Wasn&#039;t going to post again but I keep reading these posts.  When you go to meeting like a school board ot town meeting or a club convention it is as much about what isn&#039;t said and what is half said as anything else.  You have to read between the lines.
So lets do a little between the lines reading!
First this isn&#039;t about Sherry getting fired as it is about ability and attitude.
1) There is a new contract so all thaty happened before the contract is off the table and not for consideration.  Doesn&#039;t seem to be the case here.
2) The new contract is less then 2 months old and slip ups in perfmance are to be expected as new habits are being established.  A person does not get canned for performance after only 2 months.  It takes a pattern and ignoring of counseling.
3) Financial is a much more serious matter and one incident can be grounds to release an individual.  However, even that does not occur without the individual being given a chance to explain the incident.  That does not seem to have occured here.
4) The last issue is gaging Sherry.  Any outfit that tries to not pay for performance already provided can standby to pay even more.
Ask why I won&#039;t join--The attitude of the board seems to be off.  Worse the ability to supervise seems to be lacking.
I would like to see a full disclosure of the management of the restoration of old #3 as there are hints that whole story isn&#039;t out yet.