In December, Bill Sammons, managing editor of Fox News in Washington, sent the following memo to staff:

<strong><em>From</em></strong><em>: Sammon, Bill
<strong>To</strong>: 169 -SPECIAL REPORT; 036 -FOX.WHU; 054 -FNSunday; 030 -Root (FoxNews.Com); 050 -Senior Producers; 051 -Producers; 069 -Politics; 005 -Washington
<strong>Cc</strong>: Clemente, Michael; Stack, John; Wallace, Jay; Smith, Sean
<strong>Sent</strong>: Tue Dec 08 12:49:51 2009
<strong>Subject</strong>: Given the controversy over the veracity of climate change data...<strong> </strong></em>

<em>...we should refrain from asserting that the planet has warmed (or cooled) in any given period without IMMEDIATELY pointing out that such theories are based upon data that critics have called into question. It is not our place as journalists to assert such notions as facts, especially as this debate intensifies.</em>

This fits perfectly with the observations made by Naomi Oreskes and Erik M. Conway in <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Merchants-Doubt-Handful-Scientists-Obscured/dp/1596916109/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1295182691&amp;sr=1-1">Merchants of Doubt</a>, </em>which shows how scientists (well-funded by conservative organizations) obscured the truth about tobacco, ozone, acid rain and global warming.

But it also suggests another possibility, a memo, perhaps, suggesting that people might refrain from using the phrase “Fox News” without IMMEDIATELY pointing out that critics have called into question whether the channel broadcasts news, or just notions compatible with the success of the Republican Party and the profits of corporate America.