Hey Larry,
Thanks for the compliment! We knew going in that not everything would please everybody. So, we used the input we had at the time to establish what we could determine as the will of the majority of the members. That is probably as good as could be done, there is something for about everyone in the proposal, not everything for everybody, which would be mission impossible. Anyhow, I feel this is a good starting point, as it greatly increases the influence the members have, and requires considerably more accountability. It will also bring more members into the processes, which is a good thing. I did drop the ball though on one item of the summary, and it was an oversight on my part, I take the blame, I didn't catch it until I made one last review. I have e-mailed Chris to make the appropriate addition. It is the following;

ArticleVII section C (3) e. Moves appropriation of funding to Finance and Planning. This is the committee responsible for budgeting, it is proper that this committee handle this duty also, as they would have a better knowledge as to what the financial situation is. 

It is nothing really major, but I am not trying to hide anything. So, I thought I should bring this error on my part to attention.
I hope this does not cause anyone an inconvience.
Once again, thank you for the compliment!!!
Have a great day!!!
Andy