1.  A great article in <em>The Economist </em>about <a href="http://www.economist.com/printedition/displaystory.cfm?story_id=15582269">cameras </a>- especially if you are like me and are desperate to replace a manual SLR.

2.  A site which details how, where, and when different artists, writers, artists and lawyers <a href="http://dailyroutines.typepad.com/daily_routines/">work</a>.

3.  A <a href="http://www.nybooks.com/articles/23707">review</a> of <em>The Oxford Book of Modern Science Writing. </em>A great piece on the history of science, science scholarship, and what constitutes science and scientific disciplines.  The article is a great reference for science-oriented publications and I've added several to my reading wish list.  This is great for a student-scholar like me who has most of my experience in the humanities and softer social sciences.  Here is a problem I have never had to deal with and a delightful quote from the article:

<em>"Sometime in the mid-1970s I wrote a book review for </em><em>The New Yorker</em><em> in which I bemoaned the dearth of popular books on mathematics and in particular my inability to find one on Gödel's incompleteness theorems."</em>

Well, at least writing for <em>The New Yorker</em> is a problem I could one day hope to deal with!