What is wrong with that is fact that the board hired the present editor to produce a quality magazine. Like I said earlier, this is not a voluntary position, it's a paid job. Anyone who applies for and accepts a job should have the qualifications and abilities to do the job as per the contract. I am not personally bashing anyone. I think you are the one who referred to anyone who is critical of the magazine as a "cry baby" Is than not a form of bashing? Some of us are not pleased with the content of the magazine,
and to simply state that is not bashing. We are looking and hoping to see improvement in certain areas. I think I will wait to see if any other members care to post their views before I say anymore on the subject.