As most posters have sttead there is nothing really new here. A lot of this has been around for years, if not even decades. However, while the article itself can be offending, it is also in my opinion rather irresponsible, because a lot of potential customers do not have the necessary background to distinguish and they fall for the mantra of saving costs. As for the costs itself however, they are far from trivial if you look at the price schedule and the services. While a number of colleagues have replied to in regards of the service offering per se, I took therefore a different slant and reviewed the terms of the service, confidentiality agreement, etc. in more detail.Here is my summary:They position themselves as the middleman, and collect money without really doing anything and the onus and liabilities rest with the clients on both ends. It’s a job portal and they make it look like the next big thing.Therefore, my opinion is straightforward: Hogwash (and you can quote me on that)