<p>Congress made a sensible decision a decade ago when it required the states to administer yearly tests to public school students in exchange for federal education aid. The theory behind the No Child Left Behind Act was that holding schools accountable for test scores would force them to improve instruction for groups of children whom they had historically shortchanged.</p>
<p>Testing did spur some progress in student performance. But it has become clear to us over time that testing was being overemphasized — and misused — in schools that were substituting test preparation for instruction. Even though test-driven reforms were helpful in the beginning, it is now clear that they will never bring this country’s schools up to par with those of the high-performing nations that have left us far behind in math, science and even literacy instruction.</p>
<p>Read the rest of the article at <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/14/opinion/sunday/the-trouble-with-testing-mania.html?_r=0" target="_blank" title="The Trouble With Testing Mania">The New York Times</a>.</p>