet of paper, the back cover extends to twice the front cover’s length, folding in on itself. The right side of the cover has a simple pocket, while the middle of the cover has a more complex pocket. The pocket is vertically arranged, with a flap that closes by inserting the narrow point of the flap into a loop. Naval Academy insignia is stamped onto the inner pockets of the cover. The dance card was attached to the lady’s wrist by a dark brown leather strap, which still holds an 8 cm pencil. Inside contains a title page, pictures with color accents, the committee list, a section for autographs and the order of dances, which is not filled out.\r\n\r\nThe Farewell Ball, June 6th 1919 dance card has a navy blue vinyl cover with blind stamped Naval Academy insignia and date and a blue and yellow cord (10 x 8 cm). The inside contains a title page and the dances listed verso and spaces to fill out engagements listed recto. The card is not filled out and is decorated with black and white illustrations.\r\n\r\n<!--nextpage-->\r\n\r\nBound vertically in a brown leather cover, the Farewell Ball June 3rd 1920 dance card measures 11 x 7.5 cm. The cover is blind stamped with blue and yellow cords. After the order of dances, there is a calendar from June 1920 to May 1921. The months are listed two at a time, with large pictures above them. The stiff cardstock paper has gilt edges.\r\n\r\nThe Farewell Ball June 2nd 1921 dance card has a significantly different cover than the previous cards. The simple 9 x 6.5 cm white cardstock cover has a full color illustration on the cover with an embossed gold Naval Academy insignia. Previously, the covers were made of a more expensive material—usually leather or vinyl. This was the first ball held in Dahlgren Hall, one of the social buildings on the Naval Academy yard. The dances are listed 3 on a page, with no names of the songs, only the types of dances. The dances are not filled out. Next to the type of dance is a space labeled &ldquo;meet under&rdquo; and beneath the dances is a space for memories. There is also a different quote at the bottom of each page.\r\n\r\n<div id=\"attachment_1343\" class=\"alignright right\" style=\"width:195px; margin-left: 20px; margin-bottom:20px; \"><a href=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/goucher_student-work-image1_brand.jpg\"><img class=\"size-medium wp-image-1343\" title=\"goucher_student work image1_brand\" src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/goucher_student-work-image1_brand-195x250.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"195\" height=\"250\" /></a><span class=\"caption\">Front cover of the U.S. Naval Academy dance card for the June 2, 1921, Farewell Ball, from the scrapbook of Mary Lee Keith (Class of 1924). Goucher College Scrapbook Collection.</span></div>\r\n\r\nSimilarly, the Farewell Ball June 2nd 1922 dance card has a white cardstock cover with a color illustration (from Keith Scrapbook, Goucher College Library). The 9 x 6.5 cm cover includes blind stamping and a blue and yellow cord. The layout is very much like the 1921 card, containing a list of dances, with a &ldquo;meet under&rdquo; space and space below for memories. This card, however, does not have quotes at the bottom of each page. At the end, there is a committee list. The card is filled out with black pen, and in the &ldquo;meet under&rdquo; section, flags are drawn with pen and colored. The ball was held in Dahlgren Hall, like the 1921 card also containing a &ldquo;meet under&rdquo; section. Dahlgren Hall is lined with flags on either side of the long, rectangular building. The &ldquo;meet under&rdquo; space allowed the women to draw in the flag and know exactly where she was to meet her next dancing partner. This aided even more in making sure that the women had a dance partner for every dance; it ensured that she would always be able to find her intended dance partner even in the crowded room. It is also possible that an escort would fill out the card in advance for his date with the illustrations of flags in order to ensure she danced the night away.\r\n\r\n<!--nextpage-->\r\n\r\nIn 1923, the Academy went back to the leather cover for the Farewell Ball dance card. The cover is Navy blue with a gold tooled insignia, with inside pockets (11 x 8.5 cm). The recto pocket had a clear cut out to hold a photograph. For decoration, there are pictures that are whimsical in nature with tissue paper to protect the pictures from transfer. The dances are filled out in immaculately print black pen with flags drawn and colored next to last names.\r\n\r\nThe Farewell Ball dance card from 1925 has a silver cardstock cover with a picture of the Naval Academy Chapel dome in different shades of blue. Measuring 9.5 x 6.5 cm, the card contains the order of dances and a &ldquo;meet under&rdquo; space, but there is no room to record memories or a committee list like in the 1921, 1922, and 1923 cards. The card is filled out in pen with a shaky hand and the flags are drawn and colored next to the names. On the inside cover recto is a hand drawn cartoon of a midshipman.\r\n\r\nThere is a gap until 1942, when the collection resumes with the Farewell Ball, June 18th 1942. It has a white leather cover with stamping and gold accents, measuring 10 x 7.5 cm. The inside is printed in blue and it can be attached to a woman’s wrist by the yellow cord. The card contains a title page and committee list, names the orchestra, and announces that Mrs. John R. Beardall is receiving. The order of dances is filled out in two different shades of blue pen and each name is written in a different style of hand. This indicates another use for the dance card. A woman can hand her card to whoever asks her to dance and have him write in his name. This is very useful, especially if the woman has forgotten his name and can look on the card for a reminder.\r\n\r\nLike the 1942 card, the Farewell Ball, June 5th 1945 card was printed with blue ink and has a yellow cord. The 10 x 7.5 cm card has a dark blue faux leather cover with stamping and gold accents. The inside lists who was receiving, the hostesses, committee members and the orchestra. The dances, which are not filled out, are numbered, but there is no information as to what dance or what song each number will be. This shows the diminishing importance of the dances on the dance card.\r\n\r\nSimilarly, the Farewell Ball, May 31st 1956 dance card only lists numbers for the dances. This 10 x 7.5 cm card has an off-white cardstock cover with blue ink and an off-white cord. Inside, it lists the title page, orchestra, the woman receiving and the hostesses. It also lists the committee list for both the Farewell Ball and for the other hops held throughout the year. It ends with a quote, &ldquo;Three cheers for/ those who are about/ to leave us—/ Three cheers for/ those we leave behind/ us—&rdquo; This quote becomes a standard addition to each following card.\r\n\r\nThe card from the Farewell Ball, June 2nd 1959 is much the same as the 1956 card. The 10 x 7.5 cm card has a gold cardstock cover with blue wording and a silhouette of a dancing couple. The cord is also blue. The card lists the orchestra, the woman receiving, the hostesses and the program of dances—numbers only, no types of dances or names of songs. Two of the dances are filled out and the others were left blank. After the dances the card lists the Farewell Ball committee and the Hop committee, which organizes the smaller dances throughout the year. It concludes with the Three Cheers quote found in the 1956 card.\r\n\r\nThe cards from the Farewell Balls in 1964, 1965 and 1966 have almost identical contents, with different covers. The 1964 card is 10.5 x 7.5 cm with a white cardstock cover with blue ink and gold embossing and a blue cord. The 1965 card is 11.5 x 9 cm. It has a light blue cover with black embossing and a dark blue cord. The 1966 card measures 11.5 x 9 cm with a light blue cardstock cover with navy blue ink and a navy blue cord. All the cards contain a title page and list the orchestra, woman receiving, officer representative, social director and hostesses. None of the cards are filled out and they are stapled at the fold.\r\n\r\nWith each consecutive card, the changes are minimal. The 1967 and 1968 Farewell Ball dance cards are exactly the same, with a different date. They are both 11.5 x 9 cm and their covers are light blue with black ink and a blue cord. Neither card is filled out.\r\n\r\n<!--nextpage-->\r\n\r\nThe Farewell Ball June 3rd 1969 card provides a very interesting look at the evolution of the dance card. Very similar to the previous cards, it measures 11.5 x 9cm and lists the title page, orchestra, woman receiving, officer representative, social director, hostesses and committees. It has a white cardstock cover with blue ink and a blue cord. It also includes the Navy &ldquo;Blue and Gold&rdquo; song. What it doesn’t include, however, is a program of dances or even a space to write down dance partners. The point of this card is to provide a souvenir of the dance and provide information about it, but it no longer serves a way for women to write down the names of their partners.\r\n\r\nThe cards from 1970, 1971 and 1972 are the same as the 1969 card. However, the 1971 card contains one change: the midshipman’s oath appears after the title page. The all have white cardstock covers, 11.5 x 9 cm, with navy blue ink and navy blue cords.\r\n\r\nThe Farewell Ball, June 4th 1974 card presents another interesting change in the evolution of the dance card. The card no longer has a cord. The 11 x 9 cm card has a white cardstock cover with blue ink, but no cord with which a lady could attach it to her wrist. The cards from the 1975 and 1976 Farewell Balls have all the same internal elements, but measure 13 x 9 cm with a light blue cardstock cover printed in dark blue ink.\r\n\r\nThe progression of the Naval Academy Farewell Ball dance cards shows the decreased emphasis on dance and the move from the dance card as a reminder of the gentleman a woman had promised to dance with to a souvenir and program for the ball. The earlier dance cards contain little information about the ball itself; they focus on the dances, listing the order, the type of dance and the name of the song. Slowly, information is added to the card. In the 1920s, there was a place to write down memories and draw the flag under which the two would meet. These additions keep the focus on the dancing and the use of the dance card as a reminder and as a memento. In the 1940s, the cards begin to list the woman receiving, the committee who planned the ball and other information not directly related to the dancing. Also, the dances are no longer identified by type or name, they are simply numbered. This shows another step away from the focus on dancing. At this stage, the cord also becomes purely decorative. The cords attached to these cards aren’t long enough to secure around a woman’s wrist; they simply add a bit of decoration to the card. By the 1969 and into the 1970s, the dance cards no longer provide space to write the dances. They have transformed into souvenirs from the ball, giving information about the ball and incorporating quotes, song lyrics and lists of the people involved.\r\n<h5>Works Cited</h5>\r\n<div class=\"footnote\">Aldrich, Elizabeth. <em>From the Ballroom to Hell: Grace and Folly in Nineteenth-Century Dance</em>. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1991.</div>\r\n<div class=\"footnote\"><em>The American Code of Manners: a study of the usages, laws and observances which govern intercourse in the best social circles, and of the principles which underlie them</em>. New York: W. R. Andrews, 1880.</div>\r\n<div class=\"footnote\">Eichler, Lillian. <em>Book of Etiquette</em>. Oyster Bay: Nelson Doubleday Inc., 1922.</div>\r\n<div class=\"footnote\">Johnson, Sophia Orne. <em>A Manual of Etiquette, with Hints on Politeness and Good Breeding</em>. New York: G.P. Putnam’s Sons, 1885.</div>\r\n<div class=\"footnote\">Goucher College, Special Collections and Archives. Scrapbook Collection, Mary Lee Keith. Farewell Ball Dance Card, 1922.</div>\r\n<div class=\"footnote\">The Nimitz Library, United States Naval Academy, Special Collections and Archives. Student Life, Dance Card Collection.</div>','My Card Is Full: The Evolution of the Farewell Ball Dance Cards ','In a world of etiquette and formality, dance cards quickly became indispensable to young women in search of dancing partners. They were a manifestation of etiquette, used to keep social order and help their users follow protocol. Though dance cards are rarely used now, the study of these cards gives a lot of insight into the societies and groups that used them.\r\n\r\nLists of etiquette books remain from all different periods, instructing men and women how to act in each particular circumstance. Dancing claims a large portion of many of these books, as it was considered an elegant pastime and a way to judge one\'s character. Dancing was a sign of culture and social class, as the upper class had formal dance training while they were young.','inherit','open','open','','1326-revision-44','','','2012-09-25 03:36:13','2012-09-25 03:36:13','',1326,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/1326-revision-44/',0,'revision','',0),(3487,10,'2012-10-15 23:06:48','2012-10-15 23:06:48','Cleveland State Community College (CSCC), a small two-year college in southeast Tennessee, offers freshman and sophomore students a service-learning course as an introduction to research in archives. In this course, the History Laboratory students assist local cultural heritage institutions with digitizing collections and publishing them on the web. As of spring 2012, students have completed service-learning hours at the Cleveland Bradley County Public Library History Branch, the Museum Center at 5ive Points, and the Polk County Historical and Genealogical Society Library. These local archives and museums benefit from increased access to their collections, while CSCC history students gain experience with handling and researching primary sources.\r\n\r\nSeveral developments led the Department of History and the Library to collaborate on the creation of the History Laboratory. The college’s administrators recently encouraged instructors of every discipline, including the humanities, to develop content-appropriate service-learning courses to promote student engagement. Moreover, the history curriculum at CSCC emphasizes the central role of primary sources in historical analysis, even in research projects assigned in introductory courses. A history instructor, Bryan Reed, realized that his students could access a rich learning experience if they contributed to a regional digitization project, the <a href=\" http://www.clevelandstatecc.edu/setda/\">Southeast Tennessee Digital Archive</a>. Thus, Reed and I developed a service-learning history course where students assist local archives, museums, and historical societies that lack staff to digitize their collections.\r\n\r\nAs the primary instructor, I oversee the classroom content of the course, which is informed by my training in both history and information science (MA, History; MS, Information Science). The historian’s need to understand primary sources, where they are found, and how they are curated shapes the goal of the course. Information science, including the philosophy of archives, digitization, and creating metadata, shapes the course activities. Reed serves as the local history expert, assisting students with research in obscure local publications.\r\n\r\nBecause the History Laboratory’s target audience is freshman and sophomore history majors, the course is very basic. The primary goal is to expose students to the cultural heritage institution’s role as curator of artifacts. At the archive I introduce students to the archivist, collections, finding aids, and additional tools for discovering information about a collection. After this introduction to cultural heritage institutions, we discuss the historian’s role as interpreter of artifacts. This discussion is often the students’ initiation to the “historian’s craft”: assembling a narrative, interpreting facts, and determining significance.\r\n\r\nThe learning outcomes for the History Laboratory are similarly basic. By the end of the course, we expect students to demonstrate appropriate handling of unique historical materials, to create digital surrogates of assigned primary documents, to research these primary documents using relevant resources (in paper and electronic formats), and to organize and present their findings in the Southeast Tennessee Digital Archive (SETDA) using a simple content management system (CONTENTdm). The last learning outcome, creating and entering metadata, may seem out of place in a history course. Nevertheless, we felt it was essential for students to complete this step; it gives them the opportunity to digest their research, consider their audience, and share their findings. This process empowers students to take on the role of expert.\r\n\r\nAfter two pilot semesters, the History Laboratory is now an officially sanctioned course in the history curriculum at Cleveland State Community College. Former students have indicated that the course was a valuable first introduction to archives and their importance to historical research. In the future, we look forward to requiring this service-learning experience for all CSCC history majors. Although we believe that the History Laboratory offers an unparalleled initiation to archival research, we look forward to hearing whether our graduates’ experiences remain relevant as they continue their academic careers.','Sarah Shippy Copeland - Commentary','Cleveland State Community College (CSCC), a small two-year college in southeast Tennessee, offers freshman and sophomore students a service-learning course as an introduction to research in archives. In this course, the History Laboratory students assist local cultural heritage institutions with digitizing collections and publishing them on the web. As of spring 2012, students have completed service-learning hours at the Cleveland Bradley County Public Library History Branch, the Museum Center at 5ive Points, and the Polk County Historical and Genealogical Society Library. These local archives and museums benefit from increased access to their collections, while CSCC history students gain experience with handling and researching primary sources.','inherit','open','open','','1027-revision-14','','','2012-10-15 23:06:48','2012-10-15 23:06:48','',1027,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/1027-revision-14/',0,'revision','',0),(2475,19,'2012-07-27 08:25:29','2012-07-27 08:25:29','Cleveland State Community College (CSCC), a small two-year college in southeast Tennessee, offers freshman and sophomore students a service-learning course as an introduction to research in archives. In this course, the History Laboratory students assist local cultural heritage institutions with digitizing collections and publishing them on the web. As of spring 2012, students have completed service-learning hours at the Cleveland Bradley County Public Library History Branch, the Museum Center at 5ive Points, and the Polk County Historical and Genealogical Society Library. These local archives and museums benefit from increased access to their collections, while CSCC history students gain experience with handling and researching primary sources.\r\n\r\nSeveral developments led the Department of History and the Library to collaborate on the creation of the History Laboratory. The college’s administrators recently encouraged instructors of every discipline, including the humanities, to develop content-appropriate service-learning courses to promote student engagement. Moreover, the history curriculum at CSCC emphasizes the central role of primary sources in historical analysis, even in research projects assigned in introductory courses. A history instructor, Bryan Reed, realized that his students could access a rich learning experience if they contributed to a regional digitization project, the <a href=\" http://www.clevelandstatecc.edu/setda/\">Southeast Tennessee Digital Archive</a>. Thus, Reed and I developed a service-learning history course where students assist local archives, museums, and historical societies that lack staff to digitize their collections.\r\n\r\nAs the primary instructor, I oversee the classroom content of the course, which is informed by my training in both history and information science (MA, History; MS, Information Science). The historian’s need to understand primary sources, where they are found, and how they are curated shapes the goal of the course. Information science, including the philosophy of archives, digitization, and creating metadata, shapes the course activities. Reed serves as the local history expert, assisting students with research in obscure local publications.\r\n\r\nBecause the History Laboratory’s target audience is freshman and sophomore history majors, the course is very basic. The primary goal is to expose students to the cultural heritage institution’s role as curator of artifacts. At the archive I introduce students to the archivist, collections, finding aids, and additional tools for discovering information about a collection. After this introduction to cultural heritage institutions, we discuss the historian’s role as interpreter of artifacts. This discussion is often the students’ initiation to the “historian’s craft”: assembling a narrative, interpreting facts, and determining significance.\r\n\r\nThe learning outcomes for the History Laboratory are similarly basic. By the end of the course, we expect students to demonstrate appropriate handling of unique historical materials, to create digital surrogates of assigned primary documents, to research these primary documents using relevant resources (in paper and electronic formats), and to organize and present their findings in the Southeast Tennessee Digital Archive (SETDA) using a simple content management system (CONTENTdm). The last learning outcome, creating and entering metadata, may seem out of place in a history course. Nevertheless, we felt it was essential for students to complete this step; it gives them the opportunity to digest their research, consider their audience, and share their findings. This process empowers students to take on the role of expert.\r\n\r\nAfter two pilot semesters, the History Laboratory is now an officially sanctioned course in the history curriculum at Cleveland State Community College. Former students have indicated that the course was a valuable first introduction to archives and their importance to historical research. In the future, we look forward to requiring this service-learning experience for all CSCC history majors. Although we believe that the History Laboratory offers an unparalleled initiation to archival research, we look forward to hearing whether our graduates’ experiences remain relevant as they continue their academic careers.','Sarah Shippy Copeland - Commentary','Cleveland State Community College (CSCC), a small two-year college in southeast Tennessee, offers freshman and sophomore students a service-learning course as an introduction to research in archives. In this course, the History Laboratory students assist local cultural heritage institutions with digitizing collections and publishing them on the web. As of spring 2012, students have completed service-learning hours at the Cleveland Bradley County Public Library History Branch, the Museum Center at 5ive Points, and the Polk County Historical and Genealogical Society Library. These local archives and museums benefit from increased access to their collections, while CSCC history students gain experience with handling and researching primary sources.','inherit','open','open','','1027-revision-10','','','2012-07-27 08:25:29','2012-07-27 08:25:29','',1027,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/1027-revision-10/',0,'revision','',0),(2476,19,'2012-09-25 03:41:09','2012-09-25 03:41:09','Cleveland State Community College (CSCC), a small two-year college in southeast Tennessee, offers freshman and sophomore students a service-learning course as an introduction to research in archives. In this course, the History Laboratory students assist local cultural heritage institutions with digitizing collections and publishing them on the web. As of spring 2012, students have completed service-learning hours at the Cleveland Bradley County Public Library History Branch, the Museum Center at 5ive Points, and the Polk County Historical and Genealogical Society Library. These local archives and museums benefit from increased access to their collections, while CSCC history students gain experience with handling and researching primary sources.\r\n\r\nSeveral developments led the Department of History and the Library to collaborate on the creation of the History Laboratory. The college’s administrators recently encouraged instructors of every discipline, including the humanities, to develop content-appropriate service-learning courses to promote student engagement. Moreover, the history curriculum at CSCC emphasizes the central role of primary sources in historical analysis, even in research projects assigned in introductory courses. A history instructor, Bryan Reed, realized that his students could access a rich learning experience if they contributed to a regional digitization project, the <a href=\" http://www.clevelandstatecc.edu/setda/\">Southeast Tennessee Digital Archive</a>. Thus, Reed and I developed a service-learning history course where students assist local archives, museums, and historical societies that lack staff to digitize their collections.\r\n\r\nAs the primary instructor, I oversee the classroom content of the course, which is informed by my training in both history and information science (MA, History; MS, Information Science). The historian’s need to understand primary sources, where they are found, and how they are curated shapes the goal of the course. Information science, including the philosophy of archives, digitization, and creating metadata, shapes the course activities. Reed serves as the local history expert, assisting students with research in obscure local publications.\r\n\r\nBecause the History Laboratory’s target audience is freshman and sophomore history majors, the course is very basic. The primary goal is to expose students to the cultural heritage institution’s role as curator of artifacts. At the archive I introduce students to the archivist, collections, finding aids, and additional tools for discovering information about a collection. After this introduction to cultural heritage institutions, we discuss the historian’s role as interpreter of artifacts. This discussion is often the students’ initiation to the “historian’s craft”: assembling a narrative, interpreting facts, and determining significance.\r\n\r\nThe learning outcomes for the History Laboratory are similarly basic. By the end of the course, we expect students to demonstrate appropriate handling of unique historical materials, to create digital surrogates of assigned primary documents, to research these primary documents using relevant resources (in paper and electronic formats), and to organize and present their findings in the Southeast Tennessee Digital Archive (SETDA) using a simple content management system (CONTENTdm). The last learning outcome, creating and entering metadata, may seem out of place in a history course. Nevertheless, we felt it was essential for students to complete this step; it gives them the opportunity to digest their research, consider their audience, and share their findings. This process empowers students to take on the role of expert.\r\n\r\nAfter two pilot semesters, the History Laboratory is now an officially sanctioned course in the history curriculum at Cleveland State Community College. Former students have indicated that the course was a valuable first introduction to archives and their importance to historical research. In the future, we look forward to requiring this service-learning experience for all CSCC history majors. Although we believe that the History Laboratory offers an unparalleled initiation to archival research, we look forward to hearing whether our graduates’ experiences remain relevant as they continue their academic careers.','Sarah Shippy Copeland - Commentary','Cleveland State Community College (CSCC), a small two-year college in southeast Tennessee, offers freshman and sophomore students a service-learning course as an introduction to research in archives. In this course, the History Laboratory students assist local cultural heritage institutions with digitizing collections and publishing them on the web. As of spring 2012, students have completed service-learning hours at the Cleveland Bradley County Public Library History Branch, the Museum Center at 5ive Points, and the Polk County Historical and Genealogical Society Library. These local archives and museums benefit from increased access to their collections, while CSCC history students gain experience with handling and researching primary sources.','inherit','open','open','','1027-revision-11','','','2012-09-25 03:41:09','2012-09-25 03:41:09','',1027,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/1027-revision-11/',0,'revision','',0),(2477,19,'2012-09-25 03:41:25','2012-09-25 03:41:25','Cleveland State Community College (CSCC), a small two-year college in southeast Tennessee, offers freshman and sophomore students a service-learning course as an introduction to research in archives. In this course, the History Laboratory students assist local cultural heritage institutions with digitizing collections and publishing them on the web. As of spring 2012, students have completed service-learning hours at the Cleveland Bradley County Public Library History Branch, the Museum Center at 5ive Points, and the Polk County Historical and Genealogical Society Library. These local archives and museums benefit from increased access to their collections, while CSCC history students gain experience with handling and researching primary sources.\r\n\r\nSeveral developments led the Department of History and the Library to collaborate on the creation of the History Laboratory. The college’s administrators recently encouraged instructors of every discipline, including the humanities, to develop content-appropriate service-learning courses to promote student engagement. Moreover, the history curriculum at CSCC emphasizes the central role of primary sources in historical analysis, even in research projects assigned in introductory courses. A history instructor, Bryan Reed, realized that his students could access a rich learning experience if they contributed to a regional digitization project, the <a href=\" http://www.clevelandstatecc.edu/setda/\">Southeast Tennessee Digital Archive</a>. Thus, Reed and I developed a service-learning history course where students assist local archives, museums, and historical societies that lack staff to digitize their collections.\r\n\r\nAs the primary instructor, I oversee the classroom content of the course, which is informed by my training in both history and information science (MA, History; MS, Information Science). The historian’s need to understand primary sources, where they are found, and how they are curated shapes the goal of the course. Information science, including the philosophy of archives, digitization, and creating metadata, shapes the course activities. Reed serves as the local history expert, assisting students with research in obscure local publications.\r\n\r\nBecause the History Laboratory’s target audience is freshman and sophomore history majors, the course is very basic. The primary goal is to expose students to the cultural heritage institution’s role as curator of artifacts. At the archive I introduce students to the archivist, collections, finding aids, and additional tools for discovering information about a collection. After this introduction to cultural heritage institutions, we discuss the historian’s role as interpreter of artifacts. This discussion is often the students’ initiation to the “historian’s craft”: assembling a narrative, interpreting facts, and determining significance.\r\n\r\nThe learning outcomes for the History Laboratory are similarly basic. By the end of the course, we expect students to demonstrate appropriate handling of unique historical materials, to create digital surrogates of assigned primary documents, to research these primary documents using relevant resources (in paper and electronic formats), and to organize and present their findings in the Southeast Tennessee Digital Archive (SETDA) using a simple content management system (CONTENTdm). The last learning outcome, creating and entering metadata, may seem out of place in a history course. Nevertheless, we felt it was essential for students to complete this step; it gives them the opportunity to digest their research, consider their audience, and share their findings. This process empowers students to take on the role of expert.\r\n\r\nAfter two pilot semesters, the History Laboratory is now an officially sanctioned course in the history curriculum at Cleveland State Community College. Former students have indicated that the course was a valuable first introduction to archives and their importance to historical research. In the future, we look forward to requiring this service-learning experience for all CSCC history majors. Although we believe that the History Laboratory offers an unparalleled initiation to archival research, we look forward to hearing whether our graduates’ experiences remain relevant as they continue their academic careers.','Sarah Shippy Copeland - Commentary','Cleveland State Community College (CSCC), a small two-year college in southeast Tennessee, offers freshman and sophomore students a service-learning course as an introduction to research in archives. In this course, the History Laboratory students assist local cultural heritage institutions with digitizing collections and publishing them on the web. As of spring 2012, students have completed service-learning hours at the Cleveland Bradley County Public Library History Branch, the Museum Center at 5ive Points, and the Polk County Historical and Genealogical Society Library. These local archives and museums benefit from increased access to their collections, while CSCC history students gain experience with handling and researching primary sources.','inherit','open','open','','1027-revision-12','','','2012-09-25 03:41:25','2012-09-25 03:41:25','',1027,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/1027-revision-12/',0,'revision','',0),(2478,19,'2012-07-24 03:43:12','2012-07-24 03:43:12','<ol>\r\n  <li><strong>How many students worked at the History Branch and Archives of the Cleveland Bradley County Library?</strong><br>\r\n    <br>\r\n  Two students worked at the History Branch one evening a week for a set number of weeks.</li>\r\n  <li><strong>Will you work with History Lab students again?<br>\r\n    <br>\r\n  </strong>Certainly. The students were polite, reliable, diligent in their work, and followed directions with little supervision.</li>\r\n  <li><strong>What did you find most productive or enjoyable about the process of working with the students?<br>\r\n    <br>\r\n  </strong>It was rewarding to see the students’ progress from novice researchers to becoming confident in their work. Along the way their project changed from a class assignment to one of discovery. They became excited and interested in their subject and wanted to expand the scope of their work through additional research.</li>\r\n  <li><strong>How has the students’ work impacted the History Branch and its collections?</strong>  \r\n    <ul>\r\n  <li>The additional research done by the students will be available to all of the library’s patrons.</li>\r\n	<li>Students have given presentations on their research to the Bradley County Historical and Genealogical Society.</li>\r\n	<li>Observing the students as they worked with the photograph collection helped me to be more aware of the type of material that captures a new researcher’s attention.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n</li>\r\n</ol>','Barbara Fagen - Commentary','','inherit','open','open','','1020-revision-12','','','2012-07-24 03:43:12','2012-07-24 03:43:12','',1020,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/1020-revision-12/',0,'revision','',0),(2479,19,'2012-09-25 03:43:11','2012-09-25 03:43:11','<ol>\r\n  <li><strong>How many students worked at the History Branch and Archives of the Cleveland Bradley County Library?</strong>Two students worked at the History Branch one evening a week for a set number of weeks.</li>\r\n  <li><strong>Will you work with History Lab students again?</strong><br />\r\n    Certainly. The students were polite, reliable, diligent in their work, and followed directions with little supervision.</li>\r\n  <li><strong>What did you find most productive or enjoyable about the process of working with the students?</strong><br />\r\n    It was rewarding to see the students’ progress from novice researchers to becoming confident in their work. Along the way their project changed from a class assignment to one of discovery. They became excited and interested in their subject and wanted to expand the scope of their work through additional research.</li>\r\n  <li><strong>How has the students’ work impacted the History Branch and its collections?</strong>\r\n    <ul>\r\n      <li>The additional research done by the students will be available to all of the library’s patrons.</li>\r\n      <li>Students have given presentations on their research to the Bradley County Historical and Genealogical Society.</li>\r\n      <li>Observing the students as they worked with the photograph collection helped me to be more aware of the type of material that captures a new researcher’s attention.</li>\r\n    </ul>\r\n  </li>\r\n</ol>\r\n','Barbara Fagen - Commentary','','inherit','open','open','','1020-revision-13','','','2012-09-25 03:43:11','2012-09-25 03:43:11','',1020,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/1020-revision-13/',0,'revision','',0),(2480,19,'2012-09-25 01:16:36','2012-09-25 01:16:36','<a href=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/cscc_student-work_sample-material.jpg\"><img class=\"size-full wp-image-1368\" title=\"cscc_student work_sample material\" src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/cscc_student-work_sample-material.jpg\" alt=\"Image of James A. Bible (c. 1860) from the Ramsey Family Papers (MS 81).\" width=\"386\" height=\"640\" /></a>\r\n<span class=\"caption\">Image of James A. Bible (c. 1860) from the Ramsey Family Papers (MS 81). Saunders worked on this image for the Southeast Tennessee Digital Archive (SETDA). Used by permission of Cleveland Public Library.</span>','History Lab: Combining Service Learning, Research Methods, and Digital Archives ','This case study features the work of a student who took History Lab, an introductory history and service-learning course at Cleveland State Community College (CSCC). He researched individual items from a local cultural heritage organization that were then digitized, described, and published online in the <a href=\"http://www.clevelandstatecc.edu/setda/\" target=\"_blank\">Southeast Tennessee Digital Archive</a> (SETDA). \r\n\r\nMatthew Saunders\' work ended up in the Southeast Tennessee Digital Archive. You can find the whole archive <a href=\"http://www.clevelandstatecc.edu/setda/\" target=\"_blank\">here</a>, and the items Saunders contributed <a href=\"http://csccdigital.cdmhost.com/cdm/singleitem/collection/p4024coll8/id/216\" target=\"_blank\">here</a>.','inherit','open','open','','1018-revision-26','','','2012-09-25 01:16:36','2012-09-25 01:16:36','',1018,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/1018-revision-26/',0,'revision','',0),(2482,19,'2012-02-12 00:53:43','2012-02-12 00:53:43','<center><strong>HIST 2802 – HISTORY LABORATORY</strong>\r\nSpring 2011\r\n1 semester-hour credit\r\nIndependent Study/Service-Learning Experience</center>&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<strong>INSTRUCTORS</strong>\r\n\r\nSarah Copeland, Records Catalog Coordinator\r\nBryan Reed, Associate Professor of History\r\n\r\n<strong>COURSE DESCRIPTION</strong>\r\n\r\nThis course allows students to be involved in a service learning experience at an area museum, archive, historical society, or other historical collection. The course is designed to expose students to the practice of researching, digitizing, and preserving historical artifacts. Students will complete 20 hours of service during the semester. (Co-requisite: HIST 2010, 2020, or 2030)\r\n\r\n<strong>LEARNING OUTCOMES</strong>\r\n<ol>\r\n	<li>demonstrate appropriate handling of unique historical materials</li>\r\n	<li>describe the public role of institutions charged with preserving historical materials</li>\r\n	<li>create digital versions of historical documents using best practices</li>\r\n	<li>describe digitized documents using the Dublin Core metadata scheme</li>\r\n	<li>publish newly digitized materials to the Southeast Tennessee Digital Archive (SETDA) using CONTENTdm, a tool for managing digital collections and publishing them on the world wide web</li>\r\n	<li>demonstrate critical thinking and reasoning</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n<strong>REFERENCED READINGS/RESOURCES</strong>\r\n<ol>\r\n	<li>“Digital Imaging Tutorial,” Cornell University Library, http://www.library.cornell.edu/preservation/tutorial/contents.html</li>\r\n	<li>“Digital Preservation Management Tutorial,” Cornell University and the National Endowment for the Humanities, http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/dpm/dpm-eng/eng_index.html</li>\r\n	<li>“Digital Best Practices,” Washington State Library, http://digitalwa.statelib.wa.gov/newsite/best.htm</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n<strong>WHAT COUNTS TOWARD MY 20 “SERVICE LEARNING” HOURS?</strong>\r\n\r\nThere are four tasks that you will undertake in this course: (1) scanning documents, (2) researching the background of those documents, (3) turning your research into “description,” and (4) uploading your documents and description to the CONTENTdm database. Tasks 1 and 2 will count toward your 20 service learning hours. Tasks 3 and 4 are your homework.\r\n\r\n<strong>ASSESSMENTS</strong>\r\n\r\nLearning outcomes will be assessed through the following tools:\r\nStudent’s notebook (journal/log) = 100 points\r\nInstructor’s evaluation of research = 100 points\r\nOn-site supervisor’s evaluation = 100 points\r\nDigital submissions to SETDA = 100 points\r\n\r\nThere are 400 points possible in this course based upon the assessment tools. The grading scale is\r\nA = 360-400 points\r\nB = 320-359 points\r\nC = 280-319 points\r\nD = 240-279 points\r\nF = below 240 points\r\n\r\n<strong>JOURNAL/LOG</strong>\r\n\r\nStudents are required to maintain a notebook where they will log their scanning and research sessions and reflect on their service-learning experience. The notebook should also be used to keep research notes. Notebooks must be brought to every service learning session; entries must be recorded for the session attended. Each entry should include the date and time of both arrival and departure, followed by a thoughtful reflection of your experience. The following questions can help guide your journaling:\r\n<ul>\r\n	<li>How does what you are doing compare to your prior expectations?</li>\r\n	<li>What is the historical significance of the artifacts processed? How are they useful in our understanding of the past?</li>\r\n	<li>How does your work contribute to the institution where you are completing your service-learning hours? How does your work impact the community?</li>\r\n</ul>\r\nNotebooks will be collected for examination periodically during the semester. Students may elect to produce a blog with approval of the instructor at the beginning of the course.\r\n\r\n<strong>ON-SITE SUPERVISOR EVALUATION</strong>\r\n\r\nYour supervisor at the institution where you complete your service learning hours will submit an evaluation at the end of the semester. This evaluation will measure your performance in the following areas: professional conduct, quality of work, and contributive effort.\r\n\r\n<strong>DIGITAL SUBMISSIONS</strong>\r\n\r\nStudents will submit digitized images and descriptive metadata for publication in the Southeast Tennessee Digital Archive. These will be evaluated by the instructors before publication online, and students will receive feedback throughout the course as they contribute digital items. Students will identify the five digital submissions that represent their best work. Ms. Copeland will assess these five submissions according to the archival standards and preservation procedures covered in this class. (The same 5 submissions will be reviewed by Professor Reed for the quality of background research, as described below.) Each digital submission is worth 20 points and will be evaluated for digitization quality, descriptive accuracy, correct application of the tools in CONTENTdm, spelling and grammar.\r\n\r\n<strong>INSTRUCTOR EVALUATION</strong>\r\n\r\nProfessor Reed will evaluate the quality of your research at the end of the semester. This evaluation will be based on the five digital submissions that represent your best work. (The same 5 submissions will be reviewed by Ms. Copeland, as described above.) Each digital submission is worth 20 points and will be evaluated for quality and integration of source material, historical interpretation, descriptive accuracy, and spelling/grammar.\r\n\r\n<strong>ATTENDANCE</strong>\r\n\r\nEach student is expected to attend and be on time for each training and service learning session. Because of the nature of this course, attendance is critical toward preparing for and executing the service learning. More than one unexcused absence from a scheduled training of service learning session will have a significant adverse effect on your evaluation. Failure to complete the obligations of your service learning assignment in a timely and professional manner will cause substantial deductions from your overall grade. If a scheduled session cannot be met you must notify the institution and instructor(s) in advance. You are also responsible for rescheduling your missed session in consultation with your on-site supervisor.','CSCC - Project Syllabus','','inherit','open','open','','1031-revision-15','','','2012-02-12 00:53:43','2012-02-12 00:53:43','',1031,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/1031-revision-15/',0,'revision','',0),(2483,19,'2012-09-25 03:39:34','2012-09-25 03:39:34','<div id=\"attachment_1367\" class=\"alignright right\" style=\"width: 333px; margin-left: 20px; margin-bottom:20px;\"><a href=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/cscc_student-action-photo_saunders.jpg\"><img class=\"size-medium wp-image-1367 \" title=\"cscc_student action photo_saunders\" src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/cscc_student-action-photo_saunders-333x250.jpg\" alt=\"Matthew Saunders exploring the Ramsey Family Papers at the Cleveland Bradley County Library History Branch.\" width=\"333\" height=\"250\" /></a><span class=\"wp-caption-text\">Matthew Saunders exploring the Ramsey Family Papers at the Cleveland Bradley County Library History Branch (CPLHB). Photo credit: Sarah Copeland.</span></div>\r\nI was one of the first students to take the History Laboratory class at Cleveland State Community College (CSCC). My previous experience during an extra-credit activity in a traditional history course initially sparked my interest. During an American history survey course, Mr. Reed, the CSCC instructor who founded the Southeast Tennessee Digital Archive (SETDA), offered students a chance to digitize historical photographs. He demonstrated how to research a photograph\'s history, starting with the limited information written on the back and clues within the picture itself. I was eager to enroll in a course that was dedicated to digitizing historical photographs.\r\n\r\nFew history majors would turn down the opportunity to go beyond lecture courses and work directly with historical documents, but I never expected a two-year college to offer me this opportunity. The History Laboratory allowed me to gain hands-on experience preserving important records of local history. Moreover, the History Lab transformed how I research. I had to learn to use a library because the most relevant research material was not accessible online. It took a while to get into the groove of picking up a book and reading through the text as opposed to using a search engine to gather information. Using physical books to research is an invaluable experience that I will take with me throughout my future courses and career.\r\n\r\nAnother new experience was the archiving section of the class, in which we digitized photographs and organized the research in a way that would be coherent on the SETDA website. As students, we are accustomed to elaborating and expanding upon our research to produce an essay. The archiving section of the course, instead, forced me to condense my findings into a few concise sentences. The term “metadata” was foreign to me before this class, so working my research into that format was not the easiest task. Entering metadata into ContentDM was a challenge. Nevertheless, this exercise has helped me to convey my thoughts more clearly in other classes.\r\n\r\nOverall, the History Laboratory was a great experience. I had wanted to add some constructive criticism, but after reflecting on my experience I cannot think of any suggestions. The instructors were terrific and the course of study was refreshing. I would recommend this course to history students or any student who is searching for an experience that goes beyond a classroom lecture.','Matthew E. Saunders - Commentary','I was one of the first students to take the History Laboratory at Cleveland State Community College. My previous experience during an extra credit activity in a traditional history course initially sparked my interest. During an American History survey course Mr. Reed, the CSCC instructor who founded the Southeast Tennessee Digital Archive, offered students a chance to digitize historical photographs. He demonstrated how to research a photograph\'s history, starting with the limited information written on the back and clues within the picture itself. I was eager to enroll in a course that was dedicated to digitizing historical photographs.','inherit','open','open','','1040-revision-18','','','2012-09-25 03:39:34','2012-09-25 03:39:34','',1040,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/1040-revision-18/',0,'revision','',0),(2484,19,'2012-07-27 09:08:31','2012-07-27 09:08:31','[caption id=\"attachment_957\" align=\"alignright\" width=\"638\"]<img class=\"size-large wp-image-957\" title=\"uf_student  action photo_barnett 3\" src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/uf_student-action-photo_barnett-3-1024x682.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"638\" /> James (Jimmy) Barnett using a Betterlight Super 8k-HS camera back and custom mount configuration to digitize John Carrère and Thomas Hastings’ “Ground Plan, Presbyterian Church, St. Augustine, Fla.” c. 1889-1890. Photo credit: Joe Kaleita, University of Florida Libraries.[/caption]\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"attachment_958\" align=\"alignright\" width=\"638\"]<a href=\"http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UF00089836/00001\" target=\"_blank\"><img class=\"size-full wp-image-958\" title=\"Part Plan of Fourth Floor\" src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/uf_student-work_image-2.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"638\" /></a> John Carrère and Thomas Hastings. “<a href=\"http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UF00089836/00001\">Part Plan of Fourth Floor. Architectural drawings of the Hotel Ponce de Leon, St. Augustine, Florida</a>.” 96”x40”.[/caption]\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"attachment_959\" align=\"alignright\" width=\"638\"]<a href=\"http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UF00082657/00001\" target=\"_blank\"><img class=\"size-full wp-image-959\" title=\"Ground Plan, Presbyterian Church\" src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/uf_student-work_image-1.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"638\" /></a> An example of the results of Barnett’s work digitizing and preserving a large-scale architectural drawing. John Carrère and Thomas Hastings. “<a href=\"http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UF00082657/00001\">Ground Plan, Presbyterian Church, St. Augustine, Fla</a>.” c. 1889-1890.[/caption]\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\nThe images above are a small fraction of the materials made available through the project and Jimmy\'s work. The full range can be seen in the <a href=\"http://ufdc.ufl.edu/caha/all\" target=\"_blank\">Carrère &amp; Hastings Digital Collection</a>, part of the University of Florida Digital Collections. You can read more at the project blog: <a href=\"http://flaglerdrawings.wordpress.com/\" target=\"_blank\">flaglerdrawings.wordpress.com</a>.','Digitizing Large-Format Architectural Plans','This case study showcases an undergraduate’s work as the lead digital scanner of architectural drawings for the Carrère & Hastings Digital Collection, a collaborative project between the University of Florida (UF) and Flagler College to conserve and digitally preserve the large and fragile drawings. For years the drawings were stored in a basement boiler room and suffered from exposure to high Florida temperatures, humidity, insects, and rodents. The collection is now under the care of a team of faculty, staff, and students from the UF’s Special Collections, Conservation Unit, and Digital Library Center.','inherit','open','open','','946-revision-41','','','2012-07-27 09:08:31','2012-07-27 09:08:31','',946,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/946-revision-41/',0,'revision','',0),(2491,19,'2012-09-25 04:03:03','2012-09-25 04:03:03','<img class=\"size-large wp-image-957\" style=\"width: 638;\" title=\"uf_student  action photo_barnett 3\" src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/uf_student-action-photo_barnett-3-1024x682.jpg\" alt=\"\" />\r\n\r\n<a href=\"http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UF00089836/00001\" target=\"_blank\"><img class=\"size-full wp-image-958\" style=\"width: 638;\" title=\"Part Plan of Fourth Floor\" src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/uf_student-work_image-2.jpg\" alt=\"\" /></a>\r\n\r\n<a href=\"http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UF00082657/00001\" target=\"_blank\"><img class=\"size-full wp-image-959\" style=\"width: 638;\" title=\"Ground Plan, Presbyterian Church\" src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/uf_student-work_image-1.jpg\" alt=\"\" /></a>\r\n\r\nThe images above are a small fraction of the materials made available through the project and Jimmy\'s work. The full range can be seen in the <a href=\"http://ufdc.ufl.edu/caha/all\" target=\"_blank\">Carrère &amp; Hastings Digital Collection</a>, part of the University of Florida Digital Collections. You can read more at the project blog: <a href=\"http://flaglerdrawings.wordpress.com/\" target=\"_blank\">flaglerdrawings.wordpress.com</a>.','Digitizing Large-Format Architectural Plans','This case study showcases an undergraduate’s work as the lead digital scanner of architectural drawings for the Carrère & Hastings Digital Collection, a collaborative project between the University of Florida (UF) and Flagler College to conserve and digitally preserve the large and fragile drawings. For years the drawings were stored in a basement boiler room and suffered from exposure to high Florida temperatures, humidity, insects, and rodents. The collection is now under the care of a team of faculty, staff, and students from the UF’s Special Collections, Conservation Unit, and Digital Library Center.','inherit','open','open','','946-revision-43','','','2012-09-25 04:03:03','2012-09-25 04:03:03','',946,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/946-revision-43/',0,'revision','',0),(2485,19,'2012-07-27 09:14:23','2012-07-27 09:14:23','<img class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-968\" title=\"barnett\" src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/barnett.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"120\" height=\"160\" />\r\n\r\nDigitally scanning archival objects requires not only technical know-how but also an appreciation for the subject matter. My fine-arts background gave me the knowledge and skill set to digitize architectural renderings by Carrère &amp; Hastings of historic structures in Saint Augustine, Florida. I worked on the scanning with two concerns: the drawing as an artifact and the drawing’s content, or what is being represented. The architectural renderings averaged six feet by three feet, some larger and some smaller, though all were difficult to handle. Add the paper’s age and brittleness to the immense size, and one has to have quite a bit of finesse in handling the renderings. I had to hatch a strategy to properly scan each of the uniquely sized drawings.\r\n\r\nGoing into the project, I thought my experience in printmaking would influence the way I scanned the drawings, not realizing that the reverse would happen; the scanning actually affected my art practice. In printmaking I have dealt with large paper before, but never anything quite as large as these archival renderings. My experience handling large paper for the digitization project scaled up my thinking in my own work outside of the project. Consequently, my own art work got larger. With confidence in my newly learned ability to handle paper larger than me, I started a large installation piece in which I put together staging proofs of an etching plate into a single four-by-six feet layered installation. The scale and construction would have never come to mind had I not worked with these large architectural drawings.\r\n\r\n<img class=\"alignright size-medium wp-image-969\" title=\"uf_student  action photo_barnett 6\" src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/uf_student-action-photo_barnett-6-333x222.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"333\" height=\"222\" />\r\n\r\nWorking with the photo editing software to optimize the scanned images for online viewing has also affected my art. Most of the archival pieces were so large they had to be captured in successive scans of two or more and stitched together in a photo editing program. In the digital stitching process, layers are important in getting a seamless product. When scanning the segments, I had to figure out where the respective scans would overlap in their respective digital layers so that when I got to the stitching, they all line up correctly. This takes planning, calculating, and configuring measurements in relation to the object. This idea of smaller units constructing a whole informed my process in constructing the art installation mentioned above, and it continues to affect my work.\r\n\r\nWhile I did not realize it at the time, my artwork reflects the processes I was dealing with at work. All together, the many different renderings that are part of the Carrère &amp; Hastings project build a picture of the architects’ process. I learned to see their end result, the building itself, as not the whole story but the final step in the process that you can only see if you include the drawings. This idea influenced my own installation. I felt that my whole process had to be shown; the print proofs (the intermittent states) are just as important as the end result. I never would have come to this idea had I not worked on the Carrère &amp; Hastings project.','James Barnett - Commentary','Digitally scanning archival objects requires not only technical know-how but also an appreciation for the subject matter. My fine-arts background gave me the knowledge and skill set to digitize architectural renderings by Carrère & Hastings of historic structures in Saint Augustine, Florida. I worked on the scanning with two concerns: the drawing as an artifact and the drawing’s content, or what is being represented. The architectural renderings averaged six feet by three feet, some larger and some smaller, though all were difficult to handle. Add the paper’s age and brittleness to the immense size, and one has to have quite a bit of finesse in handling the renderings. I had to hatch a strategy to properly scan each of the uniquely sized drawings.','inherit','open','open','','967-revision-13','','','2012-07-27 09:14:23','2012-07-27 09:14:23','',967,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/967-revision-13/',0,'revision','',0),(2486,19,'2012-09-25 03:53:26','2012-09-25 03:53:26','<img class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-968\" title=\"barnett\" src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/barnett.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"120\" height=\"160\" />\n\nDigitally scanning archival objects requires not only technical know-how but also an appreciation for the subject matter. My fine-arts background gave me the knowledge and skill set to digitize architectural renderings by Carrère &amp; Hastings of historic structures in Saint Augustine, Florida. I worked on the scanning with two concerns: the drawing as an artifact and the drawing’s content, or what is being represented. The architectural renderings averaged six feet by three feet, some larger and some smaller, though all were difficult to handle. Add the paper’s age and brittleness to the immense size, and one has to have quite a bit of finesse in handling the renderings. I had to hatch a strategy to properly scan each of the uniquely sized drawings.\n\nGoing into the project, I thought my experience in printmaking would influence the way I scanned the drawings, not realizing that the reverse would happen; the scanning actually affected my art practice. In printmaking I have dealt with large paper before, but never anything quite as large as these archival renderings. My experience handling large paper for the digitization project scaled up my thinking in my own work outside of the project. Consequently, my own art work got larger. With confidence in my newly learned ability to handle paper larger than me, I started a large installation piece in which I put together staging proofs of an etching plate into a single four-by-six feet layered installation. The scale and construction would have never come to mind had I not worked with these large architectural drawings.\n\n<img class=\"alignright size-medium wp-image-969\" title=\"uf_student  action photo_barnett 6\" src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/uf_student-action-photo_barnett-6-333x222.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"333\" height=\"222\" />\n\nWorking with the photo editing software to optimize the scanned images for online viewing has also affected my art. Most of the archival pieces were so large they had to be captured in successive scans of two or more and stitched together in a photo editing program. In the digital stitching process, layers are important in getting a seamless product. When scanning the segments, I had to figure out where the respective scans would overlap in their respective digital layers so that when I got to the stitching, they all line up correctly. This takes planning, calculating, and configuring measurements in relation to the object. This idea of smaller units constructing a whole informed my process in constructing the art installation mentioned above, and it continues to affect my work.\n\nWhile I did not realize it at the time, my artwork reflects the processes I was dealing with at work. All together, the many different renderings that are part of the Carrère &amp; Hastings project build a picture of the architects’ process. I learned to see their end result, the building itself, as not the whole story but the final step in the process that you can only see if you include the drawings. This idea influenced my own installation. I felt that my whole process had to be shown; the print proofs (the intermittent states) are just as important as the end result. I never would have come to this idea had I not worked on the Carrère &amp; Hastings project.','James Barnett - Commentary','Digitally scanning archival objects requires not only technical know-how but also an appreciation for the subject matter. My fine-arts background gave me the knowledge and skill set to digitize architectural renderings by Carrère & Hastings of historic structures in Saint Augustine, Florida. I worked on the scanning with two concerns: the drawing as an artifact and the drawing’s content, or what is being represented. The architectural renderings averaged six feet by three feet, some larger and some smaller, though all were difficult to handle. Add the paper’s age and brittleness to the immense size, and one has to have quite a bit of finesse in handling the renderings. I had to hatch a strategy to properly scan each of the uniquely sized drawings.','inherit','open','open','','967-revision-14','','','2012-09-25 03:53:26','2012-09-25 03:53:26','',967,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/967-revision-14/',0,'revision','',0),(2487,19,'2012-07-27 09:12:18','2012-07-27 09:12:18','<img class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-977\" title=\"uf_leader headshot_nemmers\" src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/uf_leader-headshot_nemmers.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"75\" height=\"100\" />In 2010, Flagler College and the University of Florida (UF) were awarded a <em>Save America’s Treasures</em> grant by the National Endowment for the Humanities to preserve and provide access to architectural drawings for the National Historic Landmark Hotel Ponce de Leon (1885-1887) and the Memorial Presbyterian Church (1889-1890) in St. Augustine, Florida. During this two-year project, the UF Smathers Libraries are conserving and digitizing an irreplaceable collection of the earliest architectural drawings of the Carrère &amp; Hastings firm. The drawings were created for the oil and railroad tycoon Henry Flagler beginning in the 1880s, but the majority of the drawings subsequently had been “lost” for decades. The few people who knew of their existence were unaware of their historical significance, and the drawings remained stored for years in a boiler room under high Florida temperatures and humidity, and exposed to insects and rodents.\r\n\r\nThis treasure trove remained unknown and endangered until its rediscovery in 2004 at Flagler College. To ensure that the drawings are protected and accessible to researchers, the drawings were deposited in 2005 in the UF Architecture Archives, a unit of Special &amp; Area Studies Collections. Comprised of over 260 fragile objects, the St. Augustine collection includes original drawings on cloth, silk, and paper, and a variety of blueprints, diazotypes, and other reproductions. Sizes range from eight by eight inches to over four by eight feet. Many of the drawings could not be unrolled or handled because they were literally crumbling on the shelves; it is very likely that some of these drawings had not been unrolled since they were last used in the 1890s. The grant funding has enabled UF to hire personnel and supplies to properly conserve and digitize all of the drawings.\r\n\r\nThe UF Digital Library Center (DLC) has an excellent track record employing students to digitize materials in all formats and conditions. One undergraduate student, James (Jimmy) Barnett, already had experience digitizing architectural drawings in the DLC, so we were happy to hire him as the imaging technician for this project. We knew that we could trust Jimmy to handle the items properly during imaging, which is crucial since many of the drawings are in extremely poor condition and are over eight feet long. Moreover, with his background and coursework in art we were confident that Jimmy could appreciate the drawings as cultural objects and be sensitive to the techniques and media used to produce them. Our trust was well placed, and Jimmy has been an exemplary steward of the drawings placed temporarily in his custody.\r\n\r\nIn planning for this project, there was no hesitation about employing an undergraduate student to work with fragile drawings. The archivists and curators in Special Collections have long relied on undergraduate students to assist with processing, research, and outreach activities. We offer an internship course through the History Department, and we have had great success retaining former interns as either paid employees or volunteers. We are able to maintain a pool of highly-trained, motivated assistants, and the students gain practical experience working with historical records. Several of these students have gone on to pursue archives, library, or public history master’s degrees. But regardless of their educational and career paths, we have found that many undergraduate students truly appreciate the value of cultural heritage materials, and many, such as Jimmy, can be trusted to treat them with the care they require.','John Nemmers - Commentary','In 2010, Flagler College and the University of Florida (UF) were awarded a Save America’s Treasures grant by the National Endowment for the Humanities to preserve and provide access to architectural drawings for the National Historic Landmark Hotel Ponce de Leon (1885-1887) and the Memorial Presbyterian Church (1889-1890) in St. Augustine, Florida. During this two-year project, the UF Smathers Libraries are conserving and digitizing an irreplaceable collection of the earliest architectural drawings of the Carrère & Hastings firm. The drawings were created for the oil and railroad tycoon Henry Flagler beginning in the 1880s, but the majority of the drawings subsequently had been “lost” for decades. The few people who knew of their existence were unaware of their historical significance, and the drawings remained stored for years in a boiler room under high Florida temperatures and humidity, and exposed to insects and rodents.','inherit','open','open','','976-revision-10','','','2012-07-27 09:12:18','2012-07-27 09:12:18','',976,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/976-revision-10/',0,'revision','',0),(2488,19,'2012-09-25 03:59:00','2012-09-25 03:59:00','<img class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-977\" style=\"margin-right: 20px; margin-bottom: 10px;\" title=\"uf_leader headshot_nemmers\" src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/uf_leader-headshot_nemmers.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"75\" height=\"100\" />In 2010, Flagler College and the University of Florida (UF) were awarded a <em>Save America’s Treasures</em> grant by the National Endowment for the Humanities to preserve and provide access to architectural drawings for the National Historic Landmark Hotel Ponce de Leon (1885-1887) and the Memorial Presbyterian Church (1889-1890) in St. Augustine, Florida. During this two-year project, the UF Smathers Libraries are conserving and digitizing an irreplaceable collection of the earliest architectural drawings of the Carrère &amp; Hastings firm. The drawings were created for the oil and railroad tycoon Henry Flagler beginning in the 1880s, but the majority of the drawings subsequently had been “lost” for decades. The few people who knew of their existence were unaware of their historical significance, and the drawings remained stored for years in a boiler room under high Florida temperatures and humidity, and exposed to insects and rodents.\r\n\r\nThis treasure trove remained unknown and endangered until its rediscovery in 2004 at Flagler College. To ensure that the drawings are protected and accessible to researchers, the drawings were deposited in 2005 in the UF Architecture Archives, a unit of Special &amp; Area Studies Collections. Comprised of over 260 fragile objects, the St. Augustine collection includes original drawings on cloth, silk, and paper, and a variety of blueprints, diazotypes, and other reproductions. Sizes range from eight by eight inches to over four by eight feet. Many of the drawings could not be unrolled or handled because they were literally crumbling on the shelves; it is very likely that some of these drawings had not been unrolled since they were last used in the 1890s. The grant funding has enabled UF to hire personnel and supplies to properly conserve and digitize all of the drawings.\r\n\r\nThe UF Digital Library Center (DLC) has an excellent track record employing students to digitize materials in all formats and conditions. One undergraduate student, James (Jimmy) Barnett, already had experience digitizing architectural drawings in the DLC, so we were happy to hire him as the imaging technician for this project. We knew that we could trust Jimmy to handle the items properly during imaging, which is crucial since many of the drawings are in extremely poor condition and are over eight feet long. Moreover, with his background and coursework in art we were confident that Jimmy could appreciate the drawings as cultural objects and be sensitive to the techniques and media used to produce them. Our trust was well placed, and Jimmy has been an exemplary steward of the drawings placed temporarily in his custody.\r\n\r\nIn planning for this project, there was no hesitation about employing an undergraduate student to work with fragile drawings. The archivists and curators in Special Collections have long relied on undergraduate students to assist with processing, research, and outreach activities. We offer an internship course through the History Department, and we have had great success retaining former interns as either paid employees or volunteers. We are able to maintain a pool of highly-trained, motivated assistants, and the students gain practical experience working with historical records. Several of these students have gone on to pursue archives, library, or public history master’s degrees. But regardless of their educational and career paths, we have found that many undergraduate students truly appreciate the value of cultural heritage materials, and many, such as Jimmy, can be trusted to treat them with the care they require.','John Nemmers - Commentary','In 2010, Flagler College and the University of Florida (UF) were awarded a Save America’s Treasures grant by the National Endowment for the Humanities to preserve and provide access to architectural drawings for the National Historic Landmark Hotel Ponce de Leon (1885-1887) and the Memorial Presbyterian Church (1889-1890) in St. Augustine, Florida. During this two-year project, the UF Smathers Libraries are conserving and digitizing an irreplaceable collection of the earliest architectural drawings of the Carrère & Hastings firm. The drawings were created for the oil and railroad tycoon Henry Flagler beginning in the 1880s, but the majority of the drawings subsequently had been “lost” for decades. The few people who knew of their existence were unaware of their historical significance, and the drawings remained stored for years in a boiler room under high Florida temperatures and humidity, and exposed to insects and rodents.','inherit','open','open','','976-revision-11','','','2012-09-25 03:59:00','2012-09-25 03:59:00','',976,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/976-revision-11/',0,'revision','',0),(2489,19,'2012-09-25 03:59:31','2012-09-25 03:59:31','<img class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-977\" style=\"margin-right: 20px; margin-bottom: 10px;\" title=\"uf_leader headshot_nemmers\" src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/uf_leader-headshot_nemmers.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"75\" height=\"100\" />In 2010, Flagler College and the University of Florida (UF) were awarded a <em>Save America’s Treasures</em> grant by the National Endowment for the Humanities to preserve and provide access to architectural drawings for the National Historic Landmark Hotel Ponce de Leon (1885-1887) and the Memorial Presbyterian Church (1889-1890) in St. Augustine, Florida. During this two-year project, the UF Smathers Libraries are conserving and digitizing an irreplaceable collection of the earliest architectural drawings of the Carrère &amp; Hastings firm. The drawings were created for the oil and railroad tycoon Henry Flagler beginning in the 1880s, but the majority of the drawings subsequently had been “lost” for decades. The few people who knew of their existence were unaware of their historical significance, and the drawings remained stored for years in a boiler room under high Florida temperatures and humidity, and exposed to insects and rodents.\r\n\r\nThis treasure trove remained unknown and endangered until its rediscovery in 2004 at Flagler College. To ensure that the drawings are protected and accessible to researchers, the drawings were deposited in 2005 in the UF Architecture Archives, a unit of Special &amp; Area Studies Collections. Comprised of over 260 fragile objects, the St. Augustine collection includes original drawings on cloth, silk, and paper, and a variety of blueprints, diazotypes, and other reproductions. Sizes range from eight by eight inches to over four by eight feet. Many of the drawings could not be unrolled or handled because they were literally crumbling on the shelves; it is very likely that some of these drawings had not been unrolled since they were last used in the 1890s. The grant funding has enabled UF to hire personnel and supplies to properly conserve and digitize all of the drawings.\r\n\r\nThe UF Digital Library Center (DLC) has an excellent track record employing students to digitize materials in all formats and conditions. One undergraduate student, James (Jimmy) Barnett, already had experience digitizing architectural drawings in the DLC, so we were happy to hire him as the imaging technician for this project. We knew that we could trust Jimmy to handle the items properly during imaging, which is crucial since many of the drawings are in extremely poor condition and are over eight feet long. Moreover, with his background and coursework in art we were confident that Jimmy could appreciate the drawings as cultural objects and be sensitive to the techniques and media used to produce them. Our trust was well placed, and Jimmy has been an exemplary steward of the drawings placed temporarily in his custody.\r\n\r\nIn planning for this project, there was no hesitation about employing an undergraduate student to work with fragile drawings. The archivists and curators in Special Collections have long relied on undergraduate students to assist with processing, research, and outreach activities. We offer an internship course through the History Department, and we have had great success retaining former interns as either paid employees or volunteers. We are able to maintain a pool of highly-trained, motivated assistants, and the students gain practical experience working with historical records. Several of these students have gone on to pursue archives, library, or public history master’s degrees. But regardless of their educational and career paths, we have found that many undergraduate students truly appreciate the value of cultural heritage materials, and many, such as Jimmy, can be trusted to treat them with the care they require.','John Nemmers - Commentary','In 2010, Flagler College and the University of Florida (UF) were awarded a Save America’s Treasures grant by the National Endowment for the Humanities to preserve and provide access to architectural drawings for the National Historic Landmark Hotel Ponce de Leon (1885-1887) and the Memorial Presbyterian Church (1889-1890) in St. Augustine, Florida. During this two-year project, the UF Smathers Libraries are conserving and digitizing an irreplaceable collection of the earliest architectural drawings of the Carrère & Hastings firm. The drawings were created for the oil and railroad tycoon Henry Flagler beginning in the 1880s, but the majority of the drawings subsequently had been “lost” for decades. The few people who knew of their existence were unaware of their historical significance, and the drawings remained stored for years in a boiler room under high Florida temperatures and humidity, and exposed to insects and rodents.','inherit','open','open','','976-revision-12','','','2012-09-25 03:59:31','2012-09-25 03:59:31','',976,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/976-revision-12/',0,'revision','',0),(2490,19,'2012-09-25 03:52:57','2012-09-25 03:52:57','<div id=\"attachment_957\" class=\"alignright\" style=\"width:638px\"><img class=\"size-large wp-image-957\" title=\"uf_student  action photo_barnett 3\" src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/uf_student-action-photo_barnett-3-1024x682.jpg\" alt=\"\" style=\"width:638\" />  <span class=\"wp-caption-text\">James (Jimmy) Barnett using a Betterlight Super 8k-HS camera back and custom mount configuration to digitize John Carrère and Thomas Hastings&rsquo; &ldquo;Ground Plan, Presbyterian Church, St. Augustine, Fla.&rdquo; c. 1889-1890. <em>Photo credit:</em> Joe Kaleita, University of Florida Libraries.</span></div>\r\n\r\n<div id=\"attachment_958\" class=\"alignright\" style=\"width:638px\"><a href=\"http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UF00089836/00001\" target=\"_blank\"><img class=\"size-full wp-image-958\" title=\"Part Plan of Fourth Floor\" src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/uf_student-work_image-2.jpg\" alt=\"\" style=\"width:638\" /></a> <span class=\"wp-caption-text\">John Carrère and Thomas Hastings. &ldquo;<a href=\"http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UF00089836/00001\">Part Plan of Fourth Floor. Architectural drawings of the Hotel Ponce de Leon, St. Augustine, Florida</a>.&rdquo; 96\" x 40\".</span></div>\r\n\r\n<div id=\"attachment_959\" class=\"alignright\" style=\"width:638px; margin-top:20px;\"><a href=\"http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UF00082657/00001\" target=\"_blank\"><img class=\"size-full wp-image-959\" title=\"Ground Plan, Presbyterian Church\" src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/uf_student-work_image-1.jpg\" alt=\"\" style=\"width:638\" /></a>  <span class=\"wp-caption-text\" style=\"margin-bottom:30px;\">An example of the results of Barnett&rsquo;s work digitizing and preserving a large-scale architectural drawing. John Carrère and Thomas Hastings. &ldquo;<a href=\"http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UF00082657/00001\">Ground Plan, Presbyterian Church, St. Augustine, Fla</a>.&rdquo; c. 1889-1890.</span></div>\r\n\r\nThe images above are a small fraction of the materials made available through the project and Jimmy\'s work. The full range can be seen in the <a href=\"http://ufdc.ufl.edu/caha/all\" target=\"_blank\">Carrère &amp; Hastings Digital Collection</a>, part of the University of Florida Digital Collections. You can read more at the project blog: <a href=\"http://flaglerdrawings.wordpress.com/\" target=\"_blank\">flaglerdrawings.wordpress.com</a>.','Digitizing Large-Format Architectural Plans','This case study showcases an undergraduate’s work as the lead digital scanner of architectural drawings for the Carrère & Hastings Digital Collection, a collaborative project between the University of Florida (UF) and Flagler College to conserve and digitally preserve the large and fragile drawings. For years the drawings were stored in a basement boiler room and suffered from exposure to high Florida temperatures, humidity, insects, and rodents. The collection is now under the care of a team of faculty, staff, and students from the UF’s Special Collections, Conservation Unit, and Digital Library Center.','inherit','open','open','','946-revision-42','','','2012-09-25 03:52:57','2012-09-25 03:52:57','',946,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/946-revision-42/',0,'revision','',0),(2494,19,'2012-09-25 04:06:52','2012-09-25 04:06:52','[caption id=\"attachment_1185\" align=\"alignnone\" width=\"640\"]<img class=\"size-full wp-image-1185 \" src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/walters_student-action-photo_dowdle.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"640\" height=\"426\" /> Elizabeth Dowdle (in striped shirt) with Capitoline Amazon, marble (Roman copy after Kresilas, Greek, active ca. 450 BC - 420 BC).[/caption]\r\n\r\n<strong>1. Describe the sorts of work you did in developing your Google Earth presentation on this object. (You might consider both the unique forms of research involved and modes/methods of interpretation.)</strong>\r\n\r\nMy research focused on discovering the provenance of the Walters’ Capitoline Amazon, a Roman copy of a Greek bronze sculpture. Though the beautiful marble immediately caught my attention, I was surprised to find how little the museum actually knew about the object’s history. In order to unravel the mystery surrounding the sculpture, I looked for similar examples of sculpture in other museum collections and, consulting the records that came with them, began to piece together a tentative history of this ancient artwork.\r\n\r\n<strong>2. What did you learn from this project that distinguished it from other academic courses?</strong>\r\n\r\nThis project was unique in that I was provided with an ending point in the Walters gallery, but lacked a starting point for my research. This issue forced me to think outside the box and look for new ways to come up with the information I needed to draw out this object’s provenance. This called for more than an average trip to the library; I had to consult other institutions with similar sculptures in their collections and find possible answers to my questions based on the records they had on their pieces. It was a unique challenge, but this project truly taught me that where there is a will, there is a way.\r\n\r\n<strong>3. What was it like to be creating a final project that would be presented to the public?</strong>\r\n\r\nIt was both exciting and inspiring to create a project that would be presented to the public. Knowing that my work would be recognized outside the classroom inspired me to design a product that would make a difference not only for the Walters, but also for anyone looking for information about the Capitoline Amazon. I was driven to deliver a professional, museum-quality presentation that the Walters would be proud to add to their website.\r\n\r\n<strong>4. What did you learn from working in a professional museum and in conjunction with its staff?</strong>\r\n\r\nIt is always a privilege to work with professionals in the field you aspire to join, especially when you get to do so in the museum itself. Working with the staff at the Walters gave me insight into the everyday activities of registrars, curators, and collections managers as well as the challenges they face when caring for their collections and working to further their institutions’ missions. Especially in collections containing antiquities, it is not uncommon to come across objects with questionable histories. My time at the Walters taught me that it is of the utmost importance to authenticate the contents of your collection by making their unique histories known, despite the challenges this task might pose.\r\n\r\n<strong>5. What did this course/project and the opportunity to work with museum objects and their archival records mean to your education? your future plans? your general interests?</strong>\r\n\r\nThis course and the project I produced solidified my desire to pursue a career in museums. The opportunity to work with museum objects and their records has inspired me to continue my education so that I can also work in an institution dedicated to the preservation of culture for future generations. I graduated from Johns Hopkins University in May 2011 with a degree in the History of Science, Medicine and Technology and am now pursuing a master’s degree in Museum Studies at George Washington University, with a focus in museum administration and classical studies.','Elizabeth Dowdle - Commentary','My research focused on discovering the provenance of the Walters’ Capitoline Amazon, a Roman copy of a Greek bronze sculpture. Though the beautiful marble immediately caught my attention, I was surprised to find how little the museum actually knew about the object’s history. In order to unravel the mystery surrounding the sculpture, I looked for similar examples of sculpture in other museum collections and, consulting the records that came with them, began to piece together a tentative history of this ancient artwork.','inherit','open','open','','1152-revision-18','','','2012-09-25 04:06:52','2012-09-25 04:06:52','',1152,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/1152-revision-18/',0,'revision','',0),(2495,19,'2012-06-27 02:37:59','2012-06-27 02:37:59','Art on the Move was an outcome of the course “Behind the Scenes at the Walters Art Museum: Material Migrations,” offered at the Walters Art Museum through the <a href=\"http://krieger.jhu.edu/museums/\">Program in Museums and Society</a> at Johns Hopkins University in the fall of 2009. Elizabeth Rodini and Ben Tilghman were co-instructors and, with the technical guidance of Reid Sczerba, Senior Programmer Analyst in the university’s Center for Educational Resources, devised and oversaw this project. The course and project were funded by an Arts Innovation Grant from Johns Hopkins.\r\n\r\n<strong>Except From Course Syllabus</strong>\r\n\r\nThe goals of this class can be broken down into several categories:\r\n<ul>\r\n	<li>investigating the various ways/means/motives for the circulation of objects, and considering how meaning is shaped by context, from antiquity to the present and including the museum itself;</li>\r\n	<li>conducting in-depth, independent research on objects in the Walters’ collection;</li>\r\n	<li>experimenting with different styles of writing and narration;</li>\r\n	<li>learning about different areas of museum practice, including curation, conservation, registration, and education;</li>\r\n	<li>applying these experiences to the production of interpretative tools for public audiences of the Walters, in the form of Google Earth itineraries.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\nEach student will choose two* objects from the Walters’ collection to research, focusing on the “trajectory” of the objects and their shifting significance in different contexts. Research will involve studying the objects and object files at the museum as well as work in the Hopkins library and on-line. That work will be analyzed, interpreted, and gathered into a Google Earth Map “itinerary” for each object. Why? To share what we are learning with the public. This is a fundamental task of museums . . . in this course we extended that mission to the undergraduate classroom.\r\n\r\n(*The seven students worked on two objects each; a selection of these was made for the final presentation on the Walters website.)','Walters - Project Description/Syllabus','','inherit','open','open','','1130-revision-14','','','2012-06-27 02:37:59','2012-06-27 02:37:59','',1130,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/1130-revision-14/',0,'revision','',0),(2496,19,'2012-09-25 04:09:08','2012-09-25 04:09:08','Art on the Move was an outcome of the course “Behind the Scenes at the Walters Art Museum: Material Migrations,” offered at the Walters Art Museum through the <a href=\"http://krieger.jhu.edu/museums/\">Program in Museums and Society</a> at Johns Hopkins University in the fall of 2009. Elizabeth Rodini and Ben Tilghman were co-instructors and, with the technical guidance of Reid Sczerba, Senior Programmer Analyst in the university’s Center for Educational Resources, devised and oversaw this project. The course and project were funded by an Arts Innovation Grant from Johns Hopkins.\r\n\r\n<strong>Except From Course Syllabus</strong>\r\n\r\nThe goals of this class can be broken down into several categories:\r\n<ul>\r\n	<li>investigating the various ways/means/motives for the circulation of objects, and considering how meaning is shaped by context, from antiquity to the present and including the museum itself;</li>\r\n	<li>conducting in-depth, independent research on objects in the Walters’ collection;</li>\r\n	<li>experimenting with different styles of writing and narration;</li>\r\n	<li>learning about different areas of museum practice, including curation, conservation, registration, and education;</li>\r\n	<li>applying these experiences to the production of interpretative tools for public audiences of the Walters, in the form of Google Earth itineraries.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\nEach student will choose two* objects from the Walters’ collection to research, focusing on the “trajectory” of the objects and their shifting significance in different contexts. Research will involve studying the objects and object files at the museum as well as work in the Hopkins library and on-line. That work will be analyzed, interpreted, and gathered into a Google Earth Map “itinerary” for each object. Why? To share what we are learning with the public. This is a fundamental task of museums . . . in this course we extended that mission to the undergraduate classroom.\r\n\r\n(*The seven students worked on two objects each; a selection of these was made for the final presentation on the Walters website.)','Walters - Project Description/Syllabus','','inherit','open','open','','1130-revision-15','','','2012-09-25 04:09:08','2012-09-25 04:09:08','',1130,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/1130-revision-15/',0,'revision','',0),(2497,19,'2012-09-25 04:06:03','2012-09-25 04:06:03','<img class=\"size-full wp-image-1189\" title=\"walters_student action photo_devos\" src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/walters_student-action-photo_devos.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"640\" height=\"426\" /><span class=\"caption\"> Dakota DeVos (pointing at books) with Antiphonary for Abbess of Sainte-Marie of Beaupré, ink on parchment (Flemish, 1290).</span>\r\n\r\n<strong>1. Describe the sorts of work you did in developing your Google Earth presentation on this object. (You might consider both the unique forms of research involved and modes/methods of interpretation.)</strong>\r\nThis project required a diverse approach to research, including reading topical books and contemporary articles, conducting interviews with Walters conservators and curators, and making comparisons with similar objects from the period or in the artists’ oeuvres. However, an exhaustive physical examination of the objects themselves was the starting and ending point for piecing together the objects’ paths of alteration, ownership, and usage.\r\n\r\n<strong>2. What did you learn from this project that distinguished it from other academic courses?</strong>\r\nThis course offered three unique qualities. First, our research was meant for publication for museum visitors rather than exclusively for our professors. Second, we were able to do hands-on research with many of the Walters’ most revered objects while curators and conservators guided us in our examinations. Finally, this course encouraged an object-centric view of history, which was antithetical, conceptually, to the art history courses I had taken until that point. As an art history major I was accustomed to viewing specific art historical objects as close studies of broader trends that characterized the periods in which they were made. However, our assignment for Material Migrations was concerned not only with a study of the object’s creation and use in its own time, but also how its use changed throughout its history. I came away from the course with a greater appreciation for the power of contextualization. Art objects rarely remain static relics of a bygone era; rather, they continue to have vibrant lives and changing effects on their successive owners and audiences, not the least of which is their position as a tool for learning in the museum.\r\n\r\n<strong>3. What was it like to be creating a final project that would be presented to the public?</strong>\r\nThe project was intended to engage as broad a scope of museum visitors as possible, including youths and viewers who might have no background on the object, while still interesting our academic peers. Part of what made these objects so fascinating was the very unwieldiness of their provenance. I decided on central themes for both of my objects and ultimately cut out much of my research in order to focus on their tortuous histories.\r\n\r\n<strong>4. What did you learn from working in a professional museum and in conjunction with its staff?</strong>\r\nI chose one of my objects, the Beaupre Antiphonary, specifically because I had the opportunity to work with Professor Tilghman and the Walters’ rare books curator, Dr. William Noel. Collaborating with two of the top scholars in the field on an object that they knew intimately remains one of the brightest moments of my undergraduate career.\r\n\r\n<strong>5. What did this course/project and the opportunity to work with museum objects and their archival records mean to your education? your future plans? your general interests?</strong>\r\n\r\nThis course reinforced my ambition to work in the field of museums because I found the work rewarding and academically invigorating. It was meaningful and exhilarating to produce work for a class that would help enrich the presentation of the Walters’ holdings.','Dakota Devos - Commentary','This project required a diverse approach to research, including reading topical books and contemporary articles, conducting interviews with Walters conservators and curators, and making comparisons with similar objects from the period or in the artists’ oeuvres. However, an exhaustive physical examination of the objects themselves was the starting and end point for piecing together the objects’ paths of alteration, ownership, and usage. Our final product was meant to offer a new way for viewers to connect with an object and so both our maps and audio clips reinforce our findings by continually asking the viewer to look closely at the evidence right in front of them.','inherit','open','open','','1128-revision-15','','','2012-09-25 04:06:03','2012-09-25 04:06:03','',1128,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/1128-revision-15/',0,'revision','',0),(2498,19,'2012-08-28 04:57:18','2012-08-28 04:57:18','','Mapping the Provenance of Museum Objects','This case study features work from <a href=\"http://thewalters.org/earth/\" target=\"_blank\">Art on the Move</a>, which was an outcome of the course “Behind the Scenes at the Walters Art Museum: Material Migrations,” offered at the Walters Art Museum through the Program in Museums and Society at Johns Hopkins University in the fall of 2009.  Elizabeth Rodini and Ben Tilghman were co-instructors and, with the technical guidance of Reid Sczerba, Senior Programmer Analyst in the university’s Center for Educational Resources, devised and oversaw this project.  The course and project were funded by an Arts Innovation Grant from Johns Hopkins.  Students in the course researched the histories of objects in the museum’s collection and created Google Maps tracing their history.  Three students share their work in this case study.','inherit','open','open','','1121-revision-55','','','2012-08-28 04:57:18','2012-08-28 04:57:18','',1121,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/1121-revision-55/',0,'revision','',0),(2499,19,'2012-07-27 09:40:58','2012-07-27 09:40:58','<img class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-1220\" title=\"rodini\" src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/rodini.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"120\" height=\"160\" />Material Migrations, like many of the practicum courses offered in the Program in Museums and Society (M&amp;S), gave students the chance to engage directly with objects, conduct research in and around those materials, and, most distinctively, develop a final project to be shared with a general audience—in this case, Google Earth “tours” of object provenance histories, to be incorporated into the website of the Walters Art Museum. M&amp;S practicum projects take the form of exhibitions, both actual and virtual; interpretative materials, such as audio tours, gallery guides, and websites; and program development. I like to think of them as works of “public humanities,” sharing the research we do in the university with a larger audience.\r\n\r\nWhy bother with such an exercise? The answer Ben Tilghman and I provided in our syllabus for this course: “To share what we are learning with the public. This is a fundamental task of museums. . . <em>in this course we extend that mission to the undergraduate classroom.</em>” Universities suffer from being removed from the broader community, while humanistic disciplines without clear “practical” applications are particularly at risk from this sort of isolation and perceived irrelevance. On the other hand, archives, museums, and other collections with a public face are places where humanistic research can be made available, accessible, and meaningful.\r\n\r\nAlthough historians are familiar with the sub-field of public history, other disciplines have not developed the potential for outreach in such a direct, institutionalized way. It is hard to imagine the awarding of a degree in, say, public art history. But in this class our students were taking on that very role as curators presenting research through a lively interactive tool with broad dissemination.\r\n\r\nIn developing their object itineraries for the Walters Art Museum and Google Earth, students had to consider both the historical narratives they were tracing and the matter of presenting them to the public. What information would be accessible? How could they both engage and challenge their audience? How would they balance the nuanced elements of their story with the broader theoretical issues at stake in the project? What is lost in the task of producing highly condensed text, and what might be gained?\r\n\r\nIn all of our museum-based practicum courses we face the challenge of fitting student work into an established institutional frame. Classrooms are messy places where ideas are tested and debated. Despite our best efforts, the many young voices we work with over the semester may not easily gel into the perfect, marketable whole that modern museums require. Our students carefully crafted their texts, which Walters professionals then polished to a sheen. The students constructed imaginative itineraries that we honed to fit a simpler, more streamlined model.\r\n\r\nIf it seems like the nature of university research (independent, serendipitous, evolving) cannot quite square with museum exhibitions (corporate, formal, fixed), there is nevertheless much to be gained from encouraging their intersection—for students, audiences, and collections, and for universities as well. University humanities made more public are also more relevant, appreciated, and valued.','Elizabeth Rodini - Commentary','Material Migrations, like many of the practicum courses offered in the Program in Museums and Society (M&S), gave students the chance to engage directly with objects, conduct research in and around those materials, and, most distinctively, develop a final project to be shared with a general audience—in this case, Google Earth “tours” of object provenance histories, to be incorporated into the website of the Walters Art Museum. M&S practicum projects take the form of exhibitions, both actual and virtual; interpretative materials, such as audio tours, gallery guides, and websites; and program development. I like to think of them as works of “public humanities,” sharing the research we do in the university with a larger audience.','inherit','open','open','','1132-revision-9','','','2012-07-27 09:40:58','2012-07-27 09:40:58','',1132,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/1132-revision-9/',0,'revision','',0),(2500,19,'2012-09-25 04:18:38','2012-09-25 04:18:38','<img class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-1220\" title=\"rodini\" src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/rodini.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"120\" height=\"160\" />Material Migrations, like many of the practicum courses offered in the Program in Museums and Society (M&amp;S), gave students the chance to engage directly with objects, conduct research in and around those materials, and, most distinctively, develop a final project to be shared with a general audience—in this case, Google Earth “tours” of object provenance histories, to be incorporated into the website of the Walters Art Museum. M&amp;S practicum projects take the form of exhibitions, both actual and virtual; interpretative materials, such as audio tours, gallery guides, and websites; and program development. I like to think of them as works of “public humanities,” sharing the research we do in the university with a larger audience.\n\nWhy bother with such an exercise? The answer Ben Tilghman and I provided in our syllabus for this course: “To share what we are learning with the public. This is a fundamental task of museums. . . <em>in this course we extend that mission to the undergraduate classroom.</em>” Universities suffer from being removed from the broader community, while humanistic disciplines without clear “practical” applications are particularly at risk from this sort of isolation and perceived irrelevance. On the other hand, archives, museums, and other collections with a public face are places where humanistic research can be made available, accessible, and meaningful.\n\nAlthough historians are familiar with the sub-field of public history, other disciplines have not developed the potential for outreach in such a direct, institutionalized way. It is hard to imagine the awarding of a degree in, say, public art history. But in this class our students were taking on that very role as curators presenting research through a lively interactive tool with broad dissemination.\n\nIn developing their object itineraries for the Walters Art Museum and Google Earth, students had to consider both the historical narratives they were tracing and the matter of presenting them to the public. What information would be accessible? How could they both engage and challenge their audience? How would they balance the nuanced elements of their story with the broader theoretical issues at stake in the project? What is lost in the task of producing highly condensed text, and what might be gained?\n\nIn all of our museum-based practicum courses we face the challenge of fitting student work into an established institutional frame. Classrooms are messy places where ideas are tested and debated. Despite our best efforts, the many young voices we work with over the semester may not easily gel into the perfect, marketable whole that modern museums require. Our students carefully crafted their texts, which Walters professionals then polished to a sheen. The students constructed imaginative itineraries that we honed to fit a simpler, more streamlined model.\n\nIf it seems like the nature of university research (independent, serendipitous, evolving) cannot quite square with museum exhibitions (corporate, formal, fixed), there is nevertheless much to be gained from encouraging their intersection—for students, audiences, and collections, and for universities as well. University humanities made more public are also more relevant, appreciated, and valued.','Elizabeth Rodini - Commentary','Material Migrations, like many of the practicum courses offered in the Program in Museums and Society (M&S), gave students the chance to engage directly with objects, conduct research in and around those materials, and, most distinctively, develop a final project to be shared with a general audience—in this case, Google Earth “tours” of object provenance histories, to be incorporated into the website of the Walters Art Museum. M&S practicum projects take the form of exhibitions, both actual and virtual; interpretative materials, such as audio tours, gallery guides, and websites; and program development. I like to think of them as works of “public humanities,” sharing the research we do in the university with a larger audience.','inherit','open','open','','1132-revision-10','','','2012-09-25 04:18:38','2012-09-25 04:18:38','',1132,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/1132-revision-10/',0,'revision','',0),(2501,19,'2012-09-25 04:18:44','2012-09-25 04:18:44','<img class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-1220\" title=\"rodini\" src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/rodini.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"120\" height=\"160\" />Material Migrations, like many of the practicum courses offered in the Program in Museums and Society (M&amp;S), gave students the chance to engage directly with objects, conduct research in and around those materials, and, most distinctively, develop a final project to be shared with a general audience—in this case, Google Earth “tours” of object provenance histories, to be incorporated into the website of the Walters Art Museum. M&amp;S practicum projects take the form of exhibitions, both actual and virtual; interpretative materials, such as audio tours, gallery guides, and websites; and program development. I like to think of them as works of “public humanities,” sharing the research we do in the university with a larger audience.\n\nWhy bother with such an exercise? The answer Ben Tilghman and I provided in our syllabus for this course: “To share what we are learning with the public. This is a fundamental task of museums. . . <em>in this course we extend that mission to the undergraduate classroom.</em>” Universities suffer from being removed from the broader community, while humanistic disciplines without clear “practical” applications are particularly at risk from this sort of isolation and perceived irrelevance. On the other hand, archives, museums, and other collections with a public face are places where humanistic research can be made available, accessible, and meaningful.\n\nAlthough historians are familiar with the sub-field of public history, other disciplines have not developed the potential for outreach in such a direct, institutionalized way. It is hard to imagine the awarding of a degree in, say, public art history. But in this class our students were taking on that very role as curators presenting research through a lively interactive tool with broad dissemination.\n\nIn developing their object itineraries for the Walters Art Museum and Google Earth, students had to consider both the historical narratives they were tracing and the matter of presenting them to the public. What information would be accessible? How could they both engage and challenge their audience? How would they balance the nuanced elements of their story with the broader theoretical issues at stake in the project? What is lost in the task of producing highly condensed text, and what might be gained?\n\nIn all of our museum-based practicum courses we face the challenge of fitting student work into an established institutional frame. Classrooms are messy places where ideas are tested and debated. Despite our best efforts, the many young voices we work with over the semester may not easily gel into the perfect, marketable whole that modern museums require. Our students carefully crafted their texts, which Walters professionals then polished to a sheen. The students constructed imaginative itineraries that we honed to fit a simpler, more streamlined model.\n\nIf it seems like the nature of university research (independent, serendipitous, evolving) cannot quite square with museum exhibitions (corporate, formal, fixed), there is nevertheless much to be gained from encouraging their intersection—for students, audiences, and collections, and for universities as well. University humanities made more public are also more relevant, appreciated, and valued.','Elizabeth Rodini - Commentary','Material Migrations, like many of the practicum courses offered in the Program in Museums and Society (M&S), gave students the chance to engage directly with objects, conduct research in and around those materials, and, most distinctively, develop a final project to be shared with a general audience—in this case, Google Earth “tours” of object provenance histories, to be incorporated into the website of the Walters Art Museum. M&S practicum projects take the form of exhibitions, both actual and virtual; interpretative materials, such as audio tours, gallery guides, and websites; and program development. I like to think of them as works of “public humanities,” sharing the research we do in the university with a larger audience.','inherit','open','open','','1132-revision-11','','','2012-09-25 04:18:44','2012-09-25 04:18:44','',1132,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/1132-revision-11/',0,'revision','',0),(2502,19,'2012-09-25 00:43:38','2012-09-25 00:43:38','Behind a low glass case in Goucher&rsquo;s Special Collection Room sits a humble blue book box that holds the first American edition of Jane Austen&rsquo;s <em>Emma</em>. Valued from nineteen to seventy-five thousand dollars on ABEBooks.com, the edition is unquestionably valuable. But how did this extremely rare copy end up in Goucher&rsquo;s modest library? In a letter to David Gilson on August 5th, 1967 Alberta Burke revealed that she owned a copy of the 1816 Philadelphia Emma, which formerly belonged to Siegfried Sassoon. The two corresponded from 1967 to 1975 until Alberta fell ill. Throughout this time a steady thread of conversation exists about the Philadelphia Emma.\r\n\r\nAfter seeing the interest that both Alberta Burke and David Gilson had in the first American edition of Emma, perusing the pages and studying the tome in detail was essential to discover first hand the majesty of the volumes.\r\n\r\n<div id=\"attachment_1319\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\" style=\"width:281px\"><a href=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/goucher_student-work-image2_kendall.jpg\"><img class=\"size-medium wp-image-1319  \" title=\"goucher_student work image2_kendall\" src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/goucher_student-work-image2_kendall-281x250.jpg\" alt=\"First Edition of Emma (1816)\" width=\"281\" height=\"250\" /></a> <span class=\"wp-caption-text\">Front pastedown and first flyleaf of the Burke Collection copy of the American first edition of Emma (1816), with the book plates of the Countess of Dalhousie, Frank J. Hogan, and Alberta H. Burke.</span></div>\r\n\r\nThe inside of the custom-made blue book box is coated with a light perimeter of oil damage. Nancy Magnuson, one of Goucher&rsquo;s librarians and liaisons for the Special Collections, said that Alberta Burke felt so attached to the books and bindings in her collections that she oiled the leather twice a year, far more then necessary. The first volume&rsquo;s brown leather is faded and has been repaired after cracking. On the inside cover are two pasted rectangular cutouts. The first, measuring 3.5cm tall and 8cm wide, reads &ldquo;Countess of Dalhousie&rdquo; in delicate black print. The mysterious figure of the Countess Dalhousie intrigued both David Gilson and Alberta Burke. In a letter dated August 15th 1967 Burke wrote, &ldquo;The Countess of Dalhousie&rsquo;s signature, but no date, is on the title page. I like to think, most romantically, but with no evidence that she purchased it in new york when she was in Canada with her husband who was governor-general there in 1819.&rdquo;\r\n\r\nFive months later Burke and Gilson are still perplexed by the elusive Countess and her involvement with the edition. On January 12th, 1968 she writes to Gilson hoping to answer the questions he&rsquo;d had about the 1816 Philadelphia Emma. She notes that over the first half of the page in volume I there is a note in pencil, &ldquo;not I think in Sasoon&rsquo;s writing, probably in that of Percy (Mathews) who was the agent who arranged the sale from Mr. Sasoon to Mr. Hogan.&rdquo; The note, hand-written in pencil that has faded to the extent of being almost translucent, reads &ldquo;Countess of D- wife to the 9th Earl (1770-1838). Who was Governor of Canada, Nova Scotia, etc 1819-1828- this explains her owning this edition, which was unknown to G. Keynes when he compiled his Bibliography of Jane Austen, 1929.&rdquo;\r\n\r\n<!--nextpage-->\r\nThese pieces of evidence show that after being published by M. Carey in Philadelphia, this edition left Chesnut Street and most likely traveled into the hands of Lady Dalhousie. &ldquo;This copy,&rdquo; Gilson writes in his bibliography of Jane Austen, &ldquo;was in the present century found in Salisbury by Siegfried Sassoon.&rdquo;\r\n\r\nIn the same letter dated August 15th, 1967 in which she writes to Gilson about her romantic notion that the Countess of Dalhousie purchased Emma when visiting New York, she alludes to another letter involving Siegfried Sassoon. &ldquo;You may be amused at a sentence from Siegfried Sassoon&rsquo;s letter to Mr. Percy Elkin Mathews (who arranged the sale of the other 1816 Emma to Mr. Hogan in 1941. G. Keynes will be livid with me, as he wrote saying he must collate it as he wants to write something bout it for the Times Lit Supplement- which is poaching on your preserves, isn&rsquo;t it?&rdquo; She writes specifically to Gilson that, &ldquo; this is not for quotation in any article, but solely for your own pleasure.&rdquo; Alberta Burke must have known this would tickle David Gilson&rsquo;s fancy. Since Gilson first intended to write his bibliography on Jane Austen as a revised edition Geoffrey Keynes&rsquo;s 1929 bibliography, he would understand Muir&rsquo;s frustration with people encroaching on his research topic.\r\n\r\nBetween the letters from Burke and Gilson and the evidence left behind inside Emma, the provenance of this edition is fairly clear. Emma travels from the Philadelphia publisher to the Countess to Siegfried Sassoon. Inside the first volume of the Emma being examined lays a piece of lavender stationary, measuring 17.6cm tall x 13cm wide, folded in half. Opening it reveals that at the top of the stationary is typed &ldquo;Heytesbury House, Wiltshire&rdquo; and at the end of the letter is the minute script signature of Siegfried Sassoon.\r\n\r\nThe letter, addressed to Muir, dated March 12th, 1941 is written in Sassoon&rsquo;s light and witty style. He starts his letter with, &ldquo;Emma returns to you in a twitter of excitement about going to California. She is sure that Mr. F. Hogan is a very nice man, though she intends to be a bit sharp with him until she gets to know him.&rdquo; He then jokes with Muir at the expense of Keynes, writing how &ldquo;G. Keynes will be livid with me, as he wrote saying he must collate it as he wants to write something about it for the Times Lit Supplement- which is poaching on your preserves, isn&rsquo;t it?&rdquo;\r\n\r\nIn 1941 Sassoon sold the edition through Elkin Mathews to Frank J. Hogan (Gilson, 100). Under the Countess of Dalhousie&rsquo;s book label is the red leather label of Frank J. Hogan. Around the name in gold lettering it reads &ldquo;the true university of these days is a collection of books.&rdquo;\r\n\r\nIn addition to the lavender letter from Siegfried Sassoon, two additional correspondences hide between the inside cover and the title page. One letter was written to Mr. Hogan from Mr. Muir relating that the 1816 Philadelphia edition of Emma was on its way. The stationary was that of The Antiquarian Booksellers Association, shown by the stamp on the top right corner. Printed at the top is the name &ldquo;Elkin Mathews LTD&rdquo; followed by the director&rsquo;s names: Greville Worthington, Ian L. Fleming, and P. H. Muir. Underneath the names describes the objects in which these men were interested in: &ldquo;Rare Books, Manuscripts, Literary Portraits, Music.&rdquo;\r\n\r\n<!--nextpage-->\r\nLetters leading to other letters seems to be a theme when following this first American edition of Emma. In the letter to Mr. Hogan from Mr. Muir, Muir writes how he feels it is important that Mr. Hogan also get, along with the copy of Emma, the letter from Mr. Sassoon (the lavender letter found in the first volume.) &ldquo;I think it is only right and proper that you should have with the book the letter that Sassoon sent me when sending the book to me. My own feeling is that one cannot have too much of this kind of thing in association with books.&rdquo; The truth in Muir&rsquo;s statement could not be more paramount as it relates to this particular edition of Emma. Burke and Gilson&rsquo;s letter lead to examining the 1816 Philadelphia edition, which hold the additional correspondences from Sassoon and Muir. Being able to handle and analyze one of the three first American editions is a privilege in itself (Gilson, 100). Yet more than just handling the two volumes, I found the circuit of corresponding materials equally intriguing and helpful to track how the book came from Philadelphia, to the Countess Dalhousie, to Siegfried Sassoon to Frank J. Hogan and finally to Alberta Burke.\r\n\r\nThe last letter found inside the first volume relating to Emma&rsquo;s provenance is from Mr. Muir to Alberta Burke. Muir writes to Alberta on different stationary then when writing to Mr. Hogan, perhaps to add a more personal touch. Typed on yellow paper with the green &ldquo;Elkin Mathews Ltd&rdquo; insignia printed at the top, the letter is typed and dated May 22nd, 1945. Mr. Muir writes that Mr. Hogan purchased the first American 1816 Philadelphia edition for Alberta for only 300 dollars. &ldquo;I congratulate you,&rdquo; he writes, &ldquo;on getting it so cheaply. It is exceedingly rare.&rdquo;\r\n\r\nThe last letter from Alberta Burke to David Gilson is dated February 4th, 1975. After this date the Austen letters continue between Alberta&rsquo;s husband Henry Burke and David Gilson. After Alberta&rsquo;s death on May 22nd, 1975 Goucher&rsquo;s library received her Jane Austen collection. According to Goucher&rsquo;s pamphlet &ldquo;Twenty-Five Years of Jane Austen,&rdquo; Alberta had always intended to donate the collection to Goucher. &ldquo;From the time when my Jane Austen material first began to overflow the one-shelf bounds assigned to it, I have always intended that Goucher should be the ultimate recipient, and I have hoped that, sometime in the future, others would partake of the very great pleasure which they have given me for many years.&rdquo;\r\n\r\nWhen David Gilson in 1982 published A Bibliography of Jane Austen he acknowledged his gratitude to Alberta and Henry Burke. Both Alberta Burke and David Gilson benefited from their letters to one another. Alberta Burke, with her deep seeded love and interest in all things Austen, was able to help David Gilson with his mission to track down Austen texts, study and describe them.\r\n<h5>Works Cited</h5>\r\n<div class=\"footnote\">Gilson, David. <em>A Bibliography of Jane Austen</em>. first. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1982.</div>\r\n<div class=\"footnote\">Austen, Jane. <em>Emma</em>. First. Philadelphia: M.Carey, 1816.</div>\r\n<!--nextpage-->\r\n<h5>Letters From Alberta Burke to David Gilson</h5>\r\n<ul>\r\n	<li>&ldquo;Apartment Stationary&rdquo; 18.8 cm tall x 25.9 cm wide, written section is 18.8cm tall x 13.1 cm wide, folded into four quarters for mailing, black ink, cream paper, red print of &ldquo;Apartment 1318 116 West University Parkway Baltimore, Maryland 21210.&rdquo; Gray and maroon thin stripe border.</li>\r\n	<li>&ldquo;Blue Air Mail&rdquo; 30.5 cm tall x 18.1cm wide, folded into a 9.7cm tall x 14.8cm wide envelope, black ink, written completely on first side and on first fourth and last fourth on other side.</li>\r\n	<li>&ldquo;Gray Apartment Stationary&rdquo; 18.8cm tall x 25.9cm wide, written section is 18.8 cm tall x 13.1 cm wide, folded into four quarters for mailing, black ink, cream paper, gray print of &ldquo;Apartment 1318 116 West University Parkway Baltimore, Maryland 21210.&rdquo; Gray thin stripe border.</li>\r\n	<li>&ldquo;Small Note Card&rdquo; 14cm tall x 8.4cm wide, thicker note-card type cream paper, written only on one side, addressed to &ldquo;Mr. D.J Gilson, J1 Blenheim Drive Oxford OX2 8DL England&rdquo; Airmail! is written above the address in red marker. &ldquo;Burke 1318 Broadview Apts. 116 W. University Parkway Baltimore, Maryland 21210&rdquo; is typed in upper left corner. Written in blue ink.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<strong>August 5, 1967\r\n</strong><em>Apartment Stationary\r\n</em>Tells Mr. Gilson that she has the Frank J. Hogan copy of the 1816 Philadelphia Emma, which formerly belonged to Siegfried Sassoon.\r\n\r\n<strong>August 15, 1967\r\n</strong><em>Apartment Stationary\r\n</em><em>Written in black fountain pen (script writing), fairly uniform line spacing\r\n</em>&ldquo;You may be amused at a sentence from Siegfried Sassoon&rsquo;s letter to Mr. Percy Elkin Mathews (who arranged the sale of the other 1816 Emma to Mr. Hogan in 1941. &ldquo;G. Keynes will be livid with me, as he wrote saying he must collate it as he wants to write something bout it for the Times Lit Supplement&mdash;which is poaching on your preserves, isn&rsquo;t it?&rdquo; This is not for quotation in any article, but solely for your own pleasure.&rdquo;<br /><br />&ldquo;Since my copy of the 1816 Philadelphia Emma…her signature, but no date, is on the title page) I like to think, most romantically, but with no evidence, that she purchased it as a new work when she was in Canada with her husband who was governor-general there in 1819.&rdquo;\r\n\r\n<strong>January 12, 1968\r\n</strong><em>Apartment Stationary\r\n</em>&ldquo;I hope that I can answer your questions about the Philadelphia 1816 Emma satisfactorily. On inside cover of both volumes is a book place or visiting card (I don&rsquo;t know which it is) bearing only the engraved words &ldquo;Coweliers Dalhousie&rdquo;…no device etc. In the first volume at the left and perpendicular to the lives of priutsey on the title pages is the signature &ldquo;Cou C Dalhousie&rdquo; (there is a bit of extra curlicue over the first letter.) However in volume two the signature…is plainly &ldquo;C B Dalhousie&rdquo; over the first preliminary half of volume I here is a note in pencil, not I think in Sassoon&rsquo;s writing, probably in that of Percy (Mathews) who was the agent who arranged the sale from Mr. Sassoon to Mr. Hogan.&rdquo;\r\n\r\n<strong>June 10, 1969\r\n</strong><em>Blue Air Mail\r\n</em>&ldquo;Does Mr. C.B. Hogan&rsquo;s copy of the 1st Am. E [Emma] conform to the Goodspeed, Boolm Cat. No 317, p.4, 1940 description: &ldquo;Three vols. In 2…Published by M. Cary. 21 Chestnut St. ….Boston 1816.&rdquo; I – not sure M. Hogan&rsquo;s article so can&rsquo;t collate my copy until his description of his E of my 1st edition is bound(?)&rdquo;\r\n\r\n<strong>November 18, 1969\r\n</strong><em>Gray Apartment Stationary\r\n</em>&ldquo;I was delighted to know of a 3rd (if imperfect copy of the Philadelphia E turning up. When I first read the description of it in Goodspeeds (I think) 1940 catalogue I thought it was some Bookshop.\r\n#16 went for $1300 to the same buyer\r\n#17 \" \" 550 \" \" \"\r\n#18 $40.00\r\n#19 $35.00\r\n#20 (The companion to the A--) was valued at $1250 00 by the estate and had a reserve price of $550 which was not reached so that the item was withdrawn.&rdquo;\r\n\r\n<strong>March 11, 1973\r\n</strong><em>Small Note Card\r\n</em>&ldquo;In looking for something else, I picked out a letter of Dr. R.W. Chapurace to me dated 13.10.51. In it he says &ldquo;The 1816 Philadelphia Emma was the result of Scott&rsquo;s Quarterly Review, I guess. One day I looked out [the word looks like &ldquo;whatelup&rdquo; but this is impossible!] 2 R 1826 and found that it is of a ‘New Edition&rsquo; N.A+P that lso is unrecorded.&rdquo; I haven&rsquo;t checked further to see if I, or any one else has these listed, and perhaps, I am first causing you unnecessary trouble or being commonly behind the fair.&rdquo;\r\n\r\n<strong>December 16, 1973\r\n</strong><em>Gray Apartment Stationary\r\n</em>&ldquo;The only first in boards which I have which has its labels intact (they match Keynes) is M.P. The E has had the backstrips repaired and the N.A.+P 2 packstrips have crumbled away completely + 2 are very cracked + missing the labels&rdquo;\r\n\r\n<!--nextpage-->\r\n<h5>Letters from Gilson to Henry Burke (after Alberta falls ill)</h5>\r\n<ul>\r\n	<li>&ldquo;Small White Paper&rdquo; 17.9cm tall x 13.7cm wide, blue ink, almost transparent white paper, written on only one side.</li>\r\n	<li>&ldquo;Blue Air Mail&rdquo; 30.5 cm tall x 18.1cm wide, folded into a 9.7cm tall x 14.8cm wide envelope, black ink, written completely on first side and on first fourth and last fourth on other side.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<strong>June 14th, 1975\r\n</strong><em>Blue Air Mail\r\n</em>&ldquo;I see that Sotheby&rsquo;s are selling on 23rd of June &ldquo;an autograph letter by Jane Austen to her publisher commenting on the review of her novel Emma by Sir Walter Scott&rdquo;: presumably RWC 127, marked as ‘original not traced&rsquo;. I suppose the Pierpont Morgan will be bidding for this!&rdquo;\r\n\r\n<strong>August 3rd, 1975\r\n</strong><em>Small White Paper\r\n</em>&ldquo;It would be very kind if you could give me the correct address of Goucher College, and also the name of the librarian whom I should contact with any query relating to Alberta&rsquo;s books (there may be queries over some of the rarer items, especially the 1816 Philadelphia Emma.)&rdquo;\r\n\r\n<strong>October 16th, 1976\r\n</strong><em>Small White Pape</em><em>r\r\n</em><em>Written on both sides.\r\n</em>&ldquo;I spent a very interesting morning on 1st September at John Murray in Albemarte Street; they kindly allowed me to see their ledgers, giving the publication costs and other details of the first editions of Emma and Northanger Abbey and Persuasion.&rdquo;\r\n\r\n<strong>December 26th, 1976\r\n</strong><em>Small White Paper.\r\n</em><em>Written on both sides.\r\n</em>&ldquo;Miss Jones of Goucher College has very kindly sent me-free of charge- an excellent photograph of the title page of Vol.1 of Alberta&rsquo;s copy of the 1816 Philadelphia Emma (my reproduction in the Autumn 1969 Book Collector was from a Xerox of Mr. Hogan&rsquo;s copy; this photograph is much clearer).&rdquo;\r\n\r\n<strong>March 20th, 1977\r\n</strong><em>Small White Paper\r\n</em><em>Written on both sides.\r\n</em>&ldquo;Christie&rsquo;s sold first editions of Emma and of Northanger Abbey and Persuasion on 2nd February- not particularly good copies (from the catalogue descriptions) although with the half-titles in each case; I don&rsquo;t know who bought them, but they fetched 350 pounds and 230 pounds respectively. I have been given an extremely imperfect copy of the first-edition of Emma, consisting only of Vol.1 (lacking the half-title), and Vol.3 (lacking all before p.19.) It clearly has no commercial value, but still seems worth having.&rdquo;\r\n\r\n<!--nextpage-->\r\n<h5>Letters Found Inside First Volume of 1816 Philadelphia <em>Emma</em></h5>\r\n<strong>Letter 1\r\n</strong><em>17.6cm tall x 13cm wide, grayish blue stationary with &ldquo;Heytesbury House, Wiltshire&rdquo; printed on top, dated &ldquo;12a.3.41,&rdquo; hand written in script, black ink.</em>\r\n&ldquo;Dear Muir,\r\n‘Emma&rsquo; returns to you in a twitter of excitement about ‘going to California.&rsquo; She is sure that Mr. F. Hogan is a very nice man though she intends to be a bit sharp with him until she has got to know him.\r\nSeriously- I am greatly obliged to you and --- agree to your 15% etc, and my wish you are making a bit more out of it. (G. Keynes will be livid with me, as he would say, he ---- collate it as he wants to write something about it for the ----- which his --- on your ---, isn&rsquo;t it?) ….\r\nYours, SS (written on top of each other)\r\n\r\n<div id=\"attachment_1316\" align=\"wp_caption alignnone\" style=\"width:250px\"><a href=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/goucher_student-work-image3_kendall.jpg\"><img class=\"size-medium wp-image-1316\" title=\"goucher_student work image3_kendall\" src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/goucher_student-work-image3_kendall-186x250.jpg\" alt=\"Siegfried Sassoon\'s letter to Percy Muir\" width=\"186\" height=\"250\" /></a> <span class=\"wp-caption-text\">Siegfried Sassoon\'s letter to Percy Muir, antiquarian book dealer, regarding Sassoon\'s sale of the American first edition of <em>Emma</em> (1816) to Frank J. Hogan (dated December 3, 1941). The letter was discovered inside the front cover of the Burke Collection copy.</span></div>\r\n\r\n<strong>Letter 2</strong>\r\n<em>&ldquo;Antiquarian Booksellers Association&rdquo; stamp on top left, written March 18, 1941 and received April 17, 1941 (received date written in pencil on top right corner,) stationary is of &ldquo;Elkin Mathews LTD. Directors: Greville Worthington, Ian L. Fleming, and P.H. Muir,&rdquo; underneath is typed &ldquo;Rare Books, Manuscripts, Literary Portraits, Music.&rdquo;</em>\r\n&ldquo;Dear Mr. Hogan,\r\nThis is just a brief note formally to announce the fact that &ldquo;Emma&rdquo; left here today on her long journey to California. I think it only right and proper that you should have with the book the letter that Sassoon sent me when sending the book to me. My own feeling is that one cannot have too much of this kind of thing in association with books. I think Siegfried Sassoon a great writer and I would be glad to have this letter myself were I buying one of his books, and I have the feeling that you may think that way, too, so I enclose the letter. He was a great friend and admirer of Charlotte Mew&rsquo;s, by the way, which may help to endear him to you.\r\nWith every good wish and kind regards,\r\nYours very sincerely,\r\nP. H. MuirHand\r\nwritten note (in same green ink as Muir&rsquo;s signature) written below signature of &ldquo;P.H Muir&rdquo;:\r\n&ldquo;Note the date on SS&rsquo;s letter, evidently written on 131h&rdquo;\r\n\r\n<strong>Letter 3</strong>\r\n<em>Yellow paper, green &ldquo;Elkin Mathews Ltd,&rdquo; dated May 22, 1945, typed in faded black ink.</em>\r\n&ldquo;Dear Mrs. Burke,\r\nThank you very much indeed for your letter of May 6th. I congratulate you on getting the &ldquo;Emma&rdquo; so cheaply. It is exceedingly rare and Mr. Hogan as very glad to pay 300 dollars for it. I mention the price in dollars because at the time he bought it the 1-pound was below par and fluctuating, so that the price was actually quoted in dollars. I say that the price was set by Mr. Sassoon and not by me, but I saw no reason at the time to take exception to it.\r\nI always have you in mind for any interesting Jane Austen items, which turn up.\r\nYours very sincerely,\r\nP.H. Muir (signed in green ink)\r\n\r\n<!--nextpage-->\r\n<h5>Emma (1st Edition Philadelphia 1816)</h5>\r\n18.3cm tall x 11.1cm (cover)\r\n\r\n<em>Inside Cover</em>\r\ncut and pasted paper of: COUNTESS OF DALHOUSIE, below: maroon and gold sticker of: Ex Libris Frank J. Hogan (around name says: the true university of these days is a collection of books&rdquo;\r\n\r\n<em>Next Page</em>\r\nwritten by hand in faded pencil: &rdquo;Countess of d.- wife of the 9th Earl (1770-1838). Who was Governor of Canada, Nova Scotia, etc. 1819-1828- This explains her owning this edition, which was unknown to G. Keynes when he compiled his Bibliography of Jane Austen, 1929.&rdquo;\r\nunder this is the paper square for the &ldquo;Alberta H. Burke&rdquo;\r\n\r\n<div id=\"attachment_1314\" align=\"alignnone\" stlye=\"width:147px\"><a href=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/goucher_student-work-image1_kendall.jpg\"><img src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/goucher_student-work-image1_kendall-147x250.jpg\" alt=\"American first edition of Jane Austen&#039;s Emma\" title=\"goucher_student work image1_kendall\" width=\"147\" height=\"250\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-1314\" /></a> <span class=\"wp-caption-text\">Title page of the Burke Collection copy of the American first edition of Jane Austen\'s <em>Emma</em> (1816).</span></div>\r\n\r\n<em>Title Page</em>\r\nEMMA:\r\nA Novel\r\nHere Volumes in Two\r\n(written on side, vertically: A.B. Dallhousie)\r\nBy the Author of &ldquo;Pride and Prejudice,&rdquo;\r\n&amp;c. &amp;c.\r\nVol. 1\r\nPHILADELPHIA:\r\nPublished by M.Carey, No. 121 Chesnut Street\r\nAnd for Sale by Wells &amp; Lilly, Boston\r\n1816\r\n\r\n<em>Next Page</em>\r\nTo his Royal Highness\r\nThe Prince Regent, This Work Is, By his Royal Highness&rsquo;s Permission, Most Respectfully Dedicated, By His Royal Highness&rsquo;s Dutiful and Obedient Humble Servant, The Author.&rdquo;\r\n\r\n<em>First Page of Text</em>\r\n18cm tall x 9.8cm wide\r\nA2 at bottom of first page – 8 pages later is &ldquo;B&rdquo; (vol.1), 4 pages later &ldquo;B2&rdquo;, 8 pages later &ldquo;C&rdquo; (vol.1.), 4 pages later &ldquo;C2&rdquo;, 8 pages later &ldquo;D&rdquo; (vol.1)\r\naverage full page text block: 12.5cm tall x 7.4cm wide\r\n\r\n<!--nextpage-->\r\n<h5>Letters Found Inside Second Volume</h5>\r\n<strong>Letter 1</strong>\r\n<em>21.5cm tall x13.9cm wide, typed: &ldquo;Charles Sessler Inc.&rdquo; Established 1882, Bookseller and Printseller 1308 Walnut Street Philadelphia, PA. 19107&rdquo; stationary</em>\r\n<em> dated April 24, 1967</em>\r\n&ldquo;Dear Mr. Burke:\r\nIn 1945 we purchased in New York at the sale of the Frank J. Hogan Library, item No. 7, a copy of EMMA, printed in Philadelphia by Carey in 1816.\r\nDo you still have this book and would you be willing to part with it?&rdquo;\r\nYours Sincerely,\r\nMabel Zahn (signed in ink)\r\nZ.T. in bottom left corner, typed (?)\r\n\r\n<strong>Letter 2</strong>\r\n<em>Typed, same stationary as letter 1</em>\r\n<em> dated May 3, 1967</em>\r\n&ldquo;Dear Mr. Burke:\r\nThank you so much for your letter of May 1st.\r\nI am glad that you still have the copy of EMMA. Our inquiry was for a bibliographic purpose. Someone who is working on the bibliography has asked us about the copy we sold you and naturally we followed through for him.\r\nWith best wishes,\r\nYours Sincerely,\r\nMabel Zahn\r\n-Z.T. in bottom left corner, typed (?)','How Emma Travels: by letters, hands and libraries','Behind a low glass case in Goucher’s Special Collection Room sits a humble blue book box that holds the first American edition of Jane Austen’s Emma. Valued from nineteen to seventy-five thousand dollars on ABEBooks.com, the edition is unquestionably valuable. But how did this extremely rare copy end up in Goucher’s modest library? In a letter to David Gilson on August 5th, 1967 Alberta Burke revealed that she owned a copy of the 1816 Philadelphia Emma, which formerly belonged to Siegfried Sassoon. The two corresponded from 1967 to 1975 until Alberta fell ill. Throughout this time a steady thread of conversation exists about the Philadelphia Emma.\r\n\r\nAfter seeing the interest that both Alberta Burke and David Gilson had in the first American edition of Emma, perusing the pages and studying the tome in detail was essential to discover first hand the majesty of the volumes.','inherit','open','open','','1300-revision-60','','','2012-09-25 00:43:38','2012-09-25 00:43:38','',1300,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/1300-revision-60/',0,'revision','',0),(2503,19,'2012-07-27 10:14:50','2012-07-27 10:14:50','<div id=\"map3d_dowdle\"></div>\r\n<div class=\"small light\">Installed Plugin Version: <span id=\"installed-plugin-version\" style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Loading...</span></div>','Walters - Amazon Dowdle Live','','inherit','open','open','','1209-revision-16','','','2012-07-27 10:14:50','2012-07-27 10:14:50','',1209,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/1209-revision-16/',0,'revision','',0),(2504,19,'2012-07-27 10:15:49','2012-07-27 10:15:49','<div id=\"map3d_tkacs\"></div>\r\n<div class=\"small light\">Installed Plugin Version: <span id=\"installed-plugin-version\" style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Loading...</span></div>','Walters - Romances Casket Tkacs Live','','inherit','open','open','','1205-revision-18','','','2012-07-27 10:15:49','2012-07-27 10:15:49','',1205,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/1205-revision-18/',0,'revision','',0),(2505,19,'2012-09-21 03:49:28','2012-09-21 03:49:28','<img class=\"size-full wp-image-1193\" title=\"walters_student action photo_tkacs\" src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/walters_student-action-photo_tkacs.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"640\" height=\"426\" /><span class=\"caption>Joan Tkcas (on far right, in brown) and Casket with Scenes of Romances, ivory and bone with modern iron mounts (French, 1330-1350).</caption>\r\n\r\n<strong>1. Describe the sorts of work you did in developing your Google Earth presentation on this object. (You might consider both the unique forms of research involved and modes/methods of interpretation.)</strong>\r\n\r\nI researched two objects for this project, a painted tile and an ivory casket. The Walters Art Museum had a thorough record of the objects’ provenances, so the bulk of my time was spent uncovering details about the lives and tastes of their previous owners. It was important to me to understand why they found the objects interesting enough to purchase. If the owners were art collectors, I tried finding other objects in their collections to get a sense of their taste. From there, it was a matter of organizing the object’s history into a simple and compelling narrative.\r\n\r\n<strong>2. What did you learn from this project that distinguished it from other academic courses?</strong>\r\n\r\nThe credit line that you see on the typical museum label does not do justice to the histories of these objects. For example, the ivory casket I researched was made in the fourteenth century and was probably meant to function as a jewelry box, but one of its later owners took the individual panels of the case apart and framed them. He was looking at the casket in a completely different way than we do now. I did not know this before I started the project, and the research gave me a new appreciation for just how dynamic these objects are.\r\n\r\n<strong>3. What was it like to be creating a final project that would be presented to the public?</strong>\r\n\r\nThe Google Earth project was a lesson in learning how to write concisely. After spending a semester researching the history of a given object, the temptation is to then write a long-winded report on all that you had discovered. But very few people would be interested in reading something like that, I think. It is a bit harder to boil down everything you have learned into a punchy and informative presentation.\r\n\r\n<strong>4. What did you learn from working in a professional museum and in conjunction with its staff?</strong>\r\n\r\nThe Walters’ staff was incredibly giving of their time. We met with Gary Vikan, the museum director, Robert Mintz, the curator of Asian art, and William Noel, the curator of manuscripts. We got to look at the museum’s storage, and learned about what art museums take into consideration when accessioning works of art. What I remember best was getting to meet with Amanda Kodeck, a member of the museum’s education department, and getting feedback on what we had written for the project. That kind of collaboration was incredibly helpful.\r\n\r\n<strong>5. What did this course/project and the opportunity to work with museum objects and their archival records mean to your education? your future plans? your general interests?</strong>\r\n\r\nThe Google Earth project was a first for me. In other classes I may have had to research a single object for a paper, but I had never focused solely on an object’s provenance. This project proved to be a very worthwhile experience for me. Right now I am an intern at the Georgia Museum of Art and I spend a lot of my time working with the archival materials of the museum’s Pierre Daura Study Center. I do not know if I would have had this opportunity without my experience working on the Google Earth project at the Walters.','Joan Tkacs - Commentary','I researched two objects for this project, a painted tile and an ivory casket. The Walters Art Museum had a thorough record of the objects’ provenances, so the bulk of my time was spent uncovering details about the lives and tastes of their previous owners. It was important to me to understand why they found the objects interesting enough to purchase. If the owners were art collectors, I tried finding other objects in their collections to get a sense of their taste. From there, it was a matter of organizing the object’s history into a simple and compelling narrative.','inherit','open','open','','1126-revision-10','','','2012-09-21 03:49:28','2012-09-21 03:49:28','',1126,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/1126-revision-10/',0,'revision','',0),(2506,19,'2012-08-28 05:18:22','2012-08-28 05:18:22','<div><em><img class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-1223\" title=\"szerba\" src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/szerba.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"120\" height=\"160\" />Sczerba worked closely with the course instructors, Elizabeth Rodini and Ben Tilghman, to develop and refine the Google Earth tools and to train students in building tours.</em></div>\r\n<strong>1. Describe your role in this project. </strong>\r\nI work for a faculty support center at Johns Hopkins University called the Center for Educational Resources (CER). As the center’s multimedia developer, I aided Elizabeth Rodini and Ben Tilghman with the technical and logistical aspects of the project. This included determining a viable technology for the project tours and developing resource guides that aided students’ tour creation.\r\n\r\n<strong>2. What tasks did you perform at various stages of the project?</strong>\r\nInitially we had to find a program that would be available freely (both in access and cost) for students to use with a relatively low learning curve. We selected Google Earth because it allows tour creation with rich media and text mapped to the earth, and it is free to download on PCs and Macs. I then created a template tour, set up with pre-made placemarks as a starting point for the students, and content layout templates for the appearance of the tour’s placemarks. After those two resources were set, I needed to create a well-written and comprehensible workflow. I chose to create both a visual and textual workflow to clearly express what actions needed to happen and at what stages. The final step was to present this workflow to the students in a training workshop so that they could see how it all came together and do it themselves.\r\n\r\n<strong>3. What sorts of interactions did you have with faculty, students, and other members of the project community over the course of the project?</strong>\r\nI met with Elizabeth Rodini and Ben Tilghman initially to gather the project’s requirements, then later to introduce them to the proposed solution. One of my colleagues from the CER also joined these meetings to offer ideas. I was also available by e-mail to answer questions as they came up, especially during the process of approving the workflow, as it needed to be as simple as possible to follow. I also held a training workshop for the students with Professor Rodini. I continued to be available for questions by e-mail as the students worked on their projects.\r\n\r\n<strong>4. What particular challenges did this project present?</strong>\r\nThis project required that every placemark on a tour include images at that location. The only way to do this in Google Earth was to code it yourself. Certain aspects of using Google Earth were easy to master, but customizing the appearance of the placemarks requires HTML programming knowledge. Despite the fact that most students nowadays have grown up with the Internet, we have found that very few know how to use HTML. Our solution utilized an online HTML editor that had a prebuilt HTML template loaded in it. When the students were ready to create the content for their placemarks, they simply copied the content from a Word document and then pasted it in the HTML editor to generate the code. The students pasted that code into their Google Earth placemark, circumventing the need for them to learn HTML.\r\n\r\n<strong>5. What lessons did you learn from this project and what might you do differently in the future? </strong>\r\nA more ideal solution may have been to create an application that would generate the tours without using Google Earth. This would have taken more time and resources to build than we had, but it could have been a useful application for other courses as well. It was disappointing to realize that Google Earth did not have an HMTL editor built in, and that there was no application that could suit our needs at the time. Perhaps when this course is offered again, there will be an ideal solution available to allow students to create tours and focus on the content rather than the technology. If not, then perhaps we will have the time to build one ourselves and share it.','Reid Sczerba - Commentary','I work for a faculty support center at Johns Hopkins University called the Center for Educational Resources (CER). As the center’s multimedia developer, I aided Elizabeth Rodini and Ben Tilghman with the technical and logistical aspects of the project. This included determining a viable technology for the project tours and developing resource guides that aided students’ tour creation.','inherit','open','open','','1123-revision-15','','','2012-08-28 05:18:22','2012-08-28 05:18:22','',1123,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/1123-revision-15/',0,'revision','',0),(2507,19,'2012-09-25 04:22:01','2012-09-25 04:22:01','Behind a low glass case in Goucher&rsquo;s Special Collection Room sits a humble blue book box that holds the first American edition of Jane Austen&rsquo;s <em>Emma</em>. Valued from nineteen to seventy-five thousand dollars on ABEBooks.com, the edition is unquestionably valuable. But how did this extremely rare copy end up in Goucher&rsquo;s modest library? In a letter to David Gilson on August 5th, 1967 Alberta Burke revealed that she owned a copy of the 1816 Philadelphia Emma, which formerly belonged to Siegfried Sassoon. The two corresponded from 1967 to 1975 until Alberta fell ill. Throughout this time a steady thread of conversation exists about the Philadelphia Emma.\r\n\r\nAfter seeing the interest that both Alberta Burke and David Gilson had in the first American edition of Emma, perusing the pages and studying the tome in detail was essential to discover first hand the majesty of the volumes.\r\n\r\n<div id=\"attachment_1319\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\" style=\"width:281px\"><a href=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/goucher_student-work-image2_kendall.jpg\"><img class=\"size-medium wp-image-1319  \" title=\"goucher_student work image2_kendall\" src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/goucher_student-work-image2_kendall-281x250.jpg\" alt=\"First Edition of Emma (1816)\" width=\"281\" height=\"250\" /></a> <span class=\"wp-caption-text\">Front pastedown and first flyleaf of the Burke Collection copy of the American first edition of Emma (1816), with the book plates of the Countess of Dalhousie, Frank J. Hogan, and Alberta H. Burke.</span></div>\r\n\r\nThe inside of the custom-made blue book box is coated with a light perimeter of oil damage. Nancy Magnuson, one of Goucher&rsquo;s librarians and liaisons for the Special Collections, said that Alberta Burke felt so attached to the books and bindings in her collections that she oiled the leather twice a year, far more then necessary. The first volume&rsquo;s brown leather is faded and has been repaired after cracking. On the inside cover are two pasted rectangular cutouts. The first, measuring 3.5cm tall and 8cm wide, reads &ldquo;Countess of Dalhousie&rdquo; in delicate black print. The mysterious figure of the Countess Dalhousie intrigued both David Gilson and Alberta Burke. In a letter dated August 15th 1967 Burke wrote, &ldquo;The Countess of Dalhousie&rsquo;s signature, but no date, is on the title page. I like to think, most romantically, but with no evidence that she purchased it in new york when she was in Canada with her husband who was governor-general there in 1819.&rdquo;\r\n\r\nFive months later Burke and Gilson are still perplexed by the elusive Countess and her involvement with the edition. On January 12th, 1968 she writes to Gilson hoping to answer the questions he&rsquo;d had about the 1816 Philadelphia Emma. She notes that over the first half of the page in volume I there is a note in pencil, &ldquo;not I think in Sasoon&rsquo;s writing, probably in that of Percy (Mathews) who was the agent who arranged the sale from Mr. Sasoon to Mr. Hogan.&rdquo; The note, hand-written in pencil that has faded to the extent of being almost translucent, reads &ldquo;Countess of D- wife to the 9th Earl (1770-1838). Who was Governor of Canada, Nova Scotia, etc 1819-1828- this explains her owning this edition, which was unknown to G. Keynes when he compiled his Bibliography of Jane Austen, 1929.&rdquo;\r\n\r\n<!--nextpage-->\r\nThese pieces of evidence show that after being published by M. Carey in Philadelphia, this edition left Chesnut Street and most likely traveled into the hands of Lady Dalhousie. &ldquo;This copy,&rdquo; Gilson writes in his bibliography of Jane Austen, &ldquo;was in the present century found in Salisbury by Siegfried Sassoon.&rdquo;\r\n\r\nIn the same letter dated August 15th, 1967 in which she writes to Gilson about her romantic notion that the Countess of Dalhousie purchased Emma when visiting New York, she alludes to another letter involving Siegfried Sassoon. &ldquo;You may be amused at a sentence from Siegfried Sassoon&rsquo;s letter to Mr. Percy Elkin Mathews (who arranged the sale of the other 1816 Emma to Mr. Hogan in 1941. G. Keynes will be livid with me, as he wrote saying he must collate it as he wants to write something bout it for the Times Lit Supplement- which is poaching on your preserves, isn&rsquo;t it?&rdquo; She writes specifically to Gilson that, &ldquo; this is not for quotation in any article, but solely for your own pleasure.&rdquo; Alberta Burke must have known this would tickle David Gilson&rsquo;s fancy. Since Gilson first intended to write his bibliography on Jane Austen as a revised edition Geoffrey Keynes&rsquo;s 1929 bibliography, he would understand Muir&rsquo;s frustration with people encroaching on his research topic.\r\n\r\nBetween the letters from Burke and Gilson and the evidence left behind inside Emma, the provenance of this edition is fairly clear. Emma travels from the Philadelphia publisher to the Countess to Siegfried Sassoon. Inside the first volume of the Emma being examined lays a piece of lavender stationary, measuring 17.6cm tall x 13cm wide, folded in half. Opening it reveals that at the top of the stationary is typed &ldquo;Heytesbury House, Wiltshire&rdquo; and at the end of the letter is the minute script signature of Siegfried Sassoon.\r\n\r\nThe letter, addressed to Muir, dated March 12th, 1941 is written in Sassoon&rsquo;s light and witty style. He starts his letter with, &ldquo;Emma returns to you in a twitter of excitement about going to California. She is sure that Mr. F. Hogan is a very nice man, though she intends to be a bit sharp with him until she gets to know him.&rdquo; He then jokes with Muir at the expense of Keynes, writing how &ldquo;G. Keynes will be livid with me, as he wrote saying he must collate it as he wants to write something about it for the Times Lit Supplement- which is poaching on your preserves, isn&rsquo;t it?&rdquo;\r\n\r\nIn 1941 Sassoon sold the edition through Elkin Mathews to Frank J. Hogan (Gilson, 100). Under the Countess of Dalhousie&rsquo;s book label is the red leather label of Frank J. Hogan. Around the name in gold lettering it reads &ldquo;the true university of these days is a collection of books.&rdquo;\r\n\r\nIn addition to the lavender letter from Siegfried Sassoon, two additional correspondences hide between the inside cover and the title page. One letter was written to Mr. Hogan from Mr. Muir relating that the 1816 Philadelphia edition of Emma was on its way. The stationary was that of The Antiquarian Booksellers Association, shown by the stamp on the top right corner. Printed at the top is the name &ldquo;Elkin Mathews LTD&rdquo; followed by the director&rsquo;s names: Greville Worthington, Ian L. Fleming, and P. H. Muir. Underneath the names describes the objects in which these men were interested in: &ldquo;Rare Books, Manuscripts, Literary Portraits, Music.&rdquo;\r\n\r\n<!--nextpage-->\r\nLetters leading to other letters seems to be a theme when following this first American edition of Emma. In the letter to Mr. Hogan from Mr. Muir, Muir writes how he feels it is important that Mr. Hogan also get, along with the copy of Emma, the letter from Mr. Sassoon (the lavender letter found in the first volume.) &ldquo;I think it is only right and proper that you should have with the book the letter that Sassoon sent me when sending the book to me. My own feeling is that one cannot have too much of this kind of thing in association with books.&rdquo; The truth in Muir&rsquo;s statement could not be more paramount as it relates to this particular edition of Emma. Burke and Gilson&rsquo;s letter lead to examining the 1816 Philadelphia edition, which hold the additional correspondences from Sassoon and Muir. Being able to handle and analyze one of the three first American editions is a privilege in itself (Gilson, 100). Yet more than just handling the two volumes, I found the circuit of corresponding materials equally intriguing and helpful to track how the book came from Philadelphia, to the Countess Dalhousie, to Siegfried Sassoon to Frank J. Hogan and finally to Alberta Burke.\r\n\r\nThe last letter found inside the first volume relating to Emma&rsquo;s provenance is from Mr. Muir to Alberta Burke. Muir writes to Alberta on different stationary then when writing to Mr. Hogan, perhaps to add a more personal touch. Typed on yellow paper with the green &ldquo;Elkin Mathews Ltd&rdquo; insignia printed at the top, the letter is typed and dated May 22nd, 1945. Mr. Muir writes that Mr. Hogan purchased the first American 1816 Philadelphia edition for Alberta for only 300 dollars. &ldquo;I congratulate you,&rdquo; he writes, &ldquo;on getting it so cheaply. It is exceedingly rare.&rdquo;\r\n\r\nThe last letter from Alberta Burke to David Gilson is dated February 4th, 1975. After this date the Austen letters continue between Alberta&rsquo;s husband Henry Burke and David Gilson. After Alberta&rsquo;s death on May 22nd, 1975 Goucher&rsquo;s library received her Jane Austen collection. According to Goucher&rsquo;s pamphlet &ldquo;Twenty-Five Years of Jane Austen,&rdquo; Alberta had always intended to donate the collection to Goucher. &ldquo;From the time when my Jane Austen material first began to overflow the one-shelf bounds assigned to it, I have always intended that Goucher should be the ultimate recipient, and I have hoped that, sometime in the future, others would partake of the very great pleasure which they have given me for many years.&rdquo;\r\n\r\nWhen David Gilson in 1982 published A Bibliography of Jane Austen he acknowledged his gratitude to Alberta and Henry Burke. Both Alberta Burke and David Gilson benefited from their letters to one another. Alberta Burke, with her deep seeded love and interest in all things Austen, was able to help David Gilson with his mission to track down Austen texts, study and describe them.\r\n<h5>Works Cited</h5>\r\n<div class=\"footnote\">Gilson, David. <em>A Bibliography of Jane Austen</em>. first. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1982.</div>\r\n<div class=\"footnote\">Austen, Jane. <em>Emma</em>. First. Philadelphia: M.Carey, 1816.</div>\r\n<!--nextpage-->\r\n<h5>Letters From Alberta Burke to David Gilson</h5>\r\n<ul>\r\n	<li>&ldquo;Apartment Stationary&rdquo; 18.8 cm tall x 25.9 cm wide, written section is 18.8cm tall x 13.1 cm wide, folded into four quarters for mailing, black ink, cream paper, red print of &ldquo;Apartment 1318 116 West University Parkway Baltimore, Maryland 21210.&rdquo; Gray and maroon thin stripe border.</li>\r\n	<li>&ldquo;Blue Air Mail&rdquo; 30.5 cm tall x 18.1cm wide, folded into a 9.7cm tall x 14.8cm wide envelope, black ink, written completely on first side and on first fourth and last fourth on other side.</li>\r\n	<li>&ldquo;Gray Apartment Stationary&rdquo; 18.8cm tall x 25.9cm wide, written section is 18.8 cm tall x 13.1 cm wide, folded into four quarters for mailing, black ink, cream paper, gray print of &ldquo;Apartment 1318 116 West University Parkway Baltimore, Maryland 21210.&rdquo; Gray thin stripe border.</li>\r\n	<li>&ldquo;Small Note Card&rdquo; 14cm tall x 8.4cm wide, thicker note-card type cream paper, written only on one side, addressed to &ldquo;Mr. D.J Gilson, J1 Blenheim Drive Oxford OX2 8DL England&rdquo; Airmail! is written above the address in red marker. &ldquo;Burke 1318 Broadview Apts. 116 W. University Parkway Baltimore, Maryland 21210&rdquo; is typed in upper left corner. Written in blue ink.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<strong>August 5, 1967\r\n</strong><em>Apartment Stationary\r\n</em>Tells Mr. Gilson that she has the Frank J. Hogan copy of the 1816 Philadelphia Emma, which formerly belonged to Siegfried Sassoon.\r\n\r\n<strong>August 15, 1967\r\n</strong><em>Apartment Stationary\r\n</em><em>Written in black fountain pen (script writing), fairly uniform line spacing\r\n</em>&ldquo;You may be amused at a sentence from Siegfried Sassoon&rsquo;s letter to Mr. Percy Elkin Mathews (who arranged the sale of the other 1816 Emma to Mr. Hogan in 1941. &ldquo;G. Keynes will be livid with me, as he wrote saying he must collate it as he wants to write something bout it for the Times Lit Supplement&mdash;which is poaching on your preserves, isn&rsquo;t it?&rdquo; This is not for quotation in any article, but solely for your own pleasure.&rdquo;<br /><br />&ldquo;Since my copy of the 1816 Philadelphia Emma…her signature, but no date, is on the title page) I like to think, most romantically, but with no evidence, that she purchased it as a new work when she was in Canada with her husband who was governor-general there in 1819.&rdquo;\r\n\r\n<strong>January 12, 1968\r\n</strong><em>Apartment Stationary\r\n</em>&ldquo;I hope that I can answer your questions about the Philadelphia 1816 Emma satisfactorily. On inside cover of both volumes is a book place or visiting card (I don&rsquo;t know which it is) bearing only the engraved words &ldquo;Coweliers Dalhousie&rdquo;…no device etc. In the first volume at the left and perpendicular to the lives of priutsey on the title pages is the signature &ldquo;Cou C Dalhousie&rdquo; (there is a bit of extra curlicue over the first letter.) However in volume two the signature…is plainly &ldquo;C B Dalhousie&rdquo; over the first preliminary half of volume I here is a note in pencil, not I think in Sassoon&rsquo;s writing, probably in that of Percy (Mathews) who was the agent who arranged the sale from Mr. Sassoon to Mr. Hogan.&rdquo;\r\n\r\n<strong>June 10, 1969\r\n</strong><em>Blue Air Mail\r\n</em>&ldquo;Does Mr. C.B. Hogan&rsquo;s copy of the 1st Am. E [Emma] conform to the Goodspeed, Boolm Cat. No 317, p.4, 1940 description: &ldquo;Three vols. In 2…Published by M. Cary. 21 Chestnut St. ….Boston 1816.&rdquo; I – not sure M. Hogan&rsquo;s article so can&rsquo;t collate my copy until his description of his E of my 1st edition is bound(?)&rdquo;\r\n\r\n<strong>November 18, 1969\r\n</strong><em>Gray Apartment Stationary\r\n</em>&ldquo;I was delighted to know of a 3rd (if imperfect copy of the Philadelphia E turning up. When I first read the description of it in Goodspeeds (I think) 1940 catalogue I thought it was some Bookshop.\r\n#16 went for $1300 to the same buyer\r\n#17 \" \" 550 \" \" \"\r\n#18 $40.00\r\n#19 $35.00\r\n#20 (The companion to the A--) was valued at $1250 00 by the estate and had a reserve price of $550 which was not reached so that the item was withdrawn.&rdquo;\r\n\r\n<strong>March 11, 1973\r\n</strong><em>Small Note Card\r\n</em>&ldquo;In looking for something else, I picked out a letter of Dr. R.W. Chapurace to me dated 13.10.51. In it he says &ldquo;The 1816 Philadelphia Emma was the result of Scott&rsquo;s Quarterly Review, I guess. One day I looked out [the word looks like &ldquo;whatelup&rdquo; but this is impossible!] 2 R 1826 and found that it is of a ‘New Edition&rsquo; N.A+P that lso is unrecorded.&rdquo; I haven&rsquo;t checked further to see if I, or any one else has these listed, and perhaps, I am first causing you unnecessary trouble or being commonly behind the fair.&rdquo;\r\n\r\n<strong>December 16, 1973\r\n</strong><em>Gray Apartment Stationary\r\n</em>&ldquo;The only first in boards which I have which has its labels intact (they match Keynes) is M.P. The E has had the backstrips repaired and the N.A.+P 2 packstrips have crumbled away completely + 2 are very cracked + missing the labels&rdquo;\r\n\r\n<!--nextpage-->\r\n<h5>Letters from Gilson to Henry Burke (after Alberta falls ill)</h5>\r\n<ul>\r\n	<li>&ldquo;Small White Paper&rdquo; 17.9cm tall x 13.7cm wide, blue ink, almost transparent white paper, written on only one side.</li>\r\n	<li>&ldquo;Blue Air Mail&rdquo; 30.5 cm tall x 18.1cm wide, folded into a 9.7cm tall x 14.8cm wide envelope, black ink, written completely on first side and on first fourth and last fourth on other side.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<strong>June 14th, 1975\r\n</strong><em>Blue Air Mail\r\n</em>&ldquo;I see that Sotheby&rsquo;s are selling on 23rd of June &ldquo;an autograph letter by Jane Austen to her publisher commenting on the review of her novel Emma by Sir Walter Scott&rdquo;: presumably RWC 127, marked as ‘original not traced&rsquo;. I suppose the Pierpont Morgan will be bidding for this!&rdquo;\r\n\r\n<strong>August 3rd, 1975\r\n</strong><em>Small White Paper\r\n</em>&ldquo;It would be very kind if you could give me the correct address of Goucher College, and also the name of the librarian whom I should contact with any query relating to Alberta&rsquo;s books (there may be queries over some of the rarer items, especially the 1816 Philadelphia Emma.)&rdquo;\r\n\r\n<strong>October 16th, 1976\r\n</strong><em>Small White Pape</em><em>r\r\n</em><em>Written on both sides.\r\n</em>&ldquo;I spent a very interesting morning on 1st September at John Murray in Albemarte Street; they kindly allowed me to see their ledgers, giving the publication costs and other details of the first editions of Emma and Northanger Abbey and Persuasion.&rdquo;\r\n\r\n<strong>December 26th, 1976\r\n</strong><em>Small White Paper.\r\n</em><em>Written on both sides.\r\n</em>&ldquo;Miss Jones of Goucher College has very kindly sent me-free of charge- an excellent photograph of the title page of Vol.1 of Alberta&rsquo;s copy of the 1816 Philadelphia Emma (my reproduction in the Autumn 1969 Book Collector was from a Xerox of Mr. Hogan&rsquo;s copy; this photograph is much clearer).&rdquo;\r\n\r\n<strong>March 20th, 1977\r\n</strong><em>Small White Paper\r\n</em><em>Written on both sides.\r\n</em>&ldquo;Christie&rsquo;s sold first editions of Emma and of Northanger Abbey and Persuasion on 2nd February- not particularly good copies (from the catalogue descriptions) although with the half-titles in each case; I don&rsquo;t know who bought them, but they fetched 350 pounds and 230 pounds respectively. I have been given an extremely imperfect copy of the first-edition of Emma, consisting only of Vol.1 (lacking the half-title), and Vol.3 (lacking all before p.19.) It clearly has no commercial value, but still seems worth having.&rdquo;\r\n\r\n<!--nextpage-->\r\n<h5>Letters Found Inside First Volume of 1816 Philadelphia <em>Emma</em></h5>\r\n<strong>Letter 1\r\n</strong><em>17.6cm tall x 13cm wide, grayish blue stationary with &ldquo;Heytesbury House, Wiltshire&rdquo; printed on top, dated &ldquo;12a.3.41,&rdquo; hand written in script, black ink.</em>\r\n&ldquo;Dear Muir,\r\n‘Emma&rsquo; returns to you in a twitter of excitement about ‘going to California.&rsquo; She is sure that Mr. F. Hogan is a very nice man though she intends to be a bit sharp with him until she has got to know him.\r\nSeriously- I am greatly obliged to you and --- agree to your 15% etc, and my wish you are making a bit more out of it. (G. Keynes will be livid with me, as he would say, he ---- collate it as he wants to write something about it for the ----- which his --- on your ---, isn&rsquo;t it?) ….\r\nYours, SS (written on top of each other)\r\n\r\n<div id=\"attachment_1316\" align=\"wp_caption alignnone\" style=\"width:250px\"><a href=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/goucher_student-work-image3_kendall.jpg\"><img class=\"size-medium wp-image-1316\" title=\"goucher_student work image3_kendall\" src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/goucher_student-work-image3_kendall-186x250.jpg\" alt=\"Siegfried Sassoon\'s letter to Percy Muir\" width=\"186\" height=\"250\" /></a> <span class=\"wp-caption-text\">Siegfried Sassoon\'s letter to Percy Muir, antiquarian book dealer, regarding Sassoon\'s sale of the American first edition of <em>Emma</em> (1816) to Frank J. Hogan (dated December 3, 1941). The letter was discovered inside the front cover of the Burke Collection copy.</span></div>\r\n\r\n<strong>Letter 2</strong>\r\n<em>&ldquo;Antiquarian Booksellers Association&rdquo; stamp on top left, written March 18, 1941 and received April 17, 1941 (received date written in pencil on top right corner,) stationary is of &ldquo;Elkin Mathews LTD. Directors: Greville Worthington, Ian L. Fleming, and P.H. Muir,&rdquo; underneath is typed &ldquo;Rare Books, Manuscripts, Literary Portraits, Music.&rdquo;</em>\r\n&ldquo;Dear Mr. Hogan,\r\nThis is just a brief note formally to announce the fact that &ldquo;Emma&rdquo; left here today on her long journey to California. I think it only right and proper that you should have with the book the letter that Sassoon sent me when sending the book to me. My own feeling is that one cannot have too much of this kind of thing in association with books. I think Siegfried Sassoon a great writer and I would be glad to have this letter myself were I buying one of his books, and I have the feeling that you may think that way, too, so I enclose the letter. He was a great friend and admirer of Charlotte Mew&rsquo;s, by the way, which may help to endear him to you.\r\nWith every good wish and kind regards,\r\nYours very sincerely,\r\nP. H. MuirHand\r\nwritten note (in same green ink as Muir&rsquo;s signature) written below signature of &ldquo;P.H Muir&rdquo;:\r\n&ldquo;Note the date on SS&rsquo;s letter, evidently written on 131h&rdquo;\r\n\r\n<strong>Letter 3</strong>\r\n<em>Yellow paper, green &ldquo;Elkin Mathews Ltd,&rdquo; dated May 22, 1945, typed in faded black ink.</em>\r\n&ldquo;Dear Mrs. Burke,\r\nThank you very much indeed for your letter of May 6th. I congratulate you on getting the &ldquo;Emma&rdquo; so cheaply. It is exceedingly rare and Mr. Hogan as very glad to pay 300 dollars for it. I mention the price in dollars because at the time he bought it the 1-pound was below par and fluctuating, so that the price was actually quoted in dollars. I say that the price was set by Mr. Sassoon and not by me, but I saw no reason at the time to take exception to it.\r\nI always have you in mind for any interesting Jane Austen items, which turn up.\r\nYours very sincerely,\r\nP.H. Muir (signed in green ink)\r\n\r\n<!--nextpage-->\r\n<h5>Emma (1st Edition Philadelphia 1816)</h5>\r\n18.3cm tall x 11.1cm (cover)\r\n\r\n<em>Inside Cover</em>\r\ncut and pasted paper of: COUNTESS OF DALHOUSIE, below: maroon and gold sticker of: Ex Libris Frank J. Hogan (around name says: the true university of these days is a collection of books&rdquo;\r\n\r\n<em>Next Page</em>\r\nwritten by hand in faded pencil: &rdquo;Countess of d.- wife of the 9th Earl (1770-1838). Who was Governor of Canada, Nova Scotia, etc. 1819-1828- This explains her owning this edition, which was unknown to G. Keynes when he compiled his Bibliography of Jane Austen, 1929.&rdquo;\r\nunder this is the paper square for the &ldquo;Alberta H. Burke&rdquo;\r\n\r\n<div id=\"attachment_1314\" align=\"alignnone\" stlye=\"width:147px\"><a href=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/goucher_student-work-image1_kendall.jpg\"><img src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/goucher_student-work-image1_kendall-147x250.jpg\" alt=\"American first edition of Jane Austen&#039;s Emma\" title=\"goucher_student work image1_kendall\" width=\"147\" height=\"250\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-1314\" /></a> <span class=\"wp-caption-text\">Title page of the Burke Collection copy of the American first edition of Jane Austen\'s <em>Emma</em> (1816).</span></div>\r\n\r\n<em>Title Page</em>\r\nEMMA:\r\nA Novel\r\nHere Volumes in Two\r\n(written on side, vertically: A.B. Dallhousie)\r\nBy the Author of &ldquo;Pride and Prejudice,&rdquo;\r\n&amp;c. &amp;c.\r\nVol. 1\r\nPHILADELPHIA:\r\nPublished by M.Carey, No. 121 Chesnut Street\r\nAnd for Sale by Wells &amp; Lilly, Boston\r\n1816\r\n\r\n<em>Next Page</em>\r\nTo his Royal Highness\r\nThe Prince Regent, This Work Is, By his Royal Highness&rsquo;s Permission, Most Respectfully Dedicated, By His Royal Highness&rsquo;s Dutiful and Obedient Humble Servant, The Author.&rdquo;\r\n\r\n<em>First Page of Text</em>\r\n18cm tall x 9.8cm wide\r\nA2 at bottom of first page – 8 pages later is &ldquo;B&rdquo; (vol.1), 4 pages later &ldquo;B2&rdquo;, 8 pages later &ldquo;C&rdquo; (vol.1.), 4 pages later &ldquo;C2&rdquo;, 8 pages later &ldquo;D&rdquo; (vol.1)\r\naverage full page text block: 12.5cm tall x 7.4cm wide\r\n\r\n<!--nextpage-->\r\n<h5>Letters Found Inside Second Volume</h5>\r\n<strong>Letter 1</strong>\r\n<em>21.5cm tall x13.9cm wide, typed: &ldquo;Charles Sessler Inc.&rdquo; Established 1882, Bookseller and Printseller 1308 Walnut Street Philadelphia, PA. 19107&rdquo; stationary</em>\r\n<em> dated April 24, 1967</em>\r\n&ldquo;Dear Mr. Burke:\r\nIn 1945 we purchased in New York at the sale of the Frank J. Hogan Library, item No. 7, a copy of EMMA, printed in Philadelphia by Carey in 1816.\r\nDo you still have this book and would you be willing to part with it?&rdquo;\r\nYours Sincerely,\r\nMabel Zahn (signed in ink)\r\nZ.T. in bottom left corner, typed (?)\r\n\r\n<strong>Letter 2</strong>\r\n<em>Typed, same stationary as letter 1</em>\r\n<em> dated May 3, 1967</em>\r\n&ldquo;Dear Mr. Burke:\r\nThank you so much for your letter of May 1st.\r\nI am glad that you still have the copy of EMMA. Our inquiry was for a bibliographic purpose. Someone who is working on the bibliography has asked us about the copy we sold you and naturally we followed through for him.\r\nWith best wishes,\r\nYours Sincerely,\r\nMabel Zahn\r\n-Z.T. in bottom left corner, typed (?)','How Emma Travels: by letters, hands and libraries','Behind a low glass case in Goucher’s Special Collection Room sits a humble blue book box that holds the first American edition of Jane Austen’s Emma. Valued from nineteen to seventy-five thousand dollars on ABEBooks.com, the edition is unquestionably valuable. But how did this extremely rare copy end up in Goucher’s modest library? In a letter to David Gilson on August 5th, 1967 Alberta Burke revealed that she owned a copy of the 1816 Philadelphia Emma, which formerly belonged to Siegfried Sassoon. The two corresponded from 1967 to 1975 until Alberta fell ill. Throughout this time a steady thread of conversation exists about the Philadelphia Emma.\r\n\r\nAfter seeing the interest that both Alberta Burke and David Gilson had in the first American edition of Emma, perusing the pages and studying the tome in detail was essential to discover first hand the majesty of the volumes.','inherit','open','open','','1300-revision-61','','','2012-09-25 04:22:01','2012-09-25 04:22:01','',1300,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/1300-revision-61/',0,'revision','',0),(2509,19,'2012-07-02 19:22:46','2012-07-02 19:22:46','<p><iframe src=\"http://player.vimeo.com/video/40877170?title=0&amp;byline=0&amp;portrait=0\" frameborder=\"0\" width=\"640\" height=\"480\"></iframe></p>\r\n','The Assassination of Abraham Lincoln','','inherit','open','open','','1752-revision-8','','','2012-07-02 19:22:46','2012-07-02 19:22:46','',1752,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/1752-revision-8/',0,'revision','',0),(2510,19,'2012-09-25 04:24:40','2012-09-25 04:24:40','<p><iframe src=\"http://player.vimeo.com/video/40877170?title=0&amp;byline=0&amp;portrait=0\" frameborder=\"0\" width=\"640\" height=\"480\"></iframe></p>\r\n','The Assassination of Abraham Lincoln','','inherit','open','open','','1752-revision-9','','','2012-09-25 04:24:40','2012-09-25 04:24:40','',1752,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/1752-revision-9/',0,'revision','',0),(2511,19,'2012-08-28 04:56:23','2012-08-28 04:56:23','<a href=\"http://thewalters.org/earth/beaupre/\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-1977\"><img class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-1977\" title=\"beaupre\" src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/beaupre.png\" alt=\"Beaupre\" width=\"600\" height=\"400\" /></a>','Walters - Beaupre Devos','','inherit','open','open','','1975-revision-3','','','2012-08-28 04:56:23','2012-08-28 04:56:23','',1975,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/1975-revision-3/',0,'revision','',0),(2512,19,'2012-07-27 10:20:10','2012-07-27 10:20:10','<a href=\"http://thewalters.org/earth/casket/\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-1970\"><img src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/casket1.png\" alt=\"Romances Casket\" title=\"casket\" width=\"600\" height=\"400\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-1970\" /></a>','Walters - Romances Casket Tkacs ','','inherit','open','open','','1967-revision-2','','','2012-07-27 10:20:10','2012-07-27 10:20:10','',1967,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/1967-revision-2/',0,'revision','',0),(2513,19,'2012-07-27 10:24:19','2012-07-27 10:24:19','<a href=\"http://thewalters.org/earth/amazon/\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-1973\"><img src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/amazon1.png\" alt=\"Amazon Dowdle\" title=\"amazon\" width=\"600\" height=\"400\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-1973\" /></a>','Walter - Amazon Dowdle','','inherit','open','open','','1957-revision-6','','','2012-07-27 10:24:19','2012-07-27 10:24:19','',1957,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/1957-revision-6/',0,'revision','',0),(2514,19,'2012-09-25 04:25:33','2012-09-25 04:25:33','<a href=\"http://thewalters.org/earth/amazon/\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-1973\"><img src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/amazon1.png\" alt=\"Amazon Dowdle\" title=\"amazon\" width=\"600\" height=\"400\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-1973\" /></a>','Walter - Amazon Dowdle','','inherit','open','open','','1957-revision-7','','','2012-09-25 04:25:33','2012-09-25 04:25:33','',1957,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/1957-revision-7/',0,'revision','',0),(2515,19,'2012-09-25 04:25:46','2012-09-25 04:25:46','<a href=\"http://thewalters.org/earth/amazon/\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-1973\"><img src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/amazon1.png\" alt=\"Amazon Dowdle\" title=\"amazon\" width=\"600\" height=\"400\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-1973\" /></a>','Walters - Amazon Dowdle','','inherit','open','open','','1957-revision-8','','','2012-09-25 04:25:46','2012-09-25 04:25:46','',1957,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/1957-revision-8/',0,'revision','',0),(2516,19,'2012-09-25 04:25:33','2012-09-25 04:25:33','<a href=\"http://thewalters.org/earth/casket/\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-1970\"><img src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/casket1.png\" alt=\"Romances Casket\" title=\"casket\" width=\"600\" height=\"400\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-1970\" /></a>','Walters - Romances Casket Tkacs ','','inherit','open','open','','1967-revision-3','','','2012-09-25 04:25:33','2012-09-25 04:25:33','',1967,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/1967-revision-3/',0,'revision','',0),(2529,19,'2012-09-25 05:49:22','2012-09-25 05:49:22','','Past Issues','','publish','open','open','','past-issues','','','2012-10-16 05:26:05','2012-10-16 05:26:05','',0,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/?page_id=2529',0,'page','',0),(2530,19,'2012-09-25 05:49:17','2012-09-25 05:49:17','','Past Issues','','inherit','open','open','','2529-revision','','','2012-09-25 05:49:17','2012-09-25 05:49:17','',2529,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/2529-revision/',0,'revision','',0),(2531,19,'2012-09-25 05:49:22','2012-09-25 05:49:22','','Past Issues','','inherit','open','open','','2529-revision-2','','','2012-09-25 05:49:22','2012-09-25 05:49:22','',2529,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/2529-revision-2/',0,'revision','',0),(2640,19,'2012-10-15 15:04:43','2012-10-15 15:04:43','','Past Issues','','inherit','open','open','','2529-revision-4','','','2012-10-15 15:04:43','2012-10-15 15:04:43','',2529,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/2529-revision-4/',0,'revision','',0),(2532,19,'2012-09-17 21:45:51','2012-09-17 21:45:51','In the following section I would like to reflect on some questions about the nature of digital resources, humanities scholarship and the uses to which such material may be put. One of these is the still-contentious issue of whether the creation of such resources is regarded as scholarship in itself or as a way of facilitating the work of other scholars. Even the most recent studies indicate that opinions still remain sharply divided about whether the creation of digital resources such as the Whitman archive is considered to be scholarship and worthy of being rewarded us such by promotion, tenure or in the UK Research Assessment Exercise.[ref]D. Harley, S.K. Acord, S. Earl-Novell, S. Lawrence, and C.J. King, “Assessing the Future Landscape of Scholarly Communication: An Exploration of Faculty Values and Needs in Seven Disciplines” (UC Berkeley: Center for Studies in Higher Education, 2010).[/ref] There is an understandable tendency in digital humanities to regard this as an outrageous undervaluation of what we do, and to wish to advocate for our work to be better understood. Yet if we can resist this temptation, the question at issue is an important one. The argument against granting digital resources scholarly status equivalent to a journal article, monograph or critical edition must surely be that such resources are performing a service, akin to that provided by an archive or library in the analogue world: that of bringing together useful materials for other scholars to use.\r\n\r\nIt has long been the case that as Melissa Terras has argued so eloquently, in order for our digital work to be valued we must publish in traditional media.[ref]M. Terras, “Present, Not Voting: Digital Humanities in the Panopticon Digital Humanities” (plenary presented at Digital Humanities 2010 Conference, Kings College London, 2010). http://melissaterras.blogspot.com/2010/07/dh2010-plenary-present-not-voting.html[/ref] However, this is about to change, at least for some of us. In the forthcoming Research Excellence Framework in the UK, digital resources will be assessed in all subject areas as a comparable output to print. This is a vitally important change, carrying with it the implication of a re-evaluation of the scholarly value of the digital; but it places ever more emphasis on the need for us to consider in a rational, not evangelistic, fashion what may distinguish a digital scholarly work from that which renders a service.\r\n\r\nIn this context, nomenclature is not a useful guide. The Whitman project’s creators chose to call their creation an archive, perhaps because like the Rosetti Archive or Valley of the Shadow it contains a collection of various different types of material. However, McGann himself describes Rosetti as a digital edition.[ref]Jerome McGann, “Electronic Archives and Critical Editing,” <em>Literature Compass</em> 7:10 (2010): 37-42.[/ref] While I do not mean to imply that creating and curating an archive in the analogue world is not an intellectual exercise, it is not in itself something for which scholars gain credit. Thus the metaphor would hold that if scholarship done as the result of the use or creation of a physical archive as opposed to in its curation is recognised, then it should be similar in the digital sphere. But is this really appropriate, and does the name ‘archive’ under value the complex nature of what is being achieved in digital resources such as this? Conversely, why is it then that creating a critical edition, whether print or digital form is considered to be a scholarly activity worthy of credit in its own right?\r\n\r\nIt may be because in the print world editors are called upon to make selections and decisions about the best possible copy text, and which textual variants to include. Yet as Gabler argues, as digital technology progresses, digital editions increasingly try to make as many different texts and variants available to readers as possible, to the point that while we may choose to read a literary text in print, the digital medium is most appropriate for complex comparison and study of variants.[ref]H. W. Gabler “Theorizing the Digital Scholarly Edition,” <em>Literature Compass</em> 7:10 (2010):  43–56.[/ref] The theory of social editions also suggests that the literary text should be presented with reference to its broader social and intellectual milieu.[ref]Jerome McGann, <em>A Critique of Modern Textual Criticism</em> (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983) and D. F. McKenzie, <em>Bibliography and the Sociology of Texts</em>(London: The British Library, 1986).[/ref]\r\n\r\nThe Whitman archive provides page images and transcriptions of all six printed editions of <em>Leaves of Grass</em>, as well as manuscript material and newspaper copy. It calls itself an archive, yet could as easily be considered an excellent example of the digital social edition, where users are encouraged to become part of the scholarly process by comparing transcribed manuscripts with the page images or making judgements about which version of a given poem to use. So this is this, an edition (scholarly product) or an archive (service for others)? I would argue that this distinction is no longer meaningful in the digital sphere where boundaries between what we consider to be editions and archives have become blurred.\r\n\r\nEven if we assert that this is a resource for others to use, that could as easily describe a scholarly edition. It is also arguable that the value of such a resource as a scholarly product in its own right is in the choices made about what types of different materials should be brought together, and how contextual material about Whitman’s life, work and even disciples should be presented. Once again, these are just the kind of decisions that editors of scholarly editions also make. As all digital humanists are aware, the act of marking up text is in itself one of scholarly interpretation, which is why it is so vital that the full marked up texts are presented here. This, like the decision to present page images alongside transcription is an act of intellectual openness: it allows other scholars to understand, and if necessary question the decisions that have been made in their presentation.  Far from being a sub-scholarly process, digital resources such as Whitman achieve a lustration of the decision making processes that are the silent underpinning of the task of editors or literary scholars in general. In this sense, digital humanities is ahead of many other fields. Science is only beginning to discover the potential of using digital technologies to link experimental data to articles written as a result of its analysis, so that other scholars may use such data to replicate the experiments that are reported on.[ref]C. Bizer, T. Heath, and T. Berners-Lee, “Linked Data - The Story So Far,” <em>International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems</em> (IJSWIS), Special Issue on Linked Data, ed. T. Heath, M. Hepp, and C. Bizer, (forthcoming). http://linkeddata.org/docs/ijswis-special-issue[/ref] Yet resources such as the Whitman archive have been providing this kind of functionality for some time. Texts are the primary data of literary scholars after all.\r\n\r\nThere is, it appears, a good case to be made for the scholarly robustness of digital resources, even those which modestly refer to themselves as an archive. The other question we must address, however, in making the case for our discipline is not just whether such resources constitute scholarly activity, but what kind of new types of research they make possible which would not have been achievable in an analogue world. This is surely the main criterion by which digital humanities must be judged. At present this is much less clear.\r\n\r\nWe know that the digital medium presents many new possibilities for editors and resource creators themselves, but we still know too little about whether research and scholarship themselves are changing as a result of their use. Vanhoutte, for example, has argued that most users simply require a reading text  despite the fact that digital resources make a deeper kind of scholarly engagement possible.[ref]E. Vanhoutte, “Every Reader His Own Bibliographer – An Absurdity?” in <em>Text Editing, Print and the Digital World</em>, ed. Marilyn Deegan and Kathryn Sutherland (London: Ashgate, 2002): 99-112.[/ref] Even the most recent study of humanities users of digital resources[ref]C. Madsen, “Communities, Innovation, and Critical Mass: Understanding the Impact of Digitization on Scholarship in the Humanities through the Case of Tibetan and Himalayan Studies”  (PhD diss, Oxford University, 2010): Chapters 6-7.[/ref] suggests they still make relatively simple uses of digital resources, which they value as a way to access greater amounts of primary texts without the need to travel, to search them faster, and ultimately, overwhelmingly, to read them. Digital humanists may be using computational analysis or visualisation techniques on huge data sets, (for example Dan Cohen’s recent studies of Google Books[ref]Patricia Cohen, “Analyzing Literature by Words and Numbers,” <em>New York Times</em>, December 3, 2010, <a href=\"http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/04/books/04victorian.html?_r=1&amp;pagewanted=all\">http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/04/books/04victorian.html?_r=1&amp;pagewanted=all</a>[/ref]) but it appears that resources such as the Whitman archive may be more transformative of scholarship from the point of view of their creators than of most of their users. Digital Humanities has have moved on from writing evangelising articles and prescribing more training to writing use cases that, arguably, only the converted digital humanists ever read (for example a recent paper on the Monk project[ref]C. Plaisant, T. Clement, R. Vuillemot, S. Steger, and K. Uszkalo, “Use Cases Driving the Tool Development in the MONK project” (paper presented at the Digital Humanities 2009 conference, University of Maryland, USA, June 22-25, 2009).[/ref]) Yet the results appear the same, such excellent resources as Whitman may find that only a few expert users make best use of the potential of what they are being offered.\r\n\r\nThis may seem rather a depressing vision, but social networking theory may offer a more positive interpretation of this. We know that in most online communities only 10% of the participants post, the others may read, enjoy, but not take part.[ref]B. Nonnecke and J. Preece, “Lurker Demographics: Counting the Silent” in <em>Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems</em> (Proceedings of the SIGCHI, 2000): 73-80. http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=332040.332409&amp;type=series [/ref] It is also an often repeated law of software development that 80% of users make use of 20% of a given application’s features. Thus if we apply such metrics to digital humanities it seems perverse that we somehow feel we have failed unless all users are making the most extensive use of every last piece of potential a resource has to offer. This is why it is important that, as I argued above, digital resources should be accessible for the interested amateur as well as the academic expert and why we should not be disappointed if most people search for quotations for their college assignments or print out poems to use to teach a class, or to read when writing an article. Digital resources have different types of user, and to expect them all to be expert is a kind of techie arrogance of the worst kind.\r\n\r\nSocial networking is also relevant in another context when consider digital resources. The possibilities of a very different kind of social edition are only beginning to be explored by projects such as UCL’s own Transcribe Bentham project. Yet the popularity of crowd sourcing has been proven in science, and we know that users will support, explore and exploit more fully resources that they help to create.[ref]Claire Warwick, M. Terras and C. Fisher, “iTrench: A Study of User Reactions to the Use of IT in Field Archaeology” (paper presented at Digital Humanities 2008 conference, University of Oulu, Finland, June 25-29 2008).[/ref] Thus it may be that an alternative way of involving users in digital humanities is not only to consult them about what they would like to do, design resources so that they can do it as well as possible, or suggest ways in which a resources might be used, but also to encourage them to take part in their creation.\r\n\r\nIt can be seen therefore that the metaphysics wrought by the digital transformations inherent in the Whitman archives take us well beyond the limitations of books. We can appreciate the new potential inherent in digital production for the scholars who produce such resources, but further work remains to be done on exactly how such editions or archives may transform the lives of their users. Part of this work will be undertaken in the coming year by researchers from the INKE project, when we will consider digital scholarly editions. However, in a more general sense it will be fascinating to see whether and how far any kind of crowd sourced content may be integrated into serious scholarly resources such as Whitman. Until that experiment is tried in earnest, we are still some way from utilising the potential of the truly social edition.','360°: The Walt Whitman Archive – Warwick 4','In the following section I would like to reflect on some questions about the nature of digital resources, humanities scholarship and the uses to which such material may be put. One of these is the still-contentious issue of whether the creation of such resources is regarded as scholarship in itself or as a way of facilitating the work of other scholars. Even the most recent studies indicate that opinions still remain sharply divided...','inherit','open','open','','127-revision-16','','','2012-09-17 21:45:51','2012-09-17 21:45:51','',127,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/127-revision-16/',0,'revision','',0),(2533,19,'2012-09-17 21:45:51','2012-09-17 21:45:51','The Whitman archive is an example of excellent practice in the creation of digital scholarly resources. Its layout is simple, clear and easy to understand and navigate. It is obvious to a user where she is in the site, how to return to where she started from and what its various contents are. This might seem basic, but many resources, perhaps particularly those designed by and for academics tend not to pay enough attention to the basics of good design and usability, and can, as a result be confusing and frustrating for users. Since we make decisions about web pages in fractions of a second[ref]G. Lindgaard, C. Dudek, F. Fernandes, and J. Brown, “Attention Web Designers: You Have 50 Milliseconds to Make a Good First Impression,” <em>Behaviour &amp; Information Technology</em> 25 (2005): 115-126.[/ref] and humanities users, in particular, are easily deterred from using a resource that seems untrustworthy to them[ref]Claire Warwick, M. Terras, P. Huntington, and N. Pappa, “If You Build It Will They Come? The LAIRAH Study: Quantifying the Use of Online Resources in the Arts and Humanities through Statistical Analysis of User Log Data,” <em>Literary and Linguistic Computing</em> 23:1 (2008): 85-102.[/ref] it is vital that such simple considerations as the look and functionality of the site should instantly seem comprehensible and comfortable for users.[ref]Dana Wheeles, “Accessibility, Usability and the New Face of NINES” <em>Literary and Linguistic Computing</em> 25:4 (2010). Forthcoming.[/ref]\r\n\r\nOne of the most impressive things about the Whitman archive is that it can be addressed in different ways depending on the level of expertise the user may have: this is by no means common in scholarly digital resources. As someone who was once worked on English, but not American, literature and who now regards herself as a full time Digital Humanist, I know relatively little about Walt Whitman\'s life and career.  As a result of using the archive, however, I was able to find a considerable amount of information at an appropriate level. In other words, this was content of a level well beyond the introductory but which was not simply directed at other Whitman scholars and other expert users. This is a surprisingly difficult balance to achieve in any medium but seems especially challenging in the digital one. Many digital scholarly resources tend to assume that their users will be experts in the subject matter. This is not necessarily the case and as a result non-expert users may easily be confused or lose interest.[ref]Warwick et al., “If You Build It.”[/ref] This seems particularly perverse, since digital resources are an excellent way for scholars to engage with those outside academia who share their interests and to encourage those with an interest to become to sufficiently intrigued that they become the experts of the future. If the non-expert user is deterred, how will they make progress to expertise? This is an opportunity that the Whitman archive has fully understood.\r\n\r\nThis does not mean that expert users are neglected, however.  The archive has evidently been designed with the needs of its academic users in mind. For example, scholars interested in the language of poetry who may want to run linguistic analysis software on these texts will be particularly please that the full TEI marked up texts are available for downloading from the archive as well as being presented on line. The fact that such texts and detailed markup guidelines are available is an example of excellent practice and also rather unusual. Even some of the best TEI practitioners can seem somewhat nervous of making their markup decisions so public, and many digital humanities resources only make texts available as post-processed XHTML.\r\n\r\nThere is also a clear understanding on the part of the Archive’s creators of the way that scholars prefer to work in digital and physical environments. We know, for example, that however many resources are digitised scholars generally want to see the originals. It is now well known that the more digital resources are available the higher the demand that tends to be for original material. As a result, it is especially welcome that the archive has provided such detailed guidance as to how the original materials may be accessed with full bibliographic records. This means that scholars are able to consult manuscript images and transcriptions before they visit physical archives, which enhances, rather than disrupts their use of archival material. This is a particularly effective use of digital resources to complement physical ones.\r\n\r\nOne of the most impressive features of the Whitman Archive is that documentation about the project is so easy to access. As we recommended in the LAIRAH study[ref]Claire Warwick, I. Galina, M. Terras, P. Huntington, and N. Pappa, “The Master Builders: LAIRAH Research on Good Practice in the Construction of Digital Humanities Projects,” <em>Literary and Linguistic Computing</em> 23:3 (2008): 383-396.[/ref] there is a top level link from the title page to documentation about the project. Under this link are to be found a great variety of very useful documents telling readers and users just about anything they might want to know about the archive in terms of its scholarly principles, history, technical standards and encoding guidelines. It is also clear who its creators are their expertise and how this has been used to take decisions about the creation and direction of the archive. This excellent feature is surprisingly difficult to find in many digital archives, editions or resources. However, it is vital, since users require users require this type of contextual information about the processes used to select and interpret data. In the print medium we have evolved techniques and processes to indicate that a selection and evaluation process has taken place (the footnote, the imprimatur, the authorial biography, the bibliography) In the digital world such things are still developing and the digital still remains, for many academic users in particular,  less trustworthy than print.[ref]Warwick et al., “If You Build It.”[/ref]','360°: The Walt Whitman Archive – Warwick 1','The Whitman archive is an example of excellent practice in the creation of digital scholarly resources. Its layout is simple, clear and easy to understand and navigate. It is obvious to a user where she is in the site, how to return to where she started from and what its various contents are. This might seem basic, but many resources, perhaps particularly those designed by and for academics...','inherit','open','open','','117-revision-16','','','2012-09-17 21:45:51','2012-09-17 21:45:51','',117,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/117-revision-16/',0,'revision','',0),(2534,19,'2012-09-17 21:45:51','2012-09-17 21:45:51','Though the <em>Walt Whitman Archive</em> seems well designed for researchers at all levels of expertise, it strikes me as particularly well-suited for students or for others who may enter the site with limited knowledge about the author and his works. A significant advantage is the clean and inviting appearance of the layout at all levels of the database. The interface is wonderfully uncluttered, making exploration simple and unintimidating. On the homepage left-hand navigation menu, I found the categories to be intuitive and well-organized. I clarified this assessment with an experiment, in which I browsed manually for items that I already knew existed in the archive. In all cases, I was able to locate the target items with little or no backtracking.\r\n\r\nI found the most valuable feature of the site for the non-expert visitor to be the contextual information that was present on many of the pages in the database.  For example, when clicking on any of the major links under the “published works” tab, I was given a short blurb that generally included a preface to the contents of the page, its status of development and coming additions, and any important contextual knowledge that would help me situate it in culture or among Whitman’s other works. It was also extremely helpful to find each of Whitman’s published books (excluding the foreign editions) furnished with a detailed and thoughtful “About” page, which provided enough background and compelling analysis to give me, the student and non-expert, a firm grasp of the material I was about to browse.\r\n\r\nI would feel confident and comfortable investigating a specific topic, browsing for research material, or exploring new content out of curiosity on the <em>Archive</em>. More than a repository, it is well-developed as a learning tool for those who are new to Whitman scholarship.','360°: The Walt Whitman Archive – McGonagill 1','Though the Walt Whitman Archive seems well designed for researchers at all levels of expertise, it strikes me as particularly well-suited for students or for others who may enter the site with limited knowledge about the author and his works. A significant advantage is the clean and inviting appearance of the layout at all levels of the database. The interface is wonderfully uncluttered, making exploration simple and unintimidating.','inherit','open','open','','130-revision-18','','','2012-09-17 21:45:51','2012-09-17 21:45:51','',130,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/130-revision-18/',0,'revision','',0),(2535,19,'2012-09-25 06:07:29','2012-09-25 06:07:29','Though the <em>Walt Whitman Archive</em> seems well designed for researchers at all levels of expertise, it strikes me as particularly well-suited for students or for others who may enter the site with limited knowledge about the author and his works. A significant advantage is the clean and inviting appearance of the layout at all levels of the database. The interface is wonderfully uncluttered, making exploration simple and unintimidating. On the homepage left-hand navigation menu, I found the categories to be intuitive and well-organized. I clarified this assessment with an experiment, in which I browsed manually for items that I already knew existed in the archive. In all cases, I was able to locate the target items with little or no backtracking.\r\n\r\nI found the most valuable feature of the site for the non-expert visitor to be the contextual information that was present on many of the pages in the database. For example, when clicking on any of the major links under the “published works” tab, I was given a short blurb that generally included a preface to the contents of the page, its status of development and coming additions, and any important contextual knowledge that would help me situate it in culture or among Whitman’s other works. It was also extremely helpful to find each of Whitman’s published books (excluding the foreign editions) furnished with a detailed and thoughtful “About” page, which provided enough background and compelling analysis to give me, the student and non-expert, a firm grasp of the material I was about to browse.\r\n\r\nI would feel confident and comfortable investigating a specific topic, browsing for research material, or exploring new content out of curiosity on the <em>Archive</em>. More than a repository, it is well-developed as a learning tool for those who are new to Whitman scholarship.','360°: The Walt Whitman Archive – McGonagill 1','Though the Walt Whitman Archive seems well designed for researchers at all levels of expertise, it strikes me as particularly well-suited for students or for others who may enter the site with limited knowledge about the author and his works. A significant advantage is the clean and inviting appearance of the layout at all levels of the database. The interface is wonderfully uncluttered, making exploration simple and unintimidating.','inherit','open','open','','130-revision-19','','','2012-09-25 06:07:29','2012-09-25 06:07:29','',130,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/130-revision-19/',0,'revision','',0),(2536,19,'2012-09-17 21:45:51','2012-09-17 21:45:51','In the Digital Humanist’s tool belt, the database is the trusty stand-by. Robust and indispensable, it has become a basic tool of modern academic research. One of the primary endeavors of the Digital Humanities, however, is to re-focus the perspective on the tools we use, and perhaps to redefine the term “tool” in the process. The Oxford English Dictionary defines it as “a thing … with which some operation is performed; a means of effecting something.”[ref]<em>Oxford English Dictionary</em>, 2<sup>nd</sup> ed., s.v. “Tool.”[/ref] This definition points plainly toward outcome, the tool’s utility at accomplishing “some operation,” as if it were an extension of the user’s will as a wrench is an extension of his or her hand. But by emphasizing results only, the dictionary neglects a tool’s significant influence over process.\r\n\r\nTools define process as much as they do outcome. When one searches a database, its individual design mediates the experience, filters it, frames it. A sleek database makes the act of use nearly imperceptible—it stays out of the way, as it were, by anticipating the needs and intuitions of the general user in its design. However, the specific user will always be limited by these presuppositions. It is tempting to imagine a database as a neutral container, a kind of Tupperware 2.0, while in fact the tool guides the searches that one can make, the items that they will return, and which will appear prominent. Facets of the design guide what sorts of orderings of information, or narratives, the researcher will construct out of the raw data, such that the database itself can form a subtle argument or narrative claim.\r\n\r\nAcknowledging the skewed nature of any tool that presents information, <em>Walt Whitman Archive</em> co-editor Ed Folsom describes his approach to structuring the database: “Initially, [co-editor Kenneth] Price and I had ideas of how we would control the material in the database, and we knew the narratives we wanted to tell, the frames we wanted to construct. But the details of the database quickly exceeded any narrative we might try to frame the data with. Little roots shot out everywhere and attached to particulars we could not have imagined. Only if we insulated the narrative from the database could the narrative persist.”[ref]Ed Folsom, “Database as Genre: the Epic Transformation of Archives,”<em> The Walt Whitman Archive</em>, accessed November 2010,<em> </em><a href=\"http://www.whitmanarchive.org/about/articles/anc.00142.html\">http://www.whitmanarchive.org/about/articles/anc.00142.html</a>.[/ref] To me, the <em>Walt Whitman Archive</em> is rife with narrative paths for the user. Some of these are micro-narratives, unavoidably emerging from details of the interface. Because the left-hand navigation menu is more visually prominent than the search bar, the user is more strongly guided into a browsing mode of exploration, which encourages him or her to consider Whitman through a compartmentalized view of his life and works. By featuring a simple search bar without advanced specifications or filtration[ref]A notice on the site informs the user that this feature is soon slated to undergo an enhancement, which will include the development of faceted search capabilities.[/ref], the database allows the user to cast a virtual fishing line for an assortment of items but makes it more difficult to conduct a narrowly directed search—thus, one is likely to encounter information that seems scattered rather than tight and contextual.\r\n\r\nApart from these micro-narratives, the database also cradles a deep narrative claim pertaining to Whitman’s corpus: throughout the database there is an open discussion examining the suggestive congruity between Whitman’s work and the digital medium in which it is takes form. The documentation of this resonance begins with observations about Whitman’s language and works, which seem to share characteristics of digital structure. For example, Ed Folsom to the organic networks present in Whitman’s language, an intertextual and burgeoning web of words. He compares this quality to the dense entanglement of leaves and roots that adorn the lettering on the first edition of <em>Leaves of Grass</em>, recalling the rhizome[ref]Defined as “an elongated, usually horizontal, subterranean stem which sends out roots and leafy shoots at intervals along its length.” <em>Oxford English Dictionary</em>, 3rd ed., s.v. \"Rhizome.\"[/ref]—“that subterranean stem that grows every which way and represents the nomadic multiplicity of identity—no central root but an intertwined web of roots.”[ref]Folsom, “Database as Genre.<em>”</em>[/ref] Databases, too, are rhizomorphous, he argues—and this accordance between Whitman’s work and its digital format allows the two to reflect through and off of one another, revealing new permutations of form and language.\r\n\r\nIn a proleptic twist, Whitman’s work predates its own ideal medium. A common observation in the various articles about the database is the fact that the work is perhaps better displayed in digital form that it ever was in print: the digital medium is better equipped to represent the shapes and forms of the Whitman corpus, and flexible enough to accommodate the complex relationship between the many iterations of <em>Leaves of Grass</em>. The database does not privilege one edition over any other, and treats them as autonomous but entwined works rather than pieces of a distinct whole or drafts leading up to a definitive version. The sheer multiplicity of his writing is betrayed by the rigidity of print mediums. “Whitman’s work was always being revised, was always in flux, and fixed forms of print do not adequately capture his incessant revisions,” argues Price.[ref]Kenneth M. Price, “About the <em>Archive</em>: History,” <em>The Walt Whitman Archive</em>, accessed November 2010, http://www.whitmanarchive.org/about/history.html.[/ref] Whitman himself advocated methods of reading and taking meaning from his texts that today seem almost designed for digital tools. A line from <em>Leaves of Grass</em>, first appearing in the 1881-82 edition, reads “the words of my book nothing, the drift of it every thing.”[ref]Walt Whitman, <em>Leaves of Grass</em>, (Washington, D.C, 1881-82), http://whitmanarchive.org/published/LG/1871/whole.html.[/ref] Taking long-view of literature, Whitman’s remark resonates with the current practice of distant reading, in which vast quantities of text can be analyzed as an entity using statistical information and visualizations. Predating this practice, Whitman draws the reader away from the individual minutiae of his poetry and towards impressionistic views. If any text was written for a database, this one was.\r\n\r\nThus, the <em>Archive</em> attempts not only to exhibit its contents, but to carry out a vision that Whitman may have offered in the original work. This narrative is present throughout the site primarily via the apparent compatibility between the content and form. The claim is so elegant, so fluid and simple, that the argument almost makes itself.\r\n\r\nThe <em>Walt Whitman Archive</em> is able to transcend its (considerable) utility as a research tool, performing simultaneously as a critical analysis, a new edition of Whitman, and independent artistic work. I imagine four theoretical levels at which a format can manage a text, with increasing involvement: presentation, description, criticism, and artistic response. The sophistication of this particular database is in how it blurs the lines between those acts, seeming to realize all at once and none predominantly, and, further, how it reveals the fact that this multiplicity of function must be true of all databases, however subtly, however unintentionally.\r\n\r\nThis remarkable plurality within a single tool (if tool is still an adequate term) is both fitting, in the context of Whitman, and disruptive to the user’s relationship with the technology. It remains to be addressed how, or whether, the user should adjust his or her approach to such a complex mechanism. At the recent undergraduate digital humanities symposium Re: Humanities, keynote speaker Amanda French advocated for the “rehumaniz[ation of] the inhuman mass of data.”[ref]Amanda French, “Humanities Research Methods from 1860 to 2060” (presentation at Re:Humanities, Haverford, PA, November 11-12, 2010).[/ref] She suggests that scholars who favor distant reading may be losing track of a meaningful element of the text. Rather than conducting interpretive based on massive aggregates of information, why not reacquaint ourselves with an affection for individual pieces of data, find “datum love” among the mass of details? The two methods appear to be mutually exclusive. However, by reconceiving the practice of data mining, it is arguably possible to find personal touches in the thrill of broad claims as well as the nuance of the particular.\r\n\r\nIf each database frames its contents in an array of narrative claims, then each one is specific, disputable, and limited. Rather than markers of failure, however, we might use these idiosyncracies to reawaken us to the particular experience that that tool offers. We could use the fact that a database mediates actively to inject an element of personal interaction into the task of digital research. In the course of achieving proficiency with any tool, one gains an understanding of its particular advantages and limitations through repeated contact and experimentation, returning to the interactive original meaning of “interface.”[ref]Defined as “a means or place of interaction between two systems, organizations, etc.; a meeting-point or common ground between two parties, systems, or disciplines; also, interaction, liaison, dialogue.” <em>Oxford English Dictionary</em>, 2nd ed., s.v. \"Interface.\"[/ref] Here is an opportunity to find a better alternative to the impersonal database experience, an escape from hard vocabulary statistics untempered by readerly love.\r\n\r\nThe management of scale is a challenge that each database must address by determining how the user will navigate between detail and distance. Due to Whitman’s distinctive engagement with matters of scale, especially the fluidity between the individual and the masses, the <em>Walt Whitman Archive</em> may be uniquely able to offer a distant reading that is paradoxically intimate in its connection to the philosophy of the poet. How can a distant reading cheat the humanist if it scrutinizes the work of the man who wrote, exhilarated, “Here is not merely a nation but a teeming nation of nations. Here is action untied from strings necessarily blind to particulars and details magnificently moving in vast masses?”[ref]Walt Whitman, <em>Leaves of Grass: 150<sup>th</sup> Anniversary Edition</em>, (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005), iii.[/ref] Ed Folsom describes Whitman’s “poetic project” as an endeavor “to move from a particular person, period, or place toward an absorptive embrace of all people, periods, and places,”[ref]Folsom, “Database as Genre.”[/ref]emphasizing the blurred distinctions between love of the particular and love of the vast. TokenX, a textual analysis tool that is available through the database, numerically charts the uses of particular words throughout the six editions of <em>Leaves of Grass</em>, giving a visual representation to the exponential growth and organic proliferation of certain words as the poetry burgeoned in its various iterations. Statistical tools such as these, when applied to the work of this particular author, are not reductive but in fact profoundly resonant with the tone and principles of the poetry they describe. Perhaps this is the database to wed tender devotion to individual data and multiplicity.\r\n\r\nFeatured prominently on the home page of the <em>Archive</em> is a striking engraving of Whitman’s face.[ref]William J. Linton, (1870-72), engraving, (http://whitmanarchive.org/multimedia/image044.html?sort=year&amp;order=ascending&amp;page=5).[/ref] The poet appears as if caught in motion, whipping past the viewer with his eddies of hair scattered about his face like sprouts. The beard connotes a general outward drift as it spreads from his face in swells and waves. And then, from somewhere in the profusion of hair and wrinkles emerges an arresting pair of dark eyes: Whitman’s eyes simultaneously confront and confide in the viewer, imparting a personal moment amidst a storm of minutiae.','360°: The Walt Whitman Archive – McGonagill 4','In the Digital Humanist’s tool belt, the database is the trusty stand-by. Robust and indispensable, it has become a basic tool of modern academic research. One of the primary endeavors of the Digital Humanities, however, is to re-focus the perspective on the tools we use, and perhaps to redefine the term “tool” in the process. The Oxford English Dictionary defines it as “a thing … with which some operation is performed; a means of effecting something.\"','inherit','open','open','','136-revision-21','','','2012-09-17 21:45:51','2012-09-17 21:45:51','',136,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/136-revision-21/',0,'revision','',0),(2537,19,'2012-09-25 06:07:57','2012-09-25 06:07:57','In the Digital Humanist’s tool belt, the database is the trusty stand-by. Robust and indispensable, it has become a basic tool of modern academic research. One of the primary endeavors of the Digital Humanities, however, is to re-focus the perspective on the tools we use, and perhaps to redefine the term “tool” in the process. The Oxford English Dictionary defines it as “a thing … with which some operation is performed; a means of effecting something.”[ref]<em>Oxford English Dictionary</em>, 2<sup>nd</sup> ed., s.v. “Tool.”[/ref] This definition points plainly toward outcome, the tool’s utility at accomplishing “some operation,” as if it were an extension of the user’s will as a wrench is an extension of his or her hand. But by emphasizing results only, the dictionary neglects a tool’s significant influence over process.\r\n\r\nTools define process as much as they do outcome. When one searches a database, its individual design mediates the experience, filters it, frames it. A sleek database makes the act of use nearly imperceptible—it stays out of the way, as it were, by anticipating the needs and intuitions of the general user in its design. However, the specific user will always be limited by these presuppositions. It is tempting to imagine a database as a neutral container, a kind of Tupperware 2.0, while in fact the tool guides the searches that one can make, the items that they will return, and which will appear prominent. Facets of the design guide what sorts of orderings of information, or narratives, the researcher will construct out of the raw data, such that the database itself can form a subtle argument or narrative claim.\r\n\r\nAcknowledging the skewed nature of any tool that presents information, <em>Walt Whitman Archive</em> co-editor Ed Folsom describes his approach to structuring the database: “Initially, [co-editor Kenneth] Price and I had ideas of how we would control the material in the database, and we knew the narratives we wanted to tell, the frames we wanted to construct. But the details of the database quickly exceeded any narrative we might try to frame the data with. Little roots shot out everywhere and attached to particulars we could not have imagined. Only if we insulated the narrative from the database could the narrative persist.”[ref]Ed Folsom, “Database as Genre: the Epic Transformation of Archives,”<em> The Walt Whitman Archive</em>, accessed November 2010,<em> </em><a href=\"http://www.whitmanarchive.org/about/articles/anc.00142.html\">http://www.whitmanarchive.org/about/articles/anc.00142.html</a>.[/ref] To me, the <em>Walt Whitman Archive</em> is rife with narrative paths for the user. Some of these are micro-narratives, unavoidably emerging from details of the interface. Because the left-hand navigation menu is more visually prominent than the search bar, the user is more strongly guided into a browsing mode of exploration, which encourages him or her to consider Whitman through a compartmentalized view of his life and works. By featuring a simple search bar without advanced specifications or filtration[ref]A notice on the site informs the user that this feature is soon slated to undergo an enhancement, which will include the development of faceted search capabilities.[/ref], the database allows the user to cast a virtual fishing line for an assortment of items but makes it more difficult to conduct a narrowly directed search—thus, one is likely to encounter information that seems scattered rather than tight and contextual.\r\n\r\nApart from these micro-narratives, the database also cradles a deep narrative claim pertaining to Whitman’s corpus: throughout the database there is an open discussion examining the suggestive congruity between Whitman’s work and the digital medium in which it is takes form. The documentation of this resonance begins with observations about Whitman’s language and works, which seem to share characteristics of digital structure. For example, Ed Folsom to the organic networks present in Whitman’s language, an intertextual and burgeoning web of words. He compares this quality to the dense entanglement of leaves and roots that adorn the lettering on the first edition of <em>Leaves of Grass</em>, recalling the rhizome[ref]Defined as “an elongated, usually horizontal, subterranean stem which sends out roots and leafy shoots at intervals along its length.” <em>Oxford English Dictionary</em>, 3rd ed., s.v. \"Rhizome.\"[/ref]—“that subterranean stem that grows every which way and represents the nomadic multiplicity of identity—no central root but an intertwined web of roots.”[ref]Folsom, “Database as Genre.<em>”</em>[/ref] Databases, too, are rhizomorphous, he argues—and this accordance between Whitman’s work and its digital format allows the two to reflect through and off of one another, revealing new permutations of form and language.\r\n\r\nIn a proleptic twist, Whitman’s work predates its own ideal medium. A common observation in the various articles about the database is the fact that the work is perhaps better displayed in digital form that it ever was in print: the digital medium is better equipped to represent the shapes and forms of the Whitman corpus, and flexible enough to accommodate the complex relationship between the many iterations of <em>Leaves of Grass</em>. The database does not privilege one edition over any other, and treats them as autonomous but entwined works rather than pieces of a distinct whole or drafts leading up to a definitive version. The sheer multiplicity of his writing is betrayed by the rigidity of print mediums. “Whitman’s work was always being revised, was always in flux, and fixed forms of print do not adequately capture his incessant revisions,” argues Price.[ref]Kenneth M. Price, “About the <em>Archive</em>: History,” <em>The Walt Whitman Archive</em>, accessed November 2010, http://www.whitmanarchive.org/about/history.html.[/ref] Whitman himself advocated methods of reading and taking meaning from his texts that today seem almost designed for digital tools. A line from <em>Leaves of Grass</em>, first appearing in the 1881-82 edition, reads “the words of my book nothing, the drift of it every thing.”[ref]Walt Whitman, <em>Leaves of Grass</em>, (Washington, D.C, 1881-82), http://whitmanarchive.org/published/LG/1871/whole.html.[/ref] Taking long-view of literature, Whitman’s remark resonates with the current practice of distant reading, in which vast quantities of text can be analyzed as an entity using statistical information and visualizations. Predating this practice, Whitman draws the reader away from the individual minutiae of his poetry and towards impressionistic views. If any text was written for a database, this one was.\r\n\r\nThus, the <em>Archive</em> attempts not only to exhibit its contents, but to carry out a vision that Whitman may have offered in the original work. This narrative is present throughout the site primarily via the apparent compatibility between the content and form. The claim is so elegant, so fluid and simple, that the argument almost makes itself.\r\n\r\nThe <em>Walt Whitman Archive</em> is able to transcend its (considerable) utility as a research tool, performing simultaneously as a critical analysis, a new edition of Whitman, and independent artistic work. I imagine four theoretical levels at which a format can manage a text, with increasing involvement: presentation, description, criticism, and artistic response. The sophistication of this particular database is in how it blurs the lines between those acts, seeming to realize all at once and none predominantly, and, further, how it reveals the fact that this multiplicity of function must be true of all databases, however subtly, however unintentionally.\r\n\r\nThis remarkable plurality within a single tool (if tool is still an adequate term) is both fitting, in the context of Whitman, and disruptive to the user’s relationship with the technology. It remains to be addressed how, or whether, the user should adjust his or her approach to such a complex mechanism. At the recent undergraduate digital humanities symposium Re: Humanities, keynote speaker Amanda French advocated for the “rehumaniz[ation of] the inhuman mass of data.”[ref]Amanda French, “Humanities Research Methods from 1860 to 2060” (presentation at Re:Humanities, Haverford, PA, November 11-12, 2010).[/ref] She suggests that scholars who favor distant reading may be losing track of a meaningful element of the text. Rather than conducting interpretive based on massive aggregates of information, why not reacquaint ourselves with an affection for individual pieces of data, find “datum love” among the mass of details? The two methods appear to be mutually exclusive. However, by reconceiving the practice of data mining, it is arguably possible to find personal touches in the thrill of broad claims as well as the nuance of the particular.\r\n\r\nIf each database frames its contents in an array of narrative claims, then each one is specific, disputable, and limited. Rather than markers of failure, however, we might use these idiosyncracies to reawaken us to the particular experience that that tool offers. We could use the fact that a database mediates actively to inject an element of personal interaction into the task of digital research. In the course of achieving proficiency with any tool, one gains an understanding of its particular advantages and limitations through repeated contact and experimentation, returning to the interactive original meaning of “interface.”[ref]Defined as “a means or place of interaction between two systems, organizations, etc.; a meeting-point or common ground between two parties, systems, or disciplines; also, interaction, liaison, dialogue.” <em>Oxford English Dictionary</em>, 2nd ed., s.v. \"Interface.\"[/ref] Here is an opportunity to find a better alternative to the impersonal database experience, an escape from hard vocabulary statistics untempered by readerly love.\r\n\r\nThe management of scale is a challenge that each database must address by determining how the user will navigate between detail and distance. Due to Whitman’s distinctive engagement with matters of scale, especially the fluidity between the individual and the masses, the <em>Walt Whitman Archive</em> may be uniquely able to offer a distant reading that is paradoxically intimate in its connection to the philosophy of the poet. How can a distant reading cheat the humanist if it scrutinizes the work of the man who wrote, exhilarated, “Here is not merely a nation but a teeming nation of nations. Here is action untied from strings necessarily blind to particulars and details magnificently moving in vast masses?”[ref]Walt Whitman, <em>Leaves of Grass: 150<sup>th</sup> Anniversary Edition</em>, (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005), iii.[/ref] Ed Folsom describes Whitman’s “poetic project” as an endeavor “to move from a particular person, period, or place toward an absorptive embrace of all people, periods, and places,”[ref]Folsom, “Database as Genre.”[/ref]emphasizing the blurred distinctions between love of the particular and love of the vast. TokenX, a textual analysis tool that is available through the database, numerically charts the uses of particular words throughout the six editions of <em>Leaves of Grass</em>, giving a visual representation to the exponential growth and organic proliferation of certain words as the poetry burgeoned in its various iterations. Statistical tools such as these, when applied to the work of this particular author, are not reductive but in fact profoundly resonant with the tone and principles of the poetry they describe. Perhaps this is the database to wed tender devotion to individual data and multiplicity.\r\n\r\nFeatured prominently on the home page of the <em>Archive</em> is a striking engraving of Whitman’s face.[ref]William J. Linton, (1870-72), engraving, (http://whitmanarchive.org/multimedia/image044.html?sort=year&amp;order=ascending&amp;page=5).[/ref] The poet appears as if caught in motion, whipping past the viewer with his eddies of hair scattered about his face like sprouts. The beard connotes a general outward drift as it spreads from his face in swells and waves. And then, from somewhere in the profusion of hair and wrinkles emerges an arresting pair of dark eyes: Whitman’s eyes simultaneously confront and confide in the viewer, imparting a personal moment amidst a storm of minutiae.','360°: The Walt Whitman Archive – McGonagill 4','In the Digital Humanist’s tool belt, the database is the trusty stand-by. Robust and indispensable, it has become a basic tool of modern academic research. One of the primary endeavors of the Digital Humanities, however, is to re-focus the perspective on the tools we use, and perhaps to redefine the term “tool” in the process. The Oxford English Dictionary defines it as “a thing … with which some operation is performed; a means of effecting something.\"','inherit','open','open','','136-revision-22','','','2012-09-25 06:07:57','2012-09-25 06:07:57','',136,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/136-revision-22/',0,'revision','',0),(2538,19,'2012-09-17 21:46:39','2012-09-17 21:46:39','I give a great credit to <em>The Walt Whitman Archive</em> co-director Kenneth Price for taking a critical look at the costs associated with an endeavor such as his.\r\n<blockquote>[M]any people, myself included, have described our site as free, yet a considerable amount of resources continue to go into its making. I want to explore that conundrum. … When users visit a deep scholarly archive on the web they are experiencing the (mostly real) benefit of displaced costs. Instead of money being spent by the user at the point of contact, money is spent elsewhere along the line: by universities in the form of faculty time, equipment, graduate student assistance, and internal grants; by external funding agencies; and, in our case, curiously, by more than one publisher. …  We might ask: Is what the Whitman archive has done a sustainable model for the production of other full-scale scholarly editions on the web? We have been fortunate with grants, publishers, libraries, and generous universities. But if it requires such a constellation of good fortune to produce an electronic scholarly edition, do we have a sound economic model in place? As the questions imply, I don\'t think we do.[ref]Kenneth M. Price, <a href=\"http://www.whitmanarchive.org/about/articles/anc.00004.html\">\"Dollars and Sense in Collaborative Digital Scholarship: The Example of the <em>Walt Whitman Hypertext Archive</em>,\"</a> <em>TWWA</em> (2001).[/ref]</blockquote>\r\nYet for all his candor, and the importance of that candor, he does not take the next (and even more difficult) step of analyzing the project’s benefits as well as its costs.  Saying such an online archival endeavor is not sustainable is, in part, to say it does not (cannot, I will suggest) provide sufficient benefits to sustain continuing such costs.  For me this is part of a larger question about how and why we allocate archival resources.  I have no particular bone to pick with the <em>Whitman Archive</em>; I have raised similar concerns about the disproportionate staff and monetary resources devoted by bricks and mortar repositories to literary collections as a genre, congressional papers as a genre,[ref]Mark A. Greene, \"Appraisal of Congressional Papers at the Minnesota Historical Society:  A Case Study,\" <em>Archival Issues</em> 19:1 (1994), 31-44.<em> </em>Republished in <em>An American Political Archives Reader,</em> Karen Dawley Paul , Glenn R Gray , and L. Rebecca Johnson Melvin eds. (Scarecrow Press, Inc., 2009), 181-96.[/ref] university records as a genre, state/county/local court records as a genre, and general store records as a genre[ref]Mark A. Greene, “From Village Smithy to Superior Vacuum Technology:  Modern Small Business Records and the Collecting Repository,” <em>Archival Issues</em> 23:1 (1998), 41-58.[/ref]—all categories of records I believe are represented disproportionately in repositories and given disproportionate attention by archivists.\r\n\r\nAn argument that resource expenditure is disproportionate requires some comparison.  As my then colleague at the Minnesota Historical Society wrote in 1998,\r\n<blockquote>while politics is an important component of Minnesota history, it is at least arguable that its importance is not so great as the resources that the Society has devoted to documenting it.  Neither the stack space nor the staff time is sufficient to swallow Congressional collections whole and still be able appropriately to document business, recreation, family life, etc. for Minnesota.  We had to ask:  ‘Do we really need 116 feet of material to document Congressman Tom Hagedorn’s eight years in office when we keep 110 feet for nearly seventy years of the St. Paul Area United Way?’[ref]Todd J. Daniels-Howell, “Reappraisal of Congressional Records at the Minnesota Historical Society,” <em>Archival Issues </em>23:1 (1998), 36.[/ref]</blockquote>\r\nThis was hardly a precise comparison, to be sure, but it was an early attempt to ask archivists to consider the theretofore reflexive resource allocation required to document congressional service to the nth degree compared to both the opportunity costs and the relative benefit (to a repository’s users) of shifting resources to other acquisition, processing, and preservation goals.  It is not that Hagedorn’s congressional tenure was value-<em>less</em> nor that the United Way’s records were objectively more valuable, only that we had never before considered the relative costs and benefits.\r\n\r\nSuch comparison is no easy matter, granted.  It might be abstractly valid to ask whether it is a good allocation of resources to develop an exhaustive online archives for Walt Whitman when there are not such efforts underway for, say, Theodore Roosevelt,[ref]At least so far as I can discover, though I did not perform a truly exhaustive search.[/ref] but the fact is we have no mechanism to determine, in any way that is even vaguely acceptable on a wide scale, whether one historical figure is more “deserving” of such a site than another.  And even if we did, we don’t have a mechanism for ensuring that the more deserving figure would automatically generate the structure necessary to solicit and manage the resources that might then be available.  And if we succeeded in identifying such mechanisms there would still loom the matter of judging relative quantity and quality of use of the sites—use being, I believe, the “end of all archival effort.”[ref]Theodore R. Schellenberg, <em>The Management of Archives</em> (New York: Columbia University Press, 1965), 108. I have pursued the idea of the centrality of use to archival work most extensively in “’The Surest Proof’:  The Use of Business Records and Implications for Appraisal,” <em>Archivaria</em> 45 (Spring 1998), 127-69 and later in Greene and Meissner, “More Product, Less Process.”[/ref]\r\n\r\nSo is this a purely rhetorical exercise?  I don’t think so.  As difficult as these questions are to answer with precision, they remain necessary questions and there are pieces of answers available once we start asking.  My plea is that we do start asking, that we do start expecting to define quantitative and qualitative measure of the costs and benefits of such projects and, by extension, of our bricks and mortar archival endeavors as well.  Not only do I think we owe it to our constituents and funders, I also believe it will increasingly be demanded by our administrators.','360°: The Walt Whitman Archive – Greene 4','I give a great credit to The Walt Whitman Archive co-director Kenneth Price for taking a critical look at the costs associated with an endeavor such as his. \"[M]any people, myself included, have described our site as free, yet a considerable amount of resources continue to go into its making. I want to explore that conundrum.\"','inherit','open','open','','104-revision-21','','','2012-09-17 21:46:39','2012-09-17 21:46:39','',104,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/104-revision-21/',0,'revision','',0),(2539,19,'2012-09-25 06:08:38','2012-09-25 06:08:38','I give a great credit to <em>The Walt Whitman Archive</em> co-director Kenneth Price for taking a critical look at the costs associated with an endeavor such as his.\r\n<blockquote>[M]any people, myself included, have described our site as free, yet a considerable amount of resources continue to go into its making. I want to explore that conundrum. … When users visit a deep scholarly archive on the web they are experiencing the (mostly real) benefit of displaced costs. Instead of money being spent by the user at the point of contact, money is spent elsewhere along the line: by universities in the form of faculty time, equipment, graduate student assistance, and internal grants; by external funding agencies; and, in our case, curiously, by more than one publisher. … We might ask: Is what the Whitman archive has done a sustainable model for the production of other full-scale scholarly editions on the web? We have been fortunate with grants, publishers, libraries, and generous universities. But if it requires such a constellation of good fortune to produce an electronic scholarly edition, do we have a sound economic model in place? As the questions imply, I don\'t think we do.[ref]Kenneth M. Price, <a href=\"http://www.whitmanarchive.org/about/articles/anc.00004.html\">\"Dollars and Sense in Collaborative Digital Scholarship: The Example of the <em>Walt Whitman Hypertext Archive</em>,\"</a> <em>TWWA</em> (2001).[/ref]</blockquote>\r\nYet for all his candor, and the importance of that candor, he does not take the next (and even more difficult) step of analyzing the project’s benefits as well as its costs. Saying such an online archival endeavor is not sustainable is, in part, to say it does not (cannot, I will suggest) provide sufficient benefits to sustain continuing such costs. For me this is part of a larger question about how and why we allocate archival resources. I have no particular bone to pick with the <em>Whitman Archive</em>; I have raised similar concerns about the disproportionate staff and monetary resources devoted by bricks and mortar repositories to literary collections as a genre, congressional papers as a genre,[ref]Mark A. Greene, \"Appraisal of Congressional Papers at the Minnesota Historical Society: A Case Study,\" <em>Archival Issues</em> 19:1 (1994), 31-44.<em> </em>Republished in <em>An American Political Archives Reader,</em> Karen Dawley Paul , Glenn R Gray , and L. Rebecca Johnson Melvin eds. (Scarecrow Press, Inc., 2009), 181-96.[/ref] university records as a genre, state/county/local court records as a genre, and general store records as a genre[ref]Mark A. Greene, “From Village Smithy to Superior Vacuum Technology: Modern Small Business Records and the Collecting Repository,” <em>Archival Issues</em> 23:1 (1998), 41-58.[/ref]—all categories of records I believe are represented disproportionately in repositories and given disproportionate attention by archivists.\r\n\r\nAn argument that resource expenditure is disproportionate requires some comparison. As my then colleague at the Minnesota Historical Society wrote in 1998,\r\n<blockquote>while politics is an important component of Minnesota history, it is at least arguable that its importance is not so great as the resources that the Society has devoted to documenting it. Neither the stack space nor the staff time is sufficient to swallow Congressional collections whole and still be able appropriately to document business, recreation, family life, etc. for Minnesota. We had to ask: ‘Do we really need 116 feet of material to document Congressman Tom Hagedorn’s eight years in office when we keep 110 feet for nearly seventy years of the St. Paul Area United Way?’[ref]Todd J. Daniels-Howell, “Reappraisal of Congressional Records at the Minnesota Historical Society,” <em>Archival Issues </em>23:1 (1998), 36.[/ref]</blockquote>\r\nThis was hardly a precise comparison, to be sure, but it was an early attempt to ask archivists to consider the theretofore reflexive resource allocation required to document congressional service to the nth degree compared to both the opportunity costs and the relative benefit (to a repository’s users) of shifting resources to other acquisition, processing, and preservation goals. It is not that Hagedorn’s congressional tenure was value-<em>less</em> nor that the United Way’s records were objectively more valuable, only that we had never before considered the relative costs and benefits.\r\n\r\nSuch comparison is no easy matter, granted. It might be abstractly valid to ask whether it is a good allocation of resources to develop an exhaustive online archives for Walt Whitman when there are not such efforts underway for, say, Theodore Roosevelt,[ref]At least so far as I can discover, though I did not perform a truly exhaustive search.[/ref] but the fact is we have no mechanism to determine, in any way that is even vaguely acceptable on a wide scale, whether one historical figure is more “deserving” of such a site than another. And even if we did, we don’t have a mechanism for ensuring that the more deserving figure would automatically generate the structure necessary to solicit and manage the resources that might then be available. And if we succeeded in identifying such mechanisms there would still loom the matter of judging relative quantity and quality of use of the sites—use being, I believe, the “end of all archival effort.”[ref]Theodore R. Schellenberg, <em>The Management of Archives</em> (New York: Columbia University Press, 1965), 108. I have pursued the idea of the centrality of use to archival work most extensively in “’The Surest Proof’: The Use of Business Records and Implications for Appraisal,” <em>Archivaria</em> 45 (Spring 1998), 127-69 and later in Greene and Meissner, “More Product, Less Process.”[/ref]\r\n\r\nSo is this a purely rhetorical exercise? I don’t think so. As difficult as these questions are to answer with precision, they remain necessary questions and there are pieces of answers available once we start asking. My plea is that we do start asking, that we do start expecting to define quantitative and qualitative measure of the costs and benefits of such projects and, by extension, of our bricks and mortar archival endeavors as well. Not only do I think we owe it to our constituents and funders, I also believe it will increasingly be demanded by our administrators.','360°: The Walt Whitman Archive – Greene 4','I give a great credit to The Walt Whitman Archive co-director Kenneth Price for taking a critical look at the costs associated with an endeavor such as his. \"[M]any people, myself included, have described our site as free, yet a considerable amount of resources continue to go into its making. I want to explore that conundrum.\"','inherit','open','open','','104-revision-22','','','2012-09-25 06:08:38','2012-09-25 06:08:38','',104,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/104-revision-22/',0,'revision','',0),(2540,10,'2012-09-25 03:46:30','2012-09-25 03:46:30','<img class=\"size-full wp-image-1368\" title=\"cscc_student work_sample material\" src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/cscc_student-work_sample-material.jpg\" alt=\"Image of James A. Bible (c. 1860) from the Ramsey Family Papers (MS 81).\" width=\"386\" height=\"640\" />\r\n<span class=\"caption\">Image of James A. Bible (c. 1860) from the Ramsey Family Papers (MS 81). Saunders worked on this image for the Southeast Tennessee Digital Archive (SETDA). Used by permission of Cleveland Public Library.</span>','History Lab: Combining Service Learning, Research Methods, and Digital Archives ','This case study features the work of a student who took History Lab, an introductory history and service-learning course at Cleveland State Community College (CSCC). He researched individual items from a local cultural heritage organization that were then digitized, described, and published online in the <a href=\"http://www.clevelandstatecc.edu/setda/\" target=\"_blank\">Southeast Tennessee Digital Archive</a> (SETDA). Matthew Saunders\' work ended up in the Southeast Tennessee Digital Archive. You can find the whole archive <a href=\"http://www.clevelandstatecc.edu/setda/\" target=\"_blank\">here</a>, and the items Saunders contributed <a href=\"http://csccdigital.cdmhost.com/cdm/singleitem/collection/p4024coll8/id/216\" target=\"_blank\">here</a>.','inherit','open','open','','1018-revision-28','','','2012-09-25 03:46:30','2012-09-25 03:46:30','',1018,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/1018-revision-28/',0,'revision','',0),(2542,10,'2012-09-28 07:54:21','2012-09-28 07:54:21','<span class=\"intro\">Saunders worked on this image for the Southeast Tennessee Digital Archive (SETDA).</span>\r\n\r\n<img class=\"size-full wp-image-1368\" title=\"cscc_student work_sample material\" src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/cscc_student-work_sample-material.jpg\" alt=\"Image of James A. Bible (c. 1860) from the Ramsey Family Papers (MS 81).\" width=\"386\" height=\"640\" />\r\n<span class=\"caption\">Image of James A. Bible (c. 1860) from the Ramsey Family Papers (MS 81). Used by permission of Cleveland Public Library.</span>','History Lab: Combining Service Learning, Research Methods, and Digital Archives ','This case study features the work of a student who took History Lab, an introductory history and service-learning course at Cleveland State Community College (CSCC). He researched individual items from a local cultural heritage organization that were then digitized, described, and published online in the <a href=\"http://www.clevelandstatecc.edu/setda/\" target=\"_blank\">Southeast Tennessee Digital Archive</a> (SETDA). Matthew Saunders\' work ended up in the Southeast Tennessee Digital Archive. You can find the whole archive <a href=\"http://www.clevelandstatecc.edu/setda/\" target=\"_blank\">here</a>, and the items Saunders contributed <a href=\"http://csccdigital.cdmhost.com/cdm/singleitem/collection/p4024coll8/id/216\" target=\"_blank\">here</a>.','inherit','open','open','','1018-revision-30','','','2012-09-28 07:54:21','2012-09-28 07:54:21','',1018,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/1018-revision-30/',0,'revision','',0),(2551,10,'2012-09-21 02:44:29','2012-09-21 02:44:29','<h3>How to Work with Primary Source Documents</h3>\r\n\r\nArchival research is an important source for coursework and teaching, as professors and instructors are increasingly incorporating work with primary documents into undergraduate courses. Because access to primary resources is often restricted by research room hours, and can be further limited because of preservation concerns if materials are extremely fragile or if collections are not fully inventoried, this kind of research takes time. Despite this, many student researchers leave archives with a great deal more information than they will be able to explore in their written scholarship. Students’ research goals also inform their actual practice, although, due to the many pleasures and challenges of working with primary documents, even the best intentions often change dramatically when working through a collection of materials. Whatever the situation, undergraduates working with primary documents need to be aware of a number of general recommendations, in addition to any particular archive’s specific rules.\r\n\r\nThough the individual archive or library is the best first source of information for working with specific collections, the following resources provide general information about working effectively with archival materials that may be of use to students and/or their teachers.\r\n<h3>Comprehensive</h3>\r\nSchmidt, Laura. \"Using Archives: A Guide to Effective Research.\" <em>Society of American Archivists</em>. 2011. <a href=\"http://www2.archivists.org/usingarchives\">http://www2.archivists.org/usingarchives</a>. An excellent primer for using archives, with considerations such as: \"What Are Archives and How do They Differ from Libraries?\"; \"Requesting Materials Remotely\"; \"Planning to Visit an Archive\"; and \"Notes on Copyright, Restrictions, and Unprocessed Collections.\"\r\n<h3>Handling Documents</h3>\r\nNational Archives (UK). \"Handling Documents.\" <em>The National Archives.</em> 2011. <a href=\"http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/visit/document-handling.htm\">http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/visit/document-handling.htm</a>. A basic overview for handling documents, including best practices and an explanation of common types of documents and handling needs.\r\n\r\nNational Park Service. \"Handling Archival Documents and Manuscripts.\" <em>Conserve O Gram </em>19, no. 17 (Sept. 1996). <a href=\"http://www.nps.gov/museum/publications/conserveogram/19-17.pdf\">http://www.nps.gov/museum/publications/conserveogram/19-17.pdf</a>. A brief guide focused on handling archival documents and manuscripts organized into a series of do’s and don’ts, including setting up the research area, moving materials, and dealing with problems (brittle, damaged, attached, and contaminated materials).\r\n<h3>Working in Archives</h3>\r\nArchives of American Art. \"Frequently Asked Questions.\" <em>Archives of American Art: Ask Us.</em> 2011. <a href=\"http://www.aaa.si.edu/askus/faq\">http://www.aaa.si.edu/askus/faq</a>: A general FAQ addressing basic questions and providing policy information, such as the need for researchers to schedule appointments, a useful reminder no matter which archive you plan to use.\r\n\r\nNew York University Libraries. \"Using Archives and Manuscripts.\" <em>New York</em><em> University</em><em> Libraries: Research Guides.</em> 2011. <a href=\"http://nyu.libguides.com/content.php?pid=38517\">http://nyu.libguides.com/content.php?pid=38517</a>. Intended for researchers using NYU collections, this guide also provides general relevant information, including definitions, recommendations on handling materials, and best practices for archival research.\r\n<h3>Teaching</h3>\r\nThe National Archives Experience (US). \"Tool Box.\"<em> The National Archives Experience: Educators and Students. </em>2011. <a href=\"http://www.archives.gov/nae/education/tool-box.html\">http://www.archives.gov/nae/education/tool-box.html</a>. The \"Tool Box\" includes many basic documents explaining the benefits of teaching with primary sources, basics for teaching with primary documents, and links to teaching workshops and collaborative opportunities (<a href=\"http://www.archives.gov/nae/education/collaboration.html\">http://www.archives.gov/nae/education/collaboration.html</a>).\r\n\r\nNational Archives of Australia. <em>Vrroom: Virtual Reading Room</em>. 2011. <a href=\"http://vrroom.naa.gov.au/\">http://vrroom.naa.gov.au/</a>. With a tagline of \"easy access to archival records for teachers and students,\" <em>Vrroom</em> is designed as a full virtual reading room, allowing users to search and browse archival collections, as well as providing support for teaching and research.\r\n<h3>Working with Technology in Archives</h3>\r\nBateman, Kirklin, Sheila Brennan, Douglas Mudd, and Paula Petrik. \"Taking a Byte Out of the Archives: Making Technology Work for You.\" <em>Perspectives Online </em>43, no. 1: (Jan. 2005)\r\n<a href=\"http://www.historians.org/perspectives/issues/2005/0501/0501arc1.cfm\">http://www.historians.org/perspectives/issues/2005/0501/0501arc1.cfm</a>. A useful overview of working with technology in archives, as well as maintaining electronic documents and notes from archival research. Published in 2005, the guide is somewhat dated (it does not include Zotero, for example, which rolled out in 2006).','How to Work with Primary Source Documents','','inherit','open','open','','2045-revision-9','','','2012-09-21 02:44:29','2012-09-21 02:44:29','',2045,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/2045-revision-9/',0,'revision','',0),(2543,10,'2012-09-28 07:55:34','2012-09-28 07:55:34','<span class=\"archives-remixed\" class=\"intro\">Saunders worked on this image for the Southeast Tennessee Digital Archive (SETDA).</span>\r\n\r\n<img class=\"size-full wp-image-1368\" title=\"cscc_student work_sample material\" src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/cscc_student-work_sample-material.jpg\" alt=\"Image of James A. Bible (c. 1860) from the Ramsey Family Papers (MS 81).\" width=\"386\" height=\"640\" />\r\n<span class=\"caption\">Image of James A. Bible (c. 1860) from the Ramsey Family Papers (MS 81). Used by permission of Cleveland Public Library.</span>','History Lab: Combining Service Learning, Research Methods, and Digital Archives ','This case study features the work of a student who took History Lab, an introductory history and service-learning course at Cleveland State Community College (CSCC). He researched individual items from a local cultural heritage organization that were then digitized, described, and published online in the <a href=\"http://www.clevelandstatecc.edu/setda/\" target=\"_blank\">Southeast Tennessee Digital Archive</a> (SETDA). Matthew Saunders\' work ended up in the Southeast Tennessee Digital Archive. You can find the whole archive <a href=\"http://www.clevelandstatecc.edu/setda/\" target=\"_blank\">here</a>, and the items Saunders contributed <a href=\"http://csccdigital.cdmhost.com/cdm/singleitem/collection/p4024coll8/id/216\" target=\"_blank\">here</a>.','inherit','open','open','','1018-revision-31','','','2012-09-28 07:55:34','2012-09-28 07:55:34','',1018,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/1018-revision-31/',0,'revision','',0),(2544,10,'2012-09-28 07:57:08','2012-09-28 07:57:08','<span class=\"single-ar-post\">Saunders worked on this image for the Southeast Tennessee Digital Archive (SETDA).</span>\r\n\r\n<img class=\"size-full wp-image-1368\" title=\"cscc_student work_sample material\" src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/cscc_student-work_sample-material.jpg\" alt=\"Image of James A. Bible (c. 1860) from the Ramsey Family Papers (MS 81).\" width=\"386\" height=\"640\" />\r\n<span class=\"caption\">Image of James A. Bible (c. 1860) from the Ramsey Family Papers (MS 81). Used by permission of Cleveland Public Library.</span>','History Lab: Combining Service Learning, Research Methods, and Digital Archives ','This case study features the work of a student who took History Lab, an introductory history and service-learning course at Cleveland State Community College (CSCC). He researched individual items from a local cultural heritage organization that were then digitized, described, and published online in the <a href=\"http://www.clevelandstatecc.edu/setda/\" target=\"_blank\">Southeast Tennessee Digital Archive</a> (SETDA). Matthew Saunders\' work ended up in the Southeast Tennessee Digital Archive. You can find the whole archive <a href=\"http://www.clevelandstatecc.edu/setda/\" target=\"_blank\">here</a>, and the items Saunders contributed <a href=\"http://csccdigital.cdmhost.com/cdm/singleitem/collection/p4024coll8/id/216\" target=\"_blank\">here</a>.','inherit','open','open','','1018-revision-32','','','2012-09-28 07:57:08','2012-09-28 07:57:08','',1018,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/1018-revision-32/',0,'revision','',0),(2545,10,'2012-09-28 08:01:31','2012-09-28 08:01:31','<span class=\"post\">Saunders worked on this image for the Southeast Tennessee Digital Archive (SETDA).</span>\r\n\r\n<img class=\"size-full wp-image-1368\" title=\"cscc_student work_sample material\" src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/cscc_student-work_sample-material.jpg\" alt=\"Image of James A. Bible (c. 1860) from the Ramsey Family Papers (MS 81).\" width=\"386\" height=\"640\" />\r\n<span class=\"caption\">Image of James A. Bible (c. 1860) from the Ramsey Family Papers (MS 81). Used by permission of Cleveland Public Library.</span>','History Lab: Combining Service Learning, Research Methods, and Digital Archives ','This case study features the work of a student who took History Lab, an introductory history and service-learning course at Cleveland State Community College (CSCC). He researched individual items from a local cultural heritage organization that were then digitized, described, and published online in the <a href=\"http://www.clevelandstatecc.edu/setda/\" target=\"_blank\">Southeast Tennessee Digital Archive</a> (SETDA). Matthew Saunders\' work ended up in the Southeast Tennessee Digital Archive. You can find the whole archive <a href=\"http://www.clevelandstatecc.edu/setda/\" target=\"_blank\">here</a>, and the items Saunders contributed <a href=\"http://csccdigital.cdmhost.com/cdm/singleitem/collection/p4024coll8/id/216\" target=\"_blank\">here</a>.','inherit','open','open','','1018-revision-33','','','2012-09-28 08:01:31','2012-09-28 08:01:31','',1018,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/1018-revision-33/',0,'revision','',0),(2546,10,'2012-09-28 08:05:40','2012-09-28 08:05:40','<span class=\"author-box\">Saunders worked on this image for the Southeast Tennessee Digital Archive (SETDA).</span>\r\n\r\n<img class=\"size-full wp-image-1368\" title=\"cscc_student work_sample material\" src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/cscc_student-work_sample-material.jpg\" alt=\"Image of James A. Bible (c. 1860) from the Ramsey Family Papers (MS 81).\" width=\"386\" height=\"640\" />\r\n<span class=\"caption\">Image of James A. Bible (c. 1860) from the Ramsey Family Papers (MS 81). Used by permission of Cleveland Public Library.</span>','History Lab: Combining Service Learning, Research Methods, and Digital Archives ','This case study features the work of a student who took History Lab, an introductory history and service-learning course at Cleveland State Community College (CSCC). He researched individual items from a local cultural heritage organization that were then digitized, described, and published online in the <a href=\"http://www.clevelandstatecc.edu/setda/\" target=\"_blank\">Southeast Tennessee Digital Archive</a> (SETDA). Matthew Saunders\' work ended up in the Southeast Tennessee Digital Archive. You can find the whole archive <a href=\"http://www.clevelandstatecc.edu/setda/\" target=\"_blank\">here</a>, and the items Saunders contributed <a href=\"http://csccdigital.cdmhost.com/cdm/singleitem/collection/p4024coll8/id/216\" target=\"_blank\">here</a>.','inherit','open','open','','1018-revision-34','','','2012-09-28 08:05:40','2012-09-28 08:05:40','',1018,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/1018-revision-34/',0,'revision','',0),(2547,10,'2012-09-25 04:03:22','2012-09-25 04:03:22','<div id=\"attachment_957\" class=\"alignright\" style=\"width:638px\"><img class=\"size-large wp-image-957\" title=\"uf_student  action photo_barnett 3\" src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/uf_student-action-photo_barnett-3-1024x682.jpg\" alt=\"\" style=\"width:638\" />  <span class=\"wp-caption-text\">James (Jimmy) Barnett using a Betterlight Super 8k-HS camera back and custom mount configuration to digitize John Carrère and Thomas Hastings&rsquo; &ldquo;Ground Plan, Presbyterian Church, St. Augustine, Fla.&rdquo; c. 1889-1890. <em>Photo credit:</em> Joe Kaleita, University of Florida Libraries.</span></div>\r\n\r\n<div id=\"attachment_958\" class=\"alignright\" style=\"width:638px\"><a href=\"http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UF00089836/00001\" target=\"_blank\"><img class=\"size-full wp-image-958\" title=\"Part Plan of Fourth Floor\" src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/uf_student-work_image-2.jpg\" alt=\"\" style=\"width:638\" /></a> <span class=\"wp-caption-text\">John Carrère and Thomas Hastings. &ldquo;<a href=\"http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UF00089836/00001\">Part Plan of Fourth Floor. Architectural drawings of the Hotel Ponce de Leon, St. Augustine, Florida</a>.&rdquo; 96\" x 40\".</span></div>\r\n\r\n<div id=\"attachment_959\" class=\"alignright\" style=\"width:638px; margin-top:20px;\"><a href=\"http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UF00082657/00001\" target=\"_blank\"><img class=\"size-full wp-image-959\" title=\"Ground Plan, Presbyterian Church\" src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/uf_student-work_image-1.jpg\" alt=\"\" style=\"width:638\" /></a>  <span class=\"wp-caption-text\" style=\"margin-bottom:30px;\">An example of the results of Barnett&rsquo;s work digitizing and preserving a large-scale architectural drawing. John Carrère and Thomas Hastings. &ldquo;<a href=\"http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UF00082657/00001\">Ground Plan, Presbyterian Church, St. Augustine, Fla</a>.&rdquo; c. 1889-1890.</span></div>\r\n\r\nThe images above are a small fraction of the materials made available through the project and Jimmy\'s work. The full range can be seen in the <a href=\"http://ufdc.ufl.edu/caha/all\" target=\"_blank\">Carrère &amp; Hastings Digital Collection</a>, part of the University of Florida Digital Collections. You can read more at the project blog: <a href=\"http://flaglerdrawings.wordpress.com/\" target=\"_blank\">flaglerdrawings.wordpress.com</a>.','Digitizing Large-Format Architectural Plans','This case study showcases an undergraduate’s work as the lead digital scanner of architectural drawings for the Carrère & Hastings Digital Collection, a collaborative project between the University of Florida (UF) and Flagler College to conserve and digitally preserve the large and fragile drawings. For years the drawings were stored in a basement boiler room and suffered from exposure to high Florida temperatures, humidity, insects, and rodents. The collection is now under the care of a team of faculty, staff, and students from the UF’s Special Collections, Conservation Unit, and Digital Library Center.','inherit','open','open','','946-revision-44','','','2012-09-25 04:03:22','2012-09-25 04:03:22','',946,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/946-revision-44/',0,'revision','',0),(2591,10,'2012-10-01 23:31:49','2012-10-01 23:31:49','“So, how do we bring students to our table?” That was the question a special collections librarian asked in 1999. <sup><a id=\"ref1\" href=\"#fn1\">[1]</a></sup> Now, in 2012, the question is no longer how: “Teaching with primary source materials is unquestionably ‘hot’ in higher education [as] authentic rare books, manuscripts, or archival documents\" appear in many undergraduate classrooms. <sup><a id=\"ref2\" href=\"#fn2\">[2]</a></sup>\r\n\r\nThe table is full; the effort to bring undergraduates into special collections and archives has been enormously successful. What matters now is how to turn these encounters to account. What happens in the archival laboratory, a place where students are actively involved in research, stewardship, publication, and exhibits? How do librarians, curators, archivists, instructors, and technology specialists collaborate to get such projects off the ground? How do we make use of these encounters to develop research and interpretive skills, showcase students’ findings, and learn from their discoveries? What do students report that they have gained through their archival experiences?\r\n\r\nIn this issue of “Archives, Remixed,” we present six case studies illustrating inventive solutions to these dilemmas of success. The parameters and formats of these projects demonstrate the diversity of ways to teach with primary source materials: not all of the projects take place in a classroom context (although some do); not all the student work is authored singly (although some is). Some projects involve one institution, while others involve partnerships with local organizations or other universities or colleges; some projects are more analog, others more digital; and some end when the student’s work is complete, while others continue. The projects all have historical claims, but the array of objects under consideration—architectural drawings, photographs, ancient statuary, newspaper clippings, rare books, personal mementos—speaks to many disciplines. The academic institutions where these projects originate, from a community college to liberal arts colleges to a research university, vary as much as the projects themselves.\r\n\r\nEach case study focuses the work students produce in these archival encounters. On each case-study page, you will find a sample of student work accompanied by a project description; commentary on the project by the student(s); commentary from the teachers, librarians, and/or technologists who structured the projects and guided students through them; as well as links to related or additional resources.\r\n\r\nWe invite you to explore, to comment, and to use these case studies as fodder for your own research and teaching projects.\r\n<div class=\"footnote\"><sup id=\"fn1\">[1]</sup>Allen, Susan M. “Rare Books and the College Library: Current Practices in Marrying Undergraduates to Special Collections.” Rare Books &amp; Manuscripts Librarianship 13.2 (Spring 1999): 110-19.</div>\r\n<div class=\"footnote\"><sup id=\"fn1\">[2]</sup> Bahde, Anne. “Taking the Show on the Road: Special Collections Instruction in the Campus Classroom.” RBM: A Journal of Rare Books, Manuscripts, &amp; Cultural Heritage 12.2 (Fall 2011): 75.</div>','Student Project Case Studies','A venue featuring new work that analyzes, uses, theorizes, creates, navigates, or reconstitutes archival practice and theory or particular archives, objects, and exhibits&mdash;in traditional essays or multi-modal or experimental formats.','inherit','open','open','','1711-revision-34','','','2012-10-01 23:31:49','2012-10-01 23:31:49','',1711,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/1711-revision-34/',0,'revision','',0),(2548,10,'2012-09-28 08:17:20','2012-09-28 08:17:20','\r\nThe images above are a small fraction of the materials made available through the project and Jimmy\'s work. The full range can be seen in the <a href=\"http://ufdc.ufl.edu/caha/all\" target=\"_blank\">Carrère &amp; Hastings Digital Collection</a>, part of the University of Florida Digital Collections. You can read more at the project blog: <a href=\"http://flaglerdrawings.wordpress.com/\" target=\"_blank\">flaglerdrawings.wordpress.com</a>.\r\n\r\n<div id=\"attachment_957\" class=\"alignright\" style=\"width:638px\"><img class=\"size-large wp-image-957\" title=\"uf_student  action photo_barnett 3\" src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/uf_student-action-photo_barnett-3-1024x682.jpg\" alt=\"\" style=\"width:638\" />  <span class=\"wp-caption-text\">James (Jimmy) Barnett using a Betterlight Super 8k-HS camera back and custom mount configuration to digitize John Carrère and Thomas Hastings&rsquo; &ldquo;Ground Plan, Presbyterian Church, St. Augustine, Fla.&rdquo; c. 1889-1890. <em>Photo credit:</em> Joe Kaleita, University of Florida Libraries.</span></div>\r\n\r\n\r\n<div id=\"attachment_959\" class=\"alignright\" style=\"width:638px; margin-top:20px;\"><a href=\"http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UF00082657/00001\" target=\"_blank\"><img class=\"size-full wp-image-959\" title=\"Ground Plan, Presbyterian Church\" src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/uf_student-work_image-1.jpg\" alt=\"\" style=\"width:638\" /></a>  <span class=\"wp-caption-text\" style=\"margin-bottom:30px;\">An example of the results of Barnett&rsquo;s work digitizing and preserving a large-scale architectural drawing. John Carrère and Thomas Hastings. &ldquo;<a href=\"http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UF00082657/00001\">Ground Plan, Presbyterian Church, St. Augustine, Fla</a>.&rdquo; c. 1889-1890.</span></div>\r\n\r\n\r\n<div id=\"attachment_958\" class=\"alignright\" style=\"width:638px\"><a href=\"http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UF00089836/00001\" target=\"_blank\"><img class=\"size-full wp-image-958\" title=\"Part Plan of Fourth Floor\" src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/uf_student-work_image-2.jpg\" alt=\"\" style=\"width:638\" /></a> <span class=\"wp-caption-text\">John Carrère and Thomas Hastings. &ldquo;<a href=\"http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UF00089836/00001\">Another example of Barnett’s work digitizing and preserving a large-scale architectural drawing. John Carrère and Thomas Hastings. \"<a href=\"http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fufdc.ufl.edu%2FUF00089836%2F00001&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNG7YpjRA9b6TXJdNqbZiRzCSCBqfw\" title=\"Part Plan of Fourth Floor. Architectural drawings of the Hotel Ponce de Leon, St. Augustine, Florida\">Part Plan of Fourth Floor. Architectural drawings of the Hotel Ponce de Leon, St. Augustine, Florida.</a>\" 96\"x40\".</span></div>\r\n\r\n','Digitizing Large-Format Architectural Plans','This case study showcases an undergraduate’s work as the lead digital scanner of architectural drawings for the Carrère & Hastings Digital Collection, a collaborative project between the University of Florida (UF) and Flagler College to conserve and digitally preserve the large and fragile drawings. For years the drawings were stored in a basement boiler room and suffered from exposure to high Florida temperatures, humidity, insects, and rodents. The collection is now under the care of a team of faculty, staff, and students from the UF’s Special Collections, Conservation Unit, and Digital Library Center.','inherit','open','open','','946-revision-45','','','2012-09-28 08:17:20','2012-09-28 08:17:20','',946,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/946-revision-45/',0,'revision','',0),(2549,10,'2012-09-28 08:20:58','2012-09-28 08:20:58','The images above are a small fraction of the materials made available through the project and Jimmy\'s work. The full range can be seen in the <a href=\"http://ufdc.ufl.edu/caha/all\" target=\"_blank\">Carrère &amp; Hastings Digital Collection</a>, part of the University of Florida Digital Collections. You can read more at the project blog: <a href=\"http://flaglerdrawings.wordpress.com/\" target=\"_blank\">flaglerdrawings.wordpress.com</a>.\r\n\r\n&nbsp\r\n\r\n<div id=\"attachment_957\" class=\"alignright\" style=\"width:638px\"><img class=\"size-large wp-image-957\" title=\"uf_student  action photo_barnett 3\" src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/uf_student-action-photo_barnett-3-1024x682.jpg\" alt=\"\" style=\"width:638\" />  <span class=\"wp-caption-text\">James (Jimmy) Barnett using a Betterlight Super 8k-HS camera back and custom mount configuration to digitize John Carrère and Thomas Hastings&rsquo; &ldquo;Ground Plan, Presbyterian Church, St. Augustine, Fla.&rdquo; c. 1889-1890. <em>Photo credit:</em> Joe Kaleita, University of Florida Libraries.</span></div>\r\n\r\n\r\n<div id=\"attachment_959\" class=\"alignright\" style=\"width:638px; margin-top:20px;\"><a href=\"http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UF00082657/00001\" target=\"_blank\"><img class=\"size-full wp-image-959\" title=\"Ground Plan, Presbyterian Church\" src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/uf_student-work_image-1.jpg\" alt=\"\" style=\"width:638\" /></a>  <span class=\"wp-caption-text\" style=\"margin-bottom:30px;\">An example of the results of Barnett&rsquo;s work digitizing and preserving a large-scale architectural drawing. John Carrère and Thomas Hastings. &ldquo;<a href=\"http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UF00082657/00001\">Ground Plan, Presbyterian Church, St. Augustine, Fla</a>.&rdquo; c. 1889-1890.</span></div>\r\n\r\n\r\n<div id=\"attachment_958\" class=\"alignright\" style=\"width:638px\"><a href=\"http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UF00089836/00001\" target=\"_blank\"><img class=\"size-full wp-image-958\" title=\"Part Plan of Fourth Floor\" src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/uf_student-work_image-2.jpg\" alt=\"\" style=\"width:638\" /></a> <span class=\"wp-caption-text\">John Carrère and Thomas Hastings. &ldquo;<a href=\"http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UF00089836/00001\">Another example of Barnett’s work digitizing and preserving a large-scale architectural drawing. John Carrère and Thomas Hastings. <a href=\"http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fufdc.ufl.edu%2FUF00089836%2F00001&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNG7YpjRA9b6TXJdNqbZiRzCSCBqfw\" title=\"Part Plan of Fourth Floor. Architectural drawings of the Hotel Ponce de Leon, St. Augustine, Florida\">Part Plan of Fourth Floor. Architectural drawings of the Hotel Ponce de Leon, St. Augustine, Florida.</a>\" 96\"x40\".</span></div>\r\n\r\n','Digitizing Large-Format Architectural Plans','This case study showcases an undergraduate’s work as the lead digital scanner of architectural drawings for the Carrère & Hastings Digital Collection, a collaborative project between the University of Florida (UF) and Flagler College to conserve and digitally preserve the large and fragile drawings. For years the drawings were stored in a basement boiler room and suffered from exposure to high Florida temperatures, humidity, insects, and rodents. The collection is now under the care of a team of faculty, staff, and students from the UF’s Special Collections, Conservation Unit, and Digital Library Center.','inherit','open','open','','946-revision-46','','','2012-09-28 08:20:58','2012-09-28 08:20:58','',946,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/946-revision-46/',0,'revision','',0),(2552,10,'2012-09-28 18:51:49','2012-09-28 18:51:49','<h3>How to Work with Primary Source Documents</h3>\r\nArchival research is an important source for coursework and teaching, as professors and instructors are increasingly incorporating work with primary documents into undergraduate courses. Because access to primary resources is often restricted by research room hours, and can be further limited because of preservation concerns if materials are extremely fragile or if collections are not fully inventoried, this kind of research takes time. Despite this, many student researchers leave archives with a great deal more information than they will be able to explore in their written scholarship. Students’ research goals also inform their actual practice, although, due to the many pleasures and challenges of working with primary documents, even the best intentions often change dramatically when working through a collection of materials. Whatever the situation, undergraduates working with primary documents need to be aware of a number of general recommendations, in addition to any particular archive’s specific rules.\r\n\r\nThough the individual archive or library is the best first source of information for working with specific collections, the following resources provide general information about working effectively with archival materials that may be of use to students and/or their teachers.\r\n<h3>Comprehensive</h3>\r\nSchmidt, Laura. \"Using Archives: A Guide to Effective Research.\" <em>Society of American Archivists</em>. 2011. <a href=\"http://www2.archivists.org/usingarchives\">http://www2.archivists.org/usingarchives</a>. An excellent primer for using archives, with considerations such as: \"What Are Archives and How do They Differ from Libraries?\"; \"Requesting Materials Remotely\"; \"Planning to Visit an Archive\"; and \"Notes on Copyright, Restrictions, and Unprocessed Collections.\"\r\n<h3>Handling Documents</h3>\r\nNational Archives (UK). \"Handling Documents.\" <em>The National Archives.</em> 2011. <a href=\"http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/visit/document-handling.htm\">http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/visit/document-handling.htm</a>. A basic overview for handling documents, including best practices and an explanation of common types of documents and handling needs.\r\n\r\nNational Park Service. \"Handling Archival Documents and Manuscripts.\" <em>Conserve O Gram </em>19, no. 17 (Sept. 1996). <a href=\"http://www.nps.gov/museum/publications/conserveogram/19-17.pdf\">http://www.nps.gov/museum/publications/conserveogram/19-17.pdf</a>. A brief guide focused on handling archival documents and manuscripts organized into a series of do’s and don’ts, including setting up the research area, moving materials, and dealing with problems (brittle, damaged, attached, and contaminated materials).\r\n<h3>Working in Archives</h3>\r\nArchives of American Art. \"Frequently Asked Questions.\" <em>Archives of American Art: Ask Us.</em> 2011. <a href=\"http://www.aaa.si.edu/askus/faq\">http://www.aaa.si.edu/askus/faq</a>: A general FAQ addressing basic questions and providing policy information, such as the need for researchers to schedule appointments, a useful reminder no matter which archive you plan to use.\r\n\r\nNew York University Libraries. \"Using Archives and Manuscripts.\" <em>New York</em><em> University</em><em> Libraries: Research Guides.</em> 2011. <a href=\"http://nyu.libguides.com/content.php?pid=38517\">http://nyu.libguides.com/content.php?pid=38517</a>. Intended for researchers using NYU collections, this guide also provides general relevant information, including definitions, recommendations on handling materials, and best practices for archival research.\r\n<h3>Teaching</h3>\r\nThe National Archives Experience (US). \"Tool Box.\"<em> The National Archives Experience: Educators and Students. </em>2011. <a href=\"http://www.archives.gov/nae/education/tool-box.html\">http://www.archives.gov/nae/education/tool-box.html</a>. The \"Tool Box\" includes many basic documents explaining the benefits of teaching with primary sources, basics for teaching with primary documents, and links to teaching workshops and collaborative opportunities (<a href=\"http://www.archives.gov/nae/education/collaboration.html\">http://www.archives.gov/nae/education/collaboration.html</a>).\r\n\r\nNational Archives of Australia. <em>Vrroom: Virtual Reading Room</em>. 2011. <a href=\"http://vrroom.naa.gov.au/\">http://vrroom.naa.gov.au/</a>. With a tagline of \"easy access to archival records for teachers and students,\" <em>Vrroom</em> is designed as a full virtual reading room, allowing users to search and browse archival collections, as well as providing support for teaching and research.\r\n<h3>Working with Technology in Archives</h3>\r\nBateman, Kirklin, Sheila Brennan, Douglas Mudd, and Paula Petrik. \"Taking a Byte Out of the Archives: Making Technology Work for You.\" <em>Perspectives Online </em>43, no. 1: (Jan. 2005)\r\n<a href=\"http://www.historians.org/perspectives/issues/2005/0501/0501arc1.cfm\">http://www.historians.org/perspectives/issues/2005/0501/0501arc1.cfm</a>. A useful overview of working with technology in archives, as well as maintaining electronic documents and notes from archival research. Published in 2005, the guide is somewhat dated (it does not include Zotero, for example, which rolled out in 2006).','How to Work with Primary Source Documents','','inherit','open','open','','2045-revision-10','','','2012-09-28 18:51:49','2012-09-28 18:51:49','',2045,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/2045-revision-10/',0,'revision','',0),(2553,10,'2012-09-28 18:52:53','2012-09-28 18:52:53','<h2>How to Work with Primary Source Documents</h2>\r\nArchival research is an important source for coursework and teaching, as professors and instructors are increasingly incorporating work with primary documents into undergraduate courses. Because access to primary resources is often restricted by research room hours, and can be further limited because of preservation concerns if materials are extremely fragile or if collections are not fully inventoried, this kind of research takes time. Despite this, many student researchers leave archives with a great deal more information than they will be able to explore in their written scholarship. Students’ research goals also inform their actual practice, although, due to the many pleasures and challenges of working with primary documents, even the best intentions often change dramatically when working through a collection of materials. Whatever the situation, undergraduates working with primary documents need to be aware of a number of general recommendations, in addition to any particular archive’s specific rules.\r\n\r\nThough the individual archive or library is the best first source of information for working with specific collections, the following resources provide general information about working effectively with archival materials that may be of use to students and/or their teachers.\r\n<h3>Comprehensive</h3>\r\nSchmidt, Laura. \"Using Archives: A Guide to Effective Research.\" <em>Society of American Archivists</em>. 2011. <a href=\"http://www2.archivists.org/usingarchives\">http://www2.archivists.org/usingarchives</a>. An excellent primer for using archives, with considerations such as: \"What Are Archives and How do They Differ from Libraries?\"; \"Requesting Materials Remotely\"; \"Planning to Visit an Archive\"; and \"Notes on Copyright, Restrictions, and Unprocessed Collections.\"\r\n<h3>Handling Documents</h3>\r\nNational Archives (UK). \"Handling Documents.\" <em>The National Archives.</em> 2011. <a href=\"http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/visit/document-handling.htm\">http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/visit/document-handling.htm</a>. A basic overview for handling documents, including best practices and an explanation of common types of documents and handling needs.\r\n\r\nNational Park Service. \"Handling Archival Documents and Manuscripts.\" <em>Conserve O Gram </em>19, no. 17 (Sept. 1996). <a href=\"http://www.nps.gov/museum/publications/conserveogram/19-17.pdf\">http://www.nps.gov/museum/publications/conserveogram/19-17.pdf</a>. A brief guide focused on handling archival documents and manuscripts organized into a series of do’s and don’ts, including setting up the research area, moving materials, and dealing with problems (brittle, damaged, attached, and contaminated materials).\r\n<h3>Working in Archives</h3>\r\nArchives of American Art. \"Frequently Asked Questions.\" <em>Archives of American Art: Ask Us.</em> 2011. <a href=\"http://www.aaa.si.edu/askus/faq\">http://www.aaa.si.edu/askus/faq</a>: A general FAQ addressing basic questions and providing policy information, such as the need for researchers to schedule appointments, a useful reminder no matter which archive you plan to use.\r\n\r\nNew York University Libraries. \"Using Archives and Manuscripts.\" <em>New York</em><em> University</em><em> Libraries: Research Guides.</em> 2011. <a href=\"http://nyu.libguides.com/content.php?pid=38517\">http://nyu.libguides.com/content.php?pid=38517</a>. Intended for researchers using NYU collections, this guide also provides general relevant information, including definitions, recommendations on handling materials, and best practices for archival research.\r\n<h3>Teaching</h3>\r\nThe National Archives Experience (US). \"Tool Box.\"<em> The National Archives Experience: Educators and Students. </em>2011. <a href=\"http://www.archives.gov/nae/education/tool-box.html\">http://www.archives.gov/nae/education/tool-box.html</a>. The \"Tool Box\" includes many basic documents explaining the benefits of teaching with primary sources, basics for teaching with primary documents, and links to teaching workshops and collaborative opportunities (<a href=\"http://www.archives.gov/nae/education/collaboration.html\">http://www.archives.gov/nae/education/collaboration.html</a>).\r\n\r\nNational Archives of Australia. <em>Vrroom: Virtual Reading Room</em>. 2011. <a href=\"http://vrroom.naa.gov.au/\">http://vrroom.naa.gov.au/</a>. With a tagline of \"easy access to archival records for teachers and students,\" <em>Vrroom</em> is designed as a full virtual reading room, allowing users to search and browse archival collections, as well as providing support for teaching and research.\r\n<h3>Working with Technology in Archives</h3>\r\nBateman, Kirklin, Sheila Brennan, Douglas Mudd, and Paula Petrik. \"Taking a Byte Out of the Archives: Making Technology Work for You.\" <em>Perspectives Online </em>43, no. 1: (Jan. 2005)\r\n<a href=\"http://www.historians.org/perspectives/issues/2005/0501/0501arc1.cfm\">http://www.historians.org/perspectives/issues/2005/0501/0501arc1.cfm</a>. A useful overview of working with technology in archives, as well as maintaining electronic documents and notes from archival research. Published in 2005, the guide is somewhat dated (it does not include Zotero, for example, which rolled out in 2006).','How to Work with Primary Source Documents','','inherit','open','open','','2045-revision-11','','','2012-09-28 18:52:53','2012-09-28 18:52:53','',2045,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/2045-revision-11/',0,'revision','',0),(2554,10,'2012-09-28 18:53:24','2012-09-28 18:53:24','<h1>How to Work with Primary Source Documents</h1>\r\nArchival research is an important source for coursework and teaching, as professors and instructors are increasingly incorporating work with primary documents into undergraduate courses. Because access to primary resources is often restricted by research room hours, and can be further limited because of preservation concerns if materials are extremely fragile or if collections are not fully inventoried, this kind of research takes time. Despite this, many student researchers leave archives with a great deal more information than they will be able to explore in their written scholarship. Students’ research goals also inform their actual practice, although, due to the many pleasures and challenges of working with primary documents, even the best intentions often change dramatically when working through a collection of materials. Whatever the situation, undergraduates working with primary documents need to be aware of a number of general recommendations, in addition to any particular archive’s specific rules.\r\n\r\nThough the individual archive or library is the best first source of information for working with specific collections, the following resources provide general information about working effectively with archival materials that may be of use to students and/or their teachers.\r\n<h3>Comprehensive</h3>\r\nSchmidt, Laura. \"Using Archives: A Guide to Effective Research.\" <em>Society of American Archivists</em>. 2011. <a href=\"http://www2.archivists.org/usingarchives\">http://www2.archivists.org/usingarchives</a>. An excellent primer for using archives, with considerations such as: \"What Are Archives and How do They Differ from Libraries?\"; \"Requesting Materials Remotely\"; \"Planning to Visit an Archive\"; and \"Notes on Copyright, Restrictions, and Unprocessed Collections.\"\r\n<h3>Handling Documents</h3>\r\nNational Archives (UK). \"Handling Documents.\" <em>The National Archives.</em> 2011. <a href=\"http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/visit/document-handling.htm\">http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/visit/document-handling.htm</a>. A basic overview for handling documents, including best practices and an explanation of common types of documents and handling needs.\r\n\r\nNational Park Service. \"Handling Archival Documents and Manuscripts.\" <em>Conserve O Gram </em>19, no. 17 (Sept. 1996). <a href=\"http://www.nps.gov/museum/publications/conserveogram/19-17.pdf\">http://www.nps.gov/museum/publications/conserveogram/19-17.pdf</a>. A brief guide focused on handling archival documents and manuscripts organized into a series of do’s and don’ts, including setting up the research area, moving materials, and dealing with problems (brittle, damaged, attached, and contaminated materials).\r\n<h3>Working in Archives</h3>\r\nArchives of American Art. \"Frequently Asked Questions.\" <em>Archives of American Art: Ask Us.</em> 2011. <a href=\"http://www.aaa.si.edu/askus/faq\">http://www.aaa.si.edu/askus/faq</a>: A general FAQ addressing basic questions and providing policy information, such as the need for researchers to schedule appointments, a useful reminder no matter which archive you plan to use.\r\n\r\nNew York University Libraries. \"Using Archives and Manuscripts.\" <em>New York</em><em> University</em><em> Libraries: Research Guides.</em> 2011. <a href=\"http://nyu.libguides.com/content.php?pid=38517\">http://nyu.libguides.com/content.php?pid=38517</a>. Intended for researchers using NYU collections, this guide also provides general relevant information, including definitions, recommendations on handling materials, and best practices for archival research.\r\n<h3>Teaching</h3>\r\nThe National Archives Experience (US). \"Tool Box.\"<em> The National Archives Experience: Educators and Students. </em>2011. <a href=\"http://www.archives.gov/nae/education/tool-box.html\">http://www.archives.gov/nae/education/tool-box.html</a>. The \"Tool Box\" includes many basic documents explaining the benefits of teaching with primary sources, basics for teaching with primary documents, and links to teaching workshops and collaborative opportunities (<a href=\"http://www.archives.gov/nae/education/collaboration.html\">http://www.archives.gov/nae/education/collaboration.html</a>).\r\n\r\nNational Archives of Australia. <em>Vrroom: Virtual Reading Room</em>. 2011. <a href=\"http://vrroom.naa.gov.au/\">http://vrroom.naa.gov.au/</a>. With a tagline of \"easy access to archival records for teachers and students,\" <em>Vrroom</em> is designed as a full virtual reading room, allowing users to search and browse archival collections, as well as providing support for teaching and research.\r\n<h3>Working with Technology in Archives</h3>\r\nBateman, Kirklin, Sheila Brennan, Douglas Mudd, and Paula Petrik. \"Taking a Byte Out of the Archives: Making Technology Work for You.\" <em>Perspectives Online </em>43, no. 1: (Jan. 2005)\r\n<a href=\"http://www.historians.org/perspectives/issues/2005/0501/0501arc1.cfm\">http://www.historians.org/perspectives/issues/2005/0501/0501arc1.cfm</a>. A useful overview of working with technology in archives, as well as maintaining electronic documents and notes from archival research. Published in 2005, the guide is somewhat dated (it does not include Zotero, for example, which rolled out in 2006).','How to Work with Primary Source Documents','','inherit','open','open','','2045-revision-12','','','2012-09-28 18:53:24','2012-09-28 18:53:24','',2045,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/2045-revision-12/',0,'revision','',0),(2555,10,'2012-10-01 23:09:52','2012-10-01 23:09:52','home page text here','Home','','inherit','open','open','','539-autosave','','','2012-10-01 23:09:52','2012-10-01 23:09:52','',539,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/539-autosave/',0,'revision','',0),(2556,10,'2012-09-10 21:23:35','2012-09-10 21:23:35','<h3>Students as Archivists</h3>\r\nBehind the scenes in special collections libraries and archives across the country, undergraduate students are being hired as part-time, temporary employees to assist with processing cultural-heritage materials. A recent survey of recipients of Cataloging Hidden Collections Special Collections and Archives grant projects<sup><a title=\"footnote\" href=\"#_ftn1\">[1]</a></sup> found that 97% of respondents employ student workers, and 73% reported that their student workers included undergraduate students. Students are assisting with civil rights collections atEmoryUniversity, modernist architectural drawings and plans atNorth CarolinaStateUniversity, Jewish cultural-heritage materials at theCollege ofCharleston, and Moravian historical documents atLehighUniversity, to name just a few examples. Employing students in special collections libraries and archives is not a new practice; indeed, many of today\'s career librarians and archivists were once student workers themselves. Generally this is a budget-driven practice: students are in need of work and their labor is relatively inexpensive. The educational impact on students, however, is not widely understood or even acknowledged. How does working in archives impact students themselves? What skills do they acquire? Is their library employment connected to their studies? Does this work experience influence their career path? How does engagement with cultural-heritage materials affect their learning in the digital age?\r\n<h3>Archivists as Educators</h3>\r\nStudent workers require management:  recruitment, training, oversight, and mentorship. In fact, when viewed strictly as employees, student workers—a transitory population with jam-packed, fluctuating schedules—do not represent the ideal work force. At the same time, we know that employment in the archives gives students an exceptional opportunity for applied learning under the guidance of professional archivists who can provide for the growth of intellectual and practical skills. These skills include exposure to primary sources combined with hands-on training in cataloging, processing, preserving, and digitizing such materials. Working with primary sources involves precisely the kind of active, integrative, experiential learning that is vital to inspiring undergraduate research.<sup><a title=\"footnote\" href=\"#_ftn2\">[2]</a></sup> So, how can we better reconcile the challenges of employing student workers with the potential educational benefits of such labor? We believe that by recognizing and empowering archivists in their roles as teachers, the informal or “hidden” learning that student workers gain can become more visible.\r\n<h3>Linking Archival Work to the Educational Missions of Universities and Colleges</h3>\r\nBased on anecdotal evidence, we know that student workers\' exposure to primary sources and the skills and technologies necessary to preserve, manage, and study them is resulting in student learning, informing choices of major, and altering career paths. Yet, the informal or \"hidden learning” that is occurring behind the scenes in libraries and archives is treated largely as a side effect, a fortunate but contingent byproduct of labor, rather than as an integral part of the educational mission. We hope this situation changes with closer attention to the educational experiences of students working in the archives. To that end, we are currently engaged in a study that investigates the impact of working in libraries and archives on students involved in civil rights-related hidden collections projects. These civil rights collections—records of organizations such as the Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund, Alianza Hispano-Americana, the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, and the Voter Education Project—are often directly connected to local communities and relevant to contemporary issues and curricula. Most importantly, students are often able to recognize themselves and their communities in the collections, thus increasing the potential for transformative educational experiences. We believe that such work should be acknowledged as precisely the kind of applied learning that most higher education institutions are now actively pursuing in the form of internships, field work, and community service. Our study raises the following questions:\r\n<ul>\r\n	<li>What if “student workers” were perceived as “student archivists,” “young researchers,” or “apprentice scholars”?</li>\r\n	<li>What if student participation in the work of libraries and archives was foregrounded and celebrated, instead of remaining largely anonymous?</li>\r\n	<li>What if training students was seen as central to the business of library and archival practice in educational institutions?</li>\r\n	<li>What if the work students were being hired to do was considered essential to their educational experience and the mission of their universities?</li>\r\n	<li>What if professional archivists emphasized their role as teachers within institutions of higher education?</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<h3>Archival Work, the Digital Humanities, and the Library Commons</h3>\r\nConnecting informal learning to university education requires that librarians, archivists, and technologists view themselves as educators working alongside faculty to help students become researchers in a hybrid analog-digital world. Twenty-first-century models for collaborative learning and teaching are emerging, especially in the digital humanities, where students study primary sources in digital formats and apply new technologies to pose and answer research questions. In the digital humanities, students are being guided by faculty to identify and study research questions using new technologies in partnership with their peers. At many institutions, such classes and activities are being supported in Library Commons\' spaces—multi-service research and learning hubs that are technology-enabled and staffed by professional librarians and technologists. How might the hidden learning that students are experiencing behind the scenes in special collections libraries and archives be connected to the digital humanities and the Library Commons?\r\n<h3>Teaching the Whole Student: Faculty, Librarian, Archivist, and Technologist as a Team</h3>\r\nCreating an integrated learning experience demands a symbiotic mindset—a team approach—with archivists, librarians, technologists, and faculty working together to support student learning through engagement with primary sources and new technologies. At the very least, expanding access to primary sources, both physical and digital, in the undergraduate curriculum will require intensifying and scaling coordination and collaboration between the faculty member teaching disciplinary content, the librarian teaching research strategies, the technologist teaching digital tools, and the archivist teaching primary sources. The aim of such coordination would be to provide an environment in which students were more likely to develop skills necessary for success in the knowledge-driven economy of the twenty-first century. Today\'s students must learn not only to find and analyze reliable information, but also to communicate effectively, solve problems, work in teams, use advanced digital tools to create new knowledge, and engage in multicultural communities. The phenomenon of student employment on archival projects is happening largely undetected at the margins of higher education, but it could inspire a new approach to undergraduate learning that foregrounds the role of cultural heritage in the digital age.\r\n<div class=\"footnote\"><sup title=\"footnote\">[1]</sup> The <a href=\"http://www.clir.org/hiddencollections/index.html\">Cataloging Hidden Special Collections and Archives</a> grant program, funded by The Mellon Foundation and administered by the Council on Library and Information Resources, addresses the problem of “hidden collections”: millions of cultural heritage materials held by libraries and archives that have not been adequately described and remain unavailable to researchers.</div>\r\n<div class=\"footnote\"><sup title=\"footnote\">[2]</sup> See, the definition of “high-impact educational practices” articulated by the Association of American Colleges and Universities LEAP (Liberal Education andAmerica’s Promise) Program: http://www.aacu.org/leap/.</div>','Hidden Learning: Undergraduates at Work in the Archives','','inherit','open','open','','1899-revision-10','','','2012-09-10 21:23:35','2012-09-10 21:23:35','',1899,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/1899-revision-10/',0,'revision','',0),(2557,10,'2012-09-24 16:18:34','2012-09-24 16:18:34','Summary of this 360 issue goes here. Summary of this 360 issue goes here. Summary of this 360 issue goes here. Summary of this 360 issue goes here. Summary of this 360 issue goes here.','Undergraduates in the Archives','','inherit','open','open','','1500-revision-44','','','2012-09-24 16:18:34','2012-09-24 16:18:34','',1500,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/1500-revision-44/',0,'revision','',0),(2558,10,'2012-10-01 23:15:07','2012-10-01 23:15:07','Summary of this 360 issue goes here. Summary of this 360 issue goes here. Summary of this 360 issue goes here. Summary of this 360 issue goes here. Summary of this 360 issue goes here.','Undergraduates in the Archives','','inherit','open','open','','1500-revision-45','','','2012-10-01 23:15:07','2012-10-01 23:15:07','',1500,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/1500-revision-45/',0,'revision','',0),(2559,10,'2012-10-01 23:15:55','2012-10-01 23:15:55','Summary of this 360 issue goes here. Summary of this 360 issue goes here. Summary of this 360 issue goes here. Summary of this 360 issue goes here. Summary of this 360 issue goes here.','Undergraduates in the Archives','','inherit','open','open','','1500-revision-46','','','2012-10-01 23:15:55','2012-10-01 23:15:55','',1500,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/1500-revision-46/',0,'revision','',0),(2560,10,'2012-09-21 17:18:08','2012-09-21 17:18:08','“So, how do we bring students to our table?” That was the question a special collections librarian asked in 1999. <sup><a id=\"ref1\" href=\"#fn1\">[1]</a></sup> Now, in 2012, the question is no longer how: “Teaching with primary source materials is unquestionably ‘hot’ in higher education [as] authentic rare books, manuscripts, or archival documents\" appear in many undergraduate classrooms. <sup><a id=\"ref2\" href=\"#fn2\">[2]</a></sup>\r\n\r\nThe table is full; the effort to bring undergraduates into special collections and archives has been enormously successful. What matters now is how to turn these encounters to account. What happens in the archival laboratory, a place where students are actively involved in research, stewardship, publication, and exhibits? How do librarians, curators, archivists, instructors, and technology specialists collaborate to get such projects off the ground? How do we make use of these encounters to develop research and interpretive skills, showcase students’ findings, and learn from their discoveries? What do students report that they have gained through their archival experiences?\r\n\r\nIn this issue of “Archives, Remixed,” we present six case studies illustrating inventive solutions to these dilemmas of success. The parameters and formats of these projects demonstrate the diversity of ways to teach with primary source materials: not all of the projects take place in a classroom context (although some do); not all the student work is authored singly (although some is). Some projects involve one institution, while others involve partnerships with local organizations or other universities or colleges; some projects are more analog, others more digital; and some end when the student’s work is complete, while others continue. The projects all have historical claims, but the array of objects under consideration—architectural drawings, photographs, ancient statuary, newspaper clippings, rare books, personal mementos—speaks to many disciplines. The academic institutions where these projects originate, from a community college to liberal arts colleges to a research university, vary as much as the projects themselves.\r\n\r\nEach case study focuses the work students produce in these archival encounters. On each case-study page, you will find a sample of student work accompanied by a project description; commentary on the project by the student(s); commentary from the teachers, librarians, and/or technologists who structured the projects and guided students through them; as well as links to related or additional resources.\r\n\r\nWe invite you to explore, to comment, and to use these case studies as fodder for your own research and teaching projects.\r\n<div class=\"footnote\"><sup id=\"fn1\">[1]</sup>Allen, Susan M. “Rare Books and the College Library: Current Practices in Marrying Undergraduates to Special Collections.” Rare Books &amp; Manuscripts Librarianship 13.2 (Spring 1999): 110-19.</div>\r\n<div class=\"footnote\"><sup id=\"fn1\">[2]</sup> Bahde, Anne. “Taking the Show on the Road: Special Collections Instruction in the Campus Classroom.” RBM: A Journal of Rare Books, Manuscripts, &amp; Cultural Heritage 12.2 (Fall 2011): 75.</div>','Student Project Case Studies','A venue featuring new work that analyzes, uses, theorizes, creates, navigates, or reconstitutes archival practice and theory or particular archives, objects, and exhibits&mdash;in traditional essays or multi-modal or experimental formats.','inherit','open','open','','1711-revision-32','','','2012-09-21 17:18:08','2012-09-21 17:18:08','',1711,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/1711-revision-32/',0,'revision','',0),(2561,10,'2012-10-01 23:25:52','2012-10-01 23:25:52','“So, how do we bring students to our table?” That was the question a special collections librarian asked in 1999. <sup><a id=\"ref1\" href=\"#fn1\">[1]</a></sup> Now, in 2012, the question is no longer how: “Teaching with primary source materials is unquestionably ‘hot’ in higher education [as] authentic rare books, manuscripts, or archival documents\" appear in many undergraduate classrooms. <sup><a id=\"ref2\" href=\"#fn2\">[2]</a></sup>\r\n\r\nThe table is full; the effort to bring undergraduates into special collections and archives has been enormously successful. What matters now is how to turn these encounters to account. What happens in the archival laboratory, a place where students are actively involved in research, stewardship, publication, and exhibits? How do librarians, curators, archivists, instructors, and technology specialists collaborate to get such projects off the ground? How do we make use of these encounters to develop research and interpretive skills, showcase students’ findings, and learn from their discoveries? What do students report that they have gained through their archival experiences?\r\n\r\nIn this issue of “Archives, Remixed,” we present six case studies illustrating inventive solutions to these dilemmas of success. The parameters and formats of these projects demonstrate the diversity of ways to teach with primary source materials: not all of the projects take place in a classroom context (although some do); not all the student work is authored singly (although some is). Some projects involve one institution, while others involve partnerships with local organizations or other universities or colleges; some projects are more analog, others more digital; and some end when the student’s work is complete, while others continue. The projects all have historical claims, but the array of objects under consideration—architectural drawings, photographs, ancient statuary, newspaper clippings, rare books, personal mementos—speaks to many disciplines. The academic institutions where these projects originate, from a community college to liberal arts colleges to a research university, vary as much as the projects themselves.\r\n\r\nEach case study focuses the work students produce in these archival encounters. On each case-study page, you will find a sample of student work accompanied by a project description; commentary on the project by the student(s); commentary from the teachers, librarians, and/or technologists who structured the projects and guided students through them; as well as links to related or additional resources.\r\n\r\nWe invite you to explore, to comment, and to use these case studies as fodder for your own research and teaching projects.\r\n<div class=\"footnote\"><sup id=\"fn1\">[1]</sup>Allen, Susan M. “Rare Books and the College Library: Current Practices in Marrying Undergraduates to Special Collections.” Rare Books &amp; Manuscripts Librarianship 13.2 (Spring 1999): 110-19.</div>\r\n<div class=\"footnote\"><sup id=\"fn1\">[2]</sup> Bahde, Anne. “Taking the Show on the Road: Special Collections Instruction in the Campus Classroom.” RBM: A Journal of Rare Books, Manuscripts, &amp; Cultural Heritage 12.2 (Fall 2011): 75.</div>','Student Project Case Studies','A venue featuring new work that analyzes, uses, theorizes, creates, navigates, or reconstitutes archival practice and theory or particular archives, objects, and exhibits&mdash;in traditional essays or multi-modal or experimental formats.','inherit','open','open','','1711-revision-33','','','2012-10-01 23:25:52','2012-10-01 23:25:52','',1711,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/1711-revision-33/',0,'revision','',0),(2562,10,'2012-10-01 23:10:50','2012-10-01 23:10:50','<h3>Students as Archivists</h3>\r\nBehind the scenes in special collections libraries and archives across the country, undergraduate students are being hired as part-time, temporary employees to assist with processing cultural-heritage materials. A recent survey of recipients of Cataloging Hidden Collections Special Collections and Archives grant projects<sup><a title=\"footnote\" href=\"#_ftn1\">[1]</a></sup> found that 97% of respondents employ student workers, and 73% reported that their student workers included undergraduate students. Students are assisting with civil rights collections atEmoryUniversity, modernist architectural drawings and plans atNorth CarolinaStateUniversity, Jewish cultural-heritage materials at theCollege ofCharleston, and Moravian historical documents atLehighUniversity, to name just a few examples. Employing students in special collections libraries and archives is not a new practice; indeed, many of today\'s career librarians and archivists were once student workers themselves. Generally this is a budget-driven practice: students are in need of work and their labor is relatively inexpensive. The educational impact on students, however, is not widely understood or even acknowledged. How does working in archives impact students themselves? What skills do they acquire? Is their library employment connected to their studies? Does this work experience influence their career path? How does engagement with cultural-heritage materials affect their learning in the digital age?\r\n<h3>Archivists as Educators</h3>\r\nStudent workers require management:  recruitment, training, oversight, and mentorship. In fact, when viewed strictly as employees, student workers—a transitory population with jam-packed, fluctuating schedules—do not represent the ideal work force. At the same time, we know that employment in the archives gives students an exceptional opportunity for applied learning under the guidance of professional archivists who can provide for the growth of intellectual and practical skills. These skills include exposure to primary sources combined with hands-on training in cataloging, processing, preserving, and digitizing such materials. Working with primary sources involves precisely the kind of active, integrative, experiential learning that is vital to inspiring undergraduate research.<sup><a title=\"footnote\" href=\"#_ftn2\">[2]</a></sup> So, how can we better reconcile the challenges of employing student workers with the potential educational benefits of such labor? We believe that by recognizing and empowering archivists in their roles as teachers, the informal or “hidden” learning that student workers gain can become more visible.\r\n<h3>Linking Archival Work to the Educational Missions of Universities and Colleges</h3>\r\nBased on anecdotal evidence, we know that student workers\' exposure to primary sources and the skills and technologies necessary to preserve, manage, and study them is resulting in student learning, informing choices of major, and altering career paths. Yet, the informal or \"hidden learning” that is occurring behind the scenes in libraries and archives is treated largely as a side effect, a fortunate but contingent byproduct of labor, rather than as an integral part of the educational mission. We hope this situation changes with closer attention to the educational experiences of students working in the archives. To that end, we are currently engaged in a study that investigates the impact of working in libraries and archives on students involved in civil rights-related hidden collections projects. These civil rights collections—records of organizations such as the Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund, Alianza Hispano-Americana, the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, and the Voter Education Project—are often directly connected to local communities and relevant to contemporary issues and curricula. Most importantly, students are often able to recognize themselves and their communities in the collections, thus increasing the potential for transformative educational experiences. We believe that such work should be acknowledged as precisely the kind of applied learning that most higher education institutions are now actively pursuing in the form of internships, field work, and community service. Our study raises the following questions:\r\n<ul>\r\n	<li>What if “student workers” were perceived as “student archivists,” “young researchers,” or “apprentice scholars”?</li>\r\n	<li>What if student participation in the work of libraries and archives was foregrounded and celebrated, instead of remaining largely anonymous?</li>\r\n	<li>What if training students was seen as central to the business of library and archival practice in educational institutions?</li>\r\n	<li>What if the work students were being hired to do was considered essential to their educational experience and the mission of their universities?</li>\r\n	<li>What if professional archivists emphasized their role as teachers within institutions of higher education?</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<h3>Archival Work, the Digital Humanities, and the Library Commons</h3>\r\nConnecting informal learning to university education requires that librarians, archivists, and technologists view themselves as educators working alongside faculty to help students become researchers in a hybrid analog-digital world. Twenty-first-century models for collaborative learning and teaching are emerging, especially in the digital humanities, where students study primary sources in digital formats and apply new technologies to pose and answer research questions. In the digital humanities, students are being guided by faculty to identify and study research questions using new technologies in partnership with their peers. At many institutions, such classes and activities are being supported in Library Commons\' spaces—multi-service research and learning hubs that are technology-enabled and staffed by professional librarians and technologists. How might the hidden learning that students are experiencing behind the scenes in special collections libraries and archives be connected to the digital humanities and the Library Commons?\r\n<h3>Teaching the Whole Student: Faculty, Librarian, Archivist, and Technologist as a Team</h3>\r\nCreating an integrated learning experience demands a symbiotic mindset—a team approach—with archivists, librarians, technologists, and faculty working together to support student learning through engagement with primary sources and new technologies. At the very least, expanding access to primary sources, both physical and digital, in the undergraduate curriculum will require intensifying and scaling coordination and collaboration between the faculty member teaching disciplinary content, the librarian teaching research strategies, the technologist teaching digital tools, and the archivist teaching primary sources. The aim of such coordination would be to provide an environment in which students were more likely to develop skills necessary for success in the knowledge-driven economy of the twenty-first century. Today\'s students must learn not only to find and analyze reliable information, but also to communicate effectively, solve problems, work in teams, use advanced digital tools to create new knowledge, and engage in multicultural communities. The phenomenon of student employment on archival projects is happening largely undetected at the margins of higher education, but it could inspire a new approach to undergraduate learning that foregrounds the role of cultural heritage in the digital age.\r\n<div class=\"footnote\"><sup title=\"footnote\">[1]</sup> The <a href=\"http://www.clir.org/hiddencollections/index.html\">Cataloging Hidden Special Collections and Archives</a> grant program, funded by The Mellon Foundation and administered by the Council on Library and Information Resources, addresses the problem of “hidden collections”: millions of cultural heritage materials held by libraries and archives that have not been adequately described and remain unavailable to researchers.</div>\r\n<div class=\"footnote\"><sup title=\"footnote\">[2]</sup> See, the definition of “high-impact educational practices” articulated by the Association of American Colleges and Universities LEAP (Liberal Education andAmerica’s Promise) Program: http://www.aacu.org/leap/.</div>','Hidden Learning: Undergraduates at Work in the Archives','','inherit','open','open','','1899-revision-11','','','2012-10-01 23:10:50','2012-10-01 23:10:50','',1899,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/1899-revision-11/',0,'revision','',0),(2563,10,'2012-10-01 23:36:26','2012-10-01 23:36:26','<h3>Students as Archivists</h3>\r\nBehind the scenes in special collections libraries and archives across the country, undergraduate students are being hired as part-time, temporary employees to assist with processing cultural-heritage materials. A recent survey of recipients of Cataloging Hidden Collections Special Collections and Archives grant projects<sup><a title=\"footnote\" href=\"#_ftn1\">[1]</a></sup> found that 97% of respondents employ student workers, and 73% reported that their student workers included undergraduate students. Students are assisting with civil rights collections atEmoryUniversity, modernist architectural drawings and plans atNorth CarolinaStateUniversity, Jewish cultural-heritage materials at theCollege ofCharleston, and Moravian historical documents atLehighUniversity, to name just a few examples. Employing students in special collections libraries and archives is not a new practice; indeed, many of today\'s career librarians and archivists were once student workers themselves. Generally this is a budget-driven practice: students are in need of work and their labor is relatively inexpensive. The educational impact on students, however, is not widely understood or even acknowledged. How does working in archives impact students themselves? What skills do they acquire? Is their library employment connected to their studies? Does this work experience influence their career path? How does engagement with cultural-heritage materials affect their learning in the digital age?\r\n<h3>Archivists as Educators</h3>\r\nStudent workers require management:  recruitment, training, oversight, and mentorship. In fact, when viewed strictly as employees, student workers—a transitory population with jam-packed, fluctuating schedules—do not represent the ideal work force. At the same time, we know that employment in the archives gives students an exceptional opportunity for applied learning under the guidance of professional archivists who can provide for the growth of intellectual and practical skills. These skills include exposure to primary sources combined with hands-on training in cataloging, processing, preserving, and digitizing such materials. Working with primary sources involves precisely the kind of active, integrative, experiential learning that is vital to inspiring undergraduate research.<sup><a title=\"footnote\" href=\"#_ftn2\">[2]</a></sup> So, how can we better reconcile the challenges of employing student workers with the potential educational benefits of such labor? We believe that by recognizing and empowering archivists in their roles as teachers, the informal or “hidden” learning that student workers gain can become more visible.\r\n<h3>Linking Archival Work to the Educational Missions of Universities and Colleges</h3>\r\nBased on anecdotal evidence, we know that student workers\' exposure to primary sources and the skills and technologies necessary to preserve, manage, and study them is resulting in student learning, informing choices of major, and altering career paths. Yet, the informal or \"hidden learning” that is occurring behind the scenes in libraries and archives is treated largely as a side effect, a fortunate but contingent byproduct of labor, rather than as an integral part of the educational mission. We hope this situation changes with closer attention to the educational experiences of students working in the archives. To that end, we are currently engaged in a study that investigates the impact of working in libraries and archives on students involved in civil rights-related hidden collections projects. These civil rights collections—records of organizations such as the Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund, Alianza Hispano-Americana, the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, and the Voter Education Project—are often directly connected to local communities and relevant to contemporary issues and curricula. Most importantly, students are often able to recognize themselves and their communities in the collections, thus increasing the potential for transformative educational experiences. We believe that such work should be acknowledged as precisely the kind of applied learning that most higher education institutions are now actively pursuing in the form of internships, field work, and community service. Our study raises the following questions:\r\n<ul>\r\n	<li>What if “student workers” were perceived as “student archivists,” “young researchers,” or “apprentice scholars”?</li>\r\n	<li>What if student participation in the work of libraries and archives was foregrounded and celebrated, instead of remaining largely anonymous?</li>\r\n	<li>What if training students was seen as central to the business of library and archival practice in educational institutions?</li>\r\n	<li>What if the work students were being hired to do was considered essential to their educational experience and the mission of their universities?</li>\r\n	<li>What if professional archivists emphasized their role as teachers within institutions of higher education?</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<h3>Archival Work, the Digital Humanities, and the Library Commons</h3>\r\nConnecting informal learning to university education requires that librarians, archivists, and technologists view themselves as educators working alongside faculty to help students become researchers in a hybrid analog-digital world. Twenty-first-century models for collaborative learning and teaching are emerging, especially in the digital humanities, where students study primary sources in digital formats and apply new technologies to pose and answer research questions. In the digital humanities, students are being guided by faculty to identify and study research questions using new technologies in partnership with their peers. At many institutions, such classes and activities are being supported in Library Commons\' spaces—multi-service research and learning hubs that are technology-enabled and staffed by professional librarians and technologists. How might the hidden learning that students are experiencing behind the scenes in special collections libraries and archives be connected to the digital humanities and the Library Commons?\r\n<h3>Teaching the Whole Student: Faculty, Librarian, Archivist, and Technologist as a Team</h3>\r\nCreating an integrated learning experience demands a symbiotic mindset—a team approach—with archivists, librarians, technologists, and faculty working together to support student learning through engagement with primary sources and new technologies. At the very least, expanding access to primary sources, both physical and digital, in the undergraduate curriculum will require intensifying and scaling coordination and collaboration between the faculty member teaching disciplinary content, the librarian teaching research strategies, the technologist teaching digital tools, and the archivist teaching primary sources. The aim of such coordination would be to provide an environment in which students were more likely to develop skills necessary for success in the knowledge-driven economy of the twenty-first century. Today\'s students must learn not only to find and analyze reliable information, but also to communicate effectively, solve problems, work in teams, use advanced digital tools to create new knowledge, and engage in multicultural communities. The phenomenon of student employment on archival projects is happening largely undetected at the margins of higher education, but it could inspire a new approach to undergraduate learning that foregrounds the role of cultural heritage in the digital age.\r\n<div class=\"footnote\"><sup title=\"footnote\">[1]</sup> The <a href=\"http://www.clir.org/hiddencollections/index.html\">Cataloging Hidden Special Collections and Archives</a> grant program, funded by The Mellon Foundation and administered by the Council on Library and Information Resources, addresses the problem of “hidden collections”: millions of cultural heritage materials held by libraries and archives that have not been adequately described and remain unavailable to researchers.</div>\r\n<div class=\"footnote\"><sup title=\"footnote\">[2]</sup> See, the definition of “high-impact educational practices” articulated by the Association of American Colleges and Universities LEAP (Liberal Education andAmerica’s Promise) Program: http://www.aacu.org/leap/.</div>','Hidden Learning: Undergraduates at Work in the Archives','','inherit','open','open','','1899-revision-12','','','2012-10-01 23:36:26','2012-10-01 23:36:26','',1899,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/1899-revision-12/',0,'revision','',0),(2564,10,'2012-10-01 23:37:28','2012-10-01 23:37:28','<h3>Students as Archivists</h3>\r\nBehind the scenes in special collections libraries and archives across the country, undergraduate students are being hired as part-time, temporary employees to assist with processing cultural-heritage materials. A recent survey of recipients of Cataloging Hidden Collections Special Collections and Archives grant projects<sup><a title=\"footnote\" href=\"#_ftn1\">[1]</a></sup> found that 97% of respondents employ student workers, and 73% reported that their student workers included undergraduate students. Students are assisting with civil rights collections atEmoryUniversity, modernist architectural drawings and plans atNorth CarolinaStateUniversity, Jewish cultural-heritage materials at theCollege ofCharleston, and Moravian historical documents atLehighUniversity, to name just a few examples. Employing students in special collections libraries and archives is not a new practice; indeed, many of today\'s career librarians and archivists were once student workers themselves. Generally this is a budget-driven practice: students are in need of work and their labor is relatively inexpensive. The educational impact on students, however, is not widely understood or even acknowledged. How does working in archives impact students themselves? What skills do they acquire? Is their library employment connected to their studies? Does this work experience influence their career path? How does engagement with cultural-heritage materials affect their learning in the digital age?\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<h3>Archivists as Educators</h3>\r\nStudent workers require management:  recruitment, training, oversight, and mentorship. In fact, when viewed strictly as employees, student workers—a transitory population with jam-packed, fluctuating schedules—do not represent the ideal work force. At the same time, we know that employment in the archives gives students an exceptional opportunity for applied learning under the guidance of professional archivists who can provide for the growth of intellectual and practical skills. These skills include exposure to primary sources combined with hands-on training in cataloging, processing, preserving, and digitizing such materials. Working with primary sources involves precisely the kind of active, integrative, experiential learning that is vital to inspiring undergraduate research.<sup><a title=\"footnote\" href=\"#_ftn2\">[2]</a></sup> So, how can we better reconcile the challenges of employing student workers with the potential educational benefits of such labor? We believe that by recognizing and empowering archivists in their roles as teachers, the informal or “hidden” learning that student workers gain can become more visible.\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<h3>Linking Archival Work to the Educational Missions of Universities and Colleges</h3>\r\nBased on anecdotal evidence, we know that student workers\' exposure to primary sources and the skills and technologies necessary to preserve, manage, and study them is resulting in student learning, informing choices of major, and altering career paths. Yet, the informal or \"hidden learning” that is occurring behind the scenes in libraries and archives is treated largely as a side effect, a fortunate but contingent byproduct of labor, rather than as an integral part of the educational mission. We hope this situation changes with closer attention to the educational experiences of students working in the archives. To that end, we are currently engaged in a study that investigates the impact of working in libraries and archives on students involved in civil rights-related hidden collections projects. These civil rights collections—records of organizations such as the Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund, Alianza Hispano-Americana, the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, and the Voter Education Project—are often directly connected to local communities and relevant to contemporary issues and curricula. Most importantly, students are often able to recognize themselves and their communities in the collections, thus increasing the potential for transformative educational experiences. We believe that such work should be acknowledged as precisely the kind of applied learning that most higher education institutions are now actively pursuing in the form of internships, field work, and community service. Our study raises the following questions:\r\n<ul>\r\n	<li>What if “student workers” were perceived as “student archivists,” “young researchers,” or “apprentice scholars”?</li>\r\n	<li>What if student participation in the work of libraries and archives was foregrounded and celebrated, instead of remaining largely anonymous?</li>\r\n	<li>What if training students was seen as central to the business of library and archival practice in educational institutions?</li>\r\n	<li>What if the work students were being hired to do was considered essential to their educational experience and the mission of their universities?</li>\r\n	<li>What if professional archivists emphasized their role as teachers within institutions of higher education?</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<h3></h3>\r\n<h3>Archival Work, the Digital Humanities, and the Library Commons</h3>\r\nConnecting informal learning to university education requires that librarians, archivists, and technologists view themselves as educators working alongside faculty to help students become researchers in a hybrid analog-digital world. Twenty-first-century models for collaborative learning and teaching are emerging, especially in the digital humanities, where students study primary sources in digital formats and apply new technologies to pose and answer research questions. In the digital humanities, students are being guided by faculty to identify and study research questions using new technologies in partnership with their peers. At many institutions, such classes and activities are being supported in Library Commons\' spaces—multi-service research and learning hubs that are technology-enabled and staffed by professional librarians and technologists. How might the hidden learning that students are experiencing behind the scenes in special collections libraries and archives be connected to the digital humanities and the Library Commons?\r\n<h3></h3>\r\n<h3>Teaching the Whole Student: Faculty, Librarian, Archivist, and Technologist as a Team</h3>\r\nCreating an integrated learning experience demands a symbiotic mindset—a team approach—with archivists, librarians, technologists, and faculty working together to support student learning through engagement with primary sources and new technologies. At the very least, expanding access to primary sources, both physical and digital, in the undergraduate curriculum will require intensifying and scaling coordination and collaboration between the faculty member teaching disciplinary content, the librarian teaching research strategies, the technologist teaching digital tools, and the archivist teaching primary sources. The aim of such coordination would be to provide an environment in which students were more likely to develop skills necessary for success in the knowledge-driven economy of the twenty-first century. Today\'s students must learn not only to find and analyze reliable information, but also to communicate effectively, solve problems, work in teams, use advanced digital tools to create new knowledge, and engage in multicultural communities. The phenomenon of student employment on archival projects is happening largely undetected at the margins of higher education, but it could inspire a new approach to undergraduate learning that foregrounds the role of cultural heritage in the digital age.\r\n<div class=\"footnote\"><sup title=\"footnote\">[1]</sup> The <a href=\"http://www.clir.org/hiddencollections/index.html\">Cataloging Hidden Special Collections and Archives</a> grant program, funded by The Mellon Foundation and administered by the Council on Library and Information Resources, addresses the problem of “hidden collections”: millions of cultural heritage materials held by libraries and archives that have not been adequately described and remain unavailable to researchers.</div>\r\n<div class=\"footnote\"><sup title=\"footnote\">[2]</sup> See, the definition of “high-impact educational practices” articulated by the Association of American Colleges and Universities LEAP (Liberal Education andAmerica’s Promise) Program: http://www.aacu.org/leap/.</div>','Hidden Learning: Undergraduates at Work in the Archives','','inherit','open','open','','1899-revision-13','','','2012-10-01 23:37:28','2012-10-01 23:37:28','',1899,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/1899-revision-13/',0,'revision','',0),(2565,10,'2012-09-21 16:02:20','2012-09-21 16:02:20','Having cut my teeth on <em>From the Mixed-Up Files of Mrs. Basil E. Frankenweiler </em>and the Indiana Jones films as a kid<em>, </em>it comes as no surprise perhaps that my scholarly career is informed and driven by archival research. I am addicted to the smell and feel of yellowed paper, ancient vellum, and the sight of spidery, faded fountain pen inscriptions makes my heart race—yes, I suffer from an incurable case of archive fever.\r\n<a href=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/code-letter1-810x10241.jpg\"><img class=\"size-medium wp-image-2005 alignright\" title=\"civil-war-letter\" src=\"http://stage.archivejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/code-letter1-810x10241-197x250.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"197\" height=\"250\" /></a> In grad school my interest in archives led me to Britain (thank you, University of Florida!) where, beneath the blue and gold and white dome of the <a href=\"http://www.britishmuseum.org/the_museum/history_and_the_building/reading_room.aspx\">old British Library</a>, I fancied I could still almost hear the whispered wishes for enlightenment that scholars and revolutionaries and historians had prayed for. Later, in the <a href=\"http://www.bronte.org.uk/\">Brontë parsonage museum</a> on the edge of the moors, I sat in a research room off the Brontës’ kitchen, reading their juvenilia <em>in situ. </em>In the <a href=\"http://www.uflib.ufl.edu/spec/baldwin/baldwin.html\">Baldwin archive</a> at UF I encountered E.R.’s <em>Geography and History by a Lady for the Use of her own Children </em>(1790), the book that changed my life by opening up an entire forgotten genre of writing by middle-class women who sought to participate in the imperial project through socially sanctioned writing for children. This taught me that archives still hold so many stories and secrets; their potential sleeps very patiently.\r\n\r\nThe lesson helped me during my postdoc at Lehigh when, in the process of cataloguing over 400 miscellaneous letters for the <a href=\"http://digital.lib.lehigh.edu/remain/\">“I remain…”</a> project, I ran across a document whose garbled syntax at first suggested too long a day, but then thrillingly emerged as a coded Civil War letter. All that year I researched the letter, talking about it to computer scientists who tried to develop an algorithm to break the Stager Cipher, discussing it with historians, presenting it to local fourth graders who eagerly peppered me with questions, and even corresponding with the NSA cryptology center to track down one of the few remaining code books about the ciphers. Though I never managed to crack it, the mystery was sustaining, engaging, and a great conversation starter wherever I went. I carried its story with me, imagined its content, and marveled at its survival. It came from the smoke of the battlefield, from the anxious hands of a telegraph operator who hurriedly crossed out mistakes and scrawled incorrect calculations in the margins on the eve of the second battle of Bull Run when so many lives and the military career of the writer hung in the balance. With the Digital Library Team, we scanned the letter, sketched its history, and <a href=\"http://digital.lib.lehigh.edu/cdm4/remain_viewer.php?DMTHUMB=1&amp;cat=Civil%20War&amp;ptr=124&amp;CISOSTART=21\">put it online</a> so that others could enjoy the mystery. This year, it was gratifying when special collections librarian Ilhan Citak forwarded me an article by computer scientists Ali Assarpour and Kent D. Boklan detailing how they broke the 148-year old code. In the end, the story of the letter goes on and so many of us have yoked our own stories to it. It seems that Derrida was right when he said that the archive opens out of and into the future, gathering associations, richness, devotees, and memories as it glides past us into the future. The past becomes a present in every sense.','Cracking a Civil War Code','Having cut my teeth on From the Mixed-Up Files of Mrs. Basil E. Frankenweiler and the Indiana Jones films as a kid, it comes as no surprise perhaps that my scholarly career is informed and driven by archival research. I am addicted to the smell and feel of yellowed paper, ancient vellum, and the sight of spidery, faded fountain pen inscriptions makes my heart race—yes, I suffer from an incurable case of archive fever.','inherit','open','open','','235-revision-42','','','2012-09-21 16:02:20','2012-09-21 16:02:20','',235,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/235-revision-42/',0,'revision','',0),(2566,10,'2012-09-21 01:54:15','2012-09-21 01:54:15','A publication of interest to Archive<em> readers: </em><a href=\"http://www.arl.org/news/pr/spec326-6dec11.shtml\">http://www.arl.org/news/pr/spec326-6dec11.shtml</a>\r\n\r\nDescription from the press release: \"The Association of Research Libraries (ARL) has published <em>Digital Humanities</em>, SPEC Kit 326, which provides a snapshot of research library experiences with digital scholarship centers or services that support the humanities (e.g., history, art, music, film, literature, philosophy, religion, etc.) and the benefits and challenges of hosting them. The survey asked ARL libraries about the organization of these services, how they are staffed and funded, what services they offer and to whom, what technical infrastructure is provided, whether the library manages or archives the digital resources produced, and how services are assessed, among other questions.\"','ARL on DH','','inherit','open','open','','2216-revision-6','','','2012-09-21 01:54:15','2012-09-21 01:54:15','',2216,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/2216-revision-6/',0,'revision','',0),(2567,10,'2012-09-21 01:52:46','2012-09-21 01:52:46','Policies and Practices in Access to Digital Archives: Towards a New\r\nResearch and Policy Agenda\r\n\r\nThe Central European University invite applicants for an intensive\r\none-week summer session in Budapest from 2 July-6 July, 2012.\r\n\r\nThis course has been developed to meet the specific needs of\r\nestablished professionals looking to deepen their impact on policy\r\nissues related to digitital archives. The creation of a diverse\r\ncoalition of experts is an envisioned goal of the course.\r\nPractitioners from the field of archives, research, law and policy\r\nmaking are encouraged to apply.\r\n\r\nThe course deals with the contemporary complexities of accessibility\r\nand the long-term preservation of archival material within\r\ninstitutional settings. It will explore the driving/prohibitive role\r\nof IPR and various implications of the regulation of digital material:\r\nWill access to primary sources become the luxury of the few under a\r\nnew type of digital divide? Do we have evidential data of the market\r\nvalue of digitised archival collections? What kind of policy agenda\r\nwill ensure the future availability of cultural heritage content? What\r\nkind of strategy will guarantee that archives within the digital\r\nEuropean single market are sustainable? The course will consist of\r\nintensive teaching sessions and participants will be expected to\r\nprepare a paper in advance for presentation purposes.\r\n\r\nPlease note that places are limited to 30 participants and offered on\r\na competitive basis. This summer course is able to offer a limited\r\namount of grants. Applicants will be asked to explain what their\r\nengagement with archival material is and what particular\r\npolicy-related issues they consider most challenging. The deadline for\r\napplication is February 15, 2012.\r\n\r\nFor further information and to apply, please visit the CEU Summer\r\nUniversity website: http://www.summer.ceu.hu/node/350','Digital Archives Course','','inherit','open','open','','2221-revision-2','','','2012-09-21 01:52:46','2012-09-21 01:52:46','',2221,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/2221-revision-2/',0,'revision','',0),(2568,10,'2012-09-21 01:50:20','2012-09-21 01:50:20','(From AAS): American Antiquarian Society Visiting Academic Fellowships, 2012-2013\r\n\r\nThe American Antiquarian Society (AAS) invites applications for its 2012-13 visiting academic fellowships. At least three AAS-National Endowment for the Humanities fellowships will be awarded for periods extending from four to twelve months. Long-term fellowships are intended for scholars beyond the doctorate; senior and mid-career scholars are particularly encouraged to apply. Over thirty short-term fellowships will be awarded for one to three months.\r\n\r\nThe short-term grants are available for scholars holding the Ph.D. and for doctoral candidates engaged in dissertation research, and offer a stipend of $1850/month. Special short-term fellowships support scholars working in the history of the book in American culture, in the American eighteenth century, and in American literary studies, as well as in studies that draw upon the Society\'s preeminent collections of graphic arts, newspapers, and periodicals. Accommodations are available for visiting fellows in housing owned by AAS.\r\n\r\nThe deadline for applications is January 15, 2012. For further details about the fellowships, as well as application materials, please consult our website &lt;http://www.americanantiquarian.org/fellowships.htm&gt;\r\n\r\nThe AAS is a research library whose collections focus on American history, literature, and culture from the colonial era through 1876. The Society\'s collections are national in scope, and include manuscripts, printed works of all kinds, newspapers and periodicals, photographs, lithographs, broadsides, sheet music, children\'s literature, maps, games, and a wide range of ephemera. For detailed descriptions of the collections, please consult our guidebook, Under Its Generous Dome, available online at &lt;http://www.americanantiquarian.org/collections.htm&gt;','AAS Fellowships','','inherit','open','open','','2212-revision-4','','','2012-09-21 01:50:20','2012-09-21 01:50:20','',2212,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/2212-revision-4/',0,'revision','',0),(2569,10,'2012-09-21 01:47:37','2012-09-21 01:47:37','A new issue of <a href=\"http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/\">DHQ </a>just came out, on the \"Future of Digital Studies.\"','Reading List','','inherit','open','open','','2210-revision-2','','','2012-09-21 01:47:37','2012-09-21 01:47:37','',2210,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/2210-revision-2/',0,'revision','',0),(2570,10,'2012-09-21 01:53:24','2012-09-21 01:53:24','For readers of the round table on <em>The Walt Whitman Archive</em>, here\'s another interesting analysis: Emily Monks-Leeson, \"Archives on the Internet: Representing Contexts and Provenance from Repository to Website.\" <em>The American Archivist</em>. Vol. 74 (Spring/Summer 2011): 38-57.','More on the Walt Whitman Archive','','inherit','open','open','','2206-revision-5','','','2012-09-21 01:53:24','2012-09-21 01:53:24','',2206,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/2206-revision-5/',0,'revision','',0),(2571,10,'2012-09-28 18:54:06','2012-09-28 18:54:06','<h1>How to Work with Primary Source Documents</h1>\r\nArchival research is an important source for coursework and teaching, as professors and instructors are increasingly incorporating work with primary documents into undergraduate courses. Because access to primary resources is often restricted by research room hours, and can be further limited because of preservation concerns if materials are extremely fragile or if collections are not fully inventoried, this kind of research takes time. Despite this, many student researchers leave archives with a great deal more information than they will be able to explore in their written scholarship. Students’ research goals also inform their actual practice, although, due to the many pleasures and challenges of working with primary documents, even the best intentions often change dramatically when working through a collection of materials. Whatever the situation, undergraduates working with primary documents need to be aware of a number of general recommendations, in addition to any particular archive’s specific rules.\r\n\r\nThough the individual archive or library is the best first source of information for working with specific collections, the following resources provide general information about working effectively with archival materials that may be of use to students and/or their teachers.\r\n\r\n<h3>Comprehensive</h3>\r\nSchmidt, Laura. \"Using Archives: A Guide to Effective Research.\" <em>Society of American Archivists</em>. 2011. <a href=\"http://www2.archivists.org/usingarchives\">http://www2.archivists.org/usingarchives</a>. An excellent primer for using archives, with considerations such as: \"What Are Archives and How do They Differ from Libraries?\"; \"Requesting Materials Remotely\"; \"Planning to Visit an Archive\"; and \"Notes on Copyright, Restrictions, and Unprocessed Collections.\"\r\n\r\n<h3>Handling Documents</h3>\r\nNational Archives (UK). \"Handling Documents.\" <em>The National Archives.</em> 2011. <a href=\"http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/visit/document-handling.htm\">http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/visit/document-handling.htm</a>. A basic overview for handling documents, including best practices and an explanation of common types of documents and handling needs.\r\n\r\nNational Park Service. \"Handling Archival Documents and Manuscripts.\" <em>Conserve O Gram </em>19, no. 17 (Sept. 1996). <a href=\"http://www.nps.gov/museum/publications/conserveogram/19-17.pdf\">http://www.nps.gov/museum/publications/conserveogram/19-17.pdf</a>. A brief guide focused on handling archival documents and manuscripts organized into a series of do’s and don’ts, including setting up the research area, moving materials, and dealing with problems (brittle, damaged, attached, and contaminated materials).\r\n\r\n<h3>Working in Archives</h3>\r\nArchives of American Art. \"Frequently Asked Questions.\" <em>Archives of American Art: Ask Us.</em> 2011. <a href=\"http://www.aaa.si.edu/askus/faq\">http://www.aaa.si.edu/askus/faq</a>: A general FAQ addressing basic questions and providing policy information, such as the need for researchers to schedule appointments, a useful reminder no matter which archive you plan to use.\r\n\r\nNew York University Libraries. \"Using Archives and Manuscripts.\" <em>New York</em><em> University</em><em> Libraries: Research Guides.</em> 2011. <a href=\"http://nyu.libguides.com/content.php?pid=38517\">http://nyu.libguides.com/content.php?pid=38517</a>. Intended for researchers using NYU collections, this guide also provides general relevant information, including definitions, recommendations on handling materials, and best practices for archival research.\r\n\r\n<h3>Teaching</h3>\r\nThe National Archives Experience (US). \"Tool Box.\"<em> The National Archives Experience: Educators and Students. </em>2011. <a href=\"http://www.archives.gov/nae/education/tool-box.html\">http://www.archives.gov/nae/education/tool-box.html</a>. The \"Tool Box\" includes many basic documents explaining the benefits of teaching with primary sources, basics for teaching with primary documents, and links to teaching workshops and collaborative opportunities (<a href=\"http://www.archives.gov/nae/education/collaboration.html\">http://www.archives.gov/nae/education/collaboration.html</a>).\r\n\r\nNational Archives of Australia. <em>Vrroom: Virtual Reading Room</em>. 2011. <a href=\"http://vrroom.naa.gov.au/\">http://vrroom.naa.gov.au/</a>. With a tagline of \"easy access to archival records for teachers and students,\" <em>Vrroom</em> is designed as a full virtual reading room, allowing users to search and browse archival collections, as well as providing support for teaching and research.\r\n<h3>Working with Technology in Archives</h3>\r\nBateman, Kirklin, Sheila Brennan, Douglas Mudd, and Paula Petrik. \"Taking a Byte Out of the Archives: Making Technology Work for You.\" <em>Perspectives Online </em>43, no. 1: (Jan. 2005)\r\n<a href=\"http://www.historians.org/perspectives/issues/2005/0501/0501arc1.cfm\">http://www.historians.org/perspectives/issues/2005/0501/0501arc1.cfm</a>. A useful overview of working with technology in archives, as well as maintaining electronic documents and notes from archival research. Published in 2005, the guide is somewhat dated (it does not include Zotero, for example, which rolled out in 2006).','How to Work with Primary Source Documents','','inherit','open','open','','2045-revision-13','','','2012-09-28 18:54:06','2012-09-28 18:54:06','',2045,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/2045-revision-13/',0,'revision','',0),(2573,10,'2012-10-01 23:45:18','2012-10-01 23:45:18','\r\nArchival research is an important source for coursework and teaching, as professors and instructors are increasingly incorporating work with primary documents into undergraduate courses. Because access to primary resources is often restricted by research room hours, and can be further limited because of preservation concerns if materials are extremely fragile or if collections are not fully inventoried, this kind of research takes time. Despite this, many student researchers leave archives with a great deal more information than they will be able to explore in their written scholarship. Students’ research goals also inform their actual practice, although, due to the many pleasures and challenges of working with primary documents, even the best intentions often change dramatically when working through a collection of materials. Whatever the situation, undergraduates working with primary documents need to be aware of a number of general recommendations, in addition to any particular archive’s specific rules.\r\n\r\nThough the individual archive or library is the best first source of information for working with specific collections, the following resources provide general information about working effectively with archival materials that may be of use to students and/or their teachers.\r\n\r\n<h3>Comprehensive</h3>\r\nSchmidt, Laura. \"Using Archives: A Guide to Effective Research.\" <em>Society of American Archivists</em>. 2011. <a href=\"http://www2.archivists.org/usingarchives\">http://www2.archivists.org/usingarchives</a>. An excellent primer for using archives, with considerations such as: \"What Are Archives and How do They Differ from Libraries?\"; \"Requesting Materials Remotely\"; \"Planning to Visit an Archive\"; and \"Notes on Copyright, Restrictions, and Unprocessed Collections.\"\r\n\r\n<h3>Handling Documents</h3>\r\nNational Archives (UK). \"Handling Documents.\" <em>The National Archives.</em> 2011. <a href=\"http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/visit/document-handling.htm\">http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/visit/document-handling.htm</a>. A basic overview for handling documents, including best practices and an explanation of common types of documents and handling needs.\r\n\r\nNational Park Service. \"Handling Archival Documents and Manuscripts.\" <em>Conserve O Gram </em>19, no. 17 (Sept. 1996). <a href=\"http://www.nps.gov/museum/publications/conserveogram/19-17.pdf\">http://www.nps.gov/museum/publications/conserveogram/19-17.pdf</a>. A brief guide focused on handling archival documents and manuscripts organized into a series of do’s and don’ts, including setting up the research area, moving materials, and dealing with problems (brittle, damaged, attached, and contaminated materials).\r\n\r\n<h3>Working in Archives</h3>\r\nArchives of American Art. \"Frequently Asked Questions.\" <em>Archives of American Art: Ask Us.</em> 2011. <a href=\"http://www.aaa.si.edu/askus/faq\">http://www.aaa.si.edu/askus/faq</a>: A general FAQ addressing basic questions and providing policy information, such as the need for researchers to schedule appointments, a useful reminder no matter which archive you plan to use.\r\n\r\nNew York University Libraries. \"Using Archives and Manuscripts.\" <em>New York</em><em> University</em><em> Libraries: Research Guides.</em> 2011. <a href=\"http://nyu.libguides.com/content.php?pid=38517\">http://nyu.libguides.com/content.php?pid=38517</a>. Intended for researchers using NYU collections, this guide also provides general relevant information, including definitions, recommendations on handling materials, and best practices for archival research.\r\n\r\n<h3>Teaching</h3>\r\nThe National Archives Experience (US). \"Tool Box.\"<em> The National Archives Experience: Educators and Students. </em>2011. <a href=\"http://www.archives.gov/nae/education/tool-box.html\">http://www.archives.gov/nae/education/tool-box.html</a>. The \"Tool Box\" includes many basic documents explaining the benefits of teaching with primary sources, basics for teaching with primary documents, and links to teaching workshops and collaborative opportunities (<a href=\"http://www.archives.gov/nae/education/collaboration.html\">http://www.archives.gov/nae/education/collaboration.html</a>).\r\n\r\nNational Archives of Australia. <em>Vrroom: Virtual Reading Room</em>. 2011. <a href=\"http://vrroom.naa.gov.au/\">http://vrroom.naa.gov.au/</a>. With a tagline of \"easy access to archival records for teachers and students,\" <em>Vrroom</em> is designed as a full virtual reading room, allowing users to search and browse archival collections, as well as providing support for teaching and research.\r\n<h3>Working with Technology in Archives</h3>\r\nBateman, Kirklin, Sheila Brennan, Douglas Mudd, and Paula Petrik. \"Taking a Byte Out of the Archives: Making Technology Work for You.\" <em>Perspectives Online </em>43, no. 1: (Jan. 2005)\r\n<a href=\"http://www.historians.org/perspectives/issues/2005/0501/0501arc1.cfm\">http://www.historians.org/perspectives/issues/2005/0501/0501arc1.cfm</a>. A useful overview of working with technology in archives, as well as maintaining electronic documents and notes from archival research. Published in 2005, the guide is somewhat dated (it does not include Zotero, for example, which rolled out in 2006).','How to Work with Primary Source Documents','','inherit','open','open','','2045-revision-14','','','2012-10-01 23:45:18','2012-10-01 23:45:18','',2045,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/2045-revision-14/',0,'revision','',0),(2574,10,'2012-10-01 23:48:43','2012-10-01 23:48:43','Archival research is an important source for coursework and teaching, as professors and instructors are increasingly incorporating work with primary documents into undergraduate courses. Because access to primary resources is often restricted by research room hours, and can be further limited because of preservation concerns if materials are extremely fragile or if collections are not fully inventoried, this kind of research takes time. Despite this, many student researchers leave archives with a great deal more information than they will be able to explore in their written scholarship. Students’ research goals also inform their actual practice, although, due to the many pleasures and challenges of working with primary documents, even the best intentions often change dramatically when working through a collection of materials. Whatever the situation, undergraduates working with primary documents need to be aware of a number of general recommendations, in addition to any particular archive’s specific rules.\r\n\r\nThough the individual archive or library is the best first source of information for working with specific collections, the following resources provide general information about working effectively with archival materials that may be of use to students and/or their teachers.\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<h2>Resources for Working with Primary Source Documents</h2>\r\n<h3>Comprehensive</h3>\r\nSchmidt, Laura. \"Using Archives: A Guide to Effective Research.\" <em>Society of American Archivists</em>. 2011. <a href=\"http://www2.archivists.org/usingarchives\">http://www2.archivists.org/usingarchives</a>. An excellent primer for using archives, with considerations such as: \"What Are Archives and How do They Differ from Libraries?\"; \"Requesting Materials Remotely\"; \"Planning to Visit an Archive\"; and \"Notes on Copyright, Restrictions, and Unprocessed Collections.\"\r\n<h3>Handling Documents</h3>\r\nNational Archives (UK). \"Handling Documents.\" <em>The National Archives.</em> 2011. <a href=\"http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/visit/document-handling.htm\">http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/visit/document-handling.htm</a>. A basic overview for handling documents, including best practices and an explanation of common types of documents and handling needs.\r\n\r\nNational Park Service. \"Handling Archival Documents and Manuscripts.\" <em>Conserve O Gram </em>19, no. 17 (Sept. 1996). <a href=\"http://www.nps.gov/museum/publications/conserveogram/19-17.pdf\">http://www.nps.gov/museum/publications/conserveogram/19-17.pdf</a>. A brief guide focused on handling archival documents and manuscripts organized into a series of do’s and don’ts, including setting up the research area, moving materials, and dealing with problems (brittle, damaged, attached, and contaminated materials).\r\n<h3>Working in Archives</h3>\r\nArchives of American Art. \"Frequently Asked Questions.\" <em>Archives of American Art: Ask Us.</em> 2011. <a href=\"http://www.aaa.si.edu/askus/faq\">http://www.aaa.si.edu/askus/faq</a>: A general FAQ addressing basic questions and providing policy information, such as the need for researchers to schedule appointments, a useful reminder no matter which archive you plan to use.\r\n\r\nNew York University Libraries. \"Using Archives and Manuscripts.\" <em>New York</em><em> University</em><em> Libraries: Research Guides.</em> 2011. <a href=\"http://nyu.libguides.com/content.php?pid=38517\">http://nyu.libguides.com/content.php?pid=38517</a>. Intended for researchers using NYU collections, this guide also provides general relevant information, including definitions, recommendations on handling materials, and best practices for archival research.\r\n<h3>Teaching</h3>\r\nThe National Archives Experience (US). \"Tool Box.\"<em> The National Archives Experience: Educators and Students. </em>2011. <a href=\"http://www.archives.gov/nae/education/tool-box.html\">http://www.archives.gov/nae/education/tool-box.html</a>. The \"Tool Box\" includes many basic documents explaining the benefits of teaching with primary sources, basics for teaching with primary documents, and links to teaching workshops and collaborative opportunities (<a href=\"http://www.archives.gov/nae/education/collaboration.html\">http://www.archives.gov/nae/education/collaboration.html</a>).\r\n\r\nNational Archives of Australia. <em>Vrroom: Virtual Reading Room</em>. 2011. <a href=\"http://vrroom.naa.gov.au/\">http://vrroom.naa.gov.au/</a>. With a tagline of \"easy access to archival records for teachers and students,\" <em>Vrroom</em> is designed as a full virtual reading room, allowing users to search and browse archival collections, as well as providing support for teaching and research.\r\n<h3>Working with Technology in Archives</h3>\r\nBateman, Kirklin, Sheila Brennan, Douglas Mudd, and Paula Petrik. \"Taking a Byte Out of the Archives: Making Technology Work for You.\" <em>Perspectives Online </em>43, no. 1: (Jan. 2005)\r\n<a href=\"http://www.historians.org/perspectives/issues/2005/0501/0501arc1.cfm\">http://www.historians.org/perspectives/issues/2005/0501/0501arc1.cfm</a>. A useful overview of working with technology in archives, as well as maintaining electronic documents and notes from archival research. Published in 2005, the guide is somewhat dated (it does not include Zotero, for example, which rolled out in 2006).','How to Work with Primary Source Documents','','inherit','open','open','','2045-revision-15','','','2012-10-01 23:48:43','2012-10-01 23:48:43','',2045,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/2045-revision-15/',0,'revision','',0),(2575,10,'2011-05-02 04:50:32','2011-05-02 04:50:32','<em>Archive </em>focuses on the use and theory of archives and special collections in higher education.\r\n\r\nThe academic community has invested deeply in the preservation, use, and digitization of materials in special collections. Projects from and with such archives have been executed and continue with great success.  Digitization efforts large and small have freed collections from the bounds of brick and mortar by bringing a wealth of texts and objects into virtual circulation. Teachers and librarians have increasingly emphasized work with original materials for students at all levels as a way to enrich student experience and position students as researchers.  The use of materials in special collections as the objects of scholarly study continues to be a key methodology of humanities disciplines even as new technologies, from data mining to visualizations to chemical analyses of vellum, open up possibilities for what scholars learn from these objects.\r\n\r\nRecent archival projects have involved multiple institutions (universities and colleges, independent libraries and archives, and non-profit organizations) and multiple constituencies (including librarians, archivists, undergraduate and graduate students, faculty, university press directors, and information technologists).  Envisioned as a central meeting place for currently disparate and dispersed projects and participants, this journal provides the opportunity to use the common ground of the archive to build conversations among members of the academic community and to bridge institutions.\r\n\r\nThe presumption guiding most archival projects, whether the use of special collections in an undergraduate research project or a large digital project, is that the encounter between scholar and object enriches all participants, and that better learning and scholarship is produced when more people have greater access to “original materials, whether they be analog, digital surrogates, or born-digital.  Yet, what the positive result is, exactly, is often anecdotal: increased student interest, a new focus for a dissertation, a new treasure uncovered.  How projects enable a generative encounter between archival object and human consciousness is an open question.  Indeed, we don’t fully know what kinds of generative encounters are being facilitated by these contacts, let alone how to share, scale, and build from them.  What the nature of our ongoing investment in archives and special collections is, and how best to enact it, demands that we aggregate our experiences, resources, and knowledge to address these fundamental questions.  We propose, as a community widely dispersed among academic positions and institutions, to study the scholarly life of archives in all of its richness.  This postulate lays the groundwork for <em>Archive</em>.\r\n\r\nThe project has been supported with a Andrew W. Mellon Foundation Grant.','About','','inherit','open','open','','2-revision-12','','','2011-05-02 04:50:32','2011-05-02 04:50:32','',2,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/2-revision-12/',0,'revision','',0),(2576,10,'2012-10-01 23:54:04','2012-10-01 23:54:04','<h2><a href=\"#welcome\">Welcome</a> | <a href=\"#mission\">Mission</a> |  <a href=\"#content\">Journal Content</a> |  <a href=\"#editors\">Editorial Team &amp; Editorial Board</a> | <a href=\"#submissions\">Submissions</a>\r\n\r\n<a href=\"#review\">Peer Review</a> |  <a href=\"#copyright\">Copyright &amp; Licenses</a> | <a href=\"#publication\">Publication</a> |  <a href=\"#design\">Web Design</a> | <a href=\"#support\"> Support</a></h2>\r\n<a name=\"welcome\"></a>\r\n<h2>Welcome</h2>\r\n<p class=\"textblock\">What you see on this site is the pilot issue, published April 2011. Work is underway (as of October 1, 2011) on Issue 2, which will focus on undergraduate work in the archive. We are also accepting proposals for Issue 3, a special issue focused on data curation.</p>\r\n\r\n<h2><a name=\"mission\"></a>Mission</h2>\r\n<em>Archive</em> focuses on the use and theory of archives and special collections in higher education.\r\n<p class=\"textblock\">The academic community has invested deeply in the preservation, use, and digitization of materials in special collections, and <em>Archive</em> provides the space to reflect on this investment. The objects and texts in special collections and archives are the focus of this journal, just as they are the focus of the many projects from and in archives that have been executed and continue with great success. Digitization efforts large and small have freed archives from the bounds of brick and mortar by bringing a wealth of texts and objects into virtual circulation. Teachers and librarians have increasingly emphasized work with original materials for students at all levels as a way to enrich student experience and position students as researchers. The use of materials in special collections as the objects of scholarly study continues to be a key methodology of humanities disciplines even as new technologies, from data mining to visualizations, open up possibilities for what scholars learn from these objects. Recent archival projects have involved multiple institutions (universities and colleges, independent libraries and archives, and non-profit organizations) and multiple constituencies (including librarians, archivists, undergraduate and graduate students, faculty, university press directors, and information technologists). In this moment when archival projects, both virtual and real, have become the norm rather than the exception, <em>Archive</em> offers a way to forge connections among the projects and the communities producing them.</p>\r\n\r\n<h2><a name=\"content\"></a>Journal Content</h2>\r\n<p class=\"textblock\">The journal consists of three content areas:</p>\r\n\r\n<ul>\r\n	<li><em>360°: Analysis and Discussion in the Round</em> features an asynchronous “discussion” among contributors from various backgrounds — in the form of several individual, linked essays — on a single archive or archival topic.</li>\r\n	<li><em>Archives, Remixed: Critical Perspectives and Pathways</em> invites analytical and creative pieces that reflect on meaning-making in and through archives. The format is open to both traditional research or theoretical essays, as well as multi-modal, alternate, or experimental formats.  Contributions that analyze, use, theorize, create, find ways through, or reconstitute particular archives, objects or exhibits are invited.  Only original work that has not been published elsewhere will be accepted for publication.</li>\r\n	<li><em>Life in the Archive</em> serves as a community space for people to share best practices, archival finds, reports from the field, and thoughts on current work in the field.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<h2><a name=\"editors\"></a>Editorial Team</h2>\r\n<table>\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr>\r\n<th><em>Editor</em></th>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Lauren Coats</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>Assistant Professor of English (LSU)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<th><em>Managing Editor</em></th>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Gabrielle Dean</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>Curator of Modern Literary Rare Books and Manuscripts, Librarian for English and the Writing Seminars (Johns Hopkins University)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<th><em>Technical Editor</em></th>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Daniel Chamberlain</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>Director, Center for Digital Learning and Research (Occidental College)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<th><em>Contributing Editors</em></th>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Cecily Marcus</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>Curator in Archives and Special Collections (University of Minnesota)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Laurie N. Taylor</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>Digital Humanities Librarian, Digital Library Center (University of Florida)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<th><em>Editorial Board</em></th>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Wendy Hui Kyong Chun</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>Professor of Modern Culture and Media (Brown University)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Dan Cohen</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>Associate Professor, Department of History and Art History; Director, Center for History and New Media (George Mason University)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Sharon Farb</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>Associate University Librarian (UCLA)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Kathleen Fitzpatrick</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>Director of Scholarly Communications (MLA) and Professor of Media Studies (Pomona College)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Julia Flanders</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>Director, Women Writers Project; Associate Director for Textbase Development, Center for Digital Scholarship (Brown University)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Amanda French</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>THATCamp Coordinator, Center for History and New Media (George Mason University)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Chuck Henry</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>President, Council on Library and Information Resources (CLIR)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Patricia Hswe</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>Digital Collections Curator (Penn State University)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Tara McPherson</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>Associate Professor of Critical Studies, School of Cinematic Arts (University of Southern California)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Kenneth M. Price</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>University Professor and Hillegass Chair of American Literature; Co-Director, Center for Digital Research in the Humanities (University of Nebraska-Lincoln)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Elliott Shore</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>CIO, Director of Libraries, and Professor of History (Bryn Mawr College)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Richard Szary</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>Director, Louis Round Wilson Library; Associate University Librarian for Special Collections (UNC-Chapel Hill)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Ed Whitley</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>Associate Professor of English (Lehigh University)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">John Willinsky</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>Khosla Family Professor of Education (Stanford University)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n</tbody>\r\n</table>\r\n<strong><a name=\"submissions\"></a>Submissions</strong>\r\n\r\nPlease review our <a href=\"http://archivejournal.net/journal/home/submit-to-archive-journal/\">submit page</a>, if you are interested in submitting to the journal, or have any suggestions for or comments about the journal.\r\n<h2><a name=\"review\"></a>Peer Review</h2>\r\nAll materials in <em>Archive Journal</em> are peer-reviewed.\r\n\r\nPeer review is central to scholarly communication by providing feedback for improvement, ensuring the quality of published materials, and validating the scholarly merit and proper credentialing of published materials. <em>Archive Journal</em>’s peer review policy is designed to achieve these goals, while also using emerging forms of peer review.  Because <em>Archive Journal</em> focuses on the use and theory of archives and special collections in higher education, offering a way to forge connections among diverse projects and the communities producing them, the review process is structured to support building connections while retaining the scholarly rigor inherent in peer review.\r\n\r\nOur review process consists of editorial and open review in the following stages:\r\n<ul>\r\n	<li>Every submission is read by the Editorial Team to determine suitability for publication. The Editorial Team declines materials that are not appropriate at this stage; gives detailed feedback and the opportunity to resubmit for appropriate materials that need substantial revision; and gives feedback and facilitates the process towards publication for appropriate materials that need minor or no revisions. Because <em>Archive Journal</em> is an interdisciplinary space to forge connections and because the online format continues to evolve, this stage may include a series of back and forth feedback from the Editorial Team in order to ensure scholarly rigor, communicability across scholarly fields, and appropriateness of online display.</li>\r\n	<li>If deemed necessary by the Editorial Team, submissions within specialized subject areas that the Editorial Team cannot assess will be sent to reviewers with the appropriate expertise. Reviewers are encouraged to provide guidance to the Editorial Team and constructive feedback for the authors.</li>\r\n	<li>Revised submissions are reviewed after revision for final approval by the Editorial Team before publication. <em>Archive Journal</em> reserves the right to reject revised materials that are deemed not suitable for publication.</li>\r\n	<li>Following peer review and before publication, all accepted materials are copyedited for style and consistency.</li>\r\n	<li>All submissions will be subject to open review via reader comments. After an appropriate open review period has passed, the author(s) will have the opportunity to revise the submission. The final version will be posted and marked as such, with a clear link to the original version and associated open review comments.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<h2><a name=\"copyright\"></a>Copyright &amp; Licenses</h2>\r\nAuthors published in <em>Archive Journal</em> retain permanent ownership of their work via an open-access license. In order to facilitate access and preservation, <em>Archive Journal</em> retains a perpetual, non-exclusive right to publish accepted work and to include it in other aggregations and indexes. Authors are free to deposit a pre-publication version in an institutional repository, individual webpage, or similar site, as well as to reprint, reuse, or republish their work in any venue after one year.\r\n\r\nThe <em>Archive Journal</em> site is made available under the terms of a <a href=\"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/\">Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License</a>. The license grants permission for non-commercial, attributed re-use of content that is produced by <em>Archive Journal</em>.\r\n\r\n<em>Archive</em> has made every effort to ensure that third-party materials used in this journal and on this site follows all copyright and other restrictions. If you have any more information about an item you\'ve seen on our website or if you are the copyright owner and believe our website has not properly attributed your work to you or has used it without permission, we want to hear from you. Please email us at <a href=\"mailto:contact@archivejournal.net\">contact@archivejournal.net</a> with your contact information and a link to the relevant content.\r\n<h2><a name=\"publication\"></a>Publication</h2>\r\nPermanent access and preservation for citation and reproducible research are core components of scholarly communication. <em>Archive Journal</em> provides permanent open, online access for all journal issues.\r\n<h2><a name=\"design\"></a>Web Design</h2>\r\n<a href=\"http://lamppostcreative.com/\">Lamppost Creative</a> serves as the current developer and designer.\r\n\r\n<a href=\"http://infernalcontraption.com/\">Infernal Contraption</a> provided the original design and layout.\r\n<h2><a name=\"support\"></a>Support</h2>\r\nThe project has been generously supported with grant funds from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation.','About','','inherit','open','open','','2-revision-13','','','2012-10-01 23:54:04','2012-10-01 23:54:04','',2,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/2-revision-13/',0,'revision','',0),(2577,10,'2012-10-01 23:54:36','2012-10-01 23:54:36','<h2><a href=\"#welcome\">Welcome</a> | <a href=\"#mission\">Mission</a> | <a href=\"#content\">Journal Content</a> | <a href=\"#editors\">Editorial Team &amp; Editorial Board</a> | <a href=\"#submissions\">Submissions</a></h2>\r\n<a href=\"#review\">Peer Review</a> | <a href=\"#copyright\">Copyright &amp; Licenses</a> | <a href=\"#publication\">Publication</a> | <a href=\"#design\">Web Design</a> | <a href=\"#support\"> Support</a>\r\n\r\n<a name=\"welcome\"></a>\r\n<h2>Welcome</h2>\r\n<p class=\"textblock\">What you see on this site is the pilot issue, published April 2011. Work is underway (as of October 1, 2011) on Issue 2, which will focus on undergraduate work in the archive. We are also accepting proposals for Issue 3, a special issue focused on data curation.</p>\r\n\r\n<h2><a name=\"mission\"></a>Mission</h2>\r\n<em>Archive</em> focuses on the use and theory of archives and special collections in higher education.\r\n<p class=\"textblock\">The academic community has invested deeply in the preservation, use, and digitization of materials in special collections, and <em>Archive</em> provides the space to reflect on this investment. The objects and texts in special collections and archives are the focus of this journal, just as they are the focus of the many projects from and in archives that have been executed and continue with great success. Digitization efforts large and small have freed archives from the bounds of brick and mortar by bringing a wealth of texts and objects into virtual circulation. Teachers and librarians have increasingly emphasized work with original materials for students at all levels as a way to enrich student experience and position students as researchers. The use of materials in special collections as the objects of scholarly study continues to be a key methodology of humanities disciplines even as new technologies, from data mining to visualizations, open up possibilities for what scholars learn from these objects. Recent archival projects have involved multiple institutions (universities and colleges, independent libraries and archives, and non-profit organizations) and multiple constituencies (including librarians, archivists, undergraduate and graduate students, faculty, university press directors, and information technologists). In this moment when archival projects, both virtual and real, have become the norm rather than the exception, <em>Archive</em> offers a way to forge connections among the projects and the communities producing them.</p>\r\n\r\n<h2><a name=\"content\"></a>Journal Content</h2>\r\n<p class=\"textblock\">The journal consists of three content areas:</p>\r\n\r\n<ul>\r\n	<li><em>360°: Analysis and Discussion in the Round</em> features an asynchronous “discussion” among contributors from various backgrounds — in the form of several individual, linked essays — on a single archive or archival topic.</li>\r\n	<li><em>Archives, Remixed: Critical Perspectives and Pathways</em> invites analytical and creative pieces that reflect on meaning-making in and through archives. The format is open to both traditional research or theoretical essays, as well as multi-modal, alternate, or experimental formats. Contributions that analyze, use, theorize, create, find ways through, or reconstitute particular archives, objects or exhibits are invited. Only original work that has not been published elsewhere will be accepted for publication.</li>\r\n	<li><em>Life in the Archive</em> serves as a community space for people to share best practices, archival finds, reports from the field, and thoughts on current work in the field.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<h2><a name=\"editors\"></a>Editorial Team</h2>\r\n<table>\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr>\r\n<th><em>Editor</em></th>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Lauren Coats</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>Assistant Professor of English (LSU)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<th><em>Managing Editor</em></th>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Gabrielle Dean</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>Curator of Modern Literary Rare Books and Manuscripts, Librarian for English and the Writing Seminars (Johns Hopkins University)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<th><em>Technical Editor</em></th>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Daniel Chamberlain</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>Director, Center for Digital Learning and Research (Occidental College)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<th><em>Contributing Editors</em></th>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Cecily Marcus</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>Curator in Archives and Special Collections (University of Minnesota)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Laurie N. Taylor</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>Digital Humanities Librarian, Digital Library Center (University of Florida)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<th><em>Editorial Board</em></th>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Wendy Hui Kyong Chun</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>Professor of Modern Culture and Media (Brown University)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Dan Cohen</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>Associate Professor, Department of History and Art History; Director, Center for History and New Media (George Mason University)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Sharon Farb</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>Associate University Librarian (UCLA)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Kathleen Fitzpatrick</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>Director of Scholarly Communications (MLA) and Professor of Media Studies (Pomona College)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Julia Flanders</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>Director, Women Writers Project; Associate Director for Textbase Development, Center for Digital Scholarship (Brown University)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Amanda French</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>THATCamp Coordinator, Center for History and New Media (George Mason University)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Chuck Henry</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>President, Council on Library and Information Resources (CLIR)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Patricia Hswe</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>Digital Collections Curator (Penn State University)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Tara McPherson</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>Associate Professor of Critical Studies, School of Cinematic Arts (University of Southern California)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Kenneth M. Price</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>University Professor and Hillegass Chair of American Literature; Co-Director, Center for Digital Research in the Humanities (University of Nebraska-Lincoln)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Elliott Shore</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>CIO, Director of Libraries, and Professor of History (Bryn Mawr College)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Richard Szary</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>Director, Louis Round Wilson Library; Associate University Librarian for Special Collections (UNC-Chapel Hill)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Ed Whitley</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>Associate Professor of English (Lehigh University)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">John Willinsky</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>Khosla Family Professor of Education (Stanford University)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n</tbody>\r\n</table>\r\n<strong><a name=\"submissions\"></a>Submissions</strong>\r\n\r\nPlease review our <a href=\"http://archivejournal.net/journal/home/submit-to-archive-journal/\">submit page</a>, if you are interested in submitting to the journal, or have any suggestions for or comments about the journal.\r\n<h2><a name=\"review\"></a>Peer Review</h2>\r\nAll materials in <em>Archive Journal</em> are peer-reviewed.\r\n\r\nPeer review is central to scholarly communication by providing feedback for improvement, ensuring the quality of published materials, and validating the scholarly merit and proper credentialing of published materials. <em>Archive Journal</em>’s peer review policy is designed to achieve these goals, while also using emerging forms of peer review. Because <em>Archive Journal</em> focuses on the use and theory of archives and special collections in higher education, offering a way to forge connections among diverse projects and the communities producing them, the review process is structured to support building connections while retaining the scholarly rigor inherent in peer review.\r\n\r\nOur review process consists of editorial and open review in the following stages:\r\n<ul>\r\n	<li>Every submission is read by the Editorial Team to determine suitability for publication. The Editorial Team declines materials that are not appropriate at this stage; gives detailed feedback and the opportunity to resubmit for appropriate materials that need substantial revision; and gives feedback and facilitates the process towards publication for appropriate materials that need minor or no revisions. Because <em>Archive Journal</em> is an interdisciplinary space to forge connections and because the online format continues to evolve, this stage may include a series of back and forth feedback from the Editorial Team in order to ensure scholarly rigor, communicability across scholarly fields, and appropriateness of online display.</li>\r\n	<li>If deemed necessary by the Editorial Team, submissions within specialized subject areas that the Editorial Team cannot assess will be sent to reviewers with the appropriate expertise. Reviewers are encouraged to provide guidance to the Editorial Team and constructive feedback for the authors.</li>\r\n	<li>Revised submissions are reviewed after revision for final approval by the Editorial Team before publication. <em>Archive Journal</em> reserves the right to reject revised materials that are deemed not suitable for publication.</li>\r\n	<li>Following peer review and before publication, all accepted materials are copyedited for style and consistency.</li>\r\n	<li>All submissions will be subject to open review via reader comments. After an appropriate open review period has passed, the author(s) will have the opportunity to revise the submission. The final version will be posted and marked as such, with a clear link to the original version and associated open review comments.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<h2><a name=\"copyright\"></a>Copyright &amp; Licenses</h2>\r\nAuthors published in <em>Archive Journal</em> retain permanent ownership of their work via an open-access license. In order to facilitate access and preservation, <em>Archive Journal</em> retains a perpetual, non-exclusive right to publish accepted work and to include it in other aggregations and indexes. Authors are free to deposit a pre-publication version in an institutional repository, individual webpage, or similar site, as well as to reprint, reuse, or republish their work in any venue after one year.\r\n\r\nThe <em>Archive Journal</em> site is made available under the terms of a <a href=\"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/\">Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License</a>. The license grants permission for non-commercial, attributed re-use of content that is produced by <em>Archive Journal</em>.\r\n\r\n<em>Archive</em> has made every effort to ensure that third-party materials used in this journal and on this site follows all copyright and other restrictions. If you have any more information about an item you\'ve seen on our website or if you are the copyright owner and believe our website has not properly attributed your work to you or has used it without permission, we want to hear from you. Please email us at <a href=\"mailto:contact@archivejournal.net\">contact@archivejournal.net</a> with your contact information and a link to the relevant content.\r\n<h2><a name=\"publication\"></a>Publication</h2>\r\nPermanent access and preservation for citation and reproducible research are core components of scholarly communication. <em>Archive Journal</em> provides permanent open, online access for all journal issues.\r\n<h2><a name=\"design\"></a>Web Design</h2>\r\n<a href=\"http://lamppostcreative.com/\">Lamppost Creative</a> serves as the current developer and designer.\r\n\r\n<a href=\"http://infernalcontraption.com/\">Infernal Contraption</a> provided the original design and layout.\r\n<h2><a name=\"support\"></a>Support</h2>\r\nThe project has been generously supported with grant funds from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation.','About','','inherit','open','open','','2-revision-14','','','2012-10-01 23:54:36','2012-10-01 23:54:36','',2,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/2-revision-14/',0,'revision','',0),(2578,10,'2012-10-01 23:56:04','2012-10-01 23:56:04','<a href=\"#welcome\">Welcome</a> | <a href=\"#mission\">Mission</a> | <a href=\"#content\">Journal Content</a> | <a href=\"#editors\">Editorial Team &amp; Editorial Board</a> | <a href=\"#submissions\">Submissions</a>\r\n<a href=\"#review\">Peer Review</a> | <a href=\"#copyright\">Copyright &amp; Licenses</a> | <a href=\"#publication\">Publication</a> | <a href=\"#design\">Web Design</a> | <a href=\"#support\"> Support</a>\r\n\r\n<a name=\"welcome\"></a>\r\n<h2>Welcome</h2>\r\n<p class=\"textblock\">What you see on this site is the pilot issue, published April 2011. Work is underway (as of October 1, 2011) on Issue 2, which will focus on undergraduate work in the archive. We are also accepting proposals for Issue 3, a special issue focused on data curation.</p>\r\n\r\n<h2><a name=\"mission\"></a>Mission</h2>\r\n<em>Archive</em> focuses on the use and theory of archives and special collections in higher education.\r\n<p class=\"textblock\">The academic community has invested deeply in the preservation, use, and digitization of materials in special collections, and <em>Archive</em> provides the space to reflect on this investment. The objects and texts in special collections and archives are the focus of this journal, just as they are the focus of the many projects from and in archives that have been executed and continue with great success. Digitization efforts large and small have freed archives from the bounds of brick and mortar by bringing a wealth of texts and objects into virtual circulation. Teachers and librarians have increasingly emphasized work with original materials for students at all levels as a way to enrich student experience and position students as researchers. The use of materials in special collections as the objects of scholarly study continues to be a key methodology of humanities disciplines even as new technologies, from data mining to visualizations, open up possibilities for what scholars learn from these objects. Recent archival projects have involved multiple institutions (universities and colleges, independent libraries and archives, and non-profit organizations) and multiple constituencies (including librarians, archivists, undergraduate and graduate students, faculty, university press directors, and information technologists). In this moment when archival projects, both virtual and real, have become the norm rather than the exception, <em>Archive</em> offers a way to forge connections among the projects and the communities producing them.</p>\r\n\r\n<h2><a name=\"content\"></a>Journal Content</h2>\r\n<p class=\"textblock\">The journal consists of three content areas:</p>\r\n\r\n<ul>\r\n	<li><em>360°: Analysis and Discussion in the Round</em> features an asynchronous “discussion” among contributors from various backgrounds — in the form of several individual, linked essays — on a single archive or archival topic.</li>\r\n	<li><em>Archives, Remixed: Critical Perspectives and Pathways</em> invites analytical and creative pieces that reflect on meaning-making in and through archives. The format is open to both traditional research or theoretical essays, as well as multi-modal, alternate, or experimental formats. Contributions that analyze, use, theorize, create, find ways through, or reconstitute particular archives, objects or exhibits are invited. Only original work that has not been published elsewhere will be accepted for publication.</li>\r\n	<li><em>Life in the Archive</em> serves as a community space for people to share best practices, archival finds, reports from the field, and thoughts on current work in the field.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<h2><a name=\"editors\"></a>Editorial Team</h2>\r\n<table>\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr>\r\n<th><em>Editor</em></th>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Lauren Coats</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>Assistant Professor of English (LSU)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<th><em>Managing Editor</em></th>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Gabrielle Dean</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>Curator of Modern Literary Rare Books and Manuscripts, Librarian for English and the Writing Seminars (Johns Hopkins University)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<th><em>Technical Editor</em></th>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Daniel Chamberlain</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>Director, Center for Digital Learning and Research (Occidental College)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<th><em>Contributing Editors</em></th>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Cecily Marcus</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>Curator in Archives and Special Collections (University of Minnesota)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Laurie N. Taylor</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>Digital Humanities Librarian, Digital Library Center (University of Florida)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<th><em>Editorial Board</em></th>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Wendy Hui Kyong Chun</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>Professor of Modern Culture and Media (Brown University)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Dan Cohen</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>Associate Professor, Department of History and Art History; Director, Center for History and New Media (George Mason University)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Sharon Farb</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>Associate University Librarian (UCLA)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Kathleen Fitzpatrick</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>Director of Scholarly Communications (MLA) and Professor of Media Studies (Pomona College)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Julia Flanders</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>Director, Women Writers Project; Associate Director for Textbase Development, Center for Digital Scholarship (Brown University)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Amanda French</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>THATCamp Coordinator, Center for History and New Media (George Mason University)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Chuck Henry</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>President, Council on Library and Information Resources (CLIR)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Patricia Hswe</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>Digital Collections Curator (Penn State University)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Tara McPherson</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>Associate Professor of Critical Studies, School of Cinematic Arts (University of Southern California)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Kenneth M. Price</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>University Professor and Hillegass Chair of American Literature; Co-Director, Center for Digital Research in the Humanities (University of Nebraska-Lincoln)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Elliott Shore</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>CIO, Director of Libraries, and Professor of History (Bryn Mawr College)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Richard Szary</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>Director, Louis Round Wilson Library; Associate University Librarian for Special Collections (UNC-Chapel Hill)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Ed Whitley</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>Associate Professor of English (Lehigh University)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">John Willinsky</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>Khosla Family Professor of Education (Stanford University)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n</tbody>\r\n</table>\r\n<strong><a name=\"submissions\"></a>Submissions</strong>\r\n\r\nPlease review our <a href=\"http://archivejournal.net/journal/home/submit-to-archive-journal/\">submit page</a>, if you are interested in submitting to the journal, or have any suggestions for or comments about the journal.\r\n<h2><a name=\"review\"></a>Peer Review</h2>\r\nAll materials in <em>Archive Journal</em> are peer-reviewed.\r\n\r\nPeer review is central to scholarly communication by providing feedback for improvement, ensuring the quality of published materials, and validating the scholarly merit and proper credentialing of published materials. <em>Archive Journal</em>’s peer review policy is designed to achieve these goals, while also using emerging forms of peer review. Because <em>Archive Journal</em> focuses on the use and theory of archives and special collections in higher education, offering a way to forge connections among diverse projects and the communities producing them, the review process is structured to support building connections while retaining the scholarly rigor inherent in peer review.\r\n\r\nOur review process consists of editorial and open review in the following stages:\r\n<ul>\r\n	<li>Every submission is read by the Editorial Team to determine suitability for publication. The Editorial Team declines materials that are not appropriate at this stage; gives detailed feedback and the opportunity to resubmit for appropriate materials that need substantial revision; and gives feedback and facilitates the process towards publication for appropriate materials that need minor or no revisions. Because <em>Archive Journal</em> is an interdisciplinary space to forge connections and because the online format continues to evolve, this stage may include a series of back and forth feedback from the Editorial Team in order to ensure scholarly rigor, communicability across scholarly fields, and appropriateness of online display.</li>\r\n	<li>If deemed necessary by the Editorial Team, submissions within specialized subject areas that the Editorial Team cannot assess will be sent to reviewers with the appropriate expertise. Reviewers are encouraged to provide guidance to the Editorial Team and constructive feedback for the authors.</li>\r\n	<li>Revised submissions are reviewed after revision for final approval by the Editorial Team before publication. <em>Archive Journal</em> reserves the right to reject revised materials that are deemed not suitable for publication.</li>\r\n	<li>Following peer review and before publication, all accepted materials are copyedited for style and consistency.</li>\r\n	<li>All submissions will be subject to open review via reader comments. After an appropriate open review period has passed, the author(s) will have the opportunity to revise the submission. The final version will be posted and marked as such, with a clear link to the original version and associated open review comments.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<h2><a name=\"copyright\"></a>Copyright &amp; Licenses</h2>\r\nAuthors published in <em>Archive Journal</em> retain permanent ownership of their work via an open-access license. In order to facilitate access and preservation, <em>Archive Journal</em> retains a perpetual, non-exclusive right to publish accepted work and to include it in other aggregations and indexes. Authors are free to deposit a pre-publication version in an institutional repository, individual webpage, or similar site, as well as to reprint, reuse, or republish their work in any venue after one year.\r\n\r\nThe <em>Archive Journal</em> site is made available under the terms of a <a href=\"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/\">Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License</a>. The license grants permission for non-commercial, attributed re-use of content that is produced by <em>Archive Journal</em>.\r\n\r\n<em>Archive</em> has made every effort to ensure that third-party materials used in this journal and on this site follows all copyright and other restrictions. If you have any more information about an item you\'ve seen on our website or if you are the copyright owner and believe our website has not properly attributed your work to you or has used it without permission, we want to hear from you. Please email us at <a href=\"mailto:contact@archivejournal.net\">contact@archivejournal.net</a> with your contact information and a link to the relevant content.\r\n<h2><a name=\"publication\"></a>Publication</h2>\r\nPermanent access and preservation for citation and reproducible research are core components of scholarly communication. <em>Archive Journal</em> provides permanent open, online access for all journal issues.\r\n<h2><a name=\"design\"></a>Web Design</h2>\r\n<a href=\"http://lamppostcreative.com/\">Lamppost Creative</a> serves as the current developer and designer.\r\n\r\n<a href=\"http://infernalcontraption.com/\">Infernal Contraption</a> provided the original design and layout.\r\n<h2><a name=\"support\"></a>Support</h2>\r\nThe project has been generously supported with grant funds from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation.','About','','inherit','open','open','','2-revision-15','','','2012-10-01 23:56:04','2012-10-01 23:56:04','',2,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/2-revision-15/',0,'revision','',0),(2579,10,'2012-10-01 23:58:15','2012-10-01 23:58:15','<a href=\"#welcome\">Welcome</a> | <a href=\"#mission\">Mission</a> | <a href=\"#content\">Journal Content</a> | <a href=\"#editors\">Editorial Team &amp; Editorial Board</a> | <a href=\"#submissions\">Submissions</a>\r\n<a href=\"#review\">Peer Review</a> | <a href=\"#copyright\">Copyright &amp; Licenses</a> | <a href=\"#publication\">Publication</a> | <a href=\"#design\">Web Design</a> | <a href=\"#support\"> Support</a>\r\n\r\n<a id=\"welcome\"></a>\r\n<h2>Welcome</h2>\r\n<p class=\"textblock\">What you see on this site is the pilot issue, published April 2011. Work is underway (as of October 1, 2011) on Issue 2, which will focus on undergraduate work in the archive. We are also accepting proposals for Issue 3, a special issue focused on data curation.</p>\r\n\r\n<h2><a name=\"mission\"></a>Mission</h2>\r\n<em>Archive</em> focuses on the use and theory of archives and special collections in higher education.\r\n<p class=\"textblock\">The academic community has invested deeply in the preservation, use, and digitization of materials in special collections, and <em>Archive</em> provides the space to reflect on this investment. The objects and texts in special collections and archives are the focus of this journal, just as they are the focus of the many projects from and in archives that have been executed and continue with great success. Digitization efforts large and small have freed archives from the bounds of brick and mortar by bringing a wealth of texts and objects into virtual circulation. Teachers and librarians have increasingly emphasized work with original materials for students at all levels as a way to enrich student experience and position students as researchers. The use of materials in special collections as the objects of scholarly study continues to be a key methodology of humanities disciplines even as new technologies, from data mining to visualizations, open up possibilities for what scholars learn from these objects. Recent archival projects have involved multiple institutions (universities and colleges, independent libraries and archives, and non-profit organizations) and multiple constituencies (including librarians, archivists, undergraduate and graduate students, faculty, university press directors, and information technologists). In this moment when archival projects, both virtual and real, have become the norm rather than the exception, <em>Archive</em> offers a way to forge connections among the projects and the communities producing them.</p>\r\n\r\n<h2><a name=\"content\"></a>Journal Content</h2>\r\n<p class=\"textblock\">The journal consists of three content areas:</p>\r\n\r\n<ul>\r\n	<li><em>360°: Analysis and Discussion in the Round</em> features an asynchronous “discussion” among contributors from various backgrounds — in the form of several individual, linked essays — on a single archive or archival topic.</li>\r\n	<li><em>Archives, Remixed: Critical Perspectives and Pathways</em> invites analytical and creative pieces that reflect on meaning-making in and through archives. The format is open to both traditional research or theoretical essays, as well as multi-modal, alternate, or experimental formats. Contributions that analyze, use, theorize, create, find ways through, or reconstitute particular archives, objects or exhibits are invited. Only original work that has not been published elsewhere will be accepted for publication.</li>\r\n	<li><em>Life in the Archive</em> serves as a community space for people to share best practices, archival finds, reports from the field, and thoughts on current work in the field.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<h2><a name=\"editors\"></a>Editorial Team</h2>\r\n<table>\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr>\r\n<th><em>Editor</em></th>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Lauren Coats</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>Assistant Professor of English (LSU)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<th><em>Managing Editor</em></th>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Gabrielle Dean</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>Curator of Modern Literary Rare Books and Manuscripts, Librarian for English and the Writing Seminars (Johns Hopkins University)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<th><em>Technical Editor</em></th>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Daniel Chamberlain</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>Director, Center for Digital Learning and Research (Occidental College)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<th><em>Contributing Editors</em></th>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Cecily Marcus</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>Curator in Archives and Special Collections (University of Minnesota)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Laurie N. Taylor</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>Digital Humanities Librarian, Digital Library Center (University of Florida)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<th><em>Editorial Board</em></th>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Wendy Hui Kyong Chun</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>Professor of Modern Culture and Media (Brown University)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Dan Cohen</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>Associate Professor, Department of History and Art History; Director, Center for History and New Media (George Mason University)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Sharon Farb</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>Associate University Librarian (UCLA)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Kathleen Fitzpatrick</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>Director of Scholarly Communications (MLA) and Professor of Media Studies (Pomona College)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Julia Flanders</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>Director, Women Writers Project; Associate Director for Textbase Development, Center for Digital Scholarship (Brown University)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Amanda French</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>THATCamp Coordinator, Center for History and New Media (George Mason University)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Chuck Henry</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>President, Council on Library and Information Resources (CLIR)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Patricia Hswe</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>Digital Collections Curator (Penn State University)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Tara McPherson</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>Associate Professor of Critical Studies, School of Cinematic Arts (University of Southern California)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Kenneth M. Price</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>University Professor and Hillegass Chair of American Literature; Co-Director, Center for Digital Research in the Humanities (University of Nebraska-Lincoln)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Elliott Shore</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>CIO, Director of Libraries, and Professor of History (Bryn Mawr College)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Richard Szary</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>Director, Louis Round Wilson Library; Associate University Librarian for Special Collections (UNC-Chapel Hill)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">Ed Whitley</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>Associate Professor of English (Lehigh University)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td class=\"name\">John Willinsky</td>\r\n<td>.......</td>\r\n<td>Khosla Family Professor of Education (Stanford University)</td>\r\n</tr>\r\n</tbody>\r\n</table>\r\n<strong><a name=\"submissions\"></a>Submissions</strong>\r\n\r\nPlease review our <a href=\"http://archivejournal.net/journal/home/submit-to-archive-journal/\">submit page</a>, if you are interested in submitting to the journal, or have any suggestions for or comments about the journal.\r\n<h2><a name=\"review\"></a>Peer Review</h2>\r\nAll materials in <em>Archive Journal</em> are peer-reviewed.\r\n\r\nPeer review is central to scholarly communication by providing feedback for improvement, ensuring the quality of published materials, and validating the scholarly merit and proper credentialing of published materials. <em>Archive Journal</em>’s peer review policy is designed to achieve these goals, while also using emerging forms of peer review. Because <em>Archive Journal</em> focuses on the use and theory of archives and special collections in higher education, offering a way to forge connections among diverse projects and the communities producing them, the review process is structured to support building connections while retaining the scholarly rigor inherent in peer review.\r\n\r\nOur review process consists of editorial and open review in the following stages:\r\n<ul>\r\n	<li>Every submission is read by the Editorial Team to determine suitability for publication. The Editorial Team declines materials that are not appropriate at this stage; gives detailed feedback and the opportunity to resubmit for appropriate materials that need substantial revision; and gives feedback and facilitates the process towards publication for appropriate materials that need minor or no revisions. Because <em>Archive Journal</em> is an interdisciplinary space to forge connections and because the online format continues to evolve, this stage may include a series of back and forth feedback from the Editorial Team in order to ensure scholarly rigor, communicability across scholarly fields, and appropriateness of online display.</li>\r\n	<li>If deemed necessary by the Editorial Team, submissions within specialized subject areas that the Editorial Team cannot assess will be sent to reviewers with the appropriate expertise. Reviewers are encouraged to provide guidance to the Editorial Team and constructive feedback for the authors.</li>\r\n	<li>Revised submissions are reviewed after revision for final approval by the Editorial Team before publication. <em>Archive Journal</em> reserves the right to reject revised materials that are deemed not suitable for publication.</li>\r\n	<li>Following peer review and before publication, all accepted materials are copyedited for style and consistency.</li>\r\n	<li>All submissions will be subject to open review via reader comments. After an appropriate open review period has passed, the author(s) will have the opportunity to revise the submission. The final version will be posted and marked as such, with a clear link to the original version and associated open review comments.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n<h2><a name=\"copyright\"></a>Copyright &amp; Licenses</h2>\r\nAuthors published in <em>Archive Journal</em> retain permanent ownership of their work via an open-access license. In order to facilitate access and preservation, <em>Archive Journal</em> retains a perpetual, non-exclusive right to publish accepted work and to include it in other aggregations and indexes. Authors are free to deposit a pre-publication version in an institutional repository, individual webpage, or similar site, as well as to reprint, reuse, or republish their work in any venue after one year.\r\n\r\nThe <em>Archive Journal</em> site is made available under the terms of a <a href=\"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/\">Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License</a>. The license grants permission for non-commercial, attributed re-use of content that is produced by <em>Archive Journal</em>.\r\n\r\n<em>Archive</em> has made every effort to ensure that third-party materials used in this journal and on this site follows all copyright and other restrictions. If you have any more information about an item you\'ve seen on our website or if you are the copyright owner and believe our website has not properly attributed your work to you or has used it without permission, we want to hear from you. Please email us at <a href=\"mailto:contact@archivejournal.net\">contact@archivejournal.net</a> with your contact information and a link to the relevant content.\r\n<h2><a name=\"publication\"></a>Publication</h2>\r\nPermanent access and preservation for citation and reproducible research are core components of scholarly communication. <em>Archive Journal</em> provides permanent open, online access for all journal issues.\r\n<h2><a name=\"design\"></a>Web Design</h2>\r\n<a href=\"http://lamppostcreative.com/\">Lamppost Creative</a> serves as the current developer and designer.\r\n\r\n<a href=\"http://infernalcontraption.com/\">Infernal Contraption</a> provided the original design and layout.\r\n<h2><a name=\"support\"></a>Support</h2>\r\nThe project has been generously supported with grant funds from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation.','About','','inherit','open','open','','2-revision-16','','','2012-10-01 23:58:15','2012-10-01 23:58:15','',2,'http://stage.archivejournal.net/issue/2/uncategorized/2-revision-16/',0,'revision','',0);
