Since everyone seems to offer up their two cents on all these recent events, I think I&#039;m going to do the same.
     There has been a lot of controversy on this trucking bill...  and I still have a couple concerns.  The first is why was it necessary to go to the way all to St. Louis to rent a trailer?  I find it very hard to believe that there wasn&#039;t one to be found in the locality of Greenville.  Also, the bill is for $789.81 for trailer rental.  I find this a very high rental rate for two days.   I understand that part of this bill was for damages to the trailer.  If this is so, why is the club liable for damages incurred that the driver should have prevented?  And I am wondering why it is John and Sherry trying to explain all of this when it was Ollie that hauled #3.  Don&#039;t get me wrong Sherry, I understand it is only natural to defend family when they are questioned as he has been, but I think these facts should come from the source since I don&#039;t believe you to be at fault for what Ollie decided to charge.  I have heard some people saying that since this tractor is special comodity, that no expense should be spared to move it.  The only problem is that in the breakdown of the trucking bill, no where is it listed that any of the prices are due to to insurance, security, etc...  Sherry made the statement that the club is not out any money due to the fundraising of the #3 toy.  I would beg to differ.  That statement sounds like &amp;quot;Hey here is the set amount of money available to restore this tractor, lets make sure our billing meets that amount.&amp;quot;  No one has seemed to think that if there was money left over for the tractor, that it could be a number of different donations relating to the tractor alone.  As I stated earlier, Sherry and John shouldn&#039;t be taking the fire for this trucking bill, but since both of you have made the decision to defend and explain it, that puts you into the line of fire of those questioning it.