The discourse is firing. I don't mind the classification by country notion, after all how often do we qualify a film in regular conversation by pointing out some time in, say, the first two sentences where it was made (not forgetting international co-productions, of course). Responding to this question is particularly difficult. I think we might want to expand on it somehow by suggesting, perhaps, that we might be fascinated by a nation's films because there is a link with aspects of its culture (maybe only film culture) that we are drawn to. Given that, I'd have to respond with one of a number of Asian cinemas: Taiwan, Hong Kong, South Korea, Japan. For some wild cards, I'd like to see more Egyptian and any country's indigenous films. Of course almost every country (Iran seems a notable exception at the moment) has its own counterpart to the dominant (i.e. Hollywood) film production mode and many filmmakers listed here already fall squarely into this category (Zhang Yimou, Benigni, Moodysson, Kassovitz, Jeunet, and arguably Kurosawa). Foreign does not always equal different.