I would have to get a copy of HPO Foundation bylaws to answer your question correctly. As I remember, and this may or may not be accurate, the HPOCA board of directors appoint the trustees of the foundation, or something like that, the terms run for a different length of time than HPOCA positions. This was done on the expectation that the members would approve elected board members for HPOCA, and was designed where influence peddling would not be possible, at least that is how I understand it. HPO Foundation clearly serves only an administrative function. I believe it might be possible to have non-HPOCA members as Officers, or Trustees of this foundation, in many foundations this is the case. Some larger foundations hire these positions, HPO is not that big. I looked over the proposals, they are pretty much standard for a foundation of this type. I guess the lawyer just took a standard format, and inserted the names, addresses, and dates. I saw nothing out of order, or unusual about this proposal.
 My comment about Missouri City, TX, was my opinion as to how travel allowances would best benefit the members. Both current and former editors have gone to these. I would rather see coverage of a chapter event. I did have some classes payed for by an employer in the past, but once I built my own business, I had to pay for this. There is a differance between being an employee, and being a contractor. As a contractor of transportation services, I am expected to provide whatever is necessary to meet my customers needs, my customers would not buy me a truck, tags, etc., and they will not pay to educate me.
 Of course, I will support Oliver Heritage. Sherry is a long time friend, we have been to many, many events, and put in lots of time working, and partying at events. We may not always agree, but that is just life. Bottom line, she told me she wanted her own publication, I agree it is the best thing for her, and want her to succeed. So, I support her effort, and encourage others to do likewise!! I hope you understand.
 To the rest of y'all;
I served in the US Army, overseas protecting our freedoms. Among these freedoms is the first amendment of the US Constitution, which guarantees free speech. With a chain being no stronger than the weakest link, we must guard that ALL have the right to express their opinion, whether we agree with that opinion or not.  When attempts are made to silence one, by any means, are made, we just weaken the chain, thus, threaten our own right to free speech. If you don't like this forum, or its discussions, your computer has an off switch, I suggest you use it! I don't care if those here agree with me, most understand this. Anybody can agree or disagree, that is not important. What is important is anyone can express their opinion, and viewpoints!!! That is the opinion from the peanut gallery!!
Take care!!!
Andy