If Andy can actually do that and cry "FOUL", because we, the voting membership were allowed to discuss the merits of his proposed by laws in our main tool of communication( the magazine), why cant we, as voting members also cry foul, as we were not allowed to actually discuss or judge the proposals before actually voting on them. After all, thats all they are is PROPOSALS, which in my opinion are something that is to be debated openly amoung membership right up till the time we have to say yes or no. He sounds like he feels they are already the law, cripted in stone and closed to any further inspection.  Thanks again  Bob