It seems to me that if the board is acting responsibly it (they) would simply tell us (the members) exactly what the reasons where for terminating the editors contract were. So far all we have heard is that there are &amp;quot;reasons&amp;quot;, ect., but no actual list of them. If the reasons are valid, I&#039;m sure that we (the members) would understand and possibly agree with them. The whole problem seems to be that  for some reason they are unwilling to explain things to us. The other thing that makes NO sense, is the fact that they just renewed her contract, and then a few months later tell us that there were such problems that they had to terminate the contract. It&#039;s sort of confusing,,,,,isn&#039;t it???????