-- Table structure for table `wp_postmeta`
--

CREATE TABLE `wp_postmeta` (
  `meta_id` bigint(20) unsigned NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
  `post_id` bigint(20) unsigned NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',
  `meta_key` varchar(255) DEFAULT NULL,
  `meta_value` longtext,
  PRIMARY KEY (`meta_id`),
  KEY `post_id` (`post_id`),
  KEY `meta_key` (`meta_key`)
) ENGINE=MyISAM AUTO_INCREMENT=307 DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8;

--
-- Dumping data for table `wp_postmeta`
--

INSERT INTO `wp_postmeta` VALUES (1,2,'_edit_lock','1235671350'),(2,2,'_edit_last','1'),(44,28,'_edit_lock','1260826772'),(13,2,'_wp_page_template','default'),(16,11,'_edit_lock','1239313344'),(17,11,'_edit_last','1'),(43,24,'_edit_last','1'),(42,24,'_edit_lock','1241648586'),(45,28,'_edit_last','1'),(46,30,'_edit_lock','1241663760'),(47,30,'_edit_last','1'),(66,41,'_edit_lock','1248657860'),(67,41,'_edit_last','1'),(56,35,'_edit_lock','1242411340'),(57,35,'_edit_last','1'),(72,47,'_edit_lock','1249942910'),(73,47,'_edit_last','1'),(78,51,'_edit_lock','1252089530'),(79,51,'_edit_last','1'),(84,54,'_edit_lock','1252527071'),(85,54,'_edit_last','1'),(94,58,'_edit_lock','1256944436'),(93,57,'_edit_last','1'),(92,57,'_edit_lock','1254153284'),(95,58,'_edit_last','1'),(106,64,'_edit_lock','1268691998'),(98,59,'_edit_lock','1256945790'),(99,59,'_edit_last','1'),(107,64,'_edit_last','1'),(115,70,'_edit_last','1'),(122,77,'_edit_lock','1267147419'),(114,70,'_edit_lock','1260991370'),(123,77,'_edit_last','2'),(120,75,'_edit_lock','1268684296'),(121,75,'_edit_last','1'),(146,91,'_wp_attached_file','EADOC_Press_Release_2007-03-05.pdf'),(138,87,'_edit_lock','1266630345'),(139,87,'_edit_last','2'),(147,91,'_wp_attachment_metadata','a:0:{}'),(179,107,'_edit_last','2'),(170,103,'_edit_lock','1266627315'),(178,107,'_edit_lock','1266628389'),(165,101,'_edit_last','2'),(164,101,'_edit_lock','1266628498'),(171,103,'_edit_last','2'),(180,108,'_wp_attached_file','EADOC_News_Using_Collaborative_Project_Mgmt_Apps1.pdf'),(181,108,'_wp_attachment_metadata','a:0:{}'),(188,112,'_edit_lock','1266628436'),(189,112,'_edit_last','2'),(190,113,'_wp_attached_file','EADOC_Press_Release_2007-03-051.pdf'),(192,113,'_wp_attachment_metadata','a:0:{}'),(213,124,'_edit_lock','1267556950'),(214,124,'_edit_last','1'),(217,128,'_edit_lock','1268151591'),(218,128,'_edit_last','1'),(221,132,'_edit_lock','1268526879'),(222,132,'_edit_last','1'),(225,137,'_edit_lock','1268684114'),(226,137,'_edit_last','1'),(234,142,'_edit_last','1'),(241,147,'_edit_lock','1270050213'),(233,142,'_edit_lock','1273595250'),(242,147,'_edit_last','1'),(245,149,'_edit_lock','1270503112'),(246,149,'_edit_last','1'),(249,163,'_edit_lock','1274401386'),(250,163,'_edit_last','1'),(253,165,'_edit_lock','1275932729'),(254,165,'_edit_last','1'),(262,177,'_edit_last','1'),(261,177,'_edit_lock','1279593690'),(265,188,'_edit_lock','1280860871'),(266,188,'_edit_last','1'),(275,194,'_edit_lock','1285893177'),(276,194,'_edit_last','1'),(277,197,'_edit_lock','1287003593'),(278,197,'_edit_last','1'),(279,199,'_edit_lock','1284151061'),(280,199,'_edit_last','1'),(281,202,'_edit_lock','1285883524'),(282,202,'_edit_last','1'),(285,204,'_edit_lock','1287003575'),(286,204,'_edit_last','1'),(287,207,'_edit_lock','1287003213'),(288,207,'_edit_last','1'),(301,222,'_edit_lock','1288214068'),(302,222,'_edit_last','1'),(303,223,'_wp_attached_file','63_MLM_How-Can-the-Contractor-Participate-in-the-Owner-CMs-Environment.pdf'),(304,223,'_wp_attachment_metadata','a:0:{}');

--
-- Table structure for table `wp_posts`
--

CREATE TABLE `wp_posts` (
  `ID` bigint(20) unsigned NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
  `post_author` bigint(20) unsigned NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',
  `post_date` datetime NOT NULL DEFAULT '0000-00-00 00:00:00',
  `post_date_gmt` datetime NOT NULL DEFAULT '0000-00-00 00:00:00',
  `post_content` longtext NOT NULL,
  `post_title` text NOT NULL,
  `post_category` int(4) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',
  `post_excerpt` text NOT NULL,
  `post_status` varchar(20) NOT NULL DEFAULT 'publish',
  `comment_status` varchar(20) NOT NULL DEFAULT 'open',
  `ping_status` varchar(20) NOT NULL DEFAULT 'open',
  `post_password` varchar(20) NOT NULL DEFAULT '',
  `post_name` varchar(200) NOT NULL DEFAULT '',
  `to_ping` text NOT NULL,
  `pinged` text NOT NULL,
  `post_modified` datetime NOT NULL DEFAULT '0000-00-00 00:00:00',
  `post_modified_gmt` datetime NOT NULL DEFAULT '0000-00-00 00:00:00',
  `post_content_filtered` text NOT NULL,
  `post_parent` bigint(20) unsigned NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',
  `guid` varchar(255) NOT NULL DEFAULT '',
  `menu_order` int(11) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',
  `post_type` varchar(20) NOT NULL DEFAULT 'post',
  `post_mime_type` varchar(100) NOT NULL DEFAULT '',
  `comment_count` bigint(20) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',
  PRIMARY KEY (`ID`),
  KEY `post_name` (`post_name`),
  KEY `type_status_date` (`post_type`,`post_status`,`post_date`,`ID`),
  KEY `post_parent` (`post_parent`)
) ENGINE=MyISAM AUTO_INCREMENT=244 DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8;

--
-- Dumping data for table `wp_posts`
--

INSERT INTO `wp_posts` VALUES (2,1,'2009-02-25 16:19:41','2009-02-25 21:19:41','The EADOC blog is setup for people to find information about EADOC’s web based project/program management application and the organization that is developing and deliverying this application. We will also be including industry information that is relevant to the AEC industry. Check back often as we plan to add content from our developers, sales team and services group to keep you up to date on what is going on.','About',0,'','publish','open','open','','about','','','2009-02-26 13:02:30','2009-02-26 18:02:30','',0,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?page_id=2',0,'page','',0),(30,1,'2009-05-06 17:02:50','2009-05-06 22:02:50','With bid prices dropping like the stock market, facility owners and CM firms needs to step up their project controls procedures. Contractors will be looking for every small change or delay as cause for a change order as their profit margins are evaporating from the bidding process. To prevent these potential change orders owners and their CM\'s will need to make sure every RFI, Submittal and Change order is carefully reviewed and responded to. The traditional approach would be to higher more staff or consultants to oversee these projects and ensure contract compliance. With today\'s economy crimping clients budgets there is no room for the expense of additional project personnel to push paper around the office. The smart owner and their cm firm will need to look toward technology to reduce project staffing requirements increase accountability and reduce project risk. Engineers are great at reviewing submittals for contract compliance but a good collaborative project management application eliminates the need for them to waste time and money pushing paper or manually logging information into outdated software. Collaborative applications bring the entire team together so they can efficiently share project information and ensure projects are completed on time, within budget for a lower cost.','Low Construction bids require tighter project controls',0,'','publish','open','open','','low-construction-bids-require-tighter-project-controls','','','2009-05-06 17:21:22','2009-05-06 22:21:22','',0,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=30',0,'post','',0),(26,1,'2009-04-09 18:05:17','2009-04-09 23:05:17','The AEC industry loves to talk about mitigating risk on their projects. Owners, Architects and Contractors are all looking for ways to mitigate risk. Unfortunately all too often the risk is not being mitigated, it is simply being passed along to another party to handle. Owners pass it to the Designers and Contractors. Designers and Contractors add cost to the risk and pass much of it along the way to subs who then add more cost. All this adds up to substantially more expensive projects for the Owner and the risk has simply been rolled down the proverbial hill. When people talk about mitigating risk they should be evaluating ways to reduce it and not pass it along. Risk reduction should start at the very beginning of a project when the project is first mentioned. One of the biggest risks that owners can mitigate is information miss management. No one thinks about managing information in the early stages of a project when that first memo is written, but this is the most critical point of a project. All too often we hear from prospects that they already have so much information in file cabinets and binders they think it is too late to introduce a project management application into the mix. Hindsight is 2020. The senior VP of a large Engineering firm told me at a conference several weeks ago \"we are great at generating large volumes of information in this industry but very poor at managing that . Combine the ability to generate large volumes of information, with long duration projects, involving  potentially hundreds or even thousands of participants and you have a tremendous risk that could be easily mitigated from the start. ','Stop passing the Risk around aka the buck',0,'','inherit','open','open','','24-revision-2','','','2009-04-09 18:05:17','2009-04-09 23:05:17','',24,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=26',0,'revision','',0),(25,1,'2009-04-09 16:55:43','2009-04-09 21:55:43','The AEC industry loves to talk about mitigating risk on their projects. Owners, Architects and Contractors are all looking for ways to mitigate risk. Unfortunately all too often the risk is not being mitigated, it is simply being passed along to another party to handle. Owners pass it to the Designers and Contractors. Designers and Contractors add cost to the risk and pass much of it along the way to subs who then add more cost. All this adds up to substantially more expensive projects for the Owner and the risk has simply been rolled down the proverbial hill. When people talk about mitigating risk they should be evaluating ways to reduce it and not pass it along. Risk reduction should start at the very beginning of a project when the project is first mentioned. One of the biggest risks that owners can mitigate is information miss management. No one thinks about managing information in the early stages of a project when that first memo is written, but this is the most critical point of a project. All too often we hear from prospects that they already have so much information in file cabinets and binders they think it is too late to introduce a project management application into the mix. Hindsight is 2020. The senior VP of a large Engineering firm told me at a conference several weeks ago that we are great at generating large volumes of information in this industry but very poor at managing. Combine the ability to generate large volumes of information, with long duration projects, involving  potentially hundreds or even thousands of participants and you have a tremendous risk that could be easily mitigated from the start. Look no further than Caltrans and the Bay Bridge project for the cost of not controlling information. They had to stop the job and do concrete core samples ','Stop passing the Risk around aka the buck',0,'','inherit','open','open','','24-revision','','','2009-04-09 16:55:43','2009-04-09 21:55:43','',24,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=25',0,'revision','',0),(24,1,'2009-05-07 10:05:58','2009-05-07 15:05:58','The AEC industry loves to talk about mitigating risk on their projects. Owners, Architects and Contractors are all looking for ways to mitigate risk. Unfortunately all too often the risk is not being mitigated, it is simply being passed along to another party to handle. Owners pass it to the Designers and Contractors. Designers and Contractors add cost to the risk and pass much of it along the way to subs who then add more cost. All this adds up to substantially more expensive projects for the Owner and the risk has simply been rolled down the proverbial hill. When people talk about mitigating risk they should be evaluating ways to reduce it and not pass it along. Risk reduction should start at the very beginning of a project when the project is first mentioned. One of the biggest risks that owners can mitigate is information miss management. No one thinks about managing information in the early stages of a project when that first memo is written, but this is the most critical point of a project. All too often we hear from prospects that they already have so much information in file cabinets and binders they think it is too late to introduce a project management application into the mix. Hindsight is 2020. The senior VP of a large Engineering firm told me at a conference several weeks ago \"we are great at generating large volumes of information in this industry but very poor at managing that information.\" Combine the ability to generate large volumes of information, with long duration projects, involving  potentially hundreds or even thousands of participants and you have a tremendous risk that could be easily mitigated from the start with the correct project management software.\r\nEric','Stop passing the Risk around aka the buck',0,'','publish','open','open','','stop-passing-the-risk-around-aka-the-buck','','','2009-05-06 17:23:06','2009-05-06 22:23:06','',0,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=24',0,'post','',0),(8,1,'2009-02-26 13:02:28','2009-02-26 18:02:28','The EADOC blog is setup for people to find information about EADOC’s web based project/program management application and the organization that is developing and deliverying this application. We will also be including industry information that is relevant to the AEC industry. Check back often as we plan to add content from our developers, sales team and services group to keep you up to date on what is going on.','About',0,'','inherit','open','open','','2-autosave','','','2009-02-26 13:02:28','2009-02-26 18:02:28','',2,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=8',0,'revision','',0),(9,1,'2009-02-25 16:19:41','2009-02-25 21:19:41','This is an example of a WordPress page, you could edit this to put information about yourself or your site so readers know where you are coming from. You can create as many pages like this one or sub-pages as you like and manage all of your content inside of WordPress.','About',0,'','inherit','open','open','','2-revision','','','2009-02-25 16:19:41','2009-02-25 21:19:41','',2,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=9',0,'revision','',0),(29,1,'2009-04-09 18:10:47','2009-04-09 23:10:47','Dear Larry\nWe would like to thank you for eliminating those pesky concurrent user licenses that so many Primavera Customers have relied on over the years. By requiring all your current customers to purchase named user licenses at $1500/user you have boosted our companies sales this past quarter. We would like to thank you and hope that you keep up this great job of sending us your customers that have the huge budget to shell out $1500 per named user.\nRegards \nThe EADOC team.','Thank You Oracle',0,'','inherit','open','open','','28-revision','','','2009-04-09 18:10:47','2009-04-09 23:10:47','',28,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=29',0,'revision','',0),(11,1,'2009-02-26 13:09:10','2009-02-26 18:09:10','With today\'s economy causing budgets to shrink and forcing everyone to do more with less there is a quiet machine in the corner that wastes more time, energy and money then any employee in your office. We have looked at the cost of your copier on a 1 year, $5M Pump Station Project based off data from several client\'s projects.\r\n\r\nAssuming it costs $.06/page in paper and ink to print a single page consider the following scenario for a $5M, 1 year, Pump Station Project.\r\n<table border=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\">\r\n	<tr>\r\n    	<td>100 RFI\'s + Responses<br />(2 pages)</td>\r\n        <td>200 Submittals + responses<br />(avg 10 pages)</td>\r\n        <td>10 change orders<br />(5 pages)</td>\r\n        <td>52 meeting agendas + minutes<br />(4 pages)</td>\r\n    </tr>\r\n    <tr>\r\n    	<td>200 Daily reports<br />(2 pages)</td>\r\n    	<td>50 Special Inspections<br />(2 pages)</td>\r\n    	<td>100 memos<br />(1 page)</td>\r\n    	<td>and 200 punch list items<br />(1 page/item)</td>\r\n    </tr>\r\n</table>\r\nThis adds up to 3,258 pages or $195.48 for printing all these documents once. Now consider each document will be printed out at least 4X by each organization and most projects of this size will have a contractor, designer, client, inspector, and at least one sub contractor taking the cost to $3909. Now include the labor cost of people to print, file, and log this paper as it works its way across your project. Let\'s assume it takes 10 minutes to print each document, walk to the printer, ship, and file it appropriately. So, that is 912 documents times 10 minutes =152 hours/organization * 5 organizations =760hrs. 760hrs*50/hr(average engineer/project assistant cost)=$38,000. Now, add in the $3,909 and you are almost at $42k for a small project with conservative estimates.\r\n\r\nNow consider a $100M treatment plant project with 15 organizations on the project, printing and copying away with 5 times the number of documents. This will cost the project over $630k just to print and push the paper. This doesn\'t include the cost of filing cabinets, office space, electricity, or disposing of this paper when the project is done. Given these numbers you should consider replacing your copier with EADOC\'s web based project management application. The best part is the copier can\'t file for unemployment or complain about being laid off.\r\nThank You\r\nEric Law\r\nFounder &amp; CEO','Save Money, Fire your Copier – it won\'t complain!',0,'','publish','open','open','','save-money-fire-your-copier-%e2%80%93-it-wont-complain','','','2009-02-27 21:08:10','2009-02-28 02:08:10','',0,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=11',0,'post','',0),(28,1,'2009-04-09 18:12:37','0000-00-00 00:00:00','Dear Larry Ellison\nWe would like to thank you for eliminating those pesky concurrent user licenses that so many Primavera Customers have relied on over the years. By requiring all your current customers to purchase named user licenses at $1500/user you have boosted our companies sales this past quarter. We would like to thank you and hope that you keep up this great job of sending us your customers that don\'t have the mega budgets or TARP funds to shell out $1500 per named user.\nRegards \nThe EADOC team.','Thank You Oracle',0,'','draft','open','open','','','','','2009-04-09 18:12:37','2009-04-09 23:12:37','',0,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=28',0,'post','',0),(12,1,'2009-02-26 13:08:31','2009-02-26 18:08:31','With today\'s economy causing budgets to shrink and forcing everyone to do more with less there is a quiet machine in the corner that wastes more time, energy and money then any employee in your office. We have looked at the cost of your copier on a 1 year, $5M Pump Station Project based off data from several client\'s projects. \nAssuming it costs $.06/page in paper and ink to print a single page consider the following scenario for a $5M, 1 year, Pump Station Project. \n100 RFI\'s+Responses(2pgs)\n200 Submittals+ responses (avg 10 pgs)\n10 change orders(5pgs)\n52 meeting agendas + minutes(4pages)\n200 Daily reports(2 pages)\n50 Special Inspections( 2 pages)\n100 memos(1 page)\nand 200 punch list items( 1page/item)\nThis adds up to 3,258 pages or $195.48 for printing all these documents once. Now consider each document will be printed out at least 4X by each organization and most projects of this size will have a contractor, designer, client, inspector, and sub contractors taking the cost to $3909. Now include the labor cost of people to print, file, and log this paper as it works its way across your project. Let\'s assume it takes 10 minutes to print each document, walk to the printer, ship, and file it appropriately. So, that is 912 documents times 10 minutes =152 hours/organization * 5 organizations =760hrs. 760hrs*50/hr(average engineer/project assistant cost)=$38,000. Now, add in the $3,909 and you are almost at $42k for a small project with conservative estimates. \nConsider a $100M treatment plant with 15 organizations on the project printing and copying away and 5 times the number of documents, this will cost the project over $630k just to print and push the paper.\nAfter including printing and labor costs for moving the paper we determined this project would save $42K by firing the copier.\nNow consider a $100M treatment plant project with 15 organizations on the project, printing and copying away with 5 times the number of documents. This will cost the project over $630k just to print and push the paper. This doesn\'t include the cost of filing cabinets, office space, electricity, or disposing of this paper when the project is done. Given these numbers you should consider replacing your copier with EADOC\'s web based project management application. The best part is the copier can\'t file for unemployment or complain about being laid off.\nThank You\nEric Law\nFounder & CEO','Save Money, Fire your Copier – it won\'t complain!',0,'','inherit','open','open','','11-revision','','','2009-02-26 13:08:31','2009-02-26 18:08:31','',11,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=12',0,'revision','',0),(13,1,'2009-02-26 13:09:10','2009-02-26 18:09:10','With today\'s economy causing budgets to shrink and forcing everyone to do more with less there is a quiet machine in the corner that wastes more time, energy and money then any employee in your office. We have looked at the cost of your copier on a 1 year, $5M Pump Station Project based off data from several client\'s projects. \r\nAssuming it costs $.06/page in paper and ink to print a single page consider the following scenario for a $5M, 1 year, Pump Station Project. \r\n100 RFI\'s+Responses(2pgs)\r\n200 Submittals+ responses (avg 10 pgs)\r\n10 change orders(5pgs)\r\n52 meeting agendas + minutes(4pages)\r\n200 Daily reports(2 pages)\r\n50 Special Inspections( 2 pages)\r\n100 memos(1 page)\r\nand 200 punch list items( 1page/item)\r\nThis adds up to 3,258 pages or $195.48 for printing all these documents once. Now consider each document will be printed out at least 4X by each organization and most projects of this size will have a contractor, designer, client, inspector, and sub contractors taking the cost to $3909. Now include the labor cost of people to print, file, and log this paper as it works its way across your project. Let\'s assume it takes 10 minutes to print each document, walk to the printer, ship, and file it appropriately. So, that is 912 documents times 10 minutes =152 hours/organization * 5 organizations =760hrs. 760hrs*50/hr(average engineer/project assistant cost)=$38,000. Now, add in the $3,909 and you are almost at $42k for a small project with conservative estimates. \r\nConsider a $100M treatment plant with 15 organizations on the project printing and copying away and 5 times the number of documents, this will cost the project over $630k just to print and push the paper.\r\nAfter including printing and labor costs for moving the paper we determined this project would save $42K by firing the copier.\r\nNow consider a $100M treatment plant project with 15 organizations on the project, printing and copying away with 5 times the number of documents. This will cost the project over $630k just to print and push the paper. This doesn\'t include the cost of filing cabinets, office space, electricity, or disposing of this paper when the project is done. Given these numbers you should consider replacing your copier with EADOC\'s web based project management application. The best part is the copier can\'t file for unemployment or complain about being laid off.\r\nThank You\r\nEric Law\r\nFounder & CEO','Save Money, Fire your Copier – it won\'t complain!',0,'','inherit','open','open','','11-revision-2','','','2009-02-26 13:09:10','2009-02-26 18:09:10','',11,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=13',0,'revision','',0),(14,1,'2009-02-27 21:07:58','2009-02-28 02:07:58','With today\'s economy causing budgets to shrink and forcing everyone to do more with less there is a quiet machine in the corner that wastes more time, energy and money then any employee in your office. We have looked at the cost of your copier on a 1 year, $5M Pump Station Project based off data from several client\'s projects.\r\n\r\nAssuming it costs $.06/page in paper and ink to print a single page consider the following scenario for a $5M, 1 year, Pump Station Project.\r\n<table border=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\">\r\n	<tr>\r\n    	<td>100 RFI\'s + Responses<br />(2 pages)</td>\r\n        <td>200 Submittals + responses<br />(avg 10 pages)</td>\r\n        <td>10 change orders<br />(5 pages)</td>\r\n        <td>52 meeting agendas + minutes<br />(4 pages)</td>\r\n    </tr>\r\n    <tr>\r\n    	<td>200 Daily reports<br />(2 pages)</td>\r\n    	<td>50 Special Inspections<br />(2 pages)</td>\r\n    	<td>100 memos<br />(1 page)</td>\r\n    	<td>and 200 punch list items<br />(1 page/item)</td>\r\n    </tr>\r\n</table>\r\nThis adds up to 3,258 pages or $195.48 for printing all these documents once. Now consider each document will be printed out at least 4X by each organization and most projects of this size will have a contractor, designer, client, inspector, and at least one sub contractor taking the cost to $3909. Now include the labor cost of people to print, file, and log this paper as it works its way across your project. Let\'s assume it takes 10 minutes to print each document, walk to the printer, ship, and file it appropriately. So, that is 912 documents times 10 minutes =152 hours/organization * 5 organizations =760hrs. 760hrs*50/hr(average engineer/project assistant cost)=$38,000. Now, add in the $3,909 and you are almost at $42k for a small project with conservative estimates.\r\n\r\nNow consider a $100M treatment plant project with 15 organizations on the project, printing and copying away with 5 times the number of documents. This will cost the project over $630k just to print and push the paper. This doesn\'t include the cost of filing cabinets, office space, electricity, or disposing of this paper when the project is done. Given these numbers you should consider replacing your copier with EADOC\'s web based project management application. The best part is the copier can\'t file for unemployment or complain about being laid off.\r\nThank You\r\nEric Law\r\nFounder &amp; CEO','Save Money, Fire your Copier – it won\'t complain!',0,'','inherit','open','open','','11-autosave','','','2009-02-27 21:07:58','2009-02-28 02:07:58','',11,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=14',0,'revision','',0),(15,1,'2009-02-26 13:09:29','2009-02-26 18:09:29','With today\'s economy causing budgets to shrink and forcing everyone to do more with less there is a quiet machine in the corner that wastes more time, energy and money then any employee in your office. We have looked at the cost of your copier on a 1 year, $5M Pump Station Project based off data from several client\'s projects. \r\nAssuming it costs $.06/page in paper and ink to print a single page consider the following scenario for a $5M, 1 year, Pump Station Project. \r\n100 RFI\'s+Responses(2pgs)\r\n200 Submittals+ responses (avg 10 pgs)\r\n10 change orders(5pgs)\r\n52 meeting agendas + minutes(4pages)\r\n200 Daily reports(2 pages)\r\n50 Special Inspections( 2 pages)\r\n100 memos(1 page)\r\nand 200 punch list items( 1page/item)\r\nThis adds up to 3,258 pages or $195.48 for printing all these documents once. Now consider each document will be printed out at least 4X by each organization and most projects of this size will have a contractor, designer, client, inspector, and sub contractors taking the cost to $3909. Now include the labor cost of people to print, file, and log this paper as it works its way across your project. Let\'s assume it takes 10 minutes to print each document, walk to the printer, ship, and file it appropriately. So, that is 912 documents times 10 minutes =152 hours/organization * 5 organizations =760hrs. 760hrs*50/hr(average engineer/project assistant cost)=$38,000. Now, add in the $3,909 and you are almost at $42k for a small project with conservative estimates. \r\nConsider a $100M treatment plant with 15 organizations on the project printing and copying away and 5 times the number of documents, this will cost the project over $630k just to print and push the paper.\r\nAfter including printing and labor costs for moving the paper we determined this project would save $42K by firing the copier.\r\nNow consider a $100M treatment plant project with 15 organizations on the project, printing and copying away with 5 times the number of documents. This will cost the project over $630k just to print and push the paper. This doesn\'t include the cost of filing cabinets, office space, electricity, or disposing of this paper when the project is done. Given these numbers you should consider replacing your copier with EADOC\'s web based project management application. The best part is the copier can\'t file for unemployment or complain about being laid off.\r\nThank You\r\nEric Law\r\nFounder & CEO','Save Money, Fire your Copier – it won\'t complain!',0,'','inherit','open','open','','11-revision-3','','','2009-02-26 13:09:29','2009-02-26 18:09:29','',11,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=15',0,'revision','',0),(27,1,'2009-04-09 18:05:58','2009-04-09 23:05:58','The AEC industry loves to talk about mitigating risk on their projects. Owners, Architects and Contractors are all looking for ways to mitigate risk. Unfortunately all too often the risk is not being mitigated, it is simply being passed along to another party to handle. Owners pass it to the Designers and Contractors. Designers and Contractors add cost to the risk and pass much of it along the way to subs who then add more cost. All this adds up to substantially more expensive projects for the Owner and the risk has simply been rolled down the proverbial hill. When people talk about mitigating risk they should be evaluating ways to reduce it and not pass it along. Risk reduction should start at the very beginning of a project when the project is first mentioned. One of the biggest risks that owners can mitigate is information miss management. No one thinks about managing information in the early stages of a project when that first memo is written, but this is the most critical point of a project. All too often we hear from prospects that they already have so much information in file cabinets and binders they think it is too late to introduce a project management application into the mix. Hindsight is 2020. The senior VP of a large Engineering firm told me at a conference several weeks ago \"we are great at generating large volumes of information in this industry but very poor at managing that information.\" Combine the ability to generate large volumes of information, with long duration projects, involving  potentially hundreds or even thousands of participants and you have a tremendous risk that could be easily mitigated from the start with the correct project management software.\r\nEric','Stop passing the Risk around aka the buck',0,'','inherit','open','open','','24-revision-3','','','2009-04-09 18:05:58','2009-04-09 23:05:58','',24,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=27',0,'revision','',0),(22,2,'2009-02-26 13:14:29','2009-02-26 18:14:29','With today\'s economy causing budgets to shrink and forcing everyone to do more with less there is a quiet machine in the corner that wastes more time, energy and money then any employee in your office. We have looked at the cost of your copier on a 1 year, $5M Pump Station Project based off data from several client\'s projects. \r\n\r\nAssuming it costs $.06/page in paper and ink to print a single page consider the following scenario for a $5M, 1 year, Pump Station Project. \r\n100 RFI\'s+Responses(2pgs)\r\n200 Submittals+ responses (avg 10 pgs)\r\n10 change orders(5pgs)\r\n52 meeting agendas + minutes(4pages)\r\n200 Daily reports(2 pages)\r\n50 Special Inspections( 2 pages)\r\n100 memos(1 page)\r\nand 200 punch list items( 1page/item)\r\nThis adds up to 3,258 pages or $195.48 for printing all these documents once. Now consider each document will be printed out at least 4X by each organization and most projects of this size will have a contractor, designer, client, inspector, and at least one sub contractor taking the cost to $3909. Now include the labor cost of people to print, file, and log this paper as it works its way across your project. Let\'s assume it takes 10 minutes to print each document, walk to the printer, ship, and file it appropriately. So, that is 912 documents times 10 minutes =152 hours/organization * 5 organizations =760hrs. 760hrs*50/hr(average engineer/project assistant cost)=$38,000. Now, add in the $3,909 and you are almost at $42k for a small project with conservative estimates. \r\n\r\nNow consider a $100M treatment plant project with 15 organizations on the project, printing and copying away with 5 times the number of documents. This will cost the project over $630k just to print and push the paper. This doesn\'t include the cost of filing cabinets, office space, electricity, or disposing of this paper when the project is done. Given these numbers you should consider replacing your copier with EADOC\'s web based project management application. The best part is the copier can\'t file for unemployment or complain about being laid off.\r\nThank You\r\nEric Law\r\nFounder & CEO','Save Money, Fire your Copier – it won\'t complain!',0,'','inherit','open','open','','11-revision-4','','','2009-02-26 13:14:29','2009-02-26 18:14:29','',11,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=22',0,'revision','',0),(31,1,'2009-04-21 17:40:47','2009-04-21 22:40:47','With bid prices dropping like the stock market, facility owners and CM firms needs to step up their project controls procedures. Contractors will be looking for every small change or delay as cause for a change order as their profit margins are evaporating from the bidding process. To prevent these potential change orders owners and their CM\'s will need to make sure every RFI, Submittal and Change order is carefully reviewed and responded to. The traditional approach would be to higher more staff or consultants to oversee these projects and ensure contract compliance. With today\'s economy crimping clients budgets there is no room for the expense of additional project personnel to push paper around the office. The smart owner and their cm firm will need to look toward technology to reduce project staffing requirements increase accountability and reduce project risk. Engineers are great at reviewing submittals for contract compliance but a good collaborative project management application eliminates the need for them to waste time and money pushing paper or manually logging information into outdated software. Collaborative ','Low Construction bids require tighter project controls',0,'','inherit','open','open','','30-revision','','','2009-04-21 17:40:47','2009-04-21 22:40:47','',30,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=31',0,'revision','',0),(32,1,'2009-05-06 17:02:16','2009-05-06 22:02:16','With bid prices dropping like the stock market, facility owners and CM firms needs to step up their project controls procedures. Contractors will be looking for every small change or delay as cause for a change order as their profit margins are evaporating from the bidding process. To prevent these potential change orders owners and their CM\'s will need to make sure every RFI, Submittal and Change order is carefully reviewed and responded to. The traditional approach would be to higher more staff or consultants to oversee these projects and ensure contract compliance. With today\'s economy crimping clients budgets there is no room for the expense of additional project personnel to push paper around the office. The smart owner and their cm firm will need to look toward technology to reduce project staffing requirements increase accountability and reduce project risk. Engineers are great at reviewing submittals for contract compliance but a good collaborative project management application eliminates the need for them to waste time and money pushing paper or manually logging information into outdated software. Collaborative applications bring the entire team together so they can efficiently share project information and ensure projects are completed on time, within budget for a lower cost.','Low Construction bids require tighter project controls',0,'','inherit','open','open','','30-revision-2','','','2009-05-06 17:02:16','2009-05-06 22:02:16','',30,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=32',0,'revision','',0),(33,1,'2009-05-06 17:02:50','2009-05-06 22:02:50','With bid prices dropping like the stock market, facility owners and CM firms needs to step up their project controls procedures. Contractors will be looking for every small change or delay as cause for a change order as their profit margins are evaporating from the bidding process. To prevent these potential change orders owners and their CM\'s will need to make sure every RFI, Submittal and Change order is carefully reviewed and responded to. The traditional approach would be to higher more staff or consultants to oversee these projects and ensure contract compliance. With today\'s economy crimping clients budgets there is no room for the expense of additional project personnel to push paper around the office. The smart owner and their cm firm will need to look toward technology to reduce project staffing requirements increase accountability and reduce project risk. Engineers are great at reviewing submittals for contract compliance but a good collaborative project management application eliminates the need for them to waste time and money pushing paper or manually logging information into outdated software. Collaborative applications bring the entire team together so they can efficiently share project information and ensure projects are completed on time, within budget for a lower cost.','Low Construction bids require tighter project controls',0,'','inherit','open','open','','30-revision-3','','','2009-05-06 17:02:50','2009-05-06 22:02:50','',30,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=33',0,'revision','',0),(34,1,'2009-04-09 18:07:01','2009-04-09 23:07:01','The AEC industry loves to talk about mitigating risk on their projects. Owners, Architects and Contractors are all looking for ways to mitigate risk. Unfortunately all too often the risk is not being mitigated, it is simply being passed along to another party to handle. Owners pass it to the Designers and Contractors. Designers and Contractors add cost to the risk and pass much of it along the way to subs who then add more cost. All this adds up to substantially more expensive projects for the Owner and the risk has simply been rolled down the proverbial hill. When people talk about mitigating risk they should be evaluating ways to reduce it and not pass it along. Risk reduction should start at the very beginning of a project when the project is first mentioned. One of the biggest risks that owners can mitigate is information miss management. No one thinks about managing information in the early stages of a project when that first memo is written, but this is the most critical point of a project. All too often we hear from prospects that they already have so much information in file cabinets and binders they think it is too late to introduce a project management application into the mix. Hindsight is 2020. The senior VP of a large Engineering firm told me at a conference several weeks ago \"we are great at generating large volumes of information in this industry but very poor at managing that information.\" Combine the ability to generate large volumes of information, with long duration projects, involving  potentially hundreds or even thousands of participants and you have a tremendous risk that could be easily mitigated from the start with the correct project management software.\r\nEric','Stop passing the Risk around aka the buck',0,'','inherit','open','open','','24-revision-4','','','2009-04-09 18:07:01','2009-04-09 23:07:01','',24,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=34',0,'revision','',0),(35,1,'2009-05-15 12:32:24','2009-05-15 17:32:24','Autodesk has made it official what many of their constructware customers have been suspecting. Autodesk has suspended development of Constructware. Here is the article http://www.specialtypub.com/emailblasts/CT_09_NEWSFLASH_05_Autodesk.htm\r\nThis comes after numerous layoffs at Autodesk and the termination of Constructware\'s founder several months ago.\r\n\r\nAnytime a product is folded after a company spends over $40M for the product everyone asks how could a client have protected themselves from this. The answer is look at the acquirer, their track record with acquisitions and how the acquired product fits in with existing product lines. Autodesk despises the web and collaboration and prefers proprietary software sold on a per seat license. Autodesk has always focused on design and never paid much attention to the Construction side of AEC. Combine this with Constructware targeting Contractors, Owners and Designers with a rigid product that offered very little flexibility and you have a recipe for failure.\r\nTake aways from this story for companies evaluating project management tools.\r\nLook at the companies industry focus and client focus within that industry. Do not assume because they target the AEC industry it is a good solution for you as there are a lot of different players in this industry.\r\nLook at the companies release history and product road map.\r\nFinally test drive the product before buying.\r\n\r\nIf you are interested in replacing Constructware and you are a Facility Owner or Engineering firm please contact us to learn more about EADOC.\r\nThank You\r\nEric\r\n','Autodesk Terminates Constructware',0,'','publish','open','open','','autodesk-terminates-constructware','','\nhttp://worldcadaccess.typepad.com/blog/2009/05/not-dead-constructware.html','2009-05-15 12:58:34','2009-05-15 17:58:34','',0,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=35',0,'post','',0),(36,1,'2009-05-15 12:34:06','2009-05-15 17:34:06','Autodesk has made it official what many of their constructware customers have been suspecting. Autodesk has suspended development of Constructware. Here is the article http://www.specialtypub.com/emailblasts/CT_09_NEWSFLASH_05_Autodesk.htm\nThis comes after numerous layoffs at Autodesk and the termination of Constructware\'s founder several months ago.\n\nAnytime a product is folded after a company spends over $40M for the product everyone asks how could a client have protected themselves from this. The answer is look at the acquirer, their track record with acquisitions and how the acquired product fits in with existing product lines. Autodesk despises the web and collaboration and prefers proprietary software sold on a per seat license. Autodesk has always focused on design and never paid much attention to the Construction side of AEC. Combine this with Constructware targeting Contractors, Owners and Designers with a rigid product that offered very little flexibility and you have a recipe for failure.\nTake aways from this story for companies evaluating project management tools.\nLook at the companies industry focus and client focus within that industry. Do not assume because they target the AEC industry it is a good solution for you as there are a lot of different players in this industry.\nLook at the companies release history and product roadmap.\nFinally test drive the product before buying.\n\nIf you are interested in replacing Constructware and you are a Facility Owner or \n','Autodesk Terminates Constructware',0,'','inherit','open','open','','35-autosave','','','2009-05-15 12:34:06','2009-05-15 17:34:06','',35,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=36',0,'revision','',0),(37,1,'2009-05-15 12:32:24','2009-05-15 17:32:24','Autodesk has made it official what many of their constructware customers have been suspecting. Autodesk has suspended development of Constructware. Here is the article http://www.specialtypub.com/emailblasts/CT_09_NEWSFLASH_05_Autodesk.htm\nThis comes after numerous layoffs at Autodesk and the termination of Constructware\'s founder several months ago.\n\nAnytime a product is folded after a company spends over $40M for the product everyone asks how could a client have protected themselves from this. The answer is look at the acquirer, their track record with acquisitions and how the acquired product fits in with existing product lines. Autodesk despises the web and collaboration and prefers proprietary software sold on a per seat license. Autodesk has always focused on design and never paid much attention to the Construction side of AEC. Combine this with Constructware targeting Contractors, Owners and Designers with a rigid product that offered very little flexibility and you have a recipe for failure.\nTake aways from this story for companies evaluating project management tools.\nLook at the companies industry focus and client focus within that industry. Do not assume because they target the AEC industry it is a good solution for you as there are a lot of different players in this industry.\nLook at the companies release history and product roadmap.\nFinally test drive the product before buying.\n\n','Autodesk Terminates Constructware',0,'','inherit','open','open','','35-revision','','','2009-05-15 12:32:24','2009-05-15 17:32:24','',35,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=37',0,'revision','',0),(38,1,'2009-05-15 12:34:25','2009-05-15 17:34:25','Autodesk has made it official what many of their constructware customers have been suspecting. Autodesk has suspended development of Constructware. Here is the article http://www.specialtypub.com/emailblasts/CT_09_NEWSFLASH_05_Autodesk.htm\r\nThis comes after numerous layoffs at Autodesk and the termination of Constructware\'s founder several months ago.\r\n\r\nAnytime a product is folded after a company spends over $40M for the product everyone asks how could a client have protected themselves from this. The answer is look at the acquirer, their track record with acquisitions and how the acquired product fits in with existing product lines. Autodesk despises the web and collaboration and prefers proprietary software sold on a per seat license. Autodesk has always focused on design and never paid much attention to the Construction side of AEC. Combine this with Constructware targeting Contractors, Owners and Designers with a rigid product that offered very little flexibility and you have a recipe for failure.\r\nTake aways from this story for companies evaluating project management tools.\r\nLook at the companies industry focus and client focus within that industry. Do not assume because they target the AEC industry it is a good solution for you as there are a lot of different players in this industry.\r\nLook at the companies release history and product roadmap.\r\nFinally test drive the product before buying.\r\n\r\nIf you are interested in replacing Constructware and you are a Facility Owner or Engineering firm please contact us to learn more about EADOC.\r\nThank You\r\nEric\r\n','Autodesk Terminates Constructware',0,'','inherit','open','open','','35-revision-2','','','2009-05-15 12:34:25','2009-05-15 17:34:25','',35,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=38',0,'revision','',0),(39,1,'2009-05-15 12:35:00','2009-05-15 17:35:00','Autodesk has made it official what many of their constructware customers have been suspecting. Autodesk has suspended development of Constructware. Here is the article http://www.specialtypub.com/emailblasts/CT_09_NEWSFLASH_05_Autodesk.htm\r\nThis comes after numerous layoffs at Autodesk and the termination of Constructware\'s founder several months ago.\r\n\r\nAnytime a product is folded after a company spends over $40M for the product everyone asks how could a client have protected themselves from this. The answer is look at the acquirer, their track record with acquisitions and how the acquired product fits in with existing product lines. Autodesk despises the web and collaboration and prefers proprietary software sold on a per seat license. Autodesk has always focused on design and never paid much attention to the Construction side of AEC. Combine this with Constructware targeting Contractors, Owners and Designers with a rigid product that offered very little flexibility and you have a recipe for failure.\r\nTake aways from this story for companies evaluating project management tools.\r\nLook at the companies industry focus and client focus within that industry. Do not assume because they target the AEC industry it is a good solution for you as there are a lot of different players in this industry.\r\nLook at the companies release history and product road map.\r\nFinally test drive the product before buying.\r\n\r\nIf you are interested in replacing Constructware and you are a Facility Owner or Engineering firm please contact us to learn more about EADOC.\r\nThank You\r\nEric\r\n','Autodesk Terminates Constructware',0,'','inherit','open','open','','35-revision-3','','','2009-05-15 12:35:00','2009-05-15 17:35:00','',35,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=39',0,'revision','',0),(40,1,'2009-05-15 12:55:43','2009-05-15 17:55:43','Autodesk has made it official what many of their constructware customers have been suspecting. Autodesk has suspended development of Constructware. Here is the article http://www.specialtypub.com/emailblasts/CT_09_NEWSFLASH_05_Autodesk.htm\r\nThis comes after numerous layoffs at Autodesk and the termination of Constructware\'s founder several months ago.\r\n\r\nAnytime a product is folded after a company spends over $40M for the product everyone asks how could a client have protected themselves from this. The answer is look at the acquirer, their track record with acquisitions and how the acquired product fits in with existing product lines. Autodesk despises the web and collaboration and prefers proprietary software sold on a per seat license. Autodesk has always focused on design and never paid much attention to the Construction side of AEC. Combine this with Constructware targeting Contractors, Owners and Designers with a rigid product that offered very little flexibility and you have a recipe for failure.\r\nTake aways from this story for companies evaluating project management tools.\r\nLook at the companies industry focus and client focus within that industry. Do not assume because they target the AEC industry it is a good solution for you as there are a lot of different players in this industry.\r\nLook at the companies release history and product road map.\r\nFinally test drive the product before buying.\r\n\r\nIf you are interested in replacing Constructware and you are a Facility Owner or Engineering firm please contact us to learn more about EADOC.\r\nThank You\r\nEric\r\n','Autodesk Terminates Constructware',0,'','inherit','open','open','','35-revision-4','','','2009-05-15 12:55:43','2009-05-15 17:55:43','',35,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=40',0,'revision','',0),(41,1,'2009-07-26 20:22:03','2009-07-27 01:22:03','Check out this recent article from Software Advice on project management applications with LEED tracking tools. <a href=\"http://www.softwareadvice.com/articles/construction/track-leed-v3-credits-in-project-management-software-1071309/\">Track LEED v3 Credits in Project Management Software</a>\r\nThe next challenge is getting the USGBC to publish a web services integration kit. This would allow  EADOC clients to submit their lead points and supporting documentation directly to USGBC. Currently USGBC requires that clients manually re-enter their project information and supporting documentation into the USGBC online application.  If anyone is a member of USGBC or interested in discussing how this would work please contact us. We are always looking to make project management easier for our customers.\r\nThanks\r\nEric\r\n','Tracking LEED points through your project management application',0,'','publish','open','open','','tracking-leed-points-through-your-project-management-application','','\nhttp://www.softwareadvice.com/articles/construction/track-leed-v3-credits-in-project-management-software-1071309/','2009-07-26 20:24:19','2009-07-27 01:24:19','',0,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=41',0,'post','',0),(42,1,'2009-07-26 20:19:58','2009-07-27 01:19:58','Check out this recent article from Software Advice on project management applications with LEED tracking tools. http://www.softwareadvice.com/articles/construction/track-leed-v3-credits-in-project-management-software-1071309/\nThe next challenge is getting the USGBC to publish a web services integration kit. This would allow  EADOC clients to submit their lead points and supporting documentation directly to USGBC. Currently USGBC requires that clients manually re-enter their project information and support documentation into the USGBC online application.  If anyone is a member of USGBC or interested in discussing how this would work please contact us. We are always looking to make project management easier for our customers.\nThanks\nEric\n','Making it Easier to Leed Certify',0,'','inherit','open','open','','41-revision','','','2009-07-26 20:19:58','2009-07-27 01:19:58','',41,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=42',0,'revision','',0),(43,1,'2009-07-26 20:20:45','2009-07-27 01:20:45','Check out this recent article from Software Advice on project management applications with LEED tracking tools. http://www.softwareadvice.com/articles/construction/track-leed-v3-credits-in-project-management-software-1071309/\r\nThe next challenge is getting the USGBC to publish a web services integration kit. This would allow  EADOC clients to submit their lead points and supporting documentation directly to USGBC. Currently USGBC requires that clients manually re-enter their project information and support documentation into the USGBC online application.  If anyone is a member of USGBC or interested in discussing how this would work please contact us. We are always looking to make project management easier for our customers.\r\nThanks\r\nEric\r\n','Making it Easier to Leed Certify',0,'','inherit','open','open','','41-revision-2','','','2009-07-26 20:20:45','2009-07-27 01:20:45','',41,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=43',0,'revision','',0),(44,1,'2009-07-26 20:21:26','2009-07-27 01:21:26','Check out this recent article from Software Advice on project management applications with LEED tracking tools. http://www.softwareadvice.com/articles/construction/track-leed-v3-credits-in-project-management-software-1071309/\r\nThe next challenge is getting the USGBC to publish a web services integration kit. This would allow  EADOC clients to submit their lead points and supporting documentation directly to USGBC. Currently USGBC requires that clients manually re-enter their project information and support documentation into the USGBC online application.  If anyone is a member of USGBC or interested in discussing how this would work please contact us. We are always looking to make project management easier for our customers.\r\nThanks\r\nEric\r\n','Tracking LEED points through your project management application',0,'','inherit','open','open','','41-revision-3','','','2009-07-26 20:21:26','2009-07-27 01:21:26','',41,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=44',0,'revision','',0),(45,1,'2009-07-26 20:24:08','2009-07-27 01:24:08','Check out this recent article from Software Advice on project management applications with LEED tracking tools. <a href=\"http://www.softwareadvice.com/articles/construction/track-leed-v3-credits-in-project-management-software-1071309/\">Track LEED v3 Credits in Project Management Software</a>\nThe next challenge is getting the USGBC to publish a web services integration kit. This would allow  EADOC clients to submit their lead points and supporting documentation directly to USGBC. Currently USGBC requires that clients manually re-enter their project information and supporting documentation into the USGBC online application.  If anyone is a member of USGBC or interested in discussing how this would work please contact us. We are always looking to make project management easier for our customers.\nThanks\nEric\n','Tracking LEED points through your project management application',0,'','inherit','open','open','','41-autosave','','','2009-07-26 20:24:08','2009-07-27 01:24:08','',41,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=45',0,'revision','',0),(46,1,'2009-07-26 20:22:03','2009-07-27 01:22:03','Check out this recent article from Software Advice on project management applications with LEED tracking tools. http://www.softwareadvice.com/articles/construction/track-leed-v3-credits-in-project-management-software-1071309/\r\nThe next challenge is getting the USGBC to publish a web services integration kit. This would allow  EADOC clients to submit their lead points and supporting documentation directly to USGBC. Currently USGBC requires that clients manually re-enter their project information and supporting documentation into the USGBC online application.  If anyone is a member of USGBC or interested in discussing how this would work please contact us. We are always looking to make project management easier for our customers.\r\nThanks\r\nEric\r\n','Tracking LEED points through your project management application',0,'','inherit','open','open','','41-revision-4','','','2009-07-26 20:22:03','2009-07-27 01:22:03','',41,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=46',0,'revision','',0),(47,1,'2009-07-26 20:42:27','2009-07-27 01:42:27','With the AACEI conference in Seattle a couple weeks ago and then CMAA\'s first ever Water/Waste Water Summit in Las Vegas last week I have been racking up a few airline points. \r\nThis was the first time EADOC exhibited at AACEI and overall we were impressed even though our booth was located off to the side. Overall we talked with some great facility owners and Engineering firms that were very much interested in EADOC and how we could help them improve their project controls.  Next years conference is in Atlanta <a href=\"http://www.aacei.org/annualmeeting/\">AACEI 2010 Conference</a> a little farther then Seattle for us but will be worth the trip I am sure.\r\nLast weeks CMAA trip to Las Vegas was excellent. We delivered a panel discussion with our client Carollo Engineers titled \"Project Controls on Water/Waste Water Infrastructure Projects\".\r\nPanelists from the City of Henderson, NV, Carollo Engineers, and CH2M Hill gave some excellent insight into the keys to successful project controls on their current project. \r\nYou can learn more about this summit at the <a href=\"http://www.cmaanet.org/blogs/jmckeon\">cmaa blog </a>\r\nWe look forward to attending next years Summit and hope to see more of our clients their.\r\nEric\r\n','Summer conference season kicks off',0,'','publish','open','open','','summer-conference-season-kicks-off','','','2009-08-10 17:21:48','2009-08-10 22:21:48','',0,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=47',0,'post','',0),(48,1,'2009-07-26 20:39:40','2009-07-27 01:39:40','With AACEI conference in Seattle a couple weeks ago and then CMAA\'s first ever Water/Waste Water Summit in Las Vegas last week I have been racking up a few airline points. \nThis was the first time EADOC exhibited at AACEI and overall we were impressed even though our booth was located off to the side. Overall we talked with some great facility owners and Engineering firms that were vey much interested in EADOC and how we could help them improve their project controls.  Next years conference is in Atlanta <a href=\"http://www.aacei.org/annualmeeting/\">AACEI 2010 Conference</a> a little farther then Seattle for us but will be worth the trip I am sure.\nLast weeks CMAA trip to Las Vegas was excellent. We delivered a panel discussion with our client Carollo Engineers titled \"Project Controls on Water/Waste Water Infrastructure Projects\".\nPanelists from the City of Henderson, NV, Carollo Engineers, and CH2M Hill gave some excellent insight into the keys to successful project controls on their current project. \nYou can learn more about this summit at the <a href=\"http://www.cmaanet.org/blogs/jmckeon\">cmaa blog </a>\nWe look forward to attending next years Summit and hope to see more of our clients their.\nEric\n','Summer conference season kicks off',0,'','inherit','open','open','','47-revision','','','2009-07-26 20:39:40','2009-07-27 01:39:40','',47,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=48',0,'revision','',0),(49,1,'2009-07-26 20:41:40','2009-07-27 01:41:40','With the AACEI conference in Seattle a couple weeks ago and then CMAA\'s first ever Water/Waste Water Summit in Las Vegas last week I have been racking up a few airline points. \nThis was the first time EADOC exhibited at AACEI and overall we were impressed even though our booth was located off to the side. Overall we talked with some great facility owners and Engineering firms that were vey much interested in EADOC and how we could help them improve their project controls.  Next years conference is in Atlanta <a href=\"http://www.aacei.org/annualmeeting/\">AACEI 2010 Conference</a> a little farther then Seattle for us but will be worth the trip I am sure.\nLast weeks CMAA trip to Las Vegas was excellent. We delivered a panel discussion with our client Carollo Engineers titled \"Project Controls on Water/Waste Water Infrastructure Projects\".\nPanelists from the City of Henderson, NV, Carollo Engineers, and CH2M Hill gave some excellent insight into the keys to successful project controls on their current project. \nYou can learn more about this summit at the <a href=\"http://www.cmaanet.org/blogs/jmckeon\">cmaa blog </a>\nWe look forward to attending next years Summit and hope to see more of our clients their.\nEric\n','Summer conference season kicks off',0,'','inherit','open','open','','47-revision-2','','','2009-07-26 20:41:40','2009-07-27 01:41:40','',47,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=49',0,'revision','',0),(50,1,'2009-07-26 20:42:27','2009-07-27 01:42:27','With the AACEI conference in Seattle a couple weeks ago and then CMAA\'s first ever Water/Waste Water Summit in Las Vegas last week I have been racking up a few airline points. \r\nThis was the first time EADOC exhibited at AACEI and overall we were impressed even though our booth was located off to the side. Overall we talked with some great facility owners and Engineering firms that were very much interested in EADOC and how we could help them improve their project controls.  Next years conference is in Atlanta <a href=\"http://www.aacei.org/annualmeeting/\">AACEI 2010 Conference</a> a little farther then Seattle for us but will be worth the trip I am sure.\r\nLast weeks CMAA trip to Las Vegas was excellent. We delivered a panel discussion with our client Carollo Engineers titled \"Project Controls on Water/Waste Water Infrastructure Projects\".\r\nPanelists from the City of Henderson, NV, Carollo Engineers, and CH2M Hill gave some excellent insight into the keys to successful project controls on their current project. \r\nYou can learn more about this summit at the <a href=\"http://www.cmaanet.org/blogs/jmckeon\">cmaa blog </a>\r\nWe look forward to attending next years Summit and hope to see more of our clients their.\r\nEric\r\n','Summer conference season kicks off',0,'','inherit','open','open','','47-revision-3','','','2009-07-26 20:42:27','2009-07-27 01:42:27','',47,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=50',0,'revision','',0),(51,1,'2009-08-10 17:27:15','2009-08-10 22:27:15','Regardless of your political opinion of the buy America clause in the ARRA bill everyone has to track and comply with this requirement until something changes. The best tool to help you with this is your project management application. A good project management application will allow you to create a custom form for your vendors to complete. The vendors can submit their product information and associated certifications showing the material is American made. This form is linked with each material on your project so you can easily check the status of each material to ensure you are in compliance. For help setting up this form in EADOC, please contact EADOC support for assistance.\r\nThank You\r\nEric\r\n','Tracking American made materials for ARRA',0,'','publish','open','open','','tracking-american-made-materials-for-arra','','','2009-09-04 10:51:23','2009-09-04 15:51:23','',0,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=51',0,'post','',0),(52,1,'2009-08-10 17:27:00','2009-08-10 22:27:00','Regardless of your political opinion of the buy America clause in the ARRA bill everyone has to track and comply with this requirement until something changes. The best tool to help you with this is your project management application. A good project management application will allow you to create a custom form for your vendors to complete. The vendors can submit their product information and associated certifications showing the material is American made. This form is linked with each material on your project so you can easily check the status of each material to ensure you are in compliance. For help setting up this form in EADOC, please contact EADOC support for assistance.\nThank You\nEric\n','Tracking American made materials',0,'','inherit','open','open','','51-revision','','','2009-08-10 17:27:00','2009-08-10 22:27:00','',51,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=52',0,'revision','',0),(53,1,'2009-08-10 17:27:15','2009-08-10 22:27:15','Regardless of your political opinion of the buy America clause in the ARRA bill everyone has to track and comply with this requirement until something changes. The best tool to help you with this is your project management application. A good project management application will allow you to create a custom form for your vendors to complete. The vendors can submit their product information and associated certifications showing the material is American made. This form is linked with each material on your project so you can easily check the status of each material to ensure you are in compliance. For help setting up this form in EADOC, please contact EADOC support for assistance.\r\nThank You\r\nEric\r\n','Tracking American made materials for ARRA',0,'','inherit','open','open','','51-revision-2','','','2009-08-10 17:27:15','2009-08-10 22:27:15','',51,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=53',0,'revision','',0),(54,1,'2009-09-09 15:11:10','2009-09-09 20:11:10','How many times have you heard someone say this with a cell phone strapped to their belt and a laptop on their desk? This person could be a colleague, boss, client, consultant, or contractor.  So how do you get someone to make a change without knowing it or feeling like they are making a change?  Unfortunately, human nature makes us scared of change and most people will try to avoid it like the plague even though the benefits could be tremendous. How were the cell phone and computer companies able to get these scared individuals to buy their products and rely on them daily?  The best  question is: How did they do it so the customer didn\'t think they were changing? Obviously, trying to sell a web based project management application to an industry drowning in paper gives EADOC some inside knowledge into changing users in this industry.   The key to making this change is the elite few that believe in change and are willing to try new tools. A great part about human nature is that the “no one wants to be left behind urge” is almost as strong as the “urge not to change”. Eventually,  “Mr./Ms. no change” sees the success of this new tool or product and decides they should use it. So, cheers to all those people that believe in change and are willing to try new products that will move this industry forward. Without you we would still be in the Stone Age!\r\n \r\nEric Law\r\nEADOC Founder/CEO','I have been managing projects this way for 20 years and I am not going to change',0,'','publish','open','open','','i-have-been-managing-projects-this-way-for-20-years-and-i-am-not-going-to-change','','','2009-09-09 15:11:10','2009-09-09 20:11:10','',0,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=54',0,'post','',0),(55,1,'2009-09-09 15:10:52','2009-09-09 20:10:52','How many times have you heard someone say this with a cell phone strapped to their belt and a laptop on their desk? This person could be a colleague, boss, client, consultant, or contractor.  So how do you get someone to make a change without knowing it or feeling like they are making a change?  Unfortunately, human nature makes us scared of change and most people will try to avoid it like the plague even though the benefits could be tremendous. How were the cell phone and computer companies able to get these scared individuals to buy their products and rely on them daily?  The best  question is: How did they do it so the customer didn\'t think they were changing? Obviously, trying to sell a web based project management application to an industry drowning in paper gives EADOC some inside knowledge into changing users in this industry.   The key to making this change is the elite few that believe in change and are willing to try new tools. A great part about human nature is that the “no one wants to be left behind urge” is almost as strong as the “urge not to change”. Eventually,  “Mr./Ms. no change” sees the success of this new tool or product and decides they should use it. So, cheers to all those people that believe in change and are willing to try new products that will move this industry forward. Without you we would still be in the Stone Age!\n \nEric Law\nEADOC Founder/CEO','I have been managing projects this way for 20 years and I am not going to change',0,'','inherit','open','open','','54-revision','','','2009-09-09 15:10:52','2009-09-09 20:10:52','',54,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=55',0,'revision','',0),(57,1,'2009-09-28 10:54:44','0000-00-00 00:00:00','','Kill your faxmachine',0,'','draft','open','open','','','','','2009-09-28 10:54:44','0000-00-00 00:00:00','',0,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=57',0,'post','',0),(58,1,'2009-10-30 18:13:56','0000-00-00 00:00:00','When your revenue is down 35% in Q3 09 compared to Q3 08 what do you do? When a VP releases a statement saying that you will be discontinuing a product what do you do. Press release for damage control. Autodesk smaller PR dept still has a few left http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Autodesk-Constructware-2010-prnews-1313450732.html?x=0&.v=1 ','Damage Control',0,'','draft','open','open','','','','','2009-10-30 18:13:56','0000-00-00 00:00:00','',0,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=58',0,'post','',0),(59,1,'2009-10-30 18:17:51','2009-10-30 23:17:51','I just returned from CMAA\'s annual conference in Orlando, FL where EADOC and several of our competitors exhibited in their trade show. Martha Montague and her staff at CMAA put together an excellent trade show for the vendors. CMAA does a tremendous job at scheduling time for attendees to visit the show and promoting the exhibitors to attendees. They also serve food and wine in the show during breaks helping to draw in project participants. This was EADOC\'s second time attending CMAA\'s annual conference and we will be signing up for next year in San Diego. For those in the construction industry looking to sell out their trade shows I would recommend you give Martha a call.\r\n','CMAA puts on the best conferences for Vendors',0,'','publish','open','open','','cmaa-puts-on-the-best-conferences-for-vendors','','','2009-10-30 18:25:26','2009-10-30 23:25:26','',0,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=59',0,'post','',0),(60,1,'2009-10-30 18:21:24','2009-10-30 23:21:24','I just returned from CMAA\'s annual conference in Orlando, FL where EADOC and several of our competitors exhibited in their trade show. Martha Montague and her staff at CMAA who put together a excellent trade show for the vendors. CMAA does an excellent job at scheduling time for attendees to visit the show and promoting the exhibitors. They also serve food and win in the show during breaks helping to draw in project participants. This was EADOC\'s second time attending CMAA\'s annual conference and we will be signing up for next year in San Diego.','CMAA puts on the best conferences for Vendors',0,'','inherit','open','open','','59-autosave','','','2009-10-30 18:21:24','2009-10-30 23:21:24','',59,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=60',0,'revision','',0),(61,1,'2009-10-30 18:17:51','2009-10-30 23:17:51','I just returned from CMAA\'s annual conference in Orlando, FL where EADOC and several of our competitors exhibited in their trade show. Excellent work by Martha Montague and her staff at CMAA who put together an excellent trade show for the vendors. CMAA does an excellent job at scheduling time for attendees to visit the show and promoting the exhibitors. They also serve food and win in the show during breaks helping to draw in project participants. This was EADOC\'s second time attending CMAA\'s annual conference and we will be signing up for next year in San Diego.','CMAA puts on the best conferences for Vendors',0,'','inherit','open','open','','59-revision','','','2009-10-30 18:17:51','2009-10-30 23:17:51','',59,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=61',0,'revision','',0),(62,1,'2009-10-30 18:22:15','2009-10-30 23:22:15','I just returned from CMAA\'s annual conference in Orlando, FL where EADOC and several of our competitors exhibited in their trade show. Martha Montague and her staff at CMAA who put together an excellent trade show for the vendors. CMAA does a tremendous job at scheduling time for attendees to visit the show and promoting the exhibitors to attendees. They also serve food and wine in the show during breaks helping to draw in project participants. This was EADOC\'s second time attending CMAA\'s annual conference and we will be signing up for next year in San Diego.\r\n','CMAA puts on the best conferences for Vendors',0,'','inherit','open','open','','59-revision-2','','','2009-10-30 18:22:15','2009-10-30 23:22:15','',59,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=62',0,'revision','',0),(63,1,'2009-10-30 18:23:31','2009-10-30 23:23:31','I just returned from CMAA\'s annual conference in Orlando, FL where EADOC and several of our competitors exhibited in their trade show. Martha Montague and her staff at CMAA put together an excellent trade show for the vendors. CMAA does a tremendous job at scheduling time for attendees to visit the show and promoting the exhibitors to attendees. They also serve food and wine in the show during breaks helping to draw in project participants. This was EADOC\'s second time attending CMAA\'s annual conference and we will be signing up for next year in San Diego. For those in the construction industry looking to sell out their trade shows I would recommend you give Martha a call.\r\n','CMAA puts on the best conferences for Vendors',0,'','inherit','open','open','','59-revision-3','','','2009-10-30 18:23:31','2009-10-30 23:23:31','',59,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=63',0,'revision','',0),(64,1,'2009-11-19 14:28:40','2009-11-19 19:28:40','Even as the economy slows more agencies, engineers and contractors are looking to SAAS solutions to reduce costs on their projects. Check out this post from Don Fornes at <a href=\"http://www.softwareadvice.com\">Software Advice</a> on the <a href=\"http://www.softwareadvice.com/articles/construction/construction-software-state-of-the-industry-report-1111209/\">State of the Industry</a>\r\nThis trend in clients going for SAAS solutions like our own EADOC application has been a major driver this year in bringing on new clients. ','Construction Software State of the Industry Report',0,'','publish','open','open','','construction-software-state-of-the-industry-report','','\nhttp://www.softwareadvice.com/articles/construction/construction-software-state-of-the-industry-report-1111209/','2010-03-15 16:34:36','2010-03-15 21:34:36','',0,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=64',0,'post','',0),(65,1,'2009-11-19 14:27:07','2009-11-19 19:27:07','Even as the economy slows more agencies, engineers and contractors are looking to SAAS solutions to reduce costs on their projects. Check out this post from Don Fornes at <a href=\"http://www.softwareadvice.com\">Software Advice</a> on the <a href=\"http://www.softwareadvice.com/articles/construction/construction-software-state-of-the-industry-report-1111209/\">State of the Industry</a>','Construction Software State of the Industry Report',0,'','inherit','open','open','','64-revision','','','2009-11-19 14:27:07','2009-11-19 19:27:07','',64,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=65',0,'revision','',0),(66,1,'2009-11-19 14:27:10','2009-11-19 19:27:10','Even as the economy slows more agencies, engineers and contractors are looking to SAAS solutions to reduce costs on their projects. Check out this post from Don Fornes at <a href=\"http://www.softwareadvice.com\">Software Advice</a> on the <a href=\"http://www.softwareadvice.com/articles/construction/construction-software-state-of-the-industry-report-1111209/\">State of the Industry</a>','Construction Software State of the Industry Report',0,'','inherit','open','open','','64-revision-2','','','2009-11-19 14:27:10','2009-11-19 19:27:10','',64,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=66',0,'revision','',0),(67,1,'2009-11-19 14:28:40','2009-11-19 19:28:40','Even as the economy slows more agencies, engineers and contractors are looking to SAAS solutions to reduce costs on their projects. Check out this post from Don Fornes at <a href=\"http://www.softwareadvice.com\">Software Advice</a> on the <a href=\"http://www.softwareadvice.com/articles/construction/construction-software-state-of-the-industry-report-1111209/\">State of the Industry</a>','Construction Software State of the Industry Report',0,'','inherit','open','open','','64-revision-3','','','2009-11-19 14:28:40','2009-11-19 19:28:40','',64,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=67',0,'revision','',0),(68,1,'2009-11-19 14:30:15','2009-11-19 19:30:15','Even as the economy slows more agencies, engineers and contractors are looking to SAAS solutions to reduce costs on their projects. Check out this post from Don Fornes at <a href=\"http://www.softwareadvice.com\">Software Advice</a> on the <a href=\"http://www.softwareadvice.com/articles/construction/construction-software-state-of-the-industry-report-1111209/\">State of the Industry</a>\nThis trend in clients going for SAAS solutions like our own EADOC application has been a major driver this year in bringing on new clients. ','Construction Software State of the Industry Report',0,'','inherit','open','open','','64-autosave','','','2009-11-19 14:30:15','2009-11-19 19:30:15','',64,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=68',0,'revision','',0),(69,1,'2009-11-19 14:29:13','2009-11-19 19:29:13','Even as the economy slows more agencies, engineers and contractors are looking to SAAS solutions to reduce costs on their projects. Check out this post from Don Fornes at <a href=\"http://www.softwareadvice.com\">Software Advice</a> on the <a href=\"http://www.softwareadvice.com/articles/construction/construction-software-state-of-the-industry-report-1111209/\">State of the Industry</a>','Construction Software State of the Industry Report',0,'','inherit','open','open','','64-revision-4','','','2009-11-19 14:29:13','2009-11-19 19:29:13','',64,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=69',0,'revision','',0),(70,1,'2009-12-10 19:10:49','2009-12-11 00:10:49','A couple weeks ago I was talking with one of our clients about how they were able to achieve their objectives of going completely paperless on their project. They said the biggest key to success was getting rid of the printers in their project office. The client said it was the only way to break the bad habit of their users constantly printing project documents. Talk of Green benefits, cost savings, team objectives all failed to break the users tendency of clicking print. Initially after removing all the printer there were a few grumbles among the team members but after a couple weeks there was not a single complaint within the office. We realize not everyone can make this drastic change given they may be required to have wet signatures on legal documents. For these cases you may want to consider only allowing users access to printers who must print legal documents for wet signatures. Even though you may still be printing a few docs the dramatic reduction in paper, printing supplies, and printer costs will make your finance department and green team very happy.','Final Step in going paperless- Getting rid of the printers',0,'','publish','open','open','','final-step-in-going-paperless-getting-rid-of-the-printers','','','2009-12-16 14:22:49','2009-12-16 19:22:49','',0,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=70',0,'post','',0),(71,1,'2009-12-10 14:20:28','2009-12-10 19:20:28','A couple weeks ago I was talking with one of our clients about how they were able to achieve their objectives of going completely paperless on their project. They said the biggest key to success was getting rid of the printers in their project office. The client said it was the only way to break the bad habit of their users constantly printing project documents. Talk of Green benefits, cost savings, team objectives all failed to break the users tendency of clicking print. Initially after removing all the printer there was a few grumbles among the team members but after a couple weeks there was not a single complaint within the office. ','Taking paperless to the extreme- getting rid of the printers',0,'','inherit','open','open','','70-revision','','','2009-12-10 14:20:28','2009-12-10 19:20:28','',70,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=71',0,'revision','',0),(72,1,'2009-12-10 14:34:09','2009-12-10 19:34:09','A couple weeks ago I was talking with one of our clients about how they were able to achieve their objectives of going completely paperless on their project. They said the biggest key to success was getting rid of the printers in their project office. The client said it was the only way to break the bad habit of their users constantly printing project documents. Talk of Green benefits, cost savings, team objectives all failed to break the users tendency of clicking print. Initially after removing all the printer there was a few grumbles among the team members but after a couple weeks there was not a single complaint within the office. We realize not everyone can make this drastic change so quickly so here are a couple tips. ','Taking paperless to the extreme- getting rid of the printers',0,'','inherit','open','open','','70-revision-2','','','2009-12-10 14:34:09','2009-12-10 19:34:09','',70,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=72',0,'revision','',0),(73,1,'2009-12-10 19:10:27','2009-12-11 00:10:27','A couple weeks ago I was talking with one of our clients about how they were able to achieve their objectives of going completely paperless on their project. They said the biggest key to success was getting rid of the printers in their project office. The client said it was the only way to break the bad habit of their users constantly printing project documents. Talk of Green benefits, cost savings, team objectives all failed to break the users tendency of clicking print. Initially after removing all the printer there was a few grumbles among the team members but after a couple weeks there was not a single complaint within the office. We realize not everyone can make this drastic change given they may be required to have wet signatures on legal documents. For these cases you may want to consider only allowing users access to printers who must print legal documents for wet signatures. Even though you may still be printing a few docs the dramatic reduction in paper, printing supplies, and printer costs will make your finance department and ','Final Step in going paperless- Getting rid of the printers',0,'','inherit','open','open','','70-revision-3','','','2009-12-10 19:10:27','2009-12-11 00:10:27','',70,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=73',0,'revision','',0),(74,1,'2009-12-10 19:10:49','2009-12-11 00:10:49','A couple weeks ago I was talking with one of our clients about how they were able to achieve their objectives of going completely paperless on their project. They said the biggest key to success was getting rid of the printers in their project office. The client said it was the only way to break the bad habit of their users constantly printing project documents. Talk of Green benefits, cost savings, team objectives all failed to break the users tendency of clicking print. Initially after removing all the printer there was a few grumbles among the team members but after a couple weeks there was not a single complaint within the office. We realize not everyone can make this drastic change given they may be required to have wet signatures on legal documents. For these cases you may want to consider only allowing users access to printers who must print legal documents for wet signatures. Even though you may still be printing a few docs the dramatic reduction in paper, printing supplies, and printer costs will make your finance department and green team very happy.','Final Step in going paperless- Getting rid of the printers',0,'','inherit','open','open','','70-revision-4','','','2009-12-10 19:10:49','2009-12-11 00:10:49','',70,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=74',0,'revision','',0),(75,1,'2009-12-30 15:16:00','2009-12-30 20:16:00','With the constant negative news about the economy and over dramatization of the world ending by the media it is nice to share some good news at the end of this year with you. This year EADOC has added 40 new contracts and 38 new clients to the EADOC application in 2009. EADOC clients are reporting tremendous costs savings in the form of reduced staff time on projects, reduced printing and shipping costs and tremendous reductions in document turnaround time. Not only are EADOC clients saving money but they are also helping the environment at the same time making the EADOC a must have tool in these difficult economic times. Another positive note is we have seen a tremendous pickup in the number of projects requests EADOC features be enabled for tracking ARRA funding sources and the buy America certifications. With the Feb deadline fast approaching for many of these projects to start we, are looking forward to a very busy start to the new year for ourselves and our clients.\r\nFrom the EADOC team we wish everyone a Happy and Safe Holiday season. ','Finally some good news for 2009',0,'','publish','open','open','','finally-some-good-news-for-2009','','','2010-03-15 15:17:13','2010-03-15 20:17:13','',0,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=75',0,'post','',0),(76,1,'2009-12-10 19:19:05','2009-12-11 00:19:05','With the constant negative new about the economy and over dramatization of the world ending by the media it is nice to share some good news at the end of this year with you. This year EADOC has added 40 new contracts and 20 new clients to the EADOC application in 2009. EADOC clients are reporting tremendous costs savings in the form of reduced staff time on projects, reduced printing and shipping costs and tremendous reductions in document turnaround time. Not only are EADOC clients saving money but they are also helping the environment at the same time making the EADOC a must have tool in these difficult economic times. Another positive note is we have seen a tremendous pickup in the number of projects requests EADOC features be enabled for tracking ARRA funding sources and the buy America certifications. With the Feb deadline for many of these projects to start we are looking forward to a very busy start to the new year. ','Finally some good news for 2009',0,'','inherit','open','open','','75-revision','','','2009-12-10 19:19:05','2009-12-11 00:19:05','',75,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=76',0,'revision','',0),(77,1,'2009-12-16 12:37:07','2009-12-16 17:37:07','J. Kent Holland wrote a great article in his monthly Construction risk report about discovery of electronic information. <a href=\"http://www.constructionrisk.com/newsletter/articles/newsletter09-10.htm#2\">Electronic Discovery Requires Cooperation between Opposing Counsel</a> The article focused mostly on which emails between a CM(Hill International) and their client were admissible based on the keywords within the emails. Because the CM was using general email for project communication where each email could not be differentiated between Hill\'s multiple clients.  The courts had to severely restrict the clients keyword ESI search to not expose emails from other Hill clients.  Had the cm and client used a collaborative project management system for all communication then all communication for that clients projects would have been filtered before the keywords were applied. This would have eliminated the need for the court to even intervene in the discovery process for this case. CM\'s and their clients need to be careful how they communicate as this case shows their is the potential for your email to be discoverable even if they had nothing to do with the project in question.\r\n\r\nThis case is a good example of why you should consider a true collaborative project management application like EADOC instead of an Enterprise project management application(Primavera) as Hill International uses.  With a true collaborative application all information including communication is kept with each individual project eliminating the potential for discovery to cross project communication lines.','Risks Of Using Email For Project Communication',0,'','publish','open','open','','risks-of-using-email-to-manage-project-information','','','2010-02-25 20:23:38','2010-02-26 01:23:38','',0,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=77',0,'post','',0),(78,1,'2009-12-16 12:29:11','2009-12-16 17:29:11','J. Kent Holland wrote a great article in his monthly Construction risk report about discovery of electronic information. <a href=\"http://www.constructionrisk.com/newsletter/articles/newsletter09-10.htm#2\">Electronic Discovery Requires Cooperation between Opposing Counsel</a>The article focused mostly on which emails between a CM(Hill International) and their client were admissible based on the keywords within the emails. Because the CM was using general email that could not be differentiated by each project they were working on the generic keywords that the client proposed for the searching would have lead to the CM turning over email from other client projects. Had the cm used a collaborative project management system for all communication with the client then all communication for that clients projects would have been filtered before the keywords were applied. This would have eliminated the need for the court to even intervene in the discovery process for this case.\n\nThis is why you should consider a true collaborative project management application like EADOC instead of an Enterprise project management application lik','Risks of using email to manage project information',0,'','inherit','open','open','','77-revision','','','2009-12-16 12:29:11','2009-12-16 17:29:11','',77,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=78',0,'revision','',0),(79,1,'2009-12-16 12:35:57','2009-12-16 17:35:57','J. Kent Holland wrote a great article in his monthly Construction risk report about discovery of electronic information. <a href=\"http://www.constructionrisk.com/newsletter/articles/newsletter09-10.htm#2\">Electronic Discovery Requires Cooperation between Opposing Counsel</a>The article focused mostly on which emails between a CM(Hill International) and their client were admissible based on the keywords within the emails. Because the CM was using general email for project communication where each email could not be differentiated between Hill\'s multiple clients.  The courts had to severely restrict the clients keyword ESI search to not expose emails from other Hill clients.  Had the cm and client used a collaborative project management system for all communication then all communication for that clients projects would have been filtered before the keywords were applied. This would have eliminated the need for the court to even intervene in the discovery process for this case.\n\nThis is why you should consider a true collaborative project management application like EADOC instead of an Enterprise project management application(Primavera) as Hill selected. ','Risks of using email to manage project information',0,'','inherit','open','open','','77-revision-2','','','2009-12-16 12:35:57','2009-12-16 17:35:57','',77,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=79',0,'revision','',0),(80,1,'2009-12-16 13:33:11','2009-12-16 18:33:11','With the constant negative news about the economy and over dramatization of the world ending by the media it is nice to share some good news at the end of this year with you. This year EADOC has added 40 new contracts and 20 new clients to the EADOC application in 2009. EADOC clients are reporting tremendous costs savings in the form of reduced staff time on projects, reduced printing and shipping costs and tremendous reductions in document turnaround time. Not only are EADOC clients saving money but they are also helping the environment at the same time making the EADOC a must have tool in these difficult economic times. Another positive note is we have seen a tremendous pickup in the number of projects requests EADOC features be enabled for tracking ARRA funding sources and the buy America certifications. With the Feb deadline fast approaching for many of these projects to start we, are looking forward to a very busy start to the new year for ourselves and our clients.\nFrom the EADOC team we wish everyone a Happy and Safe Holiday season. ','Finally some good news for 2009',0,'','inherit','open','open','','75-revision-2','','','2009-12-16 13:33:11','2009-12-16 18:33:11','',75,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=80',0,'revision','',0),(81,1,'2009-12-10 19:11:28','2009-12-11 00:11:28','A couple weeks ago I was talking with one of our clients about how they were able to achieve their objectives of going completely paperless on their project. They said the biggest key to success was getting rid of the printers in their project office. The client said it was the only way to break the bad habit of their users constantly printing project documents. Talk of Green benefits, cost savings, team objectives all failed to break the users tendency of clicking print. Initially after removing all the printer there was a few grumbles among the team members but after a couple weeks there was not a single complaint within the office. We realize not everyone can make this drastic change given they may be required to have wet signatures on legal documents. For these cases you may want to consider only allowing users access to printers who must print legal documents for wet signatures. Even though you may still be printing a few docs the dramatic reduction in paper, printing supplies, and printer costs will make your finance department and green team very happy.','Final Step in going paperless- Getting rid of the printers',0,'','inherit','open','open','','70-revision-5','','','2009-12-10 19:11:28','2009-12-11 00:11:28','',70,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=81',0,'revision','',0),(82,1,'2009-12-23 13:28:59','2009-12-23 18:28:59','J. Kent Holland wrote a great article in his monthly Construction risk report about discovery of electronic information. <a href=\"http://www.constructionrisk.com/newsletter/articles/newsletter09-10.htm#2\">Electronic Discovery Requires Cooperation between Opposing Counsel</a>The article focused mostly on which emails between a CM(Hill International) and their client were admissible based on the keywords within the emails. Because the CM was using general email for project communication where each email could not be differentiated between Hill\'s multiple clients.  The courts had to severely restrict the clients keyword ESI search to not expose emails from other Hill clients.  Had the cm and client used a collaborative project management system for all communication then all communication for that clients projects would have been filtered before the keywords were applied. This would have eliminated the need for the court to even intervene in the discovery process for this case. CM\'s and their clients need to be careful how they communicate as this case shows their is the potential for your email to be discoverable even if they had nothing to do with the project in question.\n\nThis is why you should consider a true collaborative project management application like EADOC instead of an Enterprise project management application(Primavera) as Hill International uses.  With a true collaborative application all information including communication is kept with each individual project eliminating the potential for discovery to cross project communication lines.','Risks Of Using Email For Project Communication',0,'','inherit','open','open','','77-autosave','','','2009-12-23 13:28:59','2009-12-23 18:28:59','',77,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=82',0,'revision','',0),(83,1,'2009-12-16 12:37:07','2009-12-16 17:37:07','J. Kent Holland wrote a great article in his monthly Construction risk report about discovery of electronic information. <a href=\"http://www.constructionrisk.com/newsletter/articles/newsletter09-10.htm#2\">Electronic Discovery Requires Cooperation between Opposing Counsel</a>The article focused mostly on which emails between a CM(Hill International) and their client were admissible based on the keywords within the emails. Because the CM was using general email for project communication where each email could not be differentiated between Hill\'s multiple clients.  The courts had to severely restrict the clients keyword ESI search to not expose emails from other Hill clients.  Had the cm and client used a collaborative project management system for all communication then all communication for that clients projects would have been filtered before the keywords were applied. This would have eliminated the need for the court to even intervene in the discovery process for this case.\r\n\r\nThis is why you should consider a true collaborative project management application like EADOC instead of an Enterprise project management application(Primavera) as Hill selected. ','Risks of using email to manage project information',0,'','inherit','open','open','','77-revision-3','','','2009-12-16 12:37:07','2009-12-16 17:37:07','',77,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=83',0,'revision','',0),(84,1,'2009-12-16 14:28:13','2009-12-16 19:28:13','J. Kent Holland wrote a great article in his monthly Construction risk report about discovery of electronic information. <a href=\"http://www.constructionrisk.com/newsletter/articles/newsletter09-10.htm#2\">Electronic Discovery Requires Cooperation between Opposing Counsel</a>The article focused mostly on which emails between a CM(Hill International) and their client were admissible based on the keywords within the emails. Because the CM was using general email for project communication where each email could not be differentiated between Hill\'s multiple clients.  The courts had to severely restrict the clients keyword ESI search to not expose emails from other Hill clients.  Had the cm and client used a collaborative project management system for all communication then all communication for that clients projects would have been filtered before the keywords were applied. This would have eliminated the need for the court to even intervene in the discovery process for this case. CM\'s and their clients need to be careful how they communicate as they case shows their is the potential for your email to be discoverable even if they had nothing to do with the project in question.\r\n\r\nThis is why you should consider a true collaborative project management application like EADOC instead of an Enterprise project management application(Primavera) as Hill International uses.  With a true collaborative application all information including communication is kept with each individual project eliminating the potential for discovery to cross project communication lines.','Risks Of Using Email For Project Communication',0,'','inherit','open','open','','77-revision-4','','','2009-12-16 14:28:13','2009-12-16 19:28:13','',77,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=84',0,'revision','',0),(85,1,'2009-12-23 13:35:04','2009-12-23 18:35:04','J. Kent Holland wrote a great article in his monthly Construction risk report about discovery of electronic information. <a href=\"http://www.constructionrisk.com/newsletter/articles/newsletter09-10.htm#2\">Electronic Discovery Requires Cooperation between Opposing Counsel</a>The article focused mostly on which emails between a CM(Hill International) and their client were admissible based on the keywords within the emails. Because the CM was using general email for project communication where each email could not be differentiated between Hill\'s multiple clients.  The courts had to severely restrict the clients keyword ESI search to not expose emails from other Hill clients.  Had the cm and client used a collaborative project management system for all communication then all communication for that clients projects would have been filtered before the keywords were applied. This would have eliminated the need for the court to even intervene in the discovery process for this case. CM\'s and their clients need to be careful how they communicate as this case shows their is the potential for your email to be discoverable even if they had nothing to do with the project in question.\r\n\r\nThis is why you should consider a true collaborative project management application like EADOC instead of an Enterprise project management application(Primavera) as Hill International uses.  With a true collaborative application all information including communication is kept with each individual project eliminating the potential for discovery to cross project communication lines.','Risks Of Using Email For Project Communication',0,'','inherit','open','open','','77-revision-5','','','2009-12-23 13:35:04','2009-12-23 18:35:04','',77,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=85',0,'revision','',0),(86,1,'2009-12-23 13:35:44','2009-12-23 18:35:44','J. Kent Holland wrote a great article in his monthly Construction risk report about discovery of electronic information. <a href=\"http://www.constructionrisk.com/newsletter/articles/newsletter09-10.htm#2\">Electronic Discovery Requires Cooperation between Opposing Counsel</a>The article focused mostly on which emails between a CM(Hill International) and their client were admissible based on the keywords within the emails. Because the CM was using general email for project communication where each email could not be differentiated between Hill\'s multiple clients.  The courts had to severely restrict the clients keyword ESI search to not expose emails from other Hill clients.  Had the cm and client used a collaborative project management system for all communication then all communication for that clients projects would have been filtered before the keywords were applied. This would have eliminated the need for the court to even intervene in the discovery process for this case. CM\'s and their clients need to be careful how they communicate as this case shows their is the potential for your email to be discoverable even if they had nothing to do with the project in question.\r\n\r\nThis case is a good example of why you should consider a true collaborative project management application like EADOC instead of an Enterprise project management application(Primavera) as Hill International uses.  With a true collaborative application all information including communication is kept with each individual project eliminating the potential for discovery to cross project communication lines.','Risks Of Using Email For Project Communication',0,'','inherit','open','open','','77-revision-6','','','2009-12-23 13:35:44','2009-12-23 18:35:44','',77,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=86',0,'revision','',0),(87,2,'2008-04-01 10:30:06','2008-04-01 15:30:06','Project Portfolio Management for the Building Owner.\r\n<a href=\"http://www.softwareadvice.com/articles/construction/project-portfolio-management-for-the-building-owner/\" target=\"_blank\">Read the article at Software Advice</a>','Project Portfolio Management for the Building Owner',0,'Project Portfolio Management for the Building Owner from software advice.','publish','open','open','','87','','','2010-02-19 20:15:44','2010-02-20 01:15:44','',0,'http://blog.eadocsoftware/?p=87',0,'post','',0),(88,2,'2010-02-19 13:31:06','2010-02-19 18:31:06','<a href=\"http://www.softwareadvice.com/articles/construction/project-portfolio-management-for-the-building-owner/\">Project Portfolio Management for the Building Owner from software advice</a>.','',0,'','inherit','open','open','','87-revision','','','2010-02-19 13:31:06','2010-02-19 18:31:06','',87,'http://blog.eadocsoftware/?p=88',0,'revision','',0),(89,2,'2010-02-19 13:33:48','2010-02-19 18:33:48','<a href=\"http://www.softwareadvice.com/articles/construction/project-portfolio-management-for-the-building-owner/\">Project Portfolio Management for the Building Owner from software advice</a>.','',0,'Project Portfolio Management for the Building Owner from software advice.','inherit','open','open','','87-revision-2','','','2010-02-19 13:33:48','2010-02-19 18:33:48','',87,'http://blog.eadocsoftware/?p=89',0,'revision','',0),(90,2,'2010-02-19 13:35:26','2010-02-19 18:35:26','<a href=\"http://www.softwareadvice.com/articles/construction/project-portfolio-management-for-the-building-owner/\">Project Portfolio Management for the Building Owner from software advice</a>.','Project Portfolio Management for the Building Owner',0,'Project Portfolio Management for the Building Owner from software advice.','inherit','open','open','','87-revision-3','','','2010-02-19 13:35:26','2010-02-19 18:35:26','',87,'http://blog.eadocsoftware/?p=90',0,'revision','',0),(91,2,'2010-02-19 16:23:32','2010-02-19 21:23:32','','EADOC_Press_Release_2007-03-05',0,'','inherit','open','open','','eadoc_press_release_2007-03-05','','','2010-02-19 16:23:32','2010-02-19 21:23:32','',87,'http://www.eadocsoftware.com/pdf/EADOC_Press_Release_2007-03-05.pdf',0,'attachment','application/pdf',0),(92,2,'2010-02-19 13:57:54','2010-02-19 18:57:54','<a href=\"http://www.softwareadvice.com/articles/construction/project-portfolio-management-for-the-building-owner/\">Project Portfolio Management for the Building Owner from software advice</a>','Project Portfolio Management for the Building Owner',0,'Project Portfolio Management for the Building Owner from software advice.','inherit','open','open','','87-revision-4','','','2010-02-19 13:57:54','2010-02-19 18:57:54','',87,'http://blog.eadocsoftware/?p=92',0,'revision','',0),(98,2,'2010-02-19 16:30:34','2010-02-19 21:30:34','<a href=\"http://www.softwareadvice.com/articles/construction/project-portfolio-management-for-the-building-owner/\">Project Portfolio Management for the Building Owner from software advice</a>','Project Portfolio Management for the Building Owner',0,'Project Portfolio Management for the Building Owner from software advice.','inherit','open','open','','87-revision-7','','','2010-02-19 16:30:34','2010-02-19 21:30:34','',87,'http://blog.eadocsoftware/?p=98',0,'revision','',0),(96,2,'2010-02-19 16:23:51','2010-02-19 21:23:51','<a href=\"http://www.softwareadvice.com/articles/construction/project-portfolio-management-for-the-building-owner/\">Project Portfolio Management for the Building Owner from software advice</a>\r\n\r\n<a href=\'http://www.eadocsoftware.com/pdf/EADOC_Press_Release_2007-03-05.pdf\'>EADOC_Press_Release_2007-03-05</a>','Project Portfolio Management for the Building Owner',0,'Project Portfolio Management for the Building Owner from software advice.','inherit','open','open','','87-revision-5','','','2010-02-19 16:23:51','2010-02-19 21:23:51','',87,'http://blog.eadocsoftware/?p=96',0,'revision','',0),(94,2,'2010-02-19 18:31:14','2010-02-19 23:31:14','Project Portfolio Management for the Building Owner from Software Advice.\r\n<a href=\"http://www.softwareadvice.com/articles/construction/project-portfolio-management-for-the-building-owner/\" target=\"_blank\">Read the Article at Software Advice</a>','Project Portfolio Management for the Building Owner',0,'','inherit','open','open','','87-autosave','','','2010-02-19 18:31:14','2010-02-19 23:31:14','',87,'http://blog.eadocsoftware/?p=94',0,'revision','',0),(100,2,'2010-02-19 16:34:09','2010-02-19 21:34:09','<a href=\"http://www.softwareadvice.com/articles/construction/project-portfolio-management-for-the-building-owner/\" target=\"_blank\">Project Portfolio Management for the Building Owner from Software Advice</a>','Project Portfolio Management for the Building Owner',0,'Project Portfolio Management for the Building Owner from software advice.','inherit','open','open','','87-revision-9','','','2010-02-19 16:34:09','2010-02-19 21:34:09','',87,'http://blog.eadocsoftware/?p=100',0,'revision','',0),(97,2,'2010-02-19 16:29:45','2010-02-19 21:29:45','<a href=\"http://www.softwareadvice.com/articles/construction/project-portfolio-management-for-the-building-owner/\">Project Portfolio Management for the Building Owner from software advice</a>\r\n\r\n<a href=\'http://www.eadocsoftware.com/pdf/EADOC_Press_Release_2007-03-05.pdf\'>EADOC_Press_Release_2007-03-05</a>','Project Portfolio Management for the Building Owner',0,'Project Portfolio Management for the Building Owner from software advice.','inherit','open','open','','87-revision-6','','','2010-02-19 16:29:45','2010-02-19 21:29:45','',87,'http://blog.eadocsoftware/?p=97',0,'revision','',0),(99,2,'2010-02-19 16:31:24','2010-02-19 21:31:24','<a href=\"http://www.softwareadvice.com/articles/construction/project-portfolio-management-for-the-building-owner/\" target=\"_blank\">Project Portfolio Management for the Building Owner from software advice</a>','Project Portfolio Management for the Building Owner',0,'Project Portfolio Management for the Building Owner from software advice.','inherit','open','open','','87-revision-8','','','2010-02-19 16:31:24','2010-02-19 21:31:24','',87,'http://blog.eadocsoftware/?p=99',0,'revision','',0),(101,2,'2008-04-01 10:00:27','2008-04-01 15:00:27','EADOC has moved into larger office at 436 14th st suite 150 in Downtown Oakland to accommodate their rapid growth.','EADOC has moved into larger office.',0,'','publish','open','open','','eadoc-has-moved-into-larger-office','','','2010-02-19 20:14:57','2010-02-20 01:14:57','',0,'http://blog.eadocsoftware/?p=101',0,'post','',0),(102,2,'2010-02-19 19:20:13','2010-02-20 00:20:13','EADOC has moved into larger office at 436 14th st suite 150 in Downtown Oakland to accommodate their rapid growth.','EADOC has moved into larger office.',0,'','inherit','open','open','','101-revision','','','2010-02-19 19:20:13','2010-02-20 00:20:13','',101,'http://blog.eadocsoftware/?p=102',0,'revision','',0),(103,2,'2008-04-04 09:20:58','2008-04-04 14:20:58','Richard De Palma has joined EADOC\'s sales team to cover the South Central area of the United States.','Richard De Palma has joined EADOC\'s sales team',0,'','publish','open','open','','richard-de-palma-has-joined-eadocs-sales-team','','','2010-02-19 19:45:13','2010-02-20 00:45:13','',0,'http://blog.eadocsoftware/?p=103',0,'post','',0),(104,2,'2010-02-19 19:20:58','2010-02-20 00:20:58','Richard De Palma has joined EADOC\'s sales team to cover the South Central area of the United States.','Richard De Palma has joined EADOC\'s sales team',0,'','inherit','open','open','','103-revision','','','2010-02-19 19:20:58','2010-02-20 00:20:58','',103,'http://blog.eadocsoftware/?p=104',0,'revision','',0),(105,2,'2010-02-19 19:27:12','2010-02-20 00:27:12','Richard De Palma has joined EADOC\'s sales team to cover the South Central area of the United States.','Richard De Palma has joined EADOC\'s sales team',0,'','inherit','open','open','','103-revision-2','','','2010-02-19 19:27:12','2010-02-20 00:27:12','',103,'http://blog.eadocsoftware/?p=105',0,'revision','',0),(106,2,'2010-02-19 19:41:29','2010-02-20 00:41:29','Richard De Palma has joined EADOC\'s sales team to cover the South Central area of the United States.','Richard De Palma has joined EADOC\'s sales team',0,'','inherit','open','open','','103-revision-3','','','2010-02-19 19:41:29','2010-02-20 00:41:29','',103,'http://blog.eadocsoftware/?p=106',0,'revision','',0),(107,2,'2009-02-09 19:57:37','2009-02-10 00:57:37','<a href=\'http://www.eadocsoftware.com/pdf/EADOC_News_Using_Collaborative_Project_Mgmt_Apps.pdf\'>Using Collaborative Project Management Applications</a> (PDF)\r\n<em>Note: Originally published in January 2009 issue of Modern Contractor</em>\r\n','Using Collaborative Project Management Applications',0,'','publish','open','open','','using-collaborative-project-management-applications','','','2010-02-19 20:12:08','2010-02-20 01:12:08','',0,'http://blog.eadocsoftware/?p=107',0,'post','',0),(108,2,'2010-02-19 19:57:02','2010-02-20 00:57:02','','Using Collaborative Project Management Applications',0,'','inherit','open','open','','eadoc_news_using_collaborative_project_mgmt_apps','','','2010-02-19 19:57:02','2010-02-20 00:57:02','',107,'http://www.eadocsoftware.com/pdf/EADOC_News_Using_Collaborative_Project_Mgmt_Apps1.pdf',0,'attachment','application/pdf',0),(109,2,'2010-02-19 19:56:08','2010-02-20 00:56:08','Using Collaborative Project Management Applications (PDF)\n      Note: Originally published in January 2009 issue of Modern Contractor\n','Using Collaborative Project Management Applications',0,'','inherit','open','open','','107-revision','','','2010-02-19 19:56:08','2010-02-20 00:56:08','',107,'http://blog.eadocsoftware/?p=109',0,'revision','',0),(110,2,'2010-02-19 19:57:37','2010-02-20 00:57:37','<a href=\'http://www.eadocsoftware.com/pdf/EADOC_News_Using_Collaborative_Project_Mgmt_Apps.pdf\'>Using Collaborative Project Management Applications</a>\r\n<em>Note: Originally published in January 2009 issue of Modern Contractor</em>\r\n','Using Collaborative Project Management Applications',0,'','inherit','open','open','','107-revision-2','','','2010-02-19 19:57:37','2010-02-20 00:57:37','',107,'http://blog.eadocsoftware/?p=110',0,'revision','',0),(111,2,'2010-02-19 19:57:46','2010-02-20 00:57:46','<a href=\'http://www.eadocsoftware.com/pdf/EADOC_News_Using_Collaborative_Project_Mgmt_Apps.pdf\'>Using Collaborative Project Management Applications</a>\r\n<em>Note: Originally published in January 2009 issue of Modern Contractor</em>\r\n','Using Collaborative Project Management Applications',0,'','inherit','open','open','','107-revision-3','','','2010-02-19 19:57:46','2010-02-20 00:57:46','',107,'http://blog.eadocsoftware/?p=111',0,'revision','',0),(112,2,'2007-03-07 09:30:13','2007-03-07 14:30:13','<a href=\'http://www.eadocsoftware.com/pdf/EADOC_Press_Release_2007-03-05.pdf\'>Connecting the Construction Industry: EADOC Advances Construction Management Software</a> (PDF)','Connecting the Construction Industry: EADOC Advances Construction Management Software',0,'','publish','open','open','','connecting-the-construction-industry-eadoc-advances-construction-management-software','','','2010-02-19 20:13:55','2010-02-20 01:13:55','',0,'http://blog.eadocsoftware/?p=112',0,'post','',0),(113,2,'2010-02-19 20:00:33','2010-02-20 01:00:33','','Connecting the Construction Industry: EADOC Advances Construction Management Software',0,'','inherit','open','open','','eadoc_press_release_2007-03-05-2','','','2010-02-19 20:00:33','2010-02-20 01:00:33','',112,'http://www.eadocsoftware.com/pdf/EADOC_Press_Release_2007-03-051.pdf',0,'attachment','application/pdf',0),(114,2,'2010-02-19 20:00:13','2010-02-20 01:00:13','','Connecting the Construction Industry: EADOC Advances Construction Management Software',0,'','inherit','open','open','','112-revision','','','2010-02-19 20:00:13','2010-02-20 01:00:13','',112,'http://blog.eadocsoftware/?p=114',0,'revision','',0),(115,2,'2010-02-19 20:01:13','2010-02-20 01:01:13','<a href=\'http://www.eadocsoftware.com/pdf/EADOC_Press_Release_2007-03-05.pdf\'>Connecting the Construction Industry: EADOC Advances Construction Management Software</a>','Connecting the Construction Industry: EADOC Advances Construction Management Software',0,'','inherit','open','open','','112-revision-2','','','2010-02-19 20:01:13','2010-02-20 01:01:13','',112,'http://blog.eadocsoftware/?p=115',0,'revision','',0),(116,2,'2010-02-19 20:01:30','2010-02-20 01:01:30','<a href=\'http://www.eadocsoftware.com/pdf/EADOC_Press_Release_2007-03-05.pdf\'>Connecting the Construction Industry: EADOC Advances Construction Management Software</a>','Connecting the Construction Industry: EADOC Advances Construction Management Software',0,'','inherit','open','open','','112-revision-3','','','2010-02-19 20:01:30','2010-02-20 01:01:30','',112,'http://blog.eadocsoftware/?p=116',0,'revision','',0),(117,2,'2010-02-19 19:59:59','2010-02-20 00:59:59','<a href=\'http://www.eadocsoftware.com/pdf/EADOC_News_Using_Collaborative_Project_Mgmt_Apps.pdf\'>Using Collaborative Project Management Applications</a>(PDF)\r\n<em>Note: Originally published in January 2009 issue of Modern Contractor</em>\r\n','Using Collaborative Project Management Applications',0,'','inherit','open','open','','107-revision-4','','','2010-02-19 19:59:59','2010-02-20 00:59:59','',107,'http://blog.eadocsoftware/?p=117',0,'revision','',0),(118,2,'2010-02-19 20:02:44','2010-02-20 01:02:44','<a href=\'http://www.eadocsoftware.com/pdf/EADOC_News_Using_Collaborative_Project_Mgmt_Apps.pdf\'>Using Collaborative Project Management Applications</a> (PDF)\r\n<em>Note: Originally published in January 2009 issue of Modern Contractor</em>\r\n','Using Collaborative Project Management Applications',0,'','inherit','open','open','','107-revision-5','','','2010-02-19 20:02:44','2010-02-20 01:02:44','',107,'http://blog.eadocsoftware/?p=118',0,'revision','',0),(119,2,'2010-02-19 20:11:12','2010-02-20 01:11:12','<a href=\'http://www.eadocsoftware.com/pdf/EADOC_News_Using_Collaborative_Project_Mgmt_Apps.pdf\'>Using Collaborative Project Management Applications</a> (PDF)\r\n<em>Note: Originally published in January 2009 issue of Modern Contractor</em>\r\n','Using Collaborative Project Management Applications',0,'','inherit','open','open','','107-revision-6','','','2010-02-19 20:11:12','2010-02-20 01:11:12','',107,'http://blog.eadocsoftware/?p=119',0,'revision','',0),(120,2,'2010-02-19 20:02:21','2010-02-20 01:02:21','<a href=\'http://www.eadocsoftware.com/pdf/EADOC_Press_Release_2007-03-05.pdf\'>Connecting the Construction Industry: EADOC Advances Construction Management Software</a> (PDF)','Connecting the Construction Industry: EADOC Advances Construction Management Software',0,'','inherit','open','open','','112-revision-4','','','2010-02-19 20:02:21','2010-02-20 01:02:21','',112,'http://blog.eadocsoftware/?p=120',0,'revision','',0),(121,2,'2010-02-19 19:20:27','2010-02-20 00:20:27','EADOC has moved into larger office at 436 14th st suite 150 in Downtown Oakland to accommodate their rapid growth.','EADOC has moved into larger office.',0,'','inherit','open','open','','101-revision-2','','','2010-02-19 19:20:27','2010-02-20 00:20:27','',101,'http://blog.eadocsoftware/?p=121',0,'revision','',0),(122,2,'2010-02-19 18:33:32','2010-02-19 23:33:32','Project Portfolio Management for the Building Owner.\r\n<a href=\"http://www.softwareadvice.com/articles/construction/project-portfolio-management-for-the-building-owner/\" target=\"_blank\">Read the article at Software Advice</a>','Project Portfolio Management for the Building Owner',0,'Project Portfolio Management for the Building Owner from software advice.','inherit','open','open','','87-revision-10','','','2010-02-19 18:33:32','2010-02-19 23:33:32','',87,'http://blog.eadocsoftware/?p=122',0,'revision','',0),(123,2,'2009-12-23 13:37:57','2009-12-23 18:37:57','J. Kent Holland wrote a great article in his monthly Construction risk report about discovery of electronic information. <a href=\"http://www.constructionrisk.com/newsletter/articles/newsletter09-10.htm#2\">Electronic Discovery Requires Cooperation between Opposing Counsel</a>The article focused mostly on which emails between a CM(Hill International) and their client were admissible based on the keywords within the emails. Because the CM was using general email for project communication where each email could not be differentiated between Hill\'s multiple clients.  The courts had to severely restrict the clients keyword ESI search to not expose emails from other Hill clients.  Had the cm and client used a collaborative project management system for all communication then all communication for that clients projects would have been filtered before the keywords were applied. This would have eliminated the need for the court to even intervene in the discovery process for this case. CM\'s and their clients need to be careful how they communicate as this case shows their is the potential for your email to be discoverable even if they had nothing to do with the project in question.\r\n\r\nThis case is a good example of why you should consider a true collaborative project management application like EADOC instead of an Enterprise project management application(Primavera) as Hill International uses.  With a true collaborative application all information including communication is kept with each individual project eliminating the potential for discovery to cross project communication lines.','Risks Of Using Email For Project Communication',0,'','inherit','open','open','','77-revision-7','','','2009-12-23 13:37:57','2009-12-23 18:37:57','',77,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=123',0,'revision','',0),(124,1,'2010-03-02 14:09:09','2010-03-02 19:09:09','I  just completed a webinar with Mike Warriner from  Carollo on \"Leveraging Web-Based Collaboration to Deliver Quality, Cost Effective CM Services\". CMAA asked us to conduct this presentation again via webinar. This presentation was originally delivered at the 2009 CMAA conference in Orlando, Florida. If you missed the webinar the recording is available here <a href=\"https://cmaanet.webex.com/ec0605l/eventcenter/recording/recordAction.do;jsessionid=d3vGLNgJNJNnfCShfFRfTX3z11SHhLXvPJqnmD4fFLhq9TThZZvQ!-1518541008?theAction=poprecord&actname=%2Feventcenter%2Fframe%2Fg.do&actappname=ec0605l&renewticket=0&renewticket=0&apiname=lsr.php&entappname=url0107l&needFilter=false&&isurlact=true&rID=220662&entactname=%2FnbrRecordingURL.do&rKey=b4eb2c2a1d1802d8&recordID=220662&siteurl=cmaanet&rnd=1367852142&SP=EC&AT=pb&format=short\">Click here for the recording</a> This presentation is a great opportunity for Construction Managers to learn about the benefits of using Web-Based Collaboration software for improving project control and reducing costs for their clients. The presentation provides attendees with benefits, evaluation criteria, and recommended processes for implementing a web based collaborative project management application.\r\n','CMAA Webinar follow up to 2009 conference',0,'','publish','open','open','','cmaa-webinar-follow-up-to-2009-conference','','','2010-03-02 14:09:09','2010-03-02 19:09:09','',0,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=124',0,'post','',0),(125,1,'2010-03-02 14:05:55','2010-03-02 19:05:55','Myself and Mike Warriner with Carollo just completed a webinar version of our presentation \"Leveraging Web-Based Collaboration to Deliver Quality, Cost Effective CM Services\" CMAA asked us to conduct this presentation again via webinar that was originally delivered at the 2009 CMAA conference in Orlando, Florida. If you missed the webinar the recording is available here <a href=\"https://cmaanet.webex.com/ec0605l/eventcenter/recording/recordAction.do;jsessionid=d3vGLNgJNJNnfCShfFRfTX3z11SHhLXvPJqnmD4fFLhq9TThZZvQ!-1518541008?theAction=poprecord&actname=%2Feventcenter%2Fframe%2Fg.do&actappname=ec0605l&renewticket=0&renewticket=0&apiname=lsr.php&entappname=url0107l&needFilter=false&&isurlact=true&rID=220662&entactname=%2FnbrRecordingURL.do&rKey=b4eb2c2a1d1802d8&recordID=220662&siteurl=cmaanet&rnd=1367852142&SP=EC&AT=pb&format=short\">Click here for the recording</a> This presentation is a great opportunity for Construction Managers to learn about the benefits of using Web-Based Collaboration software for improving project control and reducing costs for their clients.\n','CMAA Webinar follow up to 2009 conference',0,'','inherit','open','open','','124-revision','','','2010-03-02 14:05:55','2010-03-02 19:05:55','',124,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=125',0,'revision','',0),(126,1,'2010-03-02 14:06:55','2010-03-02 19:06:55','I  just completed a webinar with Mike Warriner from  Carolloversion of our presentation \"Leveraging Web-Based Collaboration to Deliver Quality, Cost Effective CM Services\" CMAA asked us to conduct this presentation again via webinar that was originally delivered at the 2009 CMAA conference in Orlando, Florida. If you missed the webinar the recording is available here <a href=\"https://cmaanet.webex.com/ec0605l/eventcenter/recording/recordAction.do;jsessionid=d3vGLNgJNJNnfCShfFRfTX3z11SHhLXvPJqnmD4fFLhq9TThZZvQ!-1518541008?theAction=poprecord&actname=%2Feventcenter%2Fframe%2Fg.do&actappname=ec0605l&renewticket=0&renewticket=0&apiname=lsr.php&entappname=url0107l&needFilter=false&&isurlact=true&rID=220662&entactname=%2FnbrRecordingURL.do&rKey=b4eb2c2a1d1802d8&recordID=220662&siteurl=cmaanet&rnd=1367852142&SP=EC&AT=pb&format=short\">Click here for the recording</a> This presentation is a great opportunity for Construction Managers to learn about the benefits of using Web-Based Collaboration software for improving project control and reducing costs for their clients.\n','CMAA Webinar follow up to 2009 conference',0,'','inherit','open','open','','124-revision-2','','','2010-03-02 14:06:55','2010-03-02 19:06:55','',124,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=126',0,'revision','',0),(127,1,'2010-03-02 14:09:18','2010-03-02 19:09:18','I  just completed a webinar with Mike Warriner from  Carollo on \"Leveraging Web-Based Collaboration to Deliver Quality, Cost Effective CM Services\". CMAA asked us to conduct this presentation again via webinar. This presentation was originally delivered at the 2009 CMAA conference in Orlando, Florida. If you missed the webinar the recording is available here <a href=\"https://cmaanet.webex.com/ec0605l/eventcenter/recording/recordAction.do;jsessionid=d3vGLNgJNJNnfCShfFRfTX3z11SHhLXvPJqnmD4fFLhq9TThZZvQ!-1518541008?theAction=poprecord&actname=%2Feventcenter%2Fframe%2Fg.do&actappname=ec0605l&renewticket=0&renewticket=0&apiname=lsr.php&entappname=url0107l&needFilter=false&&isurlact=true&rID=220662&entactname=%2FnbrRecordingURL.do&rKey=b4eb2c2a1d1802d8&recordID=220662&siteurl=cmaanet&rnd=1367852142&SP=EC&AT=pb&format=short\">Click here for the recording</a> This presentation is a great opportunity for Construction Managers to learn about the benefits of using Web-Based Collaboration software for improving project control and reducing costs for their clients. The presentation provides attendees with benefits, evaluation criteria, and recommended processes for implementing a web based collaborative project management application.\r\n','CMAA Webinar follow up to 2009 conference',0,'','inherit','open','open','','124-autosave','','','2010-03-02 14:09:18','2010-03-02 19:09:18','',124,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=127',0,'revision','',0),(128,1,'2010-03-09 11:19:50','2010-03-09 16:19:50','The insurance industry is way behind the construction industry in the use of technology. Blue Shield and Travelers are perfect examples of companies that still believe the fax machine is modern technology. I have had the unfortunate experience of having to work with both of these companies laboriously painful paper processes recently. Blue Shield who provides our employee health insurance plan does not have email access. Everything has to be mailed or faxed. Their invoices are 5-10 pages long with many pages duplicated. When I asked them to email these to me their response \"we don\'t do email\".\r\nTravelers a company all of us in the construction industry know well has a slight advantage over Blue Cross. This year they provided me a temporary email address for submitting our 2009 payroll records for their annual review. This is a lot better then last years 30+ page fax I had to send them. There is still room for improvements, they should really provide clients with a portal for uploading this information and tracking the status of invoices and renewals. Even the state of CA DGS lets us go online to upload our Small business certificate documents for renewal. Travelers has made some progress but still has a way to go. \r\nIn the mean time construction companies, facility owners, and engineering firms are disposing of their paper processes at a record rate and moving to web based project management applications, BIM modeling, blogs, and virtual offices faster then these three companies can refill the paper tray on their fax machine. Many in the construction industry have recognized the limits and inefficiencies in email and are moving to collaborative applications, portals, and blogs to move information electronically.\r\nSo if you want to help move the insurance industry forward I would urge you to request all insurance documents via email, after enough requests they may finally get it.\r\nEric Law\r\nEADOC Founder','Construction Industry is not last in technology just look at the insurance industry',0,'','publish','open','open','','construction-industry-is-not-last-in-technology-just-look-at-the-insurance-industry','','','2010-03-09 11:19:50','2010-03-09 16:19:50','',0,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=128',0,'post','',0),(131,1,'2010-03-09 11:18:55','2010-03-09 16:18:55','The insurance industry is way behind the construction industry in the use of technology. Blue Shield and Travelers are perfect examples of companies that still believe the fax machine is modern technology. I have had the unfortunate experience of having to work with both of these companies laboriously painful paper processes recently. Blue Shield who provides our employee health insurance plan does not have email access. Everything has to be mailed or faxed. Their invoices are 5-10 pages long with many pages duplicated. When I asked them to email these to me their response \"we don\'t do email\".\nTravelers a company all of us in the construction industry know well has a slight advantage over Blue Cross. This year they provided me a temporary email address for submitting our 2009 payroll records for their annual review. This is a lot better then last years 30+ page fax I had to send them. There is still room for improvements, they should really provide clients with a portal for uploading this information and tracking the status of invoices and renewals. Even the state of CA DGS lets us go online to upload our Small business certificate documents for renewal. Travelers has made some progress but still has a way to go. \nIn the mean time construction companies, facility owners, and engineering firms are disposing of their paper processes at a record rate and moving to web based project management applications, BIM modeling, blogs, and virtual offices faster then these three companies can refill the paper tray on their fax machine. Many in the construction industry have recognized the limits and inefficiencies in email and are moving to collaborative applications, portals, and blogs to move information electronically.\nSo if you want to help move the insurance industry forward I would urge you to request all ','Construction Industry is not last in technology just look at the insurance industry',0,'','inherit','open','open','','128-revision-3','','','2010-03-09 11:18:55','2010-03-09 16:18:55','',128,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=131',0,'revision','',0),(129,1,'2010-03-02 15:22:03','2010-03-02 20:22:03','The insurance industry and media are way behind the construction industry in the use of technology. Blue Shield, Travelers, and Specialty Publishing(writers of Constructech Magazine) are perfect examples of companies that still believe the Fax machine is modern technology. I have had the unfortunate experience of having to work with all three of these companies laboriously painful paper processes recently. Blue Shield who provides our employee health insurance plan does not have email access, they can not send or receive emails. Everything has to be mailed or faxed. Their invoices are 5-10 pages long with many pages duplicated. When I asked them to email these to me their response \"we don\'t do email\".\nTravelers a company all of us in the construction industry know well has a slight advantage over Blue Cross. This year they provided me a temporary email address for submitting our 2009 payroll records for their annual review. This is a lot better then last years 30+ page fax I had to send them. There is still room for improvements, they should really provide clients with a portal for uploading this information and tracking the status of invoices and renewels. Even the state of CA DGS lets us go online to upload our Small business certificate documents for renewal. Travelers has made some progress but still has a way to go. Finally the most embarrassing example is the media industries adoption of technology, Specialty Publishing.  At the end of last year I ordered a copy of their IT playbook. To do this I went to their website and filled out the order form, several days later I received an email with a form that I needed to complete and submit my credit card information with. Earth to Constructech you should have collected this information when I filled out my order request online. You took what should have been a 2 minute process to order into a 20+ minute process of emails, faxes, and filling out multiple forms. Next the USPS damages the magazine so bad that it was returned so they have to mail me a new one. Had Constructech been operating in 2010 instead of 1995 I should have downloaded this after placing my order online. The worst part is the magazine is supposed to be experts on technology in this industry. Their latest example of being clueless is their articles about blogging, yet they themselves do not have a blog.\nIn the mean time construction companies, facility owners, and engineering firms are disposing of their paper processes at a record rate and moving to web based project management applications, BIM modelling, blogs, and virtual office faster then these three companies can refill the paper tray on their fax machine. ','Construction Industry is not last in technology as many would believe',0,'','inherit','open','open','','128-revision','','','2010-03-02 15:22:03','2010-03-02 20:22:03','',128,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=129',0,'revision','',0),(130,1,'2010-03-02 15:23:15','2010-03-02 20:23:15','The insurance industry and media are way behind the construction industry in the use of technology. Blue Shield, Travelers, and Specialty Publishing(writers of Constructech Magazine) are perfect examples of companies that still believe the Fax machine is modern technology. I have had the unfortunate experience of having to work with all three of these companies laboriously painful paper processes recently. Blue Shield who provides our employee health insurance plan does not have email access, they can not send or receive emails. Everything has to be mailed or faxed. Their invoices are 5-10 pages long with many pages duplicated. When I asked them to email these to me their response \"we don\'t do email\".\nTravelers a company all of us in the construction industry know well has a slight advantage over Blue Cross. This year they provided me a temporary email address for submitting our 2009 payroll records for their annual review. This is a lot better then last years 30+ page fax I had to send them. There is still room for improvements, they should really provide clients with a portal for uploading this information and tracking the status of invoices and renewals. Even the state of CA DGS lets us go online to upload our Small business certificate documents for renewal. Travelers has made some progress but still has a way to go. Finally the most embarrassing example is the media industries adoption of technology, Specialty Publishing.  At the end of last year I ordered a copy of their IT playbook. To do this I went to their website and filled out the order form, several days later I received an email with a form that I needed to complete and submit my credit card information with. Earth to Constructech you should have collected this information when I filled out my order request online. You took what should have been a 2 minute process to order into a 20+ minute process of emails, faxes, and filling out multiple forms. Next the USPS damages the magazine so bad that it was returned so they have to mail me a new one. Had Constructech been operating in 2010 instead of 1995 I should have downloaded this after placing my order online. The worst part is the magazine is supposed to be experts on technology in this industry. Their latest example of being clueless is their articles about blogging, yet they themselves do not have a blog.\nIn the mean time construction companies, facility owners, and engineering firms are disposing of their paper processes at a record rate and moving to web based project management applications, BIM modeling, blogs, and virtual offices faster then these three companies can refill the paper tray on their fax machine. ','Construction Industry is not last in technology as many would believe',0,'','inherit','open','open','','128-revision-2','','','2010-03-02 15:23:15','2010-03-02 20:23:15','',128,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=130',0,'revision','',0),(132,1,'2010-03-13 19:34:37','2010-03-14 00:34:37','This is a follow up to my previous post on industries being behind the construction industry in technology adoption. I ran across an even better example then the insurance companies I mentioned in my last post that is a little closer to home.  Specialty Publishing who writes Constructech magazine appears to be more concerned with talking about technology then actually using it. This is a magazine dedicated to technology in the construction industry yet they appear to be about 10 years behind.  At the end of last year I ordered a copy of their IT playbook. To do this I went to their website and filled out the order form, several days later I received an email with a form that I needed to complete with my credit card information and return to them via fax. Online payment would have allowed this process to be completed in a couple minutes. Online payments are so common that the small pizza place next to our office accepts them. Constructech took what should have been a 2 minute process to order into a 20+ minute process of emails, faxes, and filling out multiple forms. Next the Postal Service damages the magazine so bad that it was returned, so they have to mail me a new one. Had Constructech been operating in 2010 instead of 1995 I should have downloaded the It playbook after placing my order online. The worst part is this magazine is supposed to be experts on technology in the construction industry but they appear to be behind many of their subscribers in adopting modern tools.. Their latest example of being clueless is their articles about blogging, yet they themselves do not have a blog. How can a writer write about blogging when they do not have one?\r\n\r\nIn the mean time construction companies are disposing of their paper processes at a record rate and moving to web based project management applications, BIM modeling, blogs, and virtual offices. Many of our clients receive our invoices electronically and pay us through direct deposit. I think the editors at Constructech should put down their pen and paper and visit a modern day construction site. It could help them avoid the terrible fate that so many media companies have gone through.\r\nEric Law\r\nEADOC Founder','Construction Industry is not last in technology just look at Constructech',0,'','publish','open','open','','construction-industry-is-not-last-in-technology-just-look-at-constructech','','','2010-03-13 19:34:37','2010-03-14 00:34:37','',0,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=132',0,'post','',0),(133,1,'2010-03-09 11:29:09','2010-03-09 16:29:09','This is a follow up to my previous post on industries being behind the construction industry in technology adoption. I ran across and even better example then the insurance companies I mentioned in my last post that is a little closer to home.  Specialty Publishing who writes Constructech magazine appears to be more concerned with Y2K then with keeping ahead on technology. This is a magazine dedicated to technology in the construction industry yet they appear to be about 10 years behind.  At the end of last year I ordered a copy of their IT playbook. To do this I went to their website and filled out the order form, several days later I received an email with a form that I needed to complete and submit my credit card information with via fax. Online payment would have allowed this process to be completed in a couple minutes. Online payments are so common that the small pizza place next our office accepts them. You took what should have been a 2 minute process to order into a 20+ minute process of emails, faxes, and filling out multiple forms. Next the Postal Service damages the magazine so bad that it was returned, so they have to mail me a new one. Had Constructech been operating in 2010 instead of 1995 I should have downloaded this after placing my order online. The worst part is the magazine is supposed to be experts on technology in this industry. Their latest example of being clueless is their articles about blogging, yet they themselves do not have a blog.\n\nIn the mean time construction companies are disposing of their paper processes at a record rate and moving to web based project management applications, BIM modeling, blogs, and virtual offices. Many of our clients receive our invoices electronically and pay us through direct deposit. I think the editors at Constructech should put down there pen and paper and visit a modern day construction site.','Construction Industry is not last in technology just look at Constructech',0,'','inherit','open','open','','132-revision','','','2010-03-09 11:29:09','2010-03-09 16:29:09','',132,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=133',0,'revision','',0),(134,1,'2010-03-09 11:29:25','2010-03-09 16:29:25','This is a follow up to my previous post on industries being behind the construction industry in technology adoption. I ran across and even better example then the insurance companies I mentioned in my last post that is a little closer to home.  Specialty Publishing who writes Constructech magazine appears to be more concerned with Y2K then with keeping ahead on technology. This is a magazine dedicated to technology in the construction industry yet they appear to be about 10 years behind.  At the end of last year I ordered a copy of their IT playbook. To do this I went to their website and filled out the order form, several days later I received an email with a form that I needed to complete and submit my credit card information with via fax. Online payment would have allowed this process to be completed in a couple minutes. Online payments are so common that the small pizza place next our office accepts them. You took what should have been a 2 minute process to order into a 20+ minute process of emails, faxes, and filling out multiple forms. Next the Postal Service damages the magazine so bad that it was returned, so they have to mail me a new one. Had Constructech been operating in 2010 instead of 1995 I should have downloaded this after placing my order online. The worst part is the magazine is supposed to be experts on technology in this industry. Their latest example of being clueless is their articles about blogging, yet they themselves do not have a blog.\r\n\r\nIn the mean time construction companies are disposing of their paper processes at a record rate and moving to web based project management applications, BIM modeling, blogs, and virtual offices. Many of our clients receive our invoices electronically and pay us through direct deposit. I think the editors at Constructech should put down their pen and paper and visit a modern day construction site.\r\nEric Law\r\nEADOC Founder','Construction Industry is not last in technology just look at Constructech',0,'','inherit','open','open','','132-revision-2','','','2010-03-09 11:29:25','2010-03-09 16:29:25','',132,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=134',0,'revision','',0),(135,1,'2010-03-09 11:29:31','2010-03-09 16:29:31','This is a follow up to my previous post on industries being behind the construction industry in technology adoption. I ran across and even better example then the insurance companies I mentioned in my last post that is a little closer to home.  Specialty Publishing who writes Constructech magazine appears to be more concerned with Y2K then with keeping ahead on technology. This is a magazine dedicated to technology in the construction industry yet they appear to be about 10 years behind.  At the end of last year I ordered a copy of their IT playbook. To do this I went to their website and filled out the order form, several days later I received an email with a form that I needed to complete and submit my credit card information with via fax. Online payment would have allowed this process to be completed in a couple minutes. Online payments are so common that the small pizza place next our office accepts them. You took what should have been a 2 minute process to order into a 20+ minute process of emails, faxes, and filling out multiple forms. Next the Postal Service damages the magazine so bad that it was returned, so they have to mail me a new one. Had Constructech been operating in 2010 instead of 1995 I should have downloaded this after placing my order online. The worst part is the magazine is supposed to be experts on technology in this industry. Their latest example of being clueless is their articles about blogging, yet they themselves do not have a blog.\r\n\r\nIn the mean time construction companies are disposing of their paper processes at a record rate and moving to web based project management applications, BIM modeling, blogs, and virtual offices. Many of our clients receive our invoices electronically and pay us through direct deposit. I think the editors at Constructech should put down their pen and paper and visit a modern day construction site.\r\nEric Law\r\nEADOC Founder','Construction Industry is not last in technology just look at Constructech',0,'','inherit','open','open','','132-revision-3','','','2010-03-09 11:29:31','2010-03-09 16:29:31','',132,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=135',0,'revision','',0),(136,1,'2010-03-13 19:34:17','2010-03-14 00:34:17','This is a follow up to my previous post on industries being behind the construction industry in technology adoption. I ran across an even better example then the insurance companies I mentioned in my last post that is a little closer to home.  Specialty Publishing who writes Constructech magazine appears to be more concerned with talking about technology then actually using it. This is a magazine dedicated to technology in the construction industry yet they appear to be about 10 years behind.  At the end of last year I ordered a copy of their IT playbook. To do this I went to their website and filled out the order form, several days later I received an email with a form that I needed to complete with my credit card information and return to them via fax. Online payment would have allowed this process to be completed in a couple minutes. Online payments are so common that the small pizza place next to our office accepts them. Constructech took what should have been a 2 minute process to order into a 20+ minute process of emails, faxes, and filling out multiple forms. Next the Postal Service damages the magazine so bad that it was returned, so they have to mail me a new one. Had Constructech been operating in 2010 instead of 1995 I should have downloaded the It playbook after placing my order online. The worst part is this magazine is supposed to be experts on technology in the construction industry but they appear to be behind many of their subscribers in adopting modern tools.. Their latest example of being clueless is their articles about blogging, yet they themselves do not have a blog. How can a writer write about blogging when they do not have one?\n\nIn the mean time construction companies are disposing of their paper processes at a record rate and moving to web based project management applications, BIM modeling, blogs, and virtual offices. Many of our clients receive our invoices electronically and pay us through direct deposit. I think the editors at Constructech should put down their pen and paper and visit a modern day construction site. It could help them avoid the fate of so many \nEric Law\nEADOC Founder','Construction Industry is not last in technology just look at Constructech',0,'','inherit','open','open','','132-revision-4','','','2010-03-13 19:34:17','2010-03-14 00:34:17','',132,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=136',0,'revision','',0),(137,1,'2010-03-13 19:50:12','2010-03-14 00:50:12','Last month EADOC celebrated 4 years of providing the EADOC web based project management application. This is a tremendous milestone to pass considering today\'s  tough economic environment and the shrinking construction industry. Not only are we surviving this economy but we are also growing rapidly. Our revenue grew 45% in 2009 compared to 2008 while the construction industry shrank 27%.  We added 38 new clients last year representing over $1 Billion in construction projects. With these new clients EADOC\'s user base is over 3500 now. Much of this growth is attributed to clients using EADOC to reduce costs on their capital projects allowing them to do more with their shrinking budgets. I would like to thank all of our wonderful clients along with the EADOC staff at our offices in Oakland for this success.  We are looking forward to another great year even as the Construction industry looks to be facing more challenges ahead. \r\nThank You\r\nEric Law','EADOC celebrates 4 years',0,'','publish','open','open','','eadoc-celebrates-4-years','','','2010-03-14 18:29:49','2010-03-14 23:29:49','',0,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=137',0,'post','',0),(138,1,'2010-03-13 19:49:46','2010-03-14 00:49:46','Last month EADOC celebrated 4 years of providing the EADOC web based project management application. This is a tremendous milestone to pass considering 50% of businesses fail within four years of starting. Add in the the bad economy and shrinking construction industry and you can understand why we have a lot to celebrate. Not only are we surviving this economy but we are also growing rapidly. Our revenue grew 45% in 2009 compared to 2008 while the construction industry shrank 27%.  We added 38 new clients last year representing over $1 Billion in construction projects. With these new clients EADOC\'s user base is over 3500 now. Much of this growth is attributed to clients using EADOC to reduce costs on their capital projects. I would like to thank all of our wonderful clients along with the EADOC staff at our offices in Oakland for this success.  We are looking forward to another great year even as the Construction industry looks to be facing more challenges ahead. \nThank You\nEric Law','EADOC celebrates 4 years',0,'','inherit','open','open','','137-revision','','','2010-03-13 19:49:46','2010-03-14 00:49:46','',137,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=138',0,'revision','',0),(142,1,'2010-05-11 11:27:30','0000-00-00 00:00:00','Review the submittal section that requires contractors turn in 7-10 copies of each submittal.','Review your specs periodically for areas to reduce costs',0,'','draft','open','open','','','','','2010-05-11 11:27:30','2010-05-11 16:27:30','',0,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=142',0,'post','',0),(139,1,'2010-03-14 18:29:46','2010-03-14 23:29:46','Last month EADOC celebrated 4 years of providing the EADOC web based project management application. This is a tremendous milestone to pass considering today\'s  tough economic environment and the shrinking construction industry. Not only are we surviving this economy but we are also growing rapidly. Our revenue grew 45% in 2009 compared to 2008 while the construction industry shrank 27%.  We added 38 new clients last year representing over $1 Billion in construction projects. With these new clients EADOC\'s user base is over 3500 now. Much of this growth is attributed to clients using EADOC to reduce costs on their capital projects allowing them to do more with their shrinking budgets. I would like to thank all of our wonderful clients along with the EADOC staff at our offices in Oakland for this success.  We are looking forward to another great year even as the Construction industry looks to be facing more challenges ahead. \nThank You\nEric Law','EADOC celebrates 4 years',0,'','inherit','open','open','','137-autosave','','','2010-03-14 18:29:46','2010-03-14 23:29:46','',137,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=139',0,'revision','',0),(141,1,'2010-03-14 18:28:42','2010-03-14 23:28:42','Last month EADOC celebrated 4 years of providing the EADOC web based project management application. This is a tremendous milestone to pass considering today\'s  tough economic environment and shrinking construction industry and you can understand why we have a lot to celebrate. Not only are we surviving this economy but we are also growing rapidly. Our revenue grew 45% in 2009 compared to 2008 while the construction industry shrank 27%.  We added 38 new clients last year representing over $1 Billion in construction projects. With these new clients EADOC\'s user base is over 3500 now. Much of this growth is attributed to clients using EADOC to reduce costs on their capital projects allowing them to do more with their shrinking budgets. I would like to thank all of our wonderful clients along with the EADOC staff at our offices in Oakland for this success.  We are looking forward to another great year even as the Construction industry looks to be facing more challenges ahead. \r\nThank You\r\nEric Law','EADOC celebrates 4 years',0,'','inherit','open','open','','137-revision-3','','','2010-03-14 18:28:42','2010-03-14 23:28:42','',137,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=141',0,'revision','',0),(140,1,'2010-03-13 19:50:12','2010-03-14 00:50:12','Last month EADOC celebrated 4 years of providing the EADOC web based project management application. This is a tremendous milestone to pass considering 50% of businesses fail within four years of starting. Add in the the bad economy and shrinking construction industry and you can understand why we have a lot to celebrate. Not only are we surviving this economy but we are also growing rapidly. Our revenue grew 45% in 2009 compared to 2008 while the construction industry shrank 27%.  We added 38 new clients last year representing over $1 Billion in construction projects. With these new clients EADOC\'s user base is over 3500 now. Much of this growth is attributed to clients using EADOC to reduce costs on their capital projects allowing them to do more with their shrinking budgets. I would like to thank all of our wonderful clients along with the EADOC staff at our offices in Oakland for this success.  We are looking forward to another great year even as the Construction industry looks to be facing more challenges ahead. \r\nThank You\r\nEric Law','EADOC celebrates 4 years',0,'','inherit','open','open','','137-revision-2','','','2010-03-13 19:50:12','2010-03-14 00:50:12','',137,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=140',0,'revision','',0),(143,1,'2009-12-16 13:42:16','2009-12-16 18:42:16','With the constant negative news about the economy and over dramatization of the world ending by the media it is nice to share some good news at the end of this year with you. This year EADOC has added 40 new contracts and 20 new clients to the EADOC application in 2009. EADOC clients are reporting tremendous costs savings in the form of reduced staff time on projects, reduced printing and shipping costs and tremendous reductions in document turnaround time. Not only are EADOC clients saving money but they are also helping the environment at the same time making the EADOC a must have tool in these difficult economic times. Another positive note is we have seen a tremendous pickup in the number of projects requests EADOC features be enabled for tracking ARRA funding sources and the buy America certifications. With the Feb deadline fast approaching for many of these projects to start we, are looking forward to a very busy start to the new year for ourselves and our clients.\r\nFrom the EADOC team we wish everyone a Happy and Safe Holiday season. ','Finally some good news for 2009',0,'','inherit','open','open','','75-revision-3','','','2009-12-16 13:42:16','2009-12-16 18:42:16','',75,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=143',0,'revision','',0),(144,1,'2010-03-15 15:16:00','2010-03-15 20:16:00','With the constant negative news about the economy and over dramatization of the world ending by the media it is nice to share some good news at the end of this year with you. This year EADOC has added 40 new contracts and 38 new clients to the EADOC application in 2009. EADOC clients are reporting tremendous costs savings in the form of reduced staff time on projects, reduced printing and shipping costs and tremendous reductions in document turnaround time. Not only are EADOC clients saving money but they are also helping the environment at the same time making the EADOC a must have tool in these difficult economic times. Another positive note is we have seen a tremendous pickup in the number of projects requests EADOC features be enabled for tracking ARRA funding sources and the buy America certifications. With the Feb deadline fast approaching for many of these projects to start we, are looking forward to a very busy start to the new year for ourselves and our clients.\r\nFrom the EADOC team we wish everyone a Happy and Safe Holiday season. ','Finally some good news for 2009',0,'','inherit','open','open','','75-revision-4','','','2010-03-15 15:16:00','2010-03-15 20:16:00','',75,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=144',0,'revision','',0),(145,1,'2010-03-15 15:16:41','2010-03-15 20:16:41','With the constant negative news about the economy and over dramatization of the world ending by the media it is nice to share some good news at the end of this year with you. This year EADOC has added 40 new contracts and 38 new clients to the EADOC application in 2009. EADOC clients are reporting tremendous costs savings in the form of reduced staff time on projects, reduced printing and shipping costs and tremendous reductions in document turnaround time. Not only are EADOC clients saving money but they are also helping the environment at the same time making the EADOC a must have tool in these difficult economic times. Another positive note is we have seen a tremendous pickup in the number of projects requests EADOC features be enabled for tracking ARRA funding sources and the buy America certifications. With the Feb deadline fast approaching for many of these projects to start we, are looking forward to a very busy start to the new year for ourselves and our clients.\r\nFrom the EADOC team we wish everyone a Happy and Safe Holiday season. ','Finally some good news for 2009',0,'','inherit','open','open','','75-revision-5','','','2010-03-15 15:16:41','2010-03-15 20:16:41','',75,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=145',0,'revision','',0),(146,1,'2010-03-15 15:14:12','2010-03-15 20:14:12','Review the submittal section that requires clients turn in X copies of each submittal.','Review your specs for money wasting sections',0,'','inherit','open','open','','142-revision','','','2010-03-15 15:14:12','2010-03-15 20:14:12','',142,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=146',0,'revision','',0),(147,1,'2010-03-15 16:12:33','0000-00-00 00:00:00','','Software budget should be driven by cost savings ',0,'','draft','open','open','','','','','2010-03-15 16:12:33','0000-00-00 00:00:00','',0,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=147',0,'post','',0),(148,1,'2009-11-19 14:30:56','2009-11-19 19:30:56','Even as the economy slows more agencies, engineers and contractors are looking to SAAS solutions to reduce costs on their projects. Check out this post from Don Fornes at <a href=\"http://www.softwareadvice.com\">Software Advice</a> on the <a href=\"http://www.softwareadvice.com/articles/construction/construction-software-state-of-the-industry-report-1111209/\">State of the Industry</a>\r\nThis trend in clients going for SAAS solutions like our own EADOC application has been a major driver this year in bringing on new clients. ','Construction Software State of the Industry Report',0,'','inherit','open','open','','64-revision-5','','','2009-11-19 14:30:56','2009-11-19 19:30:56','',64,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=148',0,'revision','',0),(149,1,'2010-04-05 16:31:50','2010-04-05 21:31:50','A couple weeks ago I was talking with one of our construction management clients about the cost savings and benefits of using EADOC\'s web based construction management application. The CM asked if we had any advice on how they could present the cost savings of using an electronic construction project management application to their client. I suggested the CM explain to the client how all the cost of inefficient processes like paper submittals are coming from the client\'s pocket with the following explanation.\r\n	<li>Contractor prepares a bid price based on labor, materials, sub costs and overhead for a project. Typically the overhead rate includes office admin staff, printing, filing, and other costs associated with meeting the clients requirements. Contractors adjust this rate depending on the client and their requirements. Therefore clients requiring contractors submit paper documentation will see higher bids then clients allowing for electronic submission.</li>\r\n	<li>Construction Manager calculates costs of work, adds markup and submits as fees to the client. Every CM contract we have seen has an overhead rate or line item for office costs. This cost is based on the amount of administrative work that has to be done for the client. The more paper the client requires the higher the cost to the client.</li>\r\n	<li>Designer estimates cost of construction services, typically as number of hours per submittal review. If the designer has to spend one hour just logging, copying and shipping the submittals this cost is included in their price to the client.</li>\r\nThis process is also conducted by sub contractors and sub consultants. All the costs of meeting the owners requirements are calculated and passed back to the owner in the form of bids and fees. The owner is not only paying the actual costs but also the profits that are typically added to these fees. As an owner you should really review your specs to see if the 6-10 copies of paper documents you require is really worth the impact this will have on your budget.','Facility Owners Bear the Costs of Inefficient Construction Management ',0,'','publish','open','open','','facility-owners-bear-the-costs-of-inefficient-construction-management','','','2010-04-05 16:31:50','2010-04-05 21:31:50','',0,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=149',0,'post','',0),(150,1,'2010-03-15 15:19:22','2010-03-15 20:19:22','Review the submittal section that requires clients turn in X copies of each submittal.','Look to your specs for money wasting sections that could help your budget',0,'','inherit','open','open','','142-revision-2','','','2010-03-15 15:19:22','2010-03-15 20:19:22','',142,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=150',0,'revision','',0),(151,1,'2010-03-31 11:56:42','2010-03-31 16:56:42','A couple weeks ago I was talking with one of our construction management clients about the cost savings and benefits of using EADOC to facility owners. This cm said they have a very difficult time convincing owners\nOwner says consultants and contractors pay for those costs. \nContractor','Facility owners bear the costs of inefficient construction management processes',0,'','inherit','open','open','','149-revision','','','2010-03-31 11:56:42','2010-03-31 16:56:42','',149,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=151',0,'revision','',0),(152,1,'2010-03-31 13:28:20','2010-03-31 18:28:20','A couple weeks ago I was talking with one of our construction management clients about the cost savings and benefits of using EADOC to facility owners. This cm said they have a very difficult time convincing owners\nOwner says consultants and contractors pay for those costs. \nContractor includes costs of inefficiency, adds markup and submits to the owner as a bid\nConstruction Manager calculates costs of inefficiency, adds markup and submits as fees\nDesigner calculates cost of inefficiency, adds markup and submits as fees.\nThis process is also conducted by sub contractors and sub consultants. All the costs of meeting the owners requirements are calculated and passed back to the owner.\nThe owner pays for everything on a project.\nIf an owner requires 8 paper copies of submittals then they will pay for 8 paper copies of submittals to be generated and passed along the team for review. If the owner tells the contractor to submit electronic copies of submittals the owner is saving themselves mon','Facility owners bear the costs of inefficient construction management processes',0,'','inherit','open','open','','149-revision-2','','','2010-03-31 13:28:20','2010-03-31 18:28:20','',149,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=152',0,'revision','',0),(158,1,'2010-03-31 15:06:54','2010-03-31 20:06:54','A couple weeks ago I was talking with one of our construction management clients about the cost savings and benefits of using EADOC\'s web based construction management application. The CM asked if we had any advice on how they could present the cost savings of using an electronic construction project management application to their client.  I suggested the CM explain to the client how all the cost of inefficient processes like paper submittals are coming from the client\'s pocket with the following explanation.','Facility Owners Bear the Costs of Inefficient Construction Management Processes',0,'','inherit','open','open','','149-revision-8','','','2010-03-31 15:06:54','2010-03-31 20:06:54','',149,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=158',0,'revision','',0),(155,1,'2010-03-31 14:59:35','2010-03-31 19:59:35','A couple weeks ago I was talking with one of our construction management clients about the cost savings and benefits of using EADOC\'s web based construction management application. The CM asked if we had any advice on how they could present the cost savings of using an electronic construction project management application to their client.  I suggested the CM explain to the client how all the cost of inefficient processes like paper submittals are coming from the client\'s pocket with the following explanation.\r\n	<li>Contractor prepare a bid price based on labor, materials, sub costs and overhead for a project. Typically the overhead rate includes office admin staff, printing, filling, and other costs associated with meeting the clients requirements. Contractors adjust this rate depending on the client and their requirements. Therefore clients requiring contractors submit paper documentation will see higher bids then clients allowing for electronic submission. </li>\r\n\r\n	<li>Construction Manager calculates costs of work, adds markup and submits as fees to the client. Every CM contract we have seen has an overhead rate or line item for office costs. This cost is based on the amount of administrative work that has to be done for the client. The more paper the client requires the higher the cost to the client.</li>\r\n\r\n	<li>Designer estimates cost of construction services, typically as number of hours per submittal review. If the designer has to spend one hour just logging, copying and shipping the submittals this cost is included in their price to the client.</li>\r\n\r\nThis process is also conducted by sub contractors and sub consultants. All the costs of meeting the owners requirements are calculated and passed back to the owner in the form of bids and fees. The owner is not only paying the actual costs but also the profits that are typically added to these fees. As an owner you should really review your specs to see if the 6-10 copies of paper documents you require is really worth the impact this will have on your budget.\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n','Facility owners bear the costs of inefficient construction management ',0,'','inherit','open','open','','149-revision-5','','','2010-03-31 14:59:35','2010-03-31 19:59:35','',149,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=155',0,'revision','',0),(153,1,'2010-03-31 14:56:45','2010-03-31 19:56:45','A couple weeks ago I was talking with one of our construction management clients about the cost savings and benefits of using EADOC\'s web based construction management application to facility owners. The CM said they are having a difficult time convincing one of their clients to use the EADOC application. The client was arguing that the costs for generating paper submittals was born by the contractors and design consultants they hired. I suggested the CM explain to the client how all the cost of inefficient processes like paper submittals are coming from the client\'s pocket with the following explanation.\n	<li>Contractor prepare a bid price based on labor, materials, sub costs and overhead for a project. Typically the overhead rate includes office admin staff, printing, filling, and other costs associated with meeting the clients requirements. Contractors adjust this rate depending on the client and their requirements. Therefore clients requiring contractors submit paper documentation will see higher bids then clients allowing for electronic submission. </li>\n\n	<li>Construction Manager calculates costs of work, adds markup and submits as fees to the client. Every CM contract we have seen has an overhead rate or line item for office costs. This cost is based on the amount of administrative work that has to be done for the client. The more paper the client requires the higher the cost to the client.</li>\n\n	<li>Designer estimates cost of construction services, typically as number of hours per submittal review. If the designer has to spend one hour just logging, copying and shipping the submittals this cost is included in their price to the client.</li>\n\nThis process is also conducted by sub contractors and sub consultants. All the costs of meeting the owners requirements are calculated and passed back to the owner in the form of bids and fees. The owner is not only paying the actual costs but also the profits that are typically added to these fees. As an owner you should really review your specs to see if the 6-10 copies of paper documents you require is really worth the impact this will have on your budget.\n\n\n\n','Facility owners bear the costs of inefficient construction management ',0,'','inherit','open','open','','149-revision-3','','','2010-03-31 14:56:45','2010-03-31 19:56:45','',149,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=153',0,'revision','',0),(154,1,'2010-03-31 14:57:45','2010-03-31 19:57:45','A couple weeks ago I was talking with one of our construction management clients about the cost savings and benefits of using EADOC\'s web based construction management application to facility owners. The CM asked if we had any advice. The client was arguing that the costs for generating paper submittals was born by the contractors and design consultants they hired. I suggested the CM explain to the client how all the cost of inefficient processes like paper submittals are coming from the client\'s pocket with the following explanation.\n	<li>Contractor prepare a bid price based on labor, materials, sub costs and overhead for a project. Typically the overhead rate includes office admin staff, printing, filling, and other costs associated with meeting the clients requirements. Contractors adjust this rate depending on the client and their requirements. Therefore clients requiring contractors submit paper documentation will see higher bids then clients allowing for electronic submission. </li>\n\n	<li>Construction Manager calculates costs of work, adds markup and submits as fees to the client. Every CM contract we have seen has an overhead rate or line item for office costs. This cost is based on the amount of administrative work that has to be done for the client. The more paper the client requires the higher the cost to the client.</li>\n\n	<li>Designer estimates cost of construction services, typically as number of hours per submittal review. If the designer has to spend one hour just logging, copying and shipping the submittals this cost is included in their price to the client.</li>\n\nThis process is also conducted by sub contractors and sub consultants. All the costs of meeting the owners requirements are calculated and passed back to the owner in the form of bids and fees. The owner is not only paying the actual costs but also the profits that are typically added to these fees. As an owner you should really review your specs to see if the 6-10 copies of paper documents you require is really worth the impact this will have on your budget.\n\n\n\n','Facility owners bear the costs of inefficient construction management ',0,'','inherit','open','open','','149-revision-4','','','2010-03-31 14:57:45','2010-03-31 19:57:45','',149,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=154',0,'revision','',0),(156,1,'2010-03-31 15:02:39','2010-03-31 20:02:39','A couple weeks ago I was talking with one of our construction management clients about the cost savings and benefits of using EADOC\'s web based construction management application. The CM asked if we had any advice on how they could present the cost savings of using an electronic construction project management application to their client.  I suggested the CM explain to the client how all the cost of inefficient processes like paper submittals are coming from the client\'s pocket with the following explanation.\r\n	<ol>\r\n<li>Contractor prepare a bid price based on labor, materials, sub costs and overhead for a project. Typically the overhead rate includes office admin staff, printing, filling, and other costs associated with meeting the clients requirements. Contractors adjust this rate depending on the client and their requirements. Therefore clients requiring contractors submit paper documentation will see higher bids then clients allowing for electronic submission. </li>\r\n\r\n	<li>Construction Manager calculates costs of work, adds markup and submits as fees to the client. Every CM contract we have seen has an overhead rate or line item for office costs. This cost is based on the amount of administrative work that has to be done for the client. The more paper the client requires the higher the cost to the client.</li>\r\n\r\n	<li>Designer estimates cost of construction services, typically as number of hours per submittal review. If the designer has to spend one hour just logging, copying and shipping the submittals this cost is included in their price to the client.</li>\r\n</ol>\r\n\r\n\r\nThis process is also conducted by sub contractors and sub consultants. All the costs of meeting the owners requirements are calculated and passed back to the owner in the form of bids and fees. The owner is not only paying the actual costs but also the profits that are typically added to these fees. As an owner you should really review your specs to see if the 6-10 copies of paper documents you require is really worth the impact this will have on your budget.\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n','Facility owners bear the costs of inefficient construction management ',0,'','inherit','open','open','','149-revision-6','','','2010-03-31 15:02:39','2010-03-31 20:02:39','',149,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=156',0,'revision','',0),(157,1,'2010-03-31 15:03:14','2010-03-31 20:03:14','A couple weeks ago I was talking with one of our construction management clients about the cost savings and benefits of using EADOC\'s web based construction management application. The CM asked if we had any advice on how they could present the cost savings of using an electronic construction project management application to their client.  I suggested the CM explain to the client how all the cost of inefficient processes like paper submittals are coming from the client\'s pocket with the following explanation.\r\n	<ul>\r\n<li>Contractor prepare a bid price based on labor, materials, sub costs and overhead for a project. Typically the overhead rate includes office admin staff, printing, filling, and other costs associated with meeting the clients requirements. Contractors adjust this rate depending on the client and their requirements. Therefore clients requiring contractors submit paper documentation will see higher bids then clients allowing for electronic submission. </li>\r\n\r\n	<li>Construction Manager calculates costs of work, adds markup and submits as fees to the client. Every CM contract we have seen has an overhead rate or line item for office costs. This cost is based on the amount of administrative work that has to be done for the client. The more paper the client requires the higher the cost to the client.</li>\r\n\r\n	<li>Designer estimates cost of construction services, typically as number of hours per submittal review. If the designer has to spend one hour just logging, copying and shipping the submittals this cost is included in their price to the client.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\n\r\nThis process is also conducted by sub contractors and sub consultants. All the costs of meeting the owners requirements are calculated and passed back to the owner in the form of bids and fees. The owner is not only paying the actual costs but also the profits that are typically added to these fees. As an owner you should really review your specs to see if the 6-10 copies of paper documents you require is really worth the impact this will have on your budget.\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n','Facility owners bear the costs of inefficient construction management ',0,'','inherit','open','open','','149-revision-7','','','2010-03-31 15:03:14','2010-03-31 20:03:14','',149,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=157',0,'revision','',0),(159,1,'2010-03-31 15:08:20','2010-03-31 20:08:20','A couple weeks ago I was talking with one of our construction management clients about the cost savings and benefits of using EADOC\'s web based construction management application. The CM asked if we had any advice on how they could present the cost savings of using an electronic construction project management application to their client. I suggested the CM explain to the client how all the cost of inefficient processes like paper submittals are coming from the client\'s pocket with the following explanation.\r\n\r\nContractor prepares a bid price based on labor, materials, sub costs and overhead for a project. Typically the overhead rate includes office admin staff, printing, filling, and other costs associated with meeting the clients requirements. Contractors adjust this rate depending on the client and their requirements. Therefore clients requiring contractors submit paper documentation will see higher bids then clients allowing for electronic submission.\r\n\r\nConstruction Manager calculates costs of work, adds markup and submits as fees to the client. Every CM contract we have seen has an overhead rate or line item for office costs. This cost is based on the amount of administrative work that has to be done for the client. The more paper the client requires the higher the cost to the client.\r\n\r\nDesigner estimates cost of construction services, typically as number of hours per submittal review. If the designer has to spend one hour just logging, copying and shipping the submittals this cost is included in their price to the client.\r\n\r\nThis process is also conducted by sub contractors and sub consultants. All the costs of meeting the owners requirements are calculated and passed back to the owner in the form of bids and fees. The owner is not only paying the actual costs but also the profits that are typically added to these fees. As an owner you should really review your specs to see if the 6-10 copies of paper documents you require is really worth the impact this will have on your budget.\r\n','Facility Owners Bear the Costs of Inefficient Construction Management Processes',0,'','inherit','open','open','','149-revision-9','','','2010-03-31 15:08:20','2010-03-31 20:08:20','',149,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=159',0,'revision','',0),(160,1,'2010-03-31 15:09:23','2010-03-31 20:09:23','A couple weeks ago I was talking with one of our construction management clients about the cost savings and benefits of using EADOC\'s web based construction management application. The CM asked if we had any advice on how they could present the cost savings of using an electronic construction project management application to their client. I suggested the CM explain to the client how all the cost of inefficient processes like paper submittals are coming from the client\'s pocket with the following explanation.\r\n\r\n	<li>Contractor prepares a bid price based on labor, materials, sub costs and overhead for a project. Typically the overhead rate includes office admin staff, printing, filing, and other costs associated with meeting the clients requirements. Contractors adjust this rate depending on the client and their requirements. Therefore clients requiring contractors submit paper documentation will see higher bids then clients allowing for electronic submission.</li>\r\n\r\n	<li>Construction Manager calculates costs of work, adds markup and submits as fees to the client. Every CM contract we have seen has an overhead rate or line item for office costs. This cost is based on the amount of administrative work that has to be done for the client. The more paper the client requires the higher the cost to the client.</li>\r\n\r\n	<li>Designer estimates cost of construction services, typically as number of hours per submittal review. If the designer has to spend one hour just logging, copying and shipping the submittals this cost is included in their price to the client.</li>\r\n\r\nThis process is also conducted by sub contractors and sub consultants. All the costs of meeting the owners requirements are calculated and passed back to the owner in the form of bids and fees. The owner is not only paying the actual costs but also the profits that are typically added to these fees. As an owner you should really review your specs to see if the 6-10 copies of paper documents you require is really worth the impact this will have on your budget.\r\n','Facility Owners Bear the Costs of Inefficient Construction Management Processes',0,'','inherit','open','open','','149-revision-10','','','2010-03-31 15:09:23','2010-03-31 20:09:23','',149,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=160',0,'revision','',0),(161,1,'2010-03-31 15:15:03','2010-03-31 20:15:03','A couple weeks ago I was talking with one of our construction management clients about the cost savings and benefits of using EADOC\'s web based construction management application. The CM asked if we had any advice on how they could present the cost savings of using an electronic construction project management application to their client. I suggested the CM explain to the client how all the cost of inefficient processes like paper submittals are coming from the client\'s pocket with the following explanation.\n	<li>Contractor prepares a bid price based on labor, materials, sub costs and overhead for a project. Typically the overhead rate includes office admin staff, printing, filing, and other costs associated with meeting the clients requirements. Contractors adjust this rate depending on the client and their requirements. Therefore clients requiring contractors submit paper documentation will see higher bids then clients allowing for electronic submission.</li>\n	<li>Construction Manager calculates costs of work, adds markup and submits as fees to the client. Every CM contract we have seen has an overhead rate or line item for office costs. This cost is based on the amount of administrative work that has to be done for the client. The more paper the client requires the higher the cost to the client.</li>\n	<li>Designer estimates cost of construction services, typically as number of hours per submittal review. If the designer has to spend one hour just logging, copying and shipping the submittals this cost is included in their price to the client.</li>\nThis process is also conducted by sub contractors and sub consultants. All the costs of meeting the owners requirements are calculated and passed back to the owner in the form of bids and fees. The owner is not only paying the actual costs but also the profits that are typically added to these fees. As an owner you should really review your specs to see if the 6-10 copies of paper documents you require is really worth the impact this will have on your budget.','Facility Owners Bear the Costs of Inefficient Construction Management ',0,'','inherit','open','open','','149-revision-11','','','2010-03-31 15:15:03','2010-03-31 20:15:03','',149,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=161',0,'revision','',0),(162,1,'2010-04-05 16:30:50','2010-04-05 21:30:50','A couple weeks ago I was talking with one of our construction management clients about the cost savings and benefits of using EADOC\'s web based construction management application. The CM asked if we had any advice on how they could present the cost savings of using an electronic construction project management application to their client. I suggested the CM explain to the client how all the cost of inefficient processes like paper submittals are coming from the client\'s pocket with the following explanation.\r\n	<li>Contractor prepares a bid price based on labor, materials, sub costs and overhead for a project. Typically the overhead rate includes office admin staff, printing, filing, and other costs associated with meeting the clients requirements. Contractors adjust this rate depending on the client and their requirements. Therefore clients requiring contractors submit paper documentation will see higher bids then clients allowing for electronic submission.</li>\r\n	<li>Construction Manager calculates costs of work, adds markup and submits as fees to the client. Every CM contract we have seen has an overhead rate or line item for office costs. This cost is based on the amount of administrative work that has to be done for the client. The more paper the client requires the higher the cost to the client.</li>\r\n	<li>Designer estimates cost of construction services, typically as number of hours per submittal review. If the designer has to spend one hour just logging, copying and shipping the submittals this cost is included in their price to the client.</li>\r\nThis process is also conducted by sub contractors and sub consultants. All the costs of meeting the owners requirements are calculated and passed back to the owner in the form of bids and fees. The owner is not only paying the actual costs but also the profits that are typically added to these fees. As an owner you should really review your specs to see if the 6-10 copies of paper documents you require is really worth the impact this will have on your budget.','Facility Owners Bear the Costs of Inefficient Construction Management ',0,'','inherit','open','open','','149-revision-12','','','2010-04-05 16:30:50','2010-04-05 21:30:50','',149,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=162',0,'revision','',0),(163,1,'2010-05-20 18:23:21','2010-05-20 23:23:21','If you don\'t like change, you\'re going to like irrelevance even less -\r\nGeneral Eric Shinseki\r\n\r\n','Great quote that can be applied to construction projects',0,'','publish','open','open','','great-quote-that-can-be-applied-to-construction-projects','','','2010-05-20 18:23:21','2010-05-20 23:23:21','',0,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=163',0,'post','',0),(164,1,'2010-05-20 18:22:38','2010-05-20 23:22:38','If you don\'t like change, you\'re going to like irrelevance even less -\nGeneral Eric Shinseki','Great quote that construction projects',0,'','inherit','open','open','','163-revision','','','2010-05-20 18:22:38','2010-05-20 23:22:38','',163,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=164',0,'revision','',0),(165,1,'2010-05-21 13:33:14','2010-05-21 18:33:14','In this article by the Las Vegas Sun about the dispute between Perini and MGM Mirage <a href=\"http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2010/may/20/condo-owners-enter-dispute-between-mgm-mirage-peri/\">New group enters dispute between MGM Mirage,</a>  the developer of another Perini building project is claiming that Perini used \"sophisticated wiping programs to sanitize its project server and project computers after it was ordered by the District Court to preserve all project records.\"  Whether this occurred or not is up to the courts to decide.  The question every owner should ask is \"am I tracking all this information myself?\" All too often private and public owners say \"we let the contractors take care of managing project information on our projects\".  This is obviously a recipe for disaster, even if a contractor does delete information on a construction project and is found guilty the information is still lost and can not be recovered.  Every owner should implement project management applications that track and control project information. To protect yourself even more you should implement a system from a trusted 3rd party to guarantee that no one on the project can modify or delete records pertaining your projects. Systems like EADOC\'s construction project management application do not allow any users to edit the database, this is where all the records are stored ensuring complete and accurate records of everything that occurred on the project.','Why Owners should track and control their construction project information. ',0,'','publish','open','open','','why-owners-should-track-and-control-their-construction-project-information','','','2010-06-07 11:54:27','2010-06-07 16:54:27','',0,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=165',0,'post','',0),(166,1,'2010-05-21 12:25:56','2010-05-21 17:25:56','In this article by the Las Vegas Sun about the dispute between Perini and MGM Mirage <a href=\"http://http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2010/may/20/condo-owners-enter-dispute-between-mgm-mirage-peri/\">New group enters dispute between MGM Mirage, Perini</a>  The developer of another Perini building project is claiming that Perini used \"sophisticated wiping programs to sanitize its project server and project computers after it was ordered by the District Court to preserve all project records.\"  Whether this occurred or not is up to the courts to decide.  The risk of this occurring should cause every owner who says \"we let the contractors take care of managing project information on our capital projects\" to reconsider their approach.  Even if a contractor does this on a project and is found guilty the information is still lost and can not be recovered.  Every owner should implement project management applications that track and control project information assuming the worst case scena. To protect yourself even more you should implement a system from a trusted 3rd party to guarantee that no on the project can modify or delete records pertaining your projects. ','Why Owners should track/control construction project information. ',0,'','inherit','open','open','','165-revision','','','2010-05-21 12:25:56','2010-05-21 17:25:56','',165,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=166',0,'revision','',0),(167,1,'2010-05-21 13:30:13','2010-05-21 18:30:13','In this article by the Las Vegas Sun about the dispute between Perini and MGM Mirage <a href=\"http://http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2010/may/20/condo-owners-enter-dispute-between-mgm-mirage-peri/\">New group enters dispute between MGM Mirage, Perini</a>  the developer of another Perini building project is claiming that Perini used \"sophisticated wiping programs to sanitize its project server and project computers after it was ordered by the District Court to preserve all project records.\"  Whether this occurred or not is up to the courts to decide.  The question every owner should ask is \"am I tracking all this information myself?\" All too often private and public owners say \"we let the contractors take care of managing project information on our projects\".  This is is obviously a recipe for disaster, even if a contractor does this on a project and is found guilty the information is still lost and can not be recovered.  Every owner should implement project management applications that track and control project information assuming the worst case scenario will occur. To protect yourself even more you should implement a system from a trusted 3rd party to guarantee that no one the project can modify or delete records pertaining your projects. Systems like EADOC do not allow any users to edit the database, this is where all the records are stored ensuring complete and accurate records of everything that occurred on the project.','Why Owners should track and control their construction project information. ',0,'','inherit','open','open','','165-revision-2','','','2010-05-21 13:30:13','2010-05-21 18:30:13','',165,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=167',0,'revision','',0),(168,1,'2010-05-21 13:30:54','2010-05-21 18:30:54','In this article by the Las Vegas Sun about the dispute between Perini and MGM Mirage <a href=\"http://http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2010/may/20/condo-owners-enter-dispute-between-mgm-mirage-peri/\">New group enters dispute between MGM Mirage, Perini</a>  the developer of another Perini building project is claiming that Perini used \"sophisticated wiping programs to sanitize its project server and project computers after it was ordered by the District Court to preserve all project records.\"  Whether this occurred or not is up to the courts to decide.  The question every owner should ask is \"am I tracking all this information myself?\" All too often private and public owners say \"we let the contractors take care of managing project information on our projects\".  This is is obviously a recipe for disaster, even if a contractor does this on a construction project and is found guilty the information is still lost and can not be recovered.  Every owner should implement project management applications that track and control project information assuming the worst case scenario will occur. To protect yourself even more you should implement a system from a trusted 3rd party to guarantee that no one on the project can modify or delete records pertaining your projects. Systems like EADOC\'s construction project management application do not allow any users to edit the database, this is where all the records are stored ensuring complete and accurate records of everything that occurred on the project.','Why Owners should track and control their construction project information. ',0,'','inherit','open','open','','165-revision-3','','','2010-05-21 13:30:54','2010-05-21 18:30:54','',165,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=168',0,'revision','',0),(169,1,'2010-05-21 13:30:57','2010-05-21 18:30:57','In this article by the Las Vegas Sun about the dispute between Perini and MGM Mirage <a href=\"http://http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2010/may/20/condo-owners-enter-dispute-between-mgm-mirage-peri/\">New group enters dispute between MGM Mirage, Perini</a>  the developer of another Perini building project is claiming that Perini used \"sophisticated wiping programs to sanitize its project server and project computers after it was ordered by the District Court to preserve all project records.\"  Whether this occurred or not is up to the courts to decide.  The question every owner should ask is \"am I tracking all this information myself?\" All too often private and public owners say \"we let the contractors take care of managing project information on our projects\".  This is is obviously a recipe for disaster, even if a contractor does this on a construction project and is found guilty the information is still lost and can not be recovered.  Every owner should implement project management applications that track and control project information assuming the worst case scenario will occur. To protect yourself even more you should implement a system from a trusted 3rd party to guarantee that no one on the project can modify or delete records pertaining your projects. Systems like EADOC\'s construction project management application do not allow any users to edit the database, this is where all the records are stored ensuring complete and accurate records of everything that occurred on the project.','Why Owners should track and control their construction project information. ',0,'','inherit','open','open','','165-revision-4','','','2010-05-21 13:30:57','2010-05-21 18:30:57','',165,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=169',0,'revision','',0),(170,1,'2010-05-21 13:31:32','2010-05-21 18:31:32','In this article by the Las Vegas Sun about the dispute between Perini and MGM Mirage <a href=\"http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2010/may/20/condo-owners-enter-dispute-between-mgm-mirage-peri/\">New group enters dispute between MGM Mirage, Perini</a>  the developer of another Perini building project is claiming that Perini used \"sophisticated wiping programs to sanitize its project server and project computers after it was ordered by the District Court to preserve all project records.\"  Whether this occurred or not is up to the courts to decide.  The question every owner should ask is \"am I tracking all this information myself?\" All too often private and public owners say \"we let the contractors take care of managing project information on our projects\".  This is is obviously a recipe for disaster, even if a contractor does this on a construction project and is found guilty the information is still lost and can not be recovered.  Every owner should implement project management applications that track and control project information assuming the worst case scenario will occur. To protect yourself even more you should implement a system from a trusted 3rd party to guarantee that no one on the project can modify or delete records pertaining your projects. Systems like EADOC\'s construction project management application do not allow any users to edit the database, this is where all the records are stored ensuring complete and accurate records of everything that occurred on the project.','Why Owners should track and control their construction project information. ',0,'','inherit','open','open','','165-revision-5','','','2010-05-21 13:31:32','2010-05-21 18:31:32','',165,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=170',0,'revision','',0),(171,1,'2010-05-21 13:31:34','2010-05-21 18:31:34','In this article by the Las Vegas Sun about the dispute between Perini and MGM Mirage <a href=\"http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2010/may/20/condo-owners-enter-dispute-between-mgm-mirage-peri/\">New group enters dispute between MGM Mirage, Perini</a>  the developer of another Perini building project is claiming that Perini used \"sophisticated wiping programs to sanitize its project server and project computers after it was ordered by the District Court to preserve all project records.\"  Whether this occurred or not is up to the courts to decide.  The question every owner should ask is \"am I tracking all this information myself?\" All too often private and public owners say \"we let the contractors take care of managing project information on our projects\".  This is is obviously a recipe for disaster, even if a contractor does this on a construction project and is found guilty the information is still lost and can not be recovered.  Every owner should implement project management applications that track and control project information assuming the worst case scenario will occur. To protect yourself even more you should implement a system from a trusted 3rd party to guarantee that no one on the project can modify or delete records pertaining your projects. Systems like EADOC\'s construction project management application do not allow any users to edit the database, this is where all the records are stored ensuring complete and accurate records of everything that occurred on the project.','Why Owners should track and control their construction project information. ',0,'','inherit','open','open','','165-revision-6','','','2010-05-21 13:31:34','2010-05-21 18:31:34','',165,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=171',0,'revision','',0),(172,1,'2010-05-21 13:31:36','2010-05-21 18:31:36','In this article by the Las Vegas Sun about the dispute between Perini and MGM Mirage <a href=\"http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2010/may/20/condo-owners-enter-dispute-between-mgm-mirage-peri/\">New group enters dispute between MGM Mirage, Perini</a>  the developer of another Perini building project is claiming that Perini used \"sophisticated wiping programs to sanitize its project server and project computers after it was ordered by the District Court to preserve all project records.\"  Whether this occurred or not is up to the courts to decide.  The question every owner should ask is \"am I tracking all this information myself?\" All too often private and public owners say \"we let the contractors take care of managing project information on our projects\".  This is is obviously a recipe for disaster, even if a contractor does this on a construction project and is found guilty the information is still lost and can not be recovered.  Every owner should implement project management applications that track and control project information assuming the worst case scenario will occur. To protect yourself even more you should implement a system from a trusted 3rd party to guarantee that no one on the project can modify or delete records pertaining your projects. Systems like EADOC\'s construction project management application do not allow any users to edit the database, this is where all the records are stored ensuring complete and accurate records of everything that occurred on the project.','Why Owners should track and control their construction project information. ',0,'','inherit','open','open','','165-revision-7','','','2010-05-21 13:31:36','2010-05-21 18:31:36','',165,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=172',0,'revision','',0),(173,1,'2010-05-21 13:33:04','2010-05-21 18:33:04','In this article by the Las Vegas Sun about the dispute between Perini and MGM Mirage <a href=\"http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2010/may/20/condo-owners-enter-dispute-between-mgm-mirage-peri/\">New group enters dispute between MGM Mirage, Perini</a>  the developer of another Perini building project is claiming that Perini used \"sophisticated wiping programs to sanitize its project server and project computers after it was ordered by the District Court to preserve all project records.\"  Whether this occurred or not is up to the courts to decide.  The question every owner should ask is \"am I tracking all this information myself?\" All too often private and public owners say \"we let the contractors take care of managing project information on our projects\".  This is obviously a recipe for disaster, even if a contractor does this on a construction project and is found guilty the information is still lost and can not be recovered.  Every owner should implement project management applications that track and control project information assuming the worst case scenario will occur. To protect yourself even more you should implement a system from a trusted 3rd party to guarantee that no one on the project can modify or delete records pertaining your projects. Systems like EADOC\'s construction project management application do not allow any users to edit the database, this is where all the records are stored ensuring complete and accurate records of everything that occurred on the project.','Why Owners should track and control their construction project information. ',0,'','inherit','open','open','','165-revision-8','','','2010-05-21 13:33:04','2010-05-21 18:33:04','',165,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=173',0,'revision','',0),(174,1,'2010-05-21 13:33:14','2010-05-21 18:33:14','In this article by the Las Vegas Sun about the dispute between Perini and MGM Mirage <a href=\"http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2010/may/20/condo-owners-enter-dispute-between-mgm-mirage-peri/\">New group enters dispute between MGM Mirage, Perini</a>  the developer of another Perini building project is claiming that Perini used \"sophisticated wiping programs to sanitize its project server and project computers after it was ordered by the District Court to preserve all project records.\"  Whether this occurred or not is up to the courts to decide.  The question every owner should ask is \"am I tracking all this information myself?\" All too often private and public owners say \"we let the contractors take care of managing project information on our projects\".  This is obviously a recipe for disaster, even if a contractor does this on a construction project and is found guilty the information is still lost and can not be recovered.  Every owner should implement project management applications that track and control project information assuming the worst case scenario will occur. To protect yourself even more you should implement a system from a trusted 3rd party to guarantee that no one on the project can modify or delete records pertaining your projects. Systems like EADOC\'s construction project management application do not allow any users to edit the database, this is where all the records are stored ensuring complete and accurate records of everything that occurred on the project.','Why Owners should track and control their construction project information. ',0,'','inherit','open','open','','165-revision-9','','','2010-05-21 13:33:14','2010-05-21 18:33:14','',165,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=174',0,'revision','',0),(175,1,'2010-06-07 11:54:25','2010-06-07 16:54:25','In this article by the Las Vegas Sun about the dispute between Perini and MGM Mirage <a href=\"http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2010/may/20/condo-owners-enter-dispute-between-mgm-mirage-peri/\">New group enters dispute between MGM Mirage,</a>  the developer of another Perini building project is claiming that Perini used \"sophisticated wiping programs to sanitize its project server and project computers after it was ordered by the District Court to preserve all project records.\"  Whether this occurred or not is up to the courts to decide.  The question every owner should ask is \"am I tracking all this information myself?\" All too often private and public owners say \"we let the contractors take care of managing project information on our projects\".  This is obviously a recipe for disaster, even if a contractor does delete information on a construction project and is found guilty the information is still lost and can not be recovered.  Every owner should implement project management applications that track and control project information. To protect yourself even more you should implement a system from a trusted 3rd party to guarantee that no one on the project can modify or delete records pertaining your projects. Systems like EADOC\'s construction project management application do not allow any users to edit the database, this is where all the records are stored ensuring complete and accurate records of everything that occurred on the project.','Why Owners should track and control their construction project information. ',0,'','inherit','open','open','','165-autosave','','','2010-06-07 11:54:25','2010-06-07 16:54:25','',165,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=175',0,'revision','',0),(176,1,'2010-06-07 11:53:21','2010-06-07 16:53:21','In this article by the Las Vegas Sun about the dispute between Perini and MGM Mirage <a href=\"http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2010/may/20/condo-owners-enter-dispute-between-mgm-mirage-peri/\">New group enters dispute between MGM Mirage,</a>  the developer of another Perini building project is claiming that Perini used \"sophisticated wiping programs to sanitize its project server and project computers after it was ordered by the District Court to preserve all project records.\"  Whether this occurred or not is up to the courts to decide.  The question every owner should ask is \"am I tracking all this information myself?\" All too often private and public owners say \"we let the contractors take care of managing project information on our projects\".  This is obviously a recipe for disaster, even if a contractor does this on a construction project and is found guilty the information is still lost and can not be recovered.  Every owner should implement project management applications that track and control project information assuming the worst case scenario will occur. To protect yourself even more you should implement a system from a trusted 3rd party to guarantee that no one on the project can modify or delete records pertaining your projects. Systems like EADOC\'s construction project management application do not allow any users to edit the database, this is where all the records are stored ensuring complete and accurate records of everything that occurred on the project.','Why Owners should track and control their construction project information. ',0,'','inherit','open','open','','165-revision-10','','','2010-06-07 11:53:21','2010-06-07 16:53:21','',165,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=176',0,'revision','',0),(177,1,'2010-07-19 21:41:29','2010-07-20 02:41:29','<strong>Washington, D.C. – July 20, 2010 – </strong>The American Institute of Architects (AIA) and EADOC LLC, the provider of the EADOC web-based project management application for the construction industry, today announced the integration of two select AIA Contract Documents into the EADOC application, giving easy access to AIA payment forms to owners and construction managers. These two forms, G702™–1992, Application and Certificate for Payment, and G703™–1992, Continuation Sheet, are two of the most heavily used AIA forms in the industry. This marks the AIA’s most recent effort to integrate AIA Contract Documents into a construction and project management system.\r\n\r\nEADOC users can now easily share AIA’s G702 and G703 payment forms with other project team members through the software application. The application provides the content and tools necessary to streamline workflows and save time. It automatically populates forms with project data, tracks multiple payments by period relative to budget and eliminates the need to enter duplicate payment information into two systems, reducing the chance of error.\r\n\r\n“We are eager to expand our customer’s access to and use of digital documents. The EADOC application provides our customers with access to our payment forms when they need them, where they need them,” said Molly Lindblom, Managing Director of AIA Contract Documents. “The partnership between EADOC and AIA is a great complement to the breadth of AIA contracts and forms that are available through AIA Contract Documents software.”\r\n\r\nEric Law, Founder and President of EADOC added, “Delivering AIA\'s G702 and G703 through EADOC\'s project management application makes it easier for clients to follow industry standards while reducing review time and waste associated with paper forms.”\r\n\r\n“Utilizing the AIA G702 in EADOC for our monthly billings has greatly simplified the process as we are able to create, review, approve and distribute AIA pay applications electronically,” said David Heyde, Construction Manager of Mortenson Construction and an EADOC customer. “EADOC\'s project management application combined with AIA\'s payment forms has allowed me to focus my time on managing the project instead of pushing paperwork and filling out spreadsheets.\"\r\n\r\nMore information about AIA forms in EADOC can be found at <a href=\"http://www.eadocsoftware.com/aiadocs\">www.eadocsoftware.com/aiadocs</a>\r\n\r\nMore information about AIA Contract Documents can be found at <a href=\"http://www.eadocsoftware.com/aiadocs\">www.aia.org/contractdocs</a>. AIA Contract Documents software can be purchased at <a href=\"http://www.aia.org/contractdocs/purchase\">www.aia.org/contractdocs/purchase</a>. Documents in paper form are available through the AIA’s full service distributors. For a listing of full service distributors and pricing information, please visit <a href=\"http:// www.aia.org/docs_purchase\"> www.aia.org/docs_purchase</a>.\r\n\r\n<strong>About The American Institute of Architects </strong>\r\nFor over 150 years, members of the American Institute of Architects have worked with each other and their communities to create more valuable, healthy, secure, and sustainable buildings and cityscapes. By using sustainable design practices, materials, and techniques, AIA architects are uniquely poised to provide the leadership and guidance needed to provide solutions to address climate change. AIA architects walk the walk on sustainable design. Visit <a href=\"http://www.aia.org\">www.aia.org</a>\r\n\r\n<strong>About EADOC LLC</strong> \r\nEADOC provides a fast, secure, easy to use web-based project management application that reduces construction delays, rework, and overhead costs. With unlimited users, a project team gains instant access to all the information communicated from design through construction. Visit <a href=\"http://www.eadocsoftware.com\">www.eadocsoftware.com</a> or call 877-305-3844 for more information.\r\n\r\nTo download the release click <a href=\"http://www.eadocsoftware.com/pdf/EADOC-ACD-Joint-Release-FINAL-7-20-10.pdf\">here</a>\r\n\r\n','American Institute of Architects (AIA) Contract Documents and EADOC Announce Embedding of G702 and G703 Forms into the EADOC Construction Management Application',0,'','publish','open','open','','american-institute-of-architects-aia-contract-documents-and-eadoc-announce-embedding-of-g702-and-g703-forms-into-the-eadoc-construction-management-application','','','2010-07-19 21:41:29','2010-07-20 02:41:29','',0,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=177',0,'post','',0),(178,1,'2010-07-18 21:27:54','2010-07-19 02:27:54','Washington, D.C. – July 20, 2010 – The American Institute of Architects (AIA) and EADOC LLC, the provider of the EADOC web-based project management application for the construction industry, today announced the integration of two select AIA Contract Documents into the EADOC application, giving easy access to AIA payment forms to owners and construction managers. These two forms, G702™–1992, Application and Certificate for Payment, and G703™–1992, Continuation Sheet, are two of the most heavily used AIA forms in the industry. This marks the AIA’s most recent effort to integrate AIA Contract Documents into a construction and project management system.\nEADOC users can now easily share AIA’s G702 and G703 payment forms with other project team members through the software application. The application provides the content and tools necessary to streamline workflows and save time. It automatically populates forms with project data, tracks multiple payments by period relative to budget and eliminates the need to enter duplicate payment information into two systems, reducing the chance of error.\n“We are eager to expand our customer’s access to and use of digital documents. The EADOC application provides our customers with access to our payment forms when they need them, where they need them,” said Molly Lindblom, Managing Director of AIA Contract Documents. “The partnership between EADOC and AIA is a great complement to the breadth of AIA contracts and forms that are available through AIA Contract Documents software.”\nEric Law, Founder and President of EADOC added, “Delivering AIA\'s G702 and G703 through EADOC\'s project management application makes it easier for clients to follow industry standards while reducing review time and waste associated with paper forms.”\n“Utilizing the AIA G702 in EADOC for our monthly billings has greatly simplified the process as we are able to create, review, approve and distribute AIA pay applications electronically,” said David Heyde, Construction Manager of Mortenson Construction and an EADOC customer. “EADOC\'s project management application combined with AIA\'s payment forms has allowed me to focus my time on managing the project instead of pushing paperwork and filling out spreadsheets.\"\nNews Release\nMore information about AIA forms in EADOC can be found at www.eadocsoftware.com/aiadocs.\nMore information about AIA Contract Documents can be found at www.aia.org/contractdocs. AIA Contract Documents software can be purchased at www.aia.org/contractdocs/purchase. Documents in paper form are available through the AIA’s full service distributors. For a listing of full service distributors and pricing information, please visit www.aia.org/docs_purchase.\nAbout The American Institute of Architects For over 150 years, members of the American Institute of Architects have worked with each other and their communities to create more valuable, healthy, secure, and sustainable buildings and cityscapes. By using sustainable design practices, materials, and techniques, AIA architects are uniquely poised to provide the leadership and guidance needed to provide solutions to address climate change. AIA architects walk the walk on sustainable design. Visit www.aia.org\nAbout EADOC LLC EADOC provides a fast, secure, easy to use web-based project management application that reduces construction delays, rework, and overhead costs. With unlimited users, a project team gains instant access to all the information communicated from design through construction. Visit www.eadocsoftware.com or call 877-305-3844 for more information.','American Institute of Architects (AIA) Contract Documents and EADOC Announce Embedding of G702 and G703 Forms into the EADOC Construction Management Application',0,'','inherit','open','open','','177-revision','','','2010-07-18 21:27:54','2010-07-19 02:27:54','',177,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=178',0,'revision','',0),(179,1,'2010-07-18 21:28:45','2010-07-19 02:28:45','Washington, D.C. – July 20, 2010 – The American Institute of Architects (AIA) and EADOC LLC, the provider of the EADOC web-based project management application for the construction industry, today announced the integration of two select AIA Contract Documents into the EADOC application, giving easy access to AIA payment forms to owners and construction managers. These two forms, G702™–1992, Application and Certificate for Payment, and G703™–1992, Continuation Sheet, are two of the most heavily used AIA forms in the industry. This marks the AIA’s most recent effort to integrate AIA Contract Documents into a construction and project management system.\r\nEADOC users can now easily share AIA’s G702 and G703 payment forms with other project team members through the software application. The application provides the content and tools necessary to streamline workflows and save time. It automatically populates forms with project data, tracks multiple payments by period relative to budget and eliminates the need to enter duplicate payment information into two systems, reducing the chance of error.\r\n“We are eager to expand our customer’s access to and use of digital documents. The EADOC application provides our customers with access to our payment forms when they need them, where they need them,” said Molly Lindblom, Managing Director of AIA Contract Documents. “The partnership between EADOC and AIA is a great complement to the breadth of AIA contracts and forms that are available through AIA Contract Documents software.”\r\nEric Law, Founder and President of EADOC added, “Delivering AIA\'s G702 and G703 through EADOC\'s project management application makes it easier for clients to follow industry standards while reducing review time and waste associated with paper forms.”\r\n“Utilizing the AIA G702 in EADOC for our monthly billings has greatly simplified the process as we are able to create, review, approve and distribute AIA pay applications electronically,” said David Heyde, Construction Manager of Mortenson Construction and an EADOC customer. “EADOC\'s project management application combined with AIA\'s payment forms has allowed me to focus my time on managing the project instead of pushing paperwork and filling out spreadsheets.\"\r\nNews Release\r\nMore information about AIA forms in EADOC can be found at www.eadocsoftware.com/aiadocs.\r\nMore information about AIA Contract Documents can be found at www.aia.org/contractdocs. AIA Contract Documents software can be purchased at www.aia.org/contractdocs/purchase. Documents in paper form are available through the AIA’s full service distributors. For a listing of full service distributors and pricing information, please visit www.aia.org/docs_purchase.\r\nAbout The American Institute of Architects For over 150 years, members of the American Institute of Architects have worked with each other and their communities to create more valuable, healthy, secure, and sustainable buildings and cityscapes. By using sustainable design practices, materials, and techniques, AIA architects are uniquely poised to provide the leadership and guidance needed to provide solutions to address climate change. AIA architects walk the walk on sustainable design. Visit www.aia.org\r\nAbout EADOC LLC EADOC provides a fast, secure, easy to use web-based project management application that reduces construction delays, rework, and overhead costs. With unlimited users, a project team gains instant access to all the information communicated from design through construction. Visit www.eadocsoftware.com or call 877-305-3844 for more information.\r\n\r\n','American Institute of Architects (AIA) Contract Documents and EADOC Announce Embedding of G702 and G703 Forms into the EADOC Construction Management Application',0,'','inherit','open','open','','177-revision-2','','','2010-07-18 21:28:45','2010-07-19 02:28:45','',177,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=179',0,'revision','',0),(180,1,'2010-07-18 21:28:49','2010-07-19 02:28:49','Washington, D.C. – July 20, 2010 – The American Institute of Architects (AIA) and EADOC LLC, the provider of the EADOC web-based project management application for the construction industry, today announced the integration of two select AIA Contract Documents into the EADOC application, giving easy access to AIA payment forms to owners and construction managers. These two forms, G702™–1992, Application and Certificate for Payment, and G703™–1992, Continuation Sheet, are two of the most heavily used AIA forms in the industry. This marks the AIA’s most recent effort to integrate AIA Contract Documents into a construction and project management system.\r\nEADOC users can now easily share AIA’s G702 and G703 payment forms with other project team members through the software application. The application provides the content and tools necessary to streamline workflows and save time. It automatically populates forms with project data, tracks multiple payments by period relative to budget and eliminates the need to enter duplicate payment information into two systems, reducing the chance of error.\r\n“We are eager to expand our customer’s access to and use of digital documents. The EADOC application provides our customers with access to our payment forms when they need them, where they need them,” said Molly Lindblom, Managing Director of AIA Contract Documents. “The partnership between EADOC and AIA is a great complement to the breadth of AIA contracts and forms that are available through AIA Contract Documents software.”\r\nEric Law, Founder and President of EADOC added, “Delivering AIA\'s G702 and G703 through EADOC\'s project management application makes it easier for clients to follow industry standards while reducing review time and waste associated with paper forms.”\r\n“Utilizing the AIA G702 in EADOC for our monthly billings has greatly simplified the process as we are able to create, review, approve and distribute AIA pay applications electronically,” said David Heyde, Construction Manager of Mortenson Construction and an EADOC customer. “EADOC\'s project management application combined with AIA\'s payment forms has allowed me to focus my time on managing the project instead of pushing paperwork and filling out spreadsheets.\"\r\nNews Release\r\nMore information about AIA forms in EADOC can be found at www.eadocsoftware.com/aiadocs.\r\nMore information about AIA Contract Documents can be found at www.aia.org/contractdocs. AIA Contract Documents software can be purchased at www.aia.org/contractdocs/purchase. Documents in paper form are available through the AIA’s full service distributors. For a listing of full service distributors and pricing information, please visit www.aia.org/docs_purchase.\r\nAbout The American Institute of Architects For over 150 years, members of the American Institute of Architects have worked with each other and their communities to create more valuable, healthy, secure, and sustainable buildings and cityscapes. By using sustainable design practices, materials, and techniques, AIA architects are uniquely poised to provide the leadership and guidance needed to provide solutions to address climate change. AIA architects walk the walk on sustainable design. Visit www.aia.org\r\nAbout EADOC LLC EADOC provides a fast, secure, easy to use web-based project management application that reduces construction delays, rework, and overhead costs. With unlimited users, a project team gains instant access to all the information communicated from design through construction. Visit www.eadocsoftware.com or call 877-305-3844 for more information.\r\n\r\n','American Institute of Architects (AIA) Contract Documents and EADOC Announce Embedding of G702 and G703 Forms into the EADOC Construction Management Application',0,'','inherit','open','open','','177-revision-3','','','2010-07-18 21:28:49','2010-07-19 02:28:49','',177,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=180',0,'revision','',0),(181,1,'2010-07-18 21:31:55','2010-07-19 02:31:55','Washington, D.C. – July 20, 2010 – The American Institute of Architects (AIA) and EADOC LLC, the provider of the EADOC web-based project management application for the construction industry, today announced the integration of two select AIA Contract Documents into the EADOC application, giving easy access to AIA payment forms to owners and construction managers. These two forms, G702™–1992, Application and Certificate for Payment, and G703™–1992, Continuation Sheet, are two of the most heavily used AIA forms in the industry. This marks the AIA’s most recent effort to integrate AIA Contract Documents into a construction and project management system.\r\nEADOC users can now easily share AIA’s G702 and G703 payment forms with other project team members through the software application. The application provides the content and tools necessary to streamline workflows and save time. It automatically populates forms with project data, tracks multiple payments by period relative to budget and eliminates the need to enter duplicate payment information into two systems, reducing the chance of error.\r\n\r\n“We are eager to expand our customer’s access to and use of digital documents. The EADOC application provides our customers with access to our payment forms when they need them, where they need them,” said Molly Lindblom, Managing Director of AIA Contract Documents. “The partnership between EADOC and AIA is a great complement to the breadth of AIA contracts and forms that are available through AIA Contract Documents software.”\r\n\r\nEric Law, Founder and President of EADOC added, “Delivering AIA\'s G702 and G703 through EADOC\'s project management application makes it easier for clients to follow industry standards while reducing review time and waste associated with paper forms.”\r\n\r\n“Utilizing the AIA G702 in EADOC for our monthly billings has greatly simplified the process as we are able to create, review, approve and distribute AIA pay applications electronically,” said David Heyde, Construction Manager of Mortenson Construction and an EADOC customer. “EADOC\'s project management application combined with AIA\'s payment forms has allowed me to focus my time on managing the project instead of pushing paperwork and filling out spreadsheets.\"\r\n\r\nMore information about AIA forms in EADOC can be found at <a href=\"http://www.eadocsoftware.com/aiadocs\">www.eadocsoftware.com/aiadocs</a>\r\n.\r\nMore information about AIA Contract Documents can be found at <a href=\"http://www.eadocsoftware.com/aiadocs\">www.aia.org/contractdocs</a>. AIA Contract Documents software can be purchased at <a href=\"http://www.aia.org/contractdocs/purchase\">www.aia.org/contractdocs/purchase</a>. Documents in paper form are available through the AIA’s full service distributors. For a listing of full service distributors and pricing information, please visit <a href=\"http:// www.aia.org/docs_purchase\"> www.aia.org/docs_purchase</a>.\r\n\r\nAbout The American Institute of Architects For over 150 years, members of the American Institute of Architects have worked with each other and their communities to create more valuable, healthy, secure, and sustainable buildings and cityscapes. By using sustainable design practices, materials, and techniques, AIA architects are uniquely poised to provide the leadership and guidance needed to provide solutions to address climate change. AIA architects walk the walk on sustainable design. Visit <a href=\"http://www.aia.org\">www.aia.org</a>\r\n\r\nAbout EADOC LLC EADOC provides a fast, secure, easy to use web-based project management application that reduces construction delays, rework, and overhead costs. With unlimited users, a project team gains instant access to all the information communicated from design through construction. Visit <a href=\"http://www.eadocsoftware.com\">www.eadocsoftware.com</a> or call 877-305-3844 for more information.\r\n\r\n','American Institute of Architects (AIA) Contract Documents and EADOC Announce Embedding of G702 and G703 Forms into the EADOC Construction Management Application',0,'','inherit','open','open','','177-revision-4','','','2010-07-18 21:31:55','2010-07-19 02:31:55','',177,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=181',0,'revision','',0),(182,1,'2010-07-18 21:32:12','2010-07-19 02:32:12','Washington, D.C. – July 20, 2010 – The American Institute of Architects (AIA) and EADOC LLC, the provider of the EADOC web-based project management application for the construction industry, today announced the integration of two select AIA Contract Documents into the EADOC application, giving easy access to AIA payment forms to owners and construction managers. These two forms, G702™–1992, Application and Certificate for Payment, and G703™–1992, Continuation Sheet, are two of the most heavily used AIA forms in the industry. This marks the AIA’s most recent effort to integrate AIA Contract Documents into a construction and project management system.\r\nEADOC users can now easily share AIA’s G702 and G703 payment forms with other project team members through the software application. The application provides the content and tools necessary to streamline workflows and save time. It automatically populates forms with project data, tracks multiple payments by period relative to budget and eliminates the need to enter duplicate payment information into two systems, reducing the chance of error.\r\n\r\n“We are eager to expand our customer’s access to and use of digital documents. The EADOC application provides our customers with access to our payment forms when they need them, where they need them,” said Molly Lindblom, Managing Director of AIA Contract Documents. “The partnership between EADOC and AIA is a great complement to the breadth of AIA contracts and forms that are available through AIA Contract Documents software.”\r\n\r\nEric Law, Founder and President of EADOC added, “Delivering AIA\'s G702 and G703 through EADOC\'s project management application makes it easier for clients to follow industry standards while reducing review time and waste associated with paper forms.”\r\n\r\n“Utilizing the AIA G702 in EADOC for our monthly billings has greatly simplified the process as we are able to create, review, approve and distribute AIA pay applications electronically,” said David Heyde, Construction Manager of Mortenson Construction and an EADOC customer. “EADOC\'s project management application combined with AIA\'s payment forms has allowed me to focus my time on managing the project instead of pushing paperwork and filling out spreadsheets.\"\r\n\r\nMore information about AIA forms in EADOC can be found at <a href=\"http://www.eadocsoftware.com/aiadocs\">www.eadocsoftware.com/aiadocs</a>\r\n.\r\nMore information about AIA Contract Documents can be found at <a href=\"http://www.eadocsoftware.com/aiadocs\">www.aia.org/contractdocs</a>. AIA Contract Documents software can be purchased at <a href=\"http://www.aia.org/contractdocs/purchase\">www.aia.org/contractdocs/purchase</a>. Documents in paper form are available through the AIA’s full service distributors. For a listing of full service distributors and pricing information, please visit <a href=\"http:// www.aia.org/docs_purchase\"> www.aia.org/docs_purchase</a>.\r\n\r\nAbout The American Institute of Architects For over 150 years, members of the American Institute of Architects have worked with each other and their communities to create more valuable, healthy, secure, and sustainable buildings and cityscapes. By using sustainable design practices, materials, and techniques, AIA architects are uniquely poised to provide the leadership and guidance needed to provide solutions to address climate change. AIA architects walk the walk on sustainable design. Visit <a href=\"http://www.aia.org\">www.aia.org</a>\r\n\r\nAbout EADOC LLC EADOC provides a fast, secure, easy to use web-based project management application that reduces construction delays, rework, and overhead costs. With unlimited users, a project team gains instant access to all the information communicated from design through construction. Visit <a href=\"http://www.eadocsoftware.com\">www.eadocsoftware.com</a> or call 877-305-3844 for more information.\r\n\r\n','American Institute of Architects (AIA) Contract Documents and EADOC Announce Embedding of G702 and G703 Forms into the EADOC Construction Management Application',0,'','inherit','open','open','','177-revision-5','','','2010-07-18 21:32:12','2010-07-19 02:32:12','',177,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=182',0,'revision','',0),(183,1,'2010-07-18 21:34:04','2010-07-19 02:34:04','Washington, D.C. – July 20, 2010 – The American Institute of Architects (AIA) and EADOC LLC, the provider of the EADOC web-based project management application for the construction industry, today announced the integration of two select AIA Contract Documents into the EADOC application, giving easy access to AIA payment forms to owners and construction managers. These two forms, G702™–1992, Application and Certificate for Payment, and G703™–1992, Continuation Sheet, are two of the most heavily used AIA forms in the industry. This marks the AIA’s most recent effort to integrate AIA Contract Documents into a construction and project management system.\r\n\r\nEADOC users can now easily share AIA’s G702 and G703 payment forms with other project team members through the software application. The application provides the content and tools necessary to streamline workflows and save time. It automatically populates forms with project data, tracks multiple payments by period relative to budget and eliminates the need to enter duplicate payment information into two systems, reducing the chance of error.\r\n\r\n“We are eager to expand our customer’s access to and use of digital documents. The EADOC application provides our customers with access to our payment forms when they need them, where they need them,” said Molly Lindblom, Managing Director of AIA Contract Documents. “The partnership between EADOC and AIA is a great complement to the breadth of AIA contracts and forms that are available through AIA Contract Documents software.”\r\n\r\nEric Law, Founder and President of EADOC added, “Delivering AIA\'s G702 and G703 through EADOC\'s project management application makes it easier for clients to follow industry standards while reducing review time and waste associated with paper forms.”\r\n\r\n“Utilizing the AIA G702 in EADOC for our monthly billings has greatly simplified the process as we are able to create, review, approve and distribute AIA pay applications electronically,” said David Heyde, Construction Manager of Mortenson Construction and an EADOC customer. “EADOC\'s project management application combined with AIA\'s payment forms has allowed me to focus my time on managing the project instead of pushing paperwork and filling out spreadsheets.\"\r\n\r\nMore information about AIA forms in EADOC can be found at <a href=\"http://www.eadocsoftware.com/aiadocs\">www.eadocsoftware.com/aiadocs</a>\r\n.\r\nMore information about AIA Contract Documents can be found at <a href=\"http://www.eadocsoftware.com/aiadocs\">www.aia.org/contractdocs</a>. AIA Contract Documents software can be purchased at <a href=\"http://www.aia.org/contractdocs/purchase\">www.aia.org/contractdocs/purchase</a>. Documents in paper form are available through the AIA’s full service distributors. For a listing of full service distributors and pricing information, please visit <a href=\"http:// www.aia.org/docs_purchase\"> www.aia.org/docs_purchase</a>.\r\n\r\nAbout The American Institute of Architects For over 150 years, members of the American Institute of Architects have worked with each other and their communities to create more valuable, healthy, secure, and sustainable buildings and cityscapes. By using sustainable design practices, materials, and techniques, AIA architects are uniquely poised to provide the leadership and guidance needed to provide solutions to address climate change. AIA architects walk the walk on sustainable design. Visit <a href=\"http://www.aia.org\">www.aia.org</a>\r\n\r\nAbout EADOC LLC EADOC provides a fast, secure, easy to use web-based project management application that reduces construction delays, rework, and overhead costs. With unlimited users, a project team gains instant access to all the information communicated from design through construction. Visit <a href=\"http://www.eadocsoftware.com\">www.eadocsoftware.com</a> or call 877-305-3844 for more information.\r\n\r\nTo download the release click <a href=\"http://www.eadocsoftware.com/pdf/EADOC-ACD-Joint-Release-FINAL-7-20-10.pdf\">here</a>\r\n\r\n','American Institute of Architects (AIA) Contract Documents and EADOC Announce Embedding of G702 and G703 Forms into the EADOC Construction Management Application',0,'','inherit','open','open','','177-revision-6','','','2010-07-18 21:34:04','2010-07-19 02:34:04','',177,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=183',0,'revision','',0),(184,1,'2010-07-18 21:34:08','2010-07-19 02:34:08','Washington, D.C. – July 20, 2010 – The American Institute of Architects (AIA) and EADOC LLC, the provider of the EADOC web-based project management application for the construction industry, today announced the integration of two select AIA Contract Documents into the EADOC application, giving easy access to AIA payment forms to owners and construction managers. These two forms, G702™–1992, Application and Certificate for Payment, and G703™–1992, Continuation Sheet, are two of the most heavily used AIA forms in the industry. This marks the AIA’s most recent effort to integrate AIA Contract Documents into a construction and project management system.\r\n\r\nEADOC users can now easily share AIA’s G702 and G703 payment forms with other project team members through the software application. The application provides the content and tools necessary to streamline workflows and save time. It automatically populates forms with project data, tracks multiple payments by period relative to budget and eliminates the need to enter duplicate payment information into two systems, reducing the chance of error.\r\n\r\n“We are eager to expand our customer’s access to and use of digital documents. The EADOC application provides our customers with access to our payment forms when they need them, where they need them,” said Molly Lindblom, Managing Director of AIA Contract Documents. “The partnership between EADOC and AIA is a great complement to the breadth of AIA contracts and forms that are available through AIA Contract Documents software.”\r\n\r\nEric Law, Founder and President of EADOC added, “Delivering AIA\'s G702 and G703 through EADOC\'s project management application makes it easier for clients to follow industry standards while reducing review time and waste associated with paper forms.”\r\n\r\n“Utilizing the AIA G702 in EADOC for our monthly billings has greatly simplified the process as we are able to create, review, approve and distribute AIA pay applications electronically,” said David Heyde, Construction Manager of Mortenson Construction and an EADOC customer. “EADOC\'s project management application combined with AIA\'s payment forms has allowed me to focus my time on managing the project instead of pushing paperwork and filling out spreadsheets.\"\r\n\r\nMore information about AIA forms in EADOC can be found at <a href=\"http://www.eadocsoftware.com/aiadocs\">www.eadocsoftware.com/aiadocs</a>\r\n.\r\nMore information about AIA Contract Documents can be found at <a href=\"http://www.eadocsoftware.com/aiadocs\">www.aia.org/contractdocs</a>. AIA Contract Documents software can be purchased at <a href=\"http://www.aia.org/contractdocs/purchase\">www.aia.org/contractdocs/purchase</a>. Documents in paper form are available through the AIA’s full service distributors. For a listing of full service distributors and pricing information, please visit <a href=\"http:// www.aia.org/docs_purchase\"> www.aia.org/docs_purchase</a>.\r\n\r\nAbout The American Institute of Architects For over 150 years, members of the American Institute of Architects have worked with each other and their communities to create more valuable, healthy, secure, and sustainable buildings and cityscapes. By using sustainable design practices, materials, and techniques, AIA architects are uniquely poised to provide the leadership and guidance needed to provide solutions to address climate change. AIA architects walk the walk on sustainable design. Visit <a href=\"http://www.aia.org\">www.aia.org</a>\r\n\r\nAbout EADOC LLC EADOC provides a fast, secure, easy to use web-based project management application that reduces construction delays, rework, and overhead costs. With unlimited users, a project team gains instant access to all the information communicated from design through construction. Visit <a href=\"http://www.eadocsoftware.com\">www.eadocsoftware.com</a> or call 877-305-3844 for more information.\r\n\r\nTo download the release click <a href=\"http://www.eadocsoftware.com/pdf/EADOC-ACD-Joint-Release-FINAL-7-20-10.pdf\">here</a>\r\n\r\n','American Institute of Architects (AIA) Contract Documents and EADOC Announce Embedding of G702 and G703 Forms into the EADOC Construction Management Application',0,'','inherit','open','open','','177-revision-7','','','2010-07-18 21:34:08','2010-07-19 02:34:08','',177,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=184',0,'revision','',0),(185,1,'2010-07-18 21:35:17','2010-07-19 02:35:17','<strong>Washington, D.C. – July 20, 2010 – </strong>The American Institute of Architects (AIA) and EADOC LLC, the provider of the EADOC web-based project management application for the construction industry, today announced the integration of two select AIA Contract Documents into the EADOC application, giving easy access to AIA payment forms to owners and construction managers. These two forms, G702™–1992, Application and Certificate for Payment, and G703™–1992, Continuation Sheet, are two of the most heavily used AIA forms in the industry. This marks the AIA’s most recent effort to integrate AIA Contract Documents into a construction and project management system.\r\n\r\nEADOC users can now easily share AIA’s G702 and G703 payment forms with other project team members through the software application. The application provides the content and tools necessary to streamline workflows and save time. It automatically populates forms with project data, tracks multiple payments by period relative to budget and eliminates the need to enter duplicate payment information into two systems, reducing the chance of error.\r\n\r\n“We are eager to expand our customer’s access to and use of digital documents. The EADOC application provides our customers with access to our payment forms when they need them, where they need them,” said Molly Lindblom, Managing Director of AIA Contract Documents. “The partnership between EADOC and AIA is a great complement to the breadth of AIA contracts and forms that are available through AIA Contract Documents software.”\r\n\r\nEric Law, Founder and President of EADOC added, “Delivering AIA\'s G702 and G703 through EADOC\'s project management application makes it easier for clients to follow industry standards while reducing review time and waste associated with paper forms.”\r\n\r\n“Utilizing the AIA G702 in EADOC for our monthly billings has greatly simplified the process as we are able to create, review, approve and distribute AIA pay applications electronically,” said David Heyde, Construction Manager of Mortenson Construction and an EADOC customer. “EADOC\'s project management application combined with AIA\'s payment forms has allowed me to focus my time on managing the project instead of pushing paperwork and filling out spreadsheets.\"\r\n\r\nMore information about AIA forms in EADOC can be found at <a href=\"http://www.eadocsoftware.com/aiadocs\">www.eadocsoftware.com/aiadocs</a>\r\n\r\nMore information about AIA Contract Documents can be found at <a href=\"http://www.eadocsoftware.com/aiadocs\">www.aia.org/contractdocs</a>. AIA Contract Documents software can be purchased at <a href=\"http://www.aia.org/contractdocs/purchase\">www.aia.org/contractdocs/purchase</a>. Documents in paper form are available through the AIA’s full service distributors. For a listing of full service distributors and pricing information, please visit <a href=\"http:// www.aia.org/docs_purchase\"> www.aia.org/docs_purchase</a>.\r\n\r\n<strong>About The American Institute of Architects </strong>\r\nFor over 150 years, members of the American Institute of Architects have worked with each other and their communities to create more valuable, healthy, secure, and sustainable buildings and cityscapes. By using sustainable design practices, materials, and techniques, AIA architects are uniquely poised to provide the leadership and guidance needed to provide solutions to address climate change. AIA architects walk the walk on sustainable design. Visit <a href=\"http://www.aia.org\">www.aia.org</a>\r\n\r\n<strong>About EADOC LLC</strong> \r\nEADOC provides a fast, secure, easy to use web-based project management application that reduces construction delays, rework, and overhead costs. With unlimited users, a project team gains instant access to all the information communicated from design through construction. Visit <a href=\"http://www.eadocsoftware.com\">www.eadocsoftware.com</a> or call 877-305-3844 for more information.\r\n\r\nTo download the release click <a href=\"http://www.eadocsoftware.com/pdf/EADOC-ACD-Joint-Release-FINAL-7-20-10.pdf\">here</a>\r\n\r\n','American Institute of Architects (AIA) Contract Documents and EADOC Announce Embedding of G702 and G703 Forms into the EADOC Construction Management Application',0,'','inherit','open','open','','177-revision-8','','','2010-07-18 21:35:17','2010-07-19 02:35:17','',177,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=185',0,'revision','',0),(186,1,'2010-07-18 21:36:07','2010-07-19 02:36:07','<strong>Washington, D.C. – July 20, 2010 – </strong>The American Institute of Architects (AIA) and EADOC LLC, the provider of the EADOC web-based project management application for the construction industry, today announced the integration of two select AIA Contract Documents into the EADOC application, giving easy access to AIA payment forms to owners and construction managers. These two forms, G702™–1992, Application and Certificate for Payment, and G703™–1992, Continuation Sheet, are two of the most heavily used AIA forms in the industry. This marks the AIA’s most recent effort to integrate AIA Contract Documents into a construction and project management system.\r\n\r\nEADOC users can now easily share AIA’s G702 and G703 payment forms with other project team members through the software application. The application provides the content and tools necessary to streamline workflows and save time. It automatically populates forms with project data, tracks multiple payments by period relative to budget and eliminates the need to enter duplicate payment information into two systems, reducing the chance of error.\r\n\r\n“We are eager to expand our customer’s access to and use of digital documents. The EADOC application provides our customers with access to our payment forms when they need them, where they need them,” said Molly Lindblom, Managing Director of AIA Contract Documents. “The partnership between EADOC and AIA is a great complement to the breadth of AIA contracts and forms that are available through AIA Contract Documents software.”\r\n\r\nEric Law, Founder and President of EADOC added, “Delivering AIA\'s G702 and G703 through EADOC\'s project management application makes it easier for clients to follow industry standards while reducing review time and waste associated with paper forms.”\r\n\r\n“Utilizing the AIA G702 in EADOC for our monthly billings has greatly simplified the process as we are able to create, review, approve and distribute AIA pay applications electronically,” said David Heyde, Construction Manager of Mortenson Construction and an EADOC customer. “EADOC\'s project management application combined with AIA\'s payment forms has allowed me to focus my time on managing the project instead of pushing paperwork and filling out spreadsheets.\"\r\n\r\nMore information about AIA forms in EADOC can be found at <a href=\"http://www.eadocsoftware.com/aiadocs\">www.eadocsoftware.com/aiadocs</a>\r\n\r\nMore information about AIA Contract Documents can be found at <a href=\"http://www.eadocsoftware.com/aiadocs\">www.aia.org/contractdocs</a>. AIA Contract Documents software can be purchased at <a href=\"http://www.aia.org/contractdocs/purchase\">www.aia.org/contractdocs/purchase</a>. Documents in paper form are available through the AIA’s full service distributors. For a listing of full service distributors and pricing information, please visit <a href=\"http:// www.aia.org/docs_purchase\"> www.aia.org/docs_purchase</a>.\r\n\r\n<strong>About The American Institute of Architects </strong>\r\nFor over 150 years, members of the American Institute of Architects have worked with each other and their communities to create more valuable, healthy, secure, and sustainable buildings and cityscapes. By using sustainable design practices, materials, and techniques, AIA architects are uniquely poised to provide the leadership and guidance needed to provide solutions to address climate change. AIA architects walk the walk on sustainable design. Visit <a href=\"http://www.aia.org\">www.aia.org</a>\r\n\r\n<strong>About EADOC LLC</strong> \r\nEADOC provides a fast, secure, easy to use web-based project management application that reduces construction delays, rework, and overhead costs. With unlimited users, a project team gains instant access to all the information communicated from design through construction. Visit <a href=\"http://www.eadocsoftware.com\">www.eadocsoftware.com</a> or call 877-305-3844 for more information.\r\n\r\nTo download the release click <a href=\"http://www.eadocsoftware.com/pdf/EADOC-ACD-Joint-Release-FINAL-7-20-10.pdf\">here</a>\r\n\r\n','American Institute of Architects (AIA) Contract Documents and EADOC Announce Embedding of G702 and G703 Forms into the EADOC Construction Management Application',0,'','inherit','open','open','','177-revision-9','','','2010-07-18 21:36:07','2010-07-19 02:36:07','',177,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=186',0,'revision','',0),(187,1,'2010-07-18 22:44:09','2010-07-19 03:44:09','<strong>Washington, D.C. – July 20, 2010 – </strong>The American Institute of Architects (AIA) and EADOC LLC, the provider of the EADOC web-based project management application for the construction industry, today announced the integration of two select AIA Contract Documents into the EADOC application, giving easy access to AIA payment forms to owners and construction managers. These two forms, G702™–1992, Application and Certificate for Payment, and G703™–1992, Continuation Sheet, are two of the most heavily used AIA forms in the industry. This marks the AIA’s most recent effort to integrate AIA Contract Documents into a construction and project management system.\r\n\r\nEADOC users can now easily share AIA’s G702 and G703 payment forms with other project team members through the software application. The application provides the content and tools necessary to streamline workflows and save time. It automatically populates forms with project data, tracks multiple payments by period relative to budget and eliminates the need to enter duplicate payment information into two systems, reducing the chance of error.\r\n\r\n“We are eager to expand our customer’s access to and use of digital documents. The EADOC application provides our customers with access to our payment forms when they need them, where they need them,” said Molly Lindblom, Managing Director of AIA Contract Documents. “The partnership between EADOC and AIA is a great complement to the breadth of AIA contracts and forms that are available through AIA Contract Documents software.”\r\n\r\nEric Law, Founder and President of EADOC added, “Delivering AIA\'s G702 and G703 through EADOC\'s project management application makes it easier for clients to follow industry standards while reducing review time and waste associated with paper forms.”\r\n\r\n“Utilizing the AIA G702 in EADOC for our monthly billings has greatly simplified the process as we are able to create, review, approve and distribute AIA pay applications electronically,” said David Heyde, Construction Manager of Mortenson Construction and an EADOC customer. “EADOC\'s project management application combined with AIA\'s payment forms has allowed me to focus my time on managing the project instead of pushing paperwork and filling out spreadsheets.\"\r\n\r\nMore information about AIA forms in EADOC can be found at <a href=\"http://www.eadocsoftware.com/aiadocs\">www.eadocsoftware.com/aiadocs</a>\r\n\r\nMore information about AIA Contract Documents can be found at <a href=\"http://www.eadocsoftware.com/aiadocs\">www.aia.org/contractdocs</a>. AIA Contract Documents software can be purchased at <a href=\"http://www.aia.org/contractdocs/purchase\">www.aia.org/contractdocs/purchase</a>. Documents in paper form are available through the AIA’s full service distributors. For a listing of full service distributors and pricing information, please visit <a href=\"http:// www.aia.org/docs_purchase\"> www.aia.org/docs_purchase</a>.\r\n\r\n<strong>About The American Institute of Architects </strong>\r\nFor over 150 years, members of the American Institute of Architects have worked with each other and their communities to create more valuable, healthy, secure, and sustainable buildings and cityscapes. By using sustainable design practices, materials, and techniques, AIA architects are uniquely poised to provide the leadership and guidance needed to provide solutions to address climate change. AIA architects walk the walk on sustainable design. Visit <a href=\"http://www.aia.org\">www.aia.org</a>\r\n\r\n<strong>About EADOC LLC</strong> \r\nEADOC provides a fast, secure, easy to use web-based project management application that reduces construction delays, rework, and overhead costs. With unlimited users, a project team gains instant access to all the information communicated from design through construction. Visit <a href=\"http://www.eadocsoftware.com\">www.eadocsoftware.com</a> or call 877-305-3844 for more information.\r\n\r\nTo download the release click <a href=\"http://www.eadocsoftware.com/pdf/EADOC-ACD-Joint-Release-FINAL-7-20-10.pdf\">here</a>\r\n\r\n','American Institute of Architects (AIA) Contract Documents and EADOC Announce Embedding of G702 and G703 Forms into the EADOC Construction Management Application',0,'','inherit','open','open','','177-revision-10','','','2010-07-18 22:44:09','2010-07-19 03:44:09','',177,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=187',0,'revision','',0),(188,1,'2010-08-03 13:32:56','2010-08-03 18:32:56','CMAA has posted a copy of the presentation given by Gregg Humphrey with Springfiled Metropolitan Sanitary District and Christy Crites with Crawford Murphy & Tilly on using EADOC\'s web based construction management application for the Spring Creek WWTP expansion project. Here is a link to the presentation <a href=\"http://cmaanet.org/files/shared/Case_Study.pptx\">Presentation</a> You can also learn more about the CMAA Water Summit that was held in Kansas City, MO a couple weeks ago. If you want to learn more about this years Summit you can visit <a href=\"http://cmaanet.org/2010-water-summit-presentations\">CMAA</a> For those of you that missed the presentation we will doing another one at CMAA\'s annual conference in San Diego this Fall. Check back for more details as it gets closer.','CMAA Water Summit presentation',0,'','publish','open','open','','cmaa-water-summit-presentation','','','2010-08-03 13:38:08','2010-08-03 18:38:08','',0,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=188',0,'post','',0),(189,1,'2010-08-03 13:31:14','2010-08-03 18:31:14','CMAA has posted a copy of the presentation given by GRegg Humphreys with Springfiled Metropolitan Sanitary District and Christy Chrites with Crawford Murphy & Tilly on using EADOC\'s web based constru for the Spring Creek WWTP expansion project. Here is a link to the presentation <a href=\"http://cmaanet.org/files/shared/Case_Study.pptx\">Presentation</a> You can also learn more about the CMAA Water Summit that was held in Kansas City, MO a couple weeks ago. ','CMAA Water Summit presentation',0,'','inherit','open','open','','188-revision','','','2010-08-03 13:31:14','2010-08-03 18:31:14','',188,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=189',0,'revision','',0),(190,1,'2010-08-03 13:32:25','2010-08-03 18:32:25','CMAA has posted a copy of the presentation given by GRegg Humphreys with Springfiled Metropolitan Sanitary District and Christy Chrites with Crawford Murphy & Tilly on using EADOC\'s web based construction management application for the Spring Creek WWTP expansion project. Here is a link to the presentation <a href=\"http://cmaanet.org/files/shared/Case_Study.pptx\">Presentation</a> You can also learn more about the CMAA Water Summit that was held in Kansas City, MO a couple weeks ago. If you want to learn more about this years Summit you can visit <a href=\"http://cmaanet.org/2010-water-summit-presentations\">CMAA</a> For those of you that missed the presentation we will ','CMAA Water Summit presentation',0,'','inherit','open','open','','188-revision-2','','','2010-08-03 13:32:25','2010-08-03 18:32:25','',188,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=190',0,'revision','',0),(191,1,'2010-08-03 13:32:56','2010-08-03 18:32:56','CMAA has posted a copy of the presentation given by GRegg Humphreys with Springfiled Metropolitan Sanitary District and Christy Chrites with Crawford Murphy & Tilly on using EADOC\'s web based construction management application for the Spring Creek WWTP expansion project. Here is a link to the presentation <a href=\"http://cmaanet.org/files/shared/Case_Study.pptx\">Presentation</a> You can also learn more about the CMAA Water Summit that was held in Kansas City, MO a couple weeks ago. If you want to learn more about this years Summit you can visit <a href=\"http://cmaanet.org/2010-water-summit-presentations\">CMAA</a> For those of you that missed the presentation we will doing another one at CMAA\'s annual conference in San Diego this Fall. Check back for more information.','CMAA Water Summit presentation',0,'','inherit','open','open','','188-revision-3','','','2010-08-03 13:32:56','2010-08-03 18:32:56','',188,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=191',0,'revision','',0),(192,1,'2010-08-03 13:33:36','2010-08-03 18:33:36','CMAA has posted a copy of the presentation given by GRegg Humphreys with Springfiled Metropolitan Sanitary District and Christy Chrites with Crawford Murphy & Tilly on using EADOC\'s web based construction management application for the Spring Creek WWTP expansion project. Here is a link to the presentation <a href=\"http://cmaanet.org/files/shared/Case_Study.pptx\">Presentation</a> You can also learn more about the CMAA Water Summit that was held in Kansas City, MO a couple weeks ago. If you want to learn more about this years Summit you can visit <a href=\"http://cmaanet.org/2010-water-summit-presentations\">CMAA</a> For those of you that missed the presentation we will doing another one at CMAA\'s annual conference in San Diego this Fall. Check back for more details as it gets closer.','CMAA Water Summit presentation',0,'','inherit','open','open','','188-revision-4','','','2010-08-03 13:33:36','2010-08-03 18:33:36','',188,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=192',0,'revision','',0),(193,1,'2010-08-03 13:34:45','2010-08-03 18:34:45','CMAA has posted a copy of the presentation given by Gregg Humphreys with Springfiled Metropolitan Sanitary District and Christy Crites with Crawford Murphy & Tilly on using EADOC\'s web based construction management application for the Spring Creek WWTP expansion project. Here is a link to the presentation <a href=\"http://cmaanet.org/files/shared/Case_Study.pptx\">Presentation</a> You can also learn more about the CMAA Water Summit that was held in Kansas City, MO a couple weeks ago. If you want to learn more about this years Summit you can visit <a href=\"http://cmaanet.org/2010-water-summit-presentations\">CMAA</a> For those of you that missed the presentation we will doing another one at CMAA\'s annual conference in San Diego this Fall. Check back for more details as it gets closer.','CMAA Water Summit presentation',0,'','inherit','open','open','','188-revision-5','','','2010-08-03 13:34:45','2010-08-03 18:34:45','',188,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=193',0,'revision','',0),(194,1,'2010-09-30 19:31:27','2010-10-01 00:31:27','Construction Project Controls and BIM Report published an article “<a href=\" http://www.projectcontrols.com/articles/20100811\">Primavera P3 and Suretrak Sales to Cease December 31, 2010</a>” recently about Oracle finally killing P3 and Suretrak.  Even though many in the industry have been expecting this for years this practice of killing off legacy products has a major impact on the users. The good news is that this practice of forcing customer to upgrade by killing products is no longer the only option customers have when choosing a vendor. With companies delivering Software As A Service(SAAS) the product is continuously improved over time so you always have a current version and never have to worry about the product being discontinued because a newer one is available. Delivering the software as a service eliminates: the painful/expensive upgrade/migration process, license upgrade fees, and the potential risk of the product not being supported anymore.  These newer applications are also easier to use, come with better support and all at a fraction of the cost of the older enterprise solutions.  Today\'s construction project management applications delivered via the SAAS model improve collaboration and act as a trusted third party providing even greater value over legacy enterprise software solutions.','Oracle Primavera Finally Kills P3 and Suretrak',0,'','publish','open','open','','oracle-primavera-finally-kills-p3-and-suretrak','','','2010-09-30 19:31:54','2010-10-01 00:31:54','',0,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=194',0,'post','',0),(195,1,'2010-09-10 15:32:26','2010-09-10 20:32:26','Construction Project Controls and BIM Report published an article “Primavera P3 and Suretrak Sales to Cease December 31, 2010” ()recently about Oracle finally killing P3 and Suretrak.  Even though many in the industry have been expecting this for many years this practice of killing off legacy products has a major impact on the users. The good news is that this practice of terminating products is no longer the only option customers have when choosing a vendor. With companies delivering Software As A Service(SAAS) the product is continuously improved over time so you always have a current version and never have to worry about the product being discontinued because a newer one is available. Delivering the software as a service eliminates: the painful/expensive upgrade/migration process, license upgrade fees, and the potential risk of the product not being supported anymore.  These newer applications are also easier to use, come with better support and all at a fraction of the cost of these older enterprise solutions.  Todays construction project management applications delivered via the SAAS model improve collaboration and act as a trusted third power providing even greater value over legacy enterprise software solutions.','Oracle Primavera Finally Kills P3 and Suretrak',0,'','inherit','open','open','','194-revision','','','2010-09-10 15:32:26','2010-09-10 20:32:26','',194,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=195',0,'revision','',0),(196,1,'2010-09-10 15:33:26','2010-09-10 20:33:26','Construction Project Controls and BIM Report published an article “<a href=\" http://www.projectcontrols.com/articles/20100811\">Primavera P3 and Suretrak Sales to Cease December 31, 2010</a>” recently about Oracle finally killing P3 and Suretrak.  Even though many in the industry have been expecting this for many years this practice of killing off legacy products has a major impact on the users. The good news is that this practice of terminating products is no longer the only option customers have when choosing a vendor. With companies delivering Software As A Service(SAAS) the product is continuously improved over time so you always have a current version and never have to worry about the product being discontinued because a newer one is available. Delivering the software as a service eliminates: the painful/expensive upgrade/migration process, license upgrade fees, and the potential risk of the product not being supported anymore.  These newer applications are also easier to use, come with better support and all at a fraction of the cost of these older enterprise solutions.  Todays construction project management applications delivered via the SAAS model improve collaboration and act as a trusted third power providing even greater value over legacy enterprise software solutions.','Oracle Primavera Finally Kills P3 and Suretrak',0,'','inherit','open','open','','194-revision-2','','','2010-09-10 15:33:26','2010-09-10 20:33:26','',194,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=196',0,'revision','',0),(197,1,'2010-09-10 15:35:49','0000-00-00 00:00:00','CMAA is putting on a webinar about understanding and managing the efficiency of construction. This looks to be a very detailed presentation that will provide “the most practical and proven analytical techniques to perform a measured-mile analysis” per the email announcement. This should be a great course for those with the time to attend. For those currently facing shrinking staff , budgets, and increased demand we recommend you look at some major inefficiencies that can provide you with some quick wins. The first being the laborious paper process for managing project information that encompasses filing cabinets, printer, staff hours costing your organization a lot of money while providing little control or accountability. We recommend you start with the biggest pains that can be eliminated quickly giving you time to attend the CMAA presentation and work into the more analytical analysis. ','CMAA Webinar Inefficiency Damages – Analysis and Prevention',0,'','draft','open','open','','','','','2010-09-10 15:35:49','2010-09-10 20:35:49','',0,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=197',0,'post','',0),(198,1,'2010-09-10 15:35:40','2010-09-10 20:35:40','','CMAA Webinar Inefficiency Damages – Analysis and Prevention',0,'','inherit','open','open','','197-revision','','','2010-09-10 15:35:40','2010-09-10 20:35:40','',197,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=198',0,'revision','',0),(199,1,'2010-09-10 15:37:41','0000-00-00 00:00:00','The software solution you select must reduce the costs of managing projects. Gone are the days of spending six figures on an Enterprise software solution that deliver dashboards, charts and gauges without providing any cost savings in labor.  Many of these Enterprise class tools require you to hire additional staff to enter the data in the application that drives these graphics. If all you wanted are fancy charts and reports your staff can do this in excel at a fraction of the cost.  Todays proactive project managers need to be looking at solutions that can be deployed quickly, reduce labor costs immediately and deliver unparalleled accountability.   To accomplish this you need a collaborative project management application that captures data from your project participants. Combing the power of the Internet with todays web based collaborative tools you can eliminate \r\nWhen evaluating software solutions most directors and managers are looking for tools that give them better visibility into how their projects are performing. Performance is typically measured in number of issues, costs, and schedule. There are a lot of software applications on the market that provide beautiful charts, gauges, dials, and other pretty graphics for a manager or director to look at. ','The bottom line',0,'','draft','open','open','','','','','2010-09-10 15:37:41','2010-09-10 20:37:41','',0,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=199',0,'post','',0),(200,1,'2010-09-10 15:36:07','2010-09-10 20:36:07','','The bottom line',0,'','inherit','open','open','','199-revision','','','2010-09-10 15:36:07','2010-09-10 20:36:07','',199,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=200',0,'revision','',0),(201,1,'2010-09-10 15:36:15','2010-09-10 20:36:15','The software solution you select must reduce the costs of managing projects. Gone are the days of spending six figures on an Enterprise software solution that deliver dashboards, charts and gauges without providing any cost savings in labor.  Many of these Enterprise class tools require you to hire additional staff to enter the data in the application that drives these graphics. If all you wanted are fancy charts and reports your staff can do this in excel at a fraction of the cost.  Todays proactive project managers need to be looking at solutions that can be deployed quickly, reduce labor costs immediately and deliver unparalleled accountability.   To accomplish this you need a collaborative project management application that captures data from your project participants. Combing the power of the Internet with todays web based collaborative tools you can eliminate \r\nWhen evaluating software solutions most directors and managers are looking for tools that give them better visibility into how their projects are performing. Performance is typically measured in number of issues, costs, and schedule. There are a lot of software applications on the market that provide beautiful charts, gauges, dials, and other pretty graphics for a manager or director to look at. ','The bottom line',0,'','inherit','open','open','','199-revision-2','','','2010-09-10 15:36:15','2010-09-10 20:36:15','',199,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=201',0,'revision','',0),(202,1,'2010-09-30 16:52:03','2010-09-30 21:52:03','Construction Digital has selected EADOC\'s web based construction project management application as one of the top 5 Construction Management applications in the industry.  Check out the article <a href=\"http://www.constructiondigital.com/industry-focus/building-technologies/top-5-construction-project-management-applications\">The Top 5 Construction Project Management Applications</a>','EADOC is selected as one of the top 5 Construction Management applications',0,'','publish','open','open','','eadoc-is-selected-as-one-of-the-top-5-construction-management-applications','','','2010-09-30 16:52:03','2010-09-30 21:52:03','',0,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=202',0,'post','',0),(203,1,'2010-09-30 16:50:56','2010-09-30 21:50:56','Construction Digital has selected EADOC\'s web based construction management application as one of the top 5 Construction Management applications in the industry.  Check out the article <a href=\"http://www.constructiondigital.com/industry-focus/building-technologies/top-5-construction-project-management-applications\">The Top 5 Construction Project Management Applications</a>','EADOC is selected as one of the top 5 Construction Management applications',0,'','inherit','open','open','','202-revision','','','2010-09-30 16:50:56','2010-09-30 21:50:56','',202,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=203',0,'revision','',0),(204,1,'2010-10-13 15:59:23','2010-10-13 20:59:23','I recently received a copy of DRMcNatty\'s monthly e-newsletter about their work with Primavera. Under the section \"Reduce Costs Associated with Software Implementation\" the first line says \"Primavera software implementations can be a large and complex undertaking\" . When Oracle Primavera\'s number one partner is telling clients that an implementation is a large and complex undertaking you know you will be spending major dollars on this project. I am talking well north of six figures for a basic installation. What DRMcNatty won\'t tell you is the best way to Reduce Costs Associated with Software Implementation is not to select a Software Solution like Oracle Primavera. \r\nWhen you are buying a legacy project management software application like Primavera the odds of a successful implementation are slim to none unless you have large deep pockets. Today you can remove the traditional implementation risk from the process by selecting a web based project management application hosted by the vendor like EADOC\'s project management application. By selecting a vendor hosted solution you eliminate buying hardware, installing software, and configuring the application yourself. This process alone delays poses tremendous risk to your implementation.  Also when you call the vendor for support we are looking at the same screen as you, resulting in issues being resolved in hours not weeks. So why doesn\'t Oracle host Primavera for it clients, because they would have to do an implementation and that is too expensive for Larry.  Now not all new web based solutions are created equal you need to watch out for newer companies who are are selling legacy enterprise software solutions as if they were a newer web based application. A major Healthcare provider recently contracted with IBM Global Services(Major Expense) to try and fix a 10 year implementation of an Enterprise system that has been unsuccessful to date. To help select the correct vendor conduct a Pilot project with that application. Start by asking for a log in to a demonstration site and then take the application for a spin on one of your projects before committing major dollars and thousands of man hours. If you can;t have access to a demo site within a day or be setup on a pilot project within a 1-2 weeks then you are mostly evaluating an Enterprise solution that could take months to years to deploy. Buying software is just like buying a car you need to push the buttons and drive it before making the big investment. ','DRMcNatty confirms what many in the industry already know about Primavera',0,'','publish','open','open','','drmcnatty-confirms-what-many-in-the-industry-already-know-about-primavera','','','2010-10-13 15:59:34','2010-10-13 20:59:34','',0,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=204',0,'post','',0),(205,1,'2010-09-30 17:06:57','2010-09-30 22:06:57','I recently received a copy of DRMcNatty\'s monthly e-newsletter about their work with Primavera. Under the section \"Reduce Costs Associated with Software Implementation\" the first line says \"Primavera software implementations can be a large and complex undertaking\" . When Oracle Primavera\'s number one partner is telling clients that an implementation is a large and complex undertaking you know you will be spending major dollars on this project. I am talking well north of six figures for a basic installation. What DRMcNatty won\'t tell you is the best way to Reduce Costs Associated with Software Implementation is not to select a Software Solution like Primavera. When you are buying a legacy project management software application like Primavera the odds of a successful implementation are slim to none unless you have large deep pockets. Today you can remove the traditional implementation from the process by selecting a Web Based application hosted by the vendor like EADOC\'s project management application. By selecting a vendor hosted solution you eliminate buying hardware, installing software, and configuring the application yourself. Also when you call the vendor for support we are looking at the same screen as you resulting in issues being resolved in hours not weeks. Now not all new web based solutions are created equal you need to watch out for newer companies like Skire who are selling their solution like they are Oracle. A major Healthcare provider recently contracted with IBM Global Services(Major Expense) to try and fix a 10 year implementation of Skire that has been unsuccessful to date.','DRMcNatty confirms what many in the industry already know about Primavera',0,'','inherit','open','open','','204-revision','','','2010-09-30 17:06:57','2010-09-30 22:06:57','',204,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=205',0,'revision','',0),(206,1,'2010-09-30 17:23:21','2010-09-30 22:23:21','I recently received a copy of DRMcNatty\'s monthly e-newsletter about their work with Primavera. Under the section \"Reduce Costs Associated with Software Implementation\" the first line says \"Primavera software implementations can be a large and complex undertaking\" . When Oracle Primavera\'s number one partner is telling clients that an implementation is a large and complex undertaking you know you will be spending major dollars on this project. I am talking well north of six figures for a basic installation. What DRMcNatty won\'t tell you is the best way to Reduce Costs Associated with Software Implementation is not to select a Software Solution like Primavera. When you are buying a legacy project management software application like Primavera the odds of a successful implementation are slim to none unless you have large deep pockets. Today you can remove the traditional implementation risk from the process by selecting a Web Based application hosted by the vendor like EADOC\'s project management application. By selecting a vendor hosted solution you eliminate buying hardware, installing software, and configuring the application yourself. Also when you call the vendor for support we are looking at the same screen as you, resulting in issues being resolved in hours not weeks. So why doesn\'t Oracle host Primavera for it clients, because they would have to do an implementation and that is too expensive for Larry.  Now not all new web based solutions are created equal you need to watch out for newer companies like Skire who are selling their solution like they are Oracle. A major Healthcare provider recently contracted with IBM Global Services(Major Expense) to try and fix a 10 year implementation of Skire that has been unsuccessful to date. To help select the correct vendor conduct a Pilot project with that application. Start by asking for a log in to a demonstration site and then take the application for a spin on one of your projects before committing major dollars and thousands of man hours. Buying software is just like buying a car you need to push the buttons and drive it before making the big investment. ','DRMcNatty confirms what many in the industry already know about Primavera',0,'','inherit','open','open','','204-revision-2','','','2010-09-30 17:23:21','2010-09-30 22:23:21','',204,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=206',0,'revision','',0),(207,1,'2010-10-01 12:09:31','2010-10-01 17:09:31','According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, since 1964 design and construction had been the only industry to actually grow less efficient. With all the innovations in tools and equipment we still find the majority of job sites flooded with paper and printers. The best irony I have seen was Green trailers with <a target=\"new\" href=\"http://enr.construction.com/products/product_snapshot/2010/extras/0915/slideshow.asp?slide=3\">filling cabinets</a> and <a target=\"new\" href=\"http://enr.construction.com/products/product_snapshot/2010/extras/0915/slideshow.asp?slide=2\">hanging drawings</a>. Job sites could go extremely green by needing less trailers if they would get rid of their paper addiction. Using web based project management applications and web meetings would reduce the number of trailers even further by eliminating the amount of staff on site and the square footage required to store all the paper. The first picture shown above with the office administrator and her filing cabinets is not necessary if everything were managed electronically. She could even work from home and not have to travel to the office. Everyone needs to pitch in to get rid of the paper on the projects that is costing companies exorbitant amounts of money, depleting our natural resources and doesn\'t provide any real value to the project.\r\n','The paper you love so much is killing the industry',0,'','publish','open','open','','the-paper-you-love-so-much-is-killing-the-industry','','','2010-10-13 15:53:27','2010-10-13 20:53:27','',0,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=207',0,'post','',0),(208,1,'2010-09-30 19:10:14','2010-10-01 00:10:14','According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, since 1964 design and construction had been the only industry to actually grow less efficient. With all the inovations in tools and equipment we still find the majority of job sites are still flooded with paper and printers. The best irony I have seen was Green trailers with <a href=\"http://enr.construction.com/products/product_snapshot/2010/extras/0915/slideshow.asp?slide=3\">filling cabinets</a> and <a href=\"http://enr.construction.com/products/product_snapshot/2010/extras/0915/slideshow.asp?slide=2\">hanging drawings</a>. The irony being most job sites could go extremely green by needing less trailers\n','The paper you love so much is hurting the industry',0,'','inherit','open','open','','207-revision','','','2010-09-30 19:10:14','2010-10-01 00:10:14','',207,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=208',0,'revision','',0),(209,1,'2010-09-30 19:10:33','2010-10-01 00:10:33','According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, since 1964 design and construction had been the only industry to actually grow less efficient. With all the inovations in tools and equipment we still find the majority of job sites are still flooded with paper and printers. The best irony I have seen was Green trailers with <a href=\"http://enr.construction.com/products/product_snapshot/2010/extras/0915/slideshow.asp?slide=3\">filling cabinets</a> and <a href=\"http://enr.construction.com/products/product_snapshot/2010/extras/0915/slideshow.asp?slide=2\">hanging drawings</a>. The irony being most job sites could go extremely green by needing less trailers if they would get rid of their paper addiction.\r\n','The paper you love so much is hurting the industry',0,'','inherit','open','open','','207-revision-2','','','2010-09-30 19:10:33','2010-10-01 00:10:33','',207,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=209',0,'revision','',0),(210,1,'2010-09-30 19:10:38','2010-10-01 00:10:38','According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, since 1964 design and construction had been the only industry to actually grow less efficient. With all the inovations in tools and equipment we still find the majority of job sites are still flooded with paper and printers. The best irony I have seen was Green trailers with <a href=\"http://enr.construction.com/products/product_snapshot/2010/extras/0915/slideshow.asp?slide=3\">filling cabinets</a> and <a href=\"http://enr.construction.com/products/product_snapshot/2010/extras/0915/slideshow.asp?slide=2\">hanging drawings</a>. The irony being most job sites could go extremely green by needing less trailers if they would get rid of their paper addiction.\r\n','The paper you love so much is hurting the industry',0,'','inherit','open','open','','207-revision-3','','','2010-09-30 19:10:38','2010-10-01 00:10:38','',207,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=210',0,'revision','',0),(211,1,'2010-09-30 19:11:23','2010-10-01 00:11:23','According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, since 1964 design and construction had been the only industry to actually grow less efficient. With all the inovations in tools and equipment we still find the majority of job sites are still flooded with paper and printers. The best irony I have seen was Green trailers with <a target=\"new\" href=\"http://enr.construction.com/products/product_snapshot/2010/extras/0915/slideshow.asp?slide=3\">filling cabinets</a> and <a href=\"http://enr.construction.com/products/product_snapshot/2010/extras/0915/slideshow.asp?slide=2\">hanging drawings</a>. The irony being most job sites could go extremely green by needing less trailers if they would get rid of their paper addiction.\r\n','The paper you love so much is hurting the industry',0,'','inherit','open','open','','207-revision-4','','','2010-09-30 19:11:23','2010-10-01 00:11:23','',207,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=211',0,'revision','',0),(212,1,'2010-09-30 19:11:25','2010-10-01 00:11:25','According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, since 1964 design and construction had been the only industry to actually grow less efficient. With all the inovations in tools and equipment we still find the majority of job sites are still flooded with paper and printers. The best irony I have seen was Green trailers with <a target=\"new\" href=\"http://enr.construction.com/products/product_snapshot/2010/extras/0915/slideshow.asp?slide=3\">filling cabinets</a> and <a href=\"http://enr.construction.com/products/product_snapshot/2010/extras/0915/slideshow.asp?slide=2\">hanging drawings</a>. The irony being most job sites could go extremely green by needing less trailers if they would get rid of their paper addiction.\r\n','The paper you love so much is hurting the industry',0,'','inherit','open','open','','207-revision-5','','','2010-09-30 19:11:25','2010-10-01 00:11:25','',207,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=212',0,'revision','',0),(213,1,'2010-09-30 19:17:58','2010-10-01 00:17:58','According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, since 1964 design and construction had been the only industry to actually grow less efficient. With all the inovations in tools and equipment we still find the majority of job sites are still flooded with paper and printers. The best irony I have seen was Green trailers with <a target=\"new\" href=\"http://enr.construction.com/products/product_snapshot/2010/extras/0915/slideshow.asp?slide=3\">filling cabinets</a> and <a target=\"new\" href=\"http://enr.construction.com/products/product_snapshot/2010/extras/0915/slideshow.asp?slide=2\">hanging drawings</a>. The irony being most job sites could go extremely green by needing less trailers if they would get rid of their paper addiction. Using web based project management application and web meeting would reduce the number of trailers even further by eliminating the amount of staff on site. The first picture shown above the office administrator and her filing cabinets is not necessary if everything were managed electronically. She could even work from home and not have to travel to the office. Everyone needs to pitch in to get rid of the paper on the projects.\n','The paper you love so much is hurting the industry',0,'','inherit','open','open','','207-revision-6','','','2010-09-30 19:17:58','2010-10-01 00:17:58','',207,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=213',0,'revision','',0),(214,1,'2010-09-30 19:18:53','2010-10-01 00:18:53','According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, since 1964 design and construction had been the only industry to actually grow less efficient. With all the inovations in tools and equipment we still find the majority of job sites are still flooded with paper and printers. The best irony I have seen was Green trailers with <a target=\"new\" href=\"http://enr.construction.com/products/product_snapshot/2010/extras/0915/slideshow.asp?slide=3\">filling cabinets</a> and <a target=\"new\" href=\"http://enr.construction.com/products/product_snapshot/2010/extras/0915/slideshow.asp?slide=2\">hanging drawings</a>. The irony being most job sites could go extremely green by needing less trailers if they would get rid of their paper addiction. Using web based project management application and web meeting would reduce the number of trailers even further by eliminating the amount of staff on site. The first picture shown above the office administrator and her filing cabinets is not necessary if everything were managed electronically. She could even work from home and not have to travel to the office. Everyone needs to pitch in to get rid of the paper on the projects that is costing us exorbitant amounts of money, depleting our natural resources and doesn\'t provide any real value.\r\n','The paper you love so much is hurting the industry',0,'','inherit','open','open','','207-revision-7','','','2010-09-30 19:18:53','2010-10-01 00:18:53','',207,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=214',0,'revision','',0),(215,1,'2010-09-30 19:20:08','2010-10-01 00:20:08','According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, since 1964 design and construction had been the only industry to actually grow less efficient. With all the innovations in tools and equipment we still find the majority of job sites flooded with paper and printers. The best irony I have seen was Green trailers with <a target=\"new\" href=\"http://enr.construction.com/products/product_snapshot/2010/extras/0915/slideshow.asp?slide=3\">filling cabinets</a> and <a target=\"new\" href=\"http://enr.construction.com/products/product_snapshot/2010/extras/0915/slideshow.asp?slide=2\">hanging drawings</a>. Job sites could go extremely green by needing less trailers if they would get rid of their paper addiction. Using web based project management applications and web meetings would reduce the number of trailers even further by eliminating the amount of staff on site. The first picture shown above with the office administrator and her filing cabinets is not necessary if everything were managed electronically. She could even work from home and not have to travel to the office. Everyone needs to pitch in to get rid of the paper on the projects that is costing us exorbitant amounts of money, depleting our natural resources and doesn\'t provide any real value to the project.\n','The paper you love so much is hurting the industry',0,'','inherit','open','open','','207-revision-8','','','2010-09-30 19:20:08','2010-10-01 00:20:08','',207,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=215',0,'revision','',0),(216,1,'2010-09-10 15:35:22','2010-09-10 20:35:22','Construction Project Controls and BIM Report published an article “<a href=\" http://www.projectcontrols.com/articles/20100811\">Primavera P3 and Suretrak Sales to Cease December 31, 2010</a>” recently about Oracle finally killing P3 and Suretrak.  Even though many in the industry have been expecting this for years this practice of killing off legacy products has a major impact on the users. The good news is that this practice of forcing customer to upgrade by killing products is no longer the only option customers have when choosing a vendor. With companies delivering Software As A Service(SAAS) the product is continuously improved over time so you always have a current version and never have to worry about the product being discontinued because a newer one is available. Delivering the software as a service eliminates: the painful/expensive upgrade/migration process, license upgrade fees, and the potential risk of the product not being supported anymore.  These newer applications are also easier to use, come with better support and all at a fraction of the cost of the older enterprise solutions.  Today\'s construction project management applications delivered via the SAAS model improve collaboration and act as a trusted third power providing even greater value over legacy enterprise software solutions.','Oracle Primavera Finally Kills P3 and Suretrak',0,'','inherit','open','open','','194-revision-3','','','2010-09-10 15:35:22','2010-09-10 20:35:22','',194,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=216',0,'revision','',0),(217,1,'2010-09-30 19:31:27','2010-10-01 00:31:27','Construction Project Controls and BIM Report published an article “<a href=\" http://www.projectcontrols.com/articles/20100811\">Primavera P3 and Suretrak Sales to Cease December 31, 2010</a>” recently about Oracle finally killing P3 and Suretrak.  Even though many in the industry have been expecting this for years this practice of killing off legacy products has a major impact on the users. The good news is that this practice of forcing customer to upgrade by killing products is no longer the only option customers have when choosing a vendor. With companies delivering Software As A Service(SAAS) the product is continuously improved over time so you always have a current version and never have to worry about the product being discontinued because a newer one is available. Delivering the software as a service eliminates: the painful/expensive upgrade/migration process, license upgrade fees, and the potential risk of the product not being supported anymore.  These newer applications are also easier to use, come with better support and all at a fraction of the cost of the older enterprise solutions.  Today\'s construction project management applications delivered via the SAAS model improve collaboration and act as a trusted third party providing even greater value over legacy enterprise software solutions.','Oracle Primavera Finally Kills P3 and Suretrak',0,'','inherit','open','open','','194-revision-4','','','2010-09-30 19:31:27','2010-10-01 00:31:27','',194,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=217',0,'revision','',0),(218,1,'2010-10-01 12:09:10','2010-10-01 17:09:10','According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, since 1964 design and construction had been the only industry to actually grow less efficient. With all the innovations in tools and equipment we still find the majority of job sites flooded with paper and printers. The best irony I have seen was Green trailers with <a target=\"new\" href=\"http://enr.construction.com/products/product_snapshot/2010/extras/0915/slideshow.asp?slide=3\">filling cabinets</a> and <a target=\"new\" href=\"http://enr.construction.com/products/product_snapshot/2010/extras/0915/slideshow.asp?slide=2\">hanging drawings</a>. Job sites could go extremely green by needing less trailers if they would get rid of their paper addiction. Using web based project management applications and web meetings would reduce the number of trailers even further by eliminating the amount of staff on site and the square footage required to store all the paper. The first picture shown above with the office administrator and her filing cabinets is not necessary if everything were managed electronically. She could even work from home and not have to travel to the office. Everyone needs to pitch in to get rid of the paper on the projects that is costing us exorbitant amounts of money, depleting our natural resources and doesn\'t provide any real value to the project.\n','The paper you love so much is killing the industry',0,'','inherit','open','open','','207-revision-9','','','2010-10-01 12:09:10','2010-10-01 17:09:10','',207,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=218',0,'revision','',0),(219,1,'2010-10-01 12:09:31','2010-10-01 17:09:31','According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, since 1964 design and construction had been the only industry to actually grow less efficient. With all the innovations in tools and equipment we still find the majority of job sites flooded with paper and printers. The best irony I have seen was Green trailers with <a target=\"new\" href=\"http://enr.construction.com/products/product_snapshot/2010/extras/0915/slideshow.asp?slide=3\">filling cabinets</a> and <a target=\"new\" href=\"http://enr.construction.com/products/product_snapshot/2010/extras/0915/slideshow.asp?slide=2\">hanging drawings</a>. Job sites could go extremely green by needing less trailers if they would get rid of their paper addiction. Using web based project management applications and web meetings would reduce the number of trailers even further by eliminating the amount of staff on site and the square footage required to store all the paper. The first picture shown above with the office administrator and her filing cabinets is not necessary if everything were managed electronically. She could even work from home and not have to travel to the office. Everyone needs to pitch in to get rid of the paper on the projects that is costing companies exorbitant amounts of money, depleting our natural resources and doesn\'t provide any real value to the project.\r\n','The paper you love so much is killing the industry',0,'','inherit','open','open','','207-revision-10','','','2010-10-01 12:09:31','2010-10-01 17:09:31','',207,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=219',0,'revision','',0),(220,1,'2010-10-13 15:58:55','2010-10-13 20:58:55','I recently received a copy of DRMcNatty\'s monthly e-newsletter about their work with Primavera. Under the section \"Reduce Costs Associated with Software Implementation\" the first line says \"Primavera software implementations can be a large and complex undertaking\" . When Oracle Primavera\'s number one partner is telling clients that an implementation is a large and complex undertaking you know you will be spending major dollars on this project. I am talking well north of six figures for a basic installation. What DRMcNatty won\'t tell you is the best way to Reduce Costs Associated with Software Implementation is not to select a Software Solution like Oracle Primavera. \nWhen you are buying a legacy project management software application like Primavera the odds of a successful implementation are slim to none unless you have large deep pockets. Today you can remove the traditional implementation risk from the process by selecting a VeWeb Based application hosted by the vendor like EADOC\'s project management application. By selecting a vendor hosted solution you eliminate buying hardware, installing software, and configuring the application yourself. This process alone delays poses tremendous risk to your implementation.  Also when you call the vendor for support we are looking at the same screen as you, resulting in issues being resolved in hours not weeks. So why doesn\'t Oracle host Primavera for it clients, because they would have to do an implementation and that is too expensive for Larry.  Now not all new web based solutions are created equal you need to watch out for newer companies who are are selling legacy enterprise software solutions as if they were a newer web based application. A major Healthcare provider recently contracted with IBM Global Services(Major Expense) to try and fix a 10 year implementation of an Enterprise system that has been unsuccessful to date. To help select the correct vendor conduct a Pilot project with that application. Start by asking for a log in to a demonstration site and then take the application for a spin on one of your projects before committing major dollars and thousands of man hours. If you can;t have access to a demo site within a day or be setup on a pilot project within a 1-2 weeks then you are mostly evaluating an Enterprise solution that could take months to years to deploy. Buying software is just like buying a car you need to push the buttons and drive it before making the big investment. ','DRMcNatty confirms what many in the industry already know about Primavera',0,'','inherit','open','open','','204-revision-3','','','2010-10-13 15:58:55','2010-10-13 20:58:55','',204,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=220',0,'revision','',0),(221,1,'2010-10-13 15:59:23','2010-10-13 20:59:23','I recently received a copy of DRMcNatty\'s monthly e-newsletter about their work with Primavera. Under the section \"Reduce Costs Associated with Software Implementation\" the first line says \"Primavera software implementations can be a large and complex undertaking\" . When Oracle Primavera\'s number one partner is telling clients that an implementation is a large and complex undertaking you know you will be spending major dollars on this project. I am talking well north of six figures for a basic installation. What DRMcNatty won\'t tell you is the best way to Reduce Costs Associated with Software Implementation is not to select a Software Solution like Oracle Primavera. \r\nWhen you are buying a legacy project management software application like Primavera the odds of a successful implementation are slim to none unless you have large deep pockets. Today you can remove the traditional implementation risk from the process by selecting a web based project management application hosted by the vendor like EADOC\'s project management application. By selecting a vendor hosted solution you eliminate buying hardware, installing software, and configuring the application yourself. This process alone delays poses tremendous risk to your implementation.  Also when you call the vendor for support we are looking at the same screen as you, resulting in issues being resolved in hours not weeks. So why doesn\'t Oracle host Primavera for it clients, because they would have to do an implementation and that is too expensive for Larry.  Now not all new web based solutions are created equal you need to watch out for newer companies who are are selling legacy enterprise software solutions as if they were a newer web based application. A major Healthcare provider recently contracted with IBM Global Services(Major Expense) to try and fix a 10 year implementation of an Enterprise system that has been unsuccessful to date. To help select the correct vendor conduct a Pilot project with that application. Start by asking for a log in to a demonstration site and then take the application for a spin on one of your projects before committing major dollars and thousands of man hours. If you can;t have access to a demo site within a day or be setup on a pilot project within a 1-2 weeks then you are mostly evaluating an Enterprise solution that could take months to years to deploy. Buying software is just like buying a car you need to push the buttons and drive it before making the big investment. ','DRMcNatty confirms what many in the industry already know about Primavera',0,'','inherit','open','open','','204-revision-4','','','2010-10-13 15:59:23','2010-10-13 20:59:23','',204,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=221',0,'revision','',0),(222,1,'2010-10-27 13:55:23','2010-10-27 18:55:23','Recently I came across this article \r\n<a href=\'http://www.eadocsoftware.com/pdf/63_MLM_How-Can-the-Contractor-Participate-in-the-Owner-CMs-Environment.pdf\'>\"How Can the Contractor Participate in the Owner or CMs Environment\"</a> talking about work arounds for using Primavera Contract Manager as a collaborative project management application. Essentially this article concludes that Owners and CM\'s will need to buy or develop their own application for allowing contractors to submit information electronically into Contract Manager or pay staff to manually enter the data.  Choosing EADOC will save 1-2 FTE on a project  or $250-$2M on custom software development compared to Primavera contract manager based on the options presented in the article. \r\n\r\n<strong>Option A from the article </strong>\r\n\"The  Contractor uses same  Contract Management  system as owner. This can be problematic to execute, even when the requirements are clearly spelled out in the contract by the Owner or CM. Contractors and architects will resist using the owner (or CM’s) system to manage the process of creating or reviewing documents. Most will keep this process internal and only enter the final \"official document\" in the owners system.  Contractors  and architects require full “read/write” access to the owners Contract Management environment in order to  originate  any document  or attach any backup documentation. If  a  document (RFI, Submittal) is managed inside a contractors specific project in Contract Management (as opposed to being manually re-entered in the Construction Manager\'s project  by the Owner), <strong>all review comments can be seen by the contractor,</strong>  in addition to the official response. These  two issues (“read/write”  access and the contractor being able to see reviewer’s comments) are often fatal flaws when deploying Contract Management as a project team database.  While  Option A  is a common approach,  our experience is this option does not work well. \"\r\n\r\n<strong>Option B from the article</strong> (zero cost savings over an excel spreadsheet since the CM or Owner has to enter all data into Contract Manager)\r\n\"The contractor submits an electronic copy of their document.  <strong>The Construction Manager’s staff logs  the document into their  Contract  Management  database  system, routing the document for review and recording  each reviewer’s  comments.</strong> The  advantage to  this approach  is,  the contractor may continue to use whatever system they currently use (you\'d be surprised how many do not have a standard system), to create RFI’s, proposal, submittals (85% of all documents submitted) into a printed  PDF electronic document  (documents cannot be scanned to PDF  - scans are not searchable). The printed document is emailed to the Construction Manager by the contractor.  The  contractor is never given access to  the Owners  Contract Management  System. This prevents the contractor from seeing others comments, which is often an important issue for the owners team. \"\r\n \r\nEADOC is the only true collaborative project management application that allows for the complete control of information as it works it\'s way across your project team resulting tremendous cost savings.','Primavera Contract Manager is not a collaborative solution for Owners and Construction Managers',0,'','publish','open','open','','primavera-contract-manager-is-not-a-collaborative-solution-for-owners-and-construction-managers','','','2010-10-27 13:55:23','2010-10-27 18:55:23','',0,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=222',0,'post','',0),(223,1,'2010-10-27 12:59:25','2010-10-27 17:59:25','','63_MLM_How Can the Contractor Participate in the Owner CMs Environment',0,'','inherit','open','open','','63_mlm_how-can-the-contractor-participate-in-the-owner-cms-environment','','','2010-10-27 12:59:25','2010-10-27 17:59:25','',222,'http://www.eadocsoftware.com/pdf/63_MLM_How-Can-the-Contractor-Participate-in-the-Owner-CMs-Environment.pdf',0,'attachment','application/pdf',0),(224,1,'2010-10-27 13:12:16','2010-10-27 18:12:16','Recently I came across this article \n<a href=\'http://www.eadocsoftware.com/pdf/63_MLM_How-Can-the-Contractor-Participate-in-the-Owner-CMs-Environment.pdf\'>63_MLM_How Can the Contractor Participate in the Owner CMs Environment</a> talking about work arounds for using Primavera Contract Manager in a collaborative environment. When explaining how EADOC allows all parties to share and exchange information like submittal comments securely many user are told by Primavera sales or assume that you can do this with Primavera Contract Manager. Essentially this article concludes that Owners and CM\'s will need to buy or develop their own interface for allowing contractors to submit information directly into Contract Manager in order to deliver true collaboration.  Essentially when comparing EADOC\'s project management application to the options below you will save 1-2 FTE on a project using EADOC or $250-$2M on custom software development compared to Primavera contract manager. \n\nOption A from the article \n\"The  Contractor uses same  Contract Management  system as owner. This can be problematic to execute, even when the requirements are clearly spelled out in the contract by the Owner or CM. Contractors and architects will resist using the owner (or CM’s) system to manage the process of creating or reviewing documents. Most will keep this process internal and only enter the final \"official document\" in the owners system.  Contractors  and architects require full “read/write” access to the owners Contract Management environment in order to  originate  any document  or attach any backup documentation. If  a  document (RFI, Submittal) is managed inside a contractors specific project in Contract Management (as opposed to being manually re-entered in the Construction Manager\'s project  by the Owner), <strong>all review comments can be seen by the contractor,</strong>  in addition to the official response. These  two issues (“read/write”  access and the contractor being able to see reviewer’s comments) are often fatal flaws when deploying Contract Management as a project team database.  While  Option A  is a common approach,  our experience is this option does not work well. \"\n\nOption B from the article (zero cost savings over an excel spreadsheet since the CM or Owner has to enter all data into Contract Manager)\n\"The contractor submits an electronic copy of their document.  <strong>The Construction Manager’s staff logs  the document into their  Contract  Management  database  system, routing the document for review and recording  each reviewer’s  comments.</strong> The  advantage to  this approach  is,  the contractor may continue to use whatever system they currently use (you\'d be surprised how many do not have a standard system), to create RFI’s, proposal, submittals (85% of all documents submitted) into a printed  PDF electronic document  (documents cannot be scanned to PDF  - scans are not searchable). The printed document is emailed to the Construction Manager by the contractor.  The  contractor is never given access to  the Owners  Contract Management  System. This prevents the contractor from seeing others comments, which is often an important issue for the owners team. \"\n ','Why Primavera Contract Management is not a solution for Owners and CM',0,'','inherit','open','open','','222-revision','','','2010-10-27 13:12:16','2010-10-27 18:12:16','',222,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=224',0,'revision','',0),(225,1,'2010-10-27 13:12:46','2010-10-27 18:12:46','Recently I came across this article \r\n<a href=\'http://www.eadocsoftware.com/pdf/63_MLM_How-Can-the-Contractor-Participate-in-the-Owner-CMs-Environment.pdf\'>63_MLM_How Can the Contractor Participate in the Owner CMs Environment</a> talking about work arounds for using Primavera Contract Manager in a collaborative environment. When explaining how EADOC allows all parties to share and exchange information like submittal comments securely many user are told by Primavera sales or assume that you can do this with Primavera Contract Manager. Essentially this article concludes that Owners and CM\'s will need to buy or develop their own interface for allowing contractors to submit information directly into Contract Manager in order to deliver true collaboration.  Essentially when comparing EADOC\'s project management application to the options below you will save 1-2 FTE on a project using EADOC or $250-$2M on custom software development compared to Primavera contract manager. \r\n\r\nOption A from the article \r\n\"The  Contractor uses same  Contract Management  system as owner. This can be problematic to execute, even when the requirements are clearly spelled out in the contract by the Owner or CM. Contractors and architects will resist using the owner (or CM’s) system to manage the process of creating or reviewing documents. Most will keep this process internal and only enter the final \"official document\" in the owners system.  Contractors  and architects require full “read/write” access to the owners Contract Management environment in order to  originate  any document  or attach any backup documentation. If  a  document (RFI, Submittal) is managed inside a contractors specific project in Contract Management (as opposed to being manually re-entered in the Construction Manager\'s project  by the Owner), <strong>all review comments can be seen by the contractor,</strong>  in addition to the official response. These  two issues (“read/write”  access and the contractor being able to see reviewer’s comments) are often fatal flaws when deploying Contract Management as a project team database.  While  Option A  is a common approach,  our experience is this option does not work well. \"\r\n\r\nOption B from the article (zero cost savings over an excel spreadsheet since the CM or Owner has to enter all data into Contract Manager)\r\n\"The contractor submits an electronic copy of their document.  <strong>The Construction Manager’s staff logs  the document into their  Contract  Management  database  system, routing the document for review and recording  each reviewer’s  comments.</strong> The  advantage to  this approach  is,  the contractor may continue to use whatever system they currently use (you\'d be surprised how many do not have a standard system), to create RFI’s, proposal, submittals (85% of all documents submitted) into a printed  PDF electronic document  (documents cannot be scanned to PDF  - scans are not searchable). The printed document is emailed to the Construction Manager by the contractor.  The  contractor is never given access to  the Owners  Contract Management  System. This prevents the contractor from seeing others comments, which is often an important issue for the owners team. \"\r\n ','Why Primavera Contract Management is not a collaborative solution for Owners and Construction Managers',0,'','inherit','open','open','','222-revision-2','','','2010-10-27 13:12:46','2010-10-27 18:12:46','',222,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=225',0,'revision','',0),(226,1,'2010-10-27 13:12:52','2010-10-27 18:12:52','Recently I came across this article \r\n<a href=\'http://www.eadocsoftware.com/pdf/63_MLM_How-Can-the-Contractor-Participate-in-the-Owner-CMs-Environment.pdf\'>63_MLM_How Can the Contractor Participate in the Owner CMs Environment</a> talking about work arounds for using Primavera Contract Manager in a collaborative environment. When explaining how EADOC allows all parties to share and exchange information like submittal comments securely many user are told by Primavera sales or assume that you can do this with Primavera Contract Manager. Essentially this article concludes that Owners and CM\'s will need to buy or develop their own interface for allowing contractors to submit information directly into Contract Manager in order to deliver true collaboration.  Essentially when comparing EADOC\'s project management application to the options below you will save 1-2 FTE on a project using EADOC or $250-$2M on custom software development compared to Primavera contract manager. \r\n\r\nOption A from the article \r\n\"The  Contractor uses same  Contract Management  system as owner. This can be problematic to execute, even when the requirements are clearly spelled out in the contract by the Owner or CM. Contractors and architects will resist using the owner (or CM’s) system to manage the process of creating or reviewing documents. Most will keep this process internal and only enter the final \"official document\" in the owners system.  Contractors  and architects require full “read/write” access to the owners Contract Management environment in order to  originate  any document  or attach any backup documentation. If  a  document (RFI, Submittal) is managed inside a contractors specific project in Contract Management (as opposed to being manually re-entered in the Construction Manager\'s project  by the Owner), <strong>all review comments can be seen by the contractor,</strong>  in addition to the official response. These  two issues (“read/write”  access and the contractor being able to see reviewer’s comments) are often fatal flaws when deploying Contract Management as a project team database.  While  Option A  is a common approach,  our experience is this option does not work well. \"\r\n\r\nOption B from the article (zero cost savings over an excel spreadsheet since the CM or Owner has to enter all data into Contract Manager)\r\n\"The contractor submits an electronic copy of their document.  <strong>The Construction Manager’s staff logs  the document into their  Contract  Management  database  system, routing the document for review and recording  each reviewer’s  comments.</strong> The  advantage to  this approach  is,  the contractor may continue to use whatever system they currently use (you\'d be surprised how many do not have a standard system), to create RFI’s, proposal, submittals (85% of all documents submitted) into a printed  PDF electronic document  (documents cannot be scanned to PDF  - scans are not searchable). The printed document is emailed to the Construction Manager by the contractor.  The  contractor is never given access to  the Owners  Contract Management  System. This prevents the contractor from seeing others comments, which is often an important issue for the owners team. \"\r\n ','Why Primavera Contract Management is not a collaborative solution for Owners and Construction Managers',0,'','inherit','open','open','','222-revision-3','','','2010-10-27 13:12:52','2010-10-27 18:12:52','',222,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=226',0,'revision','',0),(232,1,'2010-10-27 13:18:39','2010-10-27 18:18:39','Recently I came across this article \r\n<a href=\'http://www.eadocsoftware.com/pdf/63_MLM_How-Can-the-Contractor-Participate-in-the-Owner-CMs-Environment.pdf\'>How Can the Contractor Participate in the Owner or CMs Environment</a> talking about work arounds for using Primavera Contract Manager in a collaborative environment. Essentially this article concludes that Owners and CM\'s will need to buy or develop their own application for allowing contractors to submit information directly into Contract Manager in order to deliver true collaboration.  Essentially when comparing EADOC\'s project management application to the options below you will save 1-2 FTE on a project using EADOC or $250-$2M on custom software development compared to Primavera contract manager. \r\n\r\nOption A from the article \r\n\"The  Contractor uses same  Contract Management  system as owner. This can be problematic to execute, even when the requirements are clearly spelled out in the contract by the Owner or CM. Contractors and architects will resist using the owner (or CM’s) system to manage the process of creating or reviewing documents. Most will keep this process internal and only enter the final \"official document\" in the owners system.  Contractors  and architects require full “read/write” access to the owners Contract Management environment in order to  originate  any document  or attach any backup documentation. If  a  document (RFI, Submittal) is managed inside a contractors specific project in Contract Management (as opposed to being manually re-entered in the Construction Manager\'s project  by the Owner), <strong>all review comments can be seen by the contractor,</strong>  in addition to the official response. These  two issues (“read/write”  access and the contractor being able to see reviewer’s comments) are often fatal flaws when deploying Contract Management as a project team database.  While  Option A  is a common approach,  our experience is this option does not work well. \"\r\n\r\nOption B from the article (zero cost savings over an excel spreadsheet since the CM or Owner has to enter all data into Contract Manager)\r\n\"The contractor submits an electronic copy of their document.  <strong>The Construction Manager’s staff logs  the document into their  Contract  Management  database  system, routing the document for review and recording  each reviewer’s  comments.</strong> The  advantage to  this approach  is,  the contractor may continue to use whatever system they currently use (you\'d be surprised how many do not have a standard system), to create RFI’s, proposal, submittals (85% of all documents submitted) into a printed  PDF electronic document  (documents cannot be scanned to PDF  - scans are not searchable). The printed document is emailed to the Construction Manager by the contractor.  The  contractor is never given access to  the Owners  Contract Management  System. This prevents the contractor from seeing others comments, which is often an important issue for the owners team. \"\r\n ','Why Primavera Contract Manager is not a collaborative solution for Owners and Construction Managers',0,'','inherit','open','open','','222-revision-9','','','2010-10-27 13:18:39','2010-10-27 18:18:39','',222,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=232',0,'revision','',0),(227,1,'2010-10-27 13:17:07','2010-10-27 18:17:07','Recently I came across this article \r\n<a href=\'http://www.eadocsoftware.com/pdf/63_MLM_How-Can-the-Contractor-Participate-in-the-Owner-CMs-Environment.pdf\'>63_MLM_How Can the Contractor Participate in the Owner CMs Environment</a> talking about work arounds for using Primavera Contract Manager in a collaborative environment. When explaining how EADOC allows all parties to share and exchange information like submittal comments securely between project participants we find many users believe this functionality is part of Primavera\'s Contract Manager.  This is because Oracle Primavera spends a lot of money marketing Contract Manager as delivering \"project team collaboration\", this is only true if you want every member of the team to have access to every piece of information. Essentially this article concludes that Owners and CM\'s will need to buy or develop their own application for allowing contractors to submit information directly into Contract Manager in order to deliver true collaboration.  Essentially when comparing EADOC\'s project management application to the options below you will save 1-2 FTE on a project using EADOC or $250-$2M on custom software development compared to Primavera contract manager. \r\n\r\nOption A from the article \r\n\"The  Contractor uses same  Contract Management  system as owner. This can be problematic to execute, even when the requirements are clearly spelled out in the contract by the Owner or CM. Contractors and architects will resist using the owner (or CM’s) system to manage the process of creating or reviewing documents. Most will keep this process internal and only enter the final \"official document\" in the owners system.  Contractors  and architects require full “read/write” access to the owners Contract Management environment in order to  originate  any document  or attach any backup documentation. If  a  document (RFI, Submittal) is managed inside a contractors specific project in Contract Management (as opposed to being manually re-entered in the Construction Manager\'s project  by the Owner), <strong>all review comments can be seen by the contractor,</strong>  in addition to the official response. These  two issues (“read/write”  access and the contractor being able to see reviewer’s comments) are often fatal flaws when deploying Contract Management as a project team database.  While  Option A  is a common approach,  our experience is this option does not work well. \"\r\n\r\nOption B from the article (zero cost savings over an excel spreadsheet since the CM or Owner has to enter all data into Contract Manager)\r\n\"The contractor submits an electronic copy of their document.  <strong>The Construction Manager’s staff logs  the document into their  Contract  Management  database  system, routing the document for review and recording  each reviewer’s  comments.</strong> The  advantage to  this approach  is,  the contractor may continue to use whatever system they currently use (you\'d be surprised how many do not have a standard system), to create RFI’s, proposal, submittals (85% of all documents submitted) into a printed  PDF electronic document  (documents cannot be scanned to PDF  - scans are not searchable). The printed document is emailed to the Construction Manager by the contractor.  The  contractor is never given access to  the Owners  Contract Management  System. This prevents the contractor from seeing others comments, which is often an important issue for the owners team. \"\r\n ','Why Primavera Contract Management is not a collaborative solution for Owners and Construction Managers',0,'','inherit','open','open','','222-revision-4','','','2010-10-27 13:17:07','2010-10-27 18:17:07','',222,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=227',0,'revision','',0),(228,1,'2010-10-27 13:17:24','2010-10-27 18:17:24','Recently I came across this article \r\n<a href=\'http://www.eadocsoftware.com/pdf/63_MLM_How-Can-the-Contractor-Participate-in-the-Owner-CMs-Environment.pdf\'>How Can the Contractor Participate in the Owner or CMs Environment</a> talking about work arounds for using Primavera Contract Manager in a collaborative environment. When explaining how EADOC allows all parties to share and exchange information like submittal comments securely between project participants we find many users believe this functionality is part of Primavera\'s Contract Manager.  This is because Oracle Primavera spends a lot of money marketing Contract Manager as delivering \"project team collaboration\", this is only true if you want every member of the team to have access to every piece of information. Essentially this article concludes that Owners and CM\'s will need to buy or develop their own application for allowing contractors to submit information directly into Contract Manager in order to deliver true collaboration.  Essentially when comparing EADOC\'s project management application to the options below you will save 1-2 FTE on a project using EADOC or $250-$2M on custom software development compared to Primavera contract manager. \r\n\r\nOption A from the article \r\n\"The  Contractor uses same  Contract Management  system as owner. This can be problematic to execute, even when the requirements are clearly spelled out in the contract by the Owner or CM. Contractors and architects will resist using the owner (or CM’s) system to manage the process of creating or reviewing documents. Most will keep this process internal and only enter the final \"official document\" in the owners system.  Contractors  and architects require full “read/write” access to the owners Contract Management environment in order to  originate  any document  or attach any backup documentation. If  a  document (RFI, Submittal) is managed inside a contractors specific project in Contract Management (as opposed to being manually re-entered in the Construction Manager\'s project  by the Owner), <strong>all review comments can be seen by the contractor,</strong>  in addition to the official response. These  two issues (“read/write”  access and the contractor being able to see reviewer’s comments) are often fatal flaws when deploying Contract Management as a project team database.  While  Option A  is a common approach,  our experience is this option does not work well. \"\r\n\r\nOption B from the article (zero cost savings over an excel spreadsheet since the CM or Owner has to enter all data into Contract Manager)\r\n\"The contractor submits an electronic copy of their document.  <strong>The Construction Manager’s staff logs  the document into their  Contract  Management  database  system, routing the document for review and recording  each reviewer’s  comments.</strong> The  advantage to  this approach  is,  the contractor may continue to use whatever system they currently use (you\'d be surprised how many do not have a standard system), to create RFI’s, proposal, submittals (85% of all documents submitted) into a printed  PDF electronic document  (documents cannot be scanned to PDF  - scans are not searchable). The printed document is emailed to the Construction Manager by the contractor.  The  contractor is never given access to  the Owners  Contract Management  System. This prevents the contractor from seeing others comments, which is often an important issue for the owners team. \"\r\n ','Why Primavera Contract Management is not a collaborative solution for Owners and Construction Managers',0,'','inherit','open','open','','222-revision-5','','','2010-10-27 13:17:24','2010-10-27 18:17:24','',222,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=228',0,'revision','',0),(229,1,'2010-10-27 13:17:49','2010-10-27 18:17:49','Recently I came across this article \r\n<a href=\'http://www.eadocsoftware.com/pdf/63_MLM_How-Can-the-Contractor-Participate-in-the-Owner-CMs-Environment.pdf\'>How Can the Contractor Participate in the Owner or CMs Environment</a> talking about work arounds for using Primavera Contract Manager in a collaborative environment. When explaining how EADOC allows all parties to share and exchange information like submittal comments securely between project participants we find many users believe this functionality is part of Primavera\'s Contract Manager.  This is because Oracle Primavera spends a lot of money marketing Contract Manager as delivering \"project team collaboration\", this is only true if you want every member of the team to have access to every piece of information. Essentially this article concludes that Owners and CM\'s will need to buy or develop their own application for allowing contractors to submit information directly into Contract Manager in order to deliver true collaboration.  Essentially when comparing EADOC\'s project management application to the options below you will save 1-2 FTE on a project using EADOC or $250-$2M on custom software development compared to Primavera contract manager. \r\n\r\nOption A from the article \r\n\"The  Contractor uses same  Contract Management  system as owner. This can be problematic to execute, even when the requirements are clearly spelled out in the contract by the Owner or CM. Contractors and architects will resist using the owner (or CM’s) system to manage the process of creating or reviewing documents. Most will keep this process internal and only enter the final \"official document\" in the owners system.  Contractors  and architects require full “read/write” access to the owners Contract Management environment in order to  originate  any document  or attach any backup documentation. If  a  document (RFI, Submittal) is managed inside a contractors specific project in Contract Management (as opposed to being manually re-entered in the Construction Manager\'s project  by the Owner), <strong>all review comments can be seen by the contractor,</strong>  in addition to the official response. These  two issues (“read/write”  access and the contractor being able to see reviewer’s comments) are often fatal flaws when deploying Contract Management as a project team database.  While  Option A  is a common approach,  our experience is this option does not work well. \"\r\n\r\nOption B from the article (zero cost savings over an excel spreadsheet since the CM or Owner has to enter all data into Contract Manager)\r\n\"The contractor submits an electronic copy of their document.  <strong>The Construction Manager’s staff logs  the document into their  Contract  Management  database  system, routing the document for review and recording  each reviewer’s  comments.</strong> The  advantage to  this approach  is,  the contractor may continue to use whatever system they currently use (you\'d be surprised how many do not have a standard system), to create RFI’s, proposal, submittals (85% of all documents submitted) into a printed  PDF electronic document  (documents cannot be scanned to PDF  - scans are not searchable). The printed document is emailed to the Construction Manager by the contractor.  The  contractor is never given access to  the Owners  Contract Management  System. This prevents the contractor from seeing others comments, which is often an important issue for the owners team. \"\r\n ','Why Primavera Contract Managemer is not a collaborative solution for Owners and Construction Managers',0,'','inherit','open','open','','222-revision-6','','','2010-10-27 13:17:49','2010-10-27 18:17:49','',222,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=229',0,'revision','',0),(230,1,'2010-10-27 13:17:52','2010-10-27 18:17:52','Recently I came across this article \r\n<a href=\'http://www.eadocsoftware.com/pdf/63_MLM_How-Can-the-Contractor-Participate-in-the-Owner-CMs-Environment.pdf\'>How Can the Contractor Participate in the Owner or CMs Environment</a> talking about work arounds for using Primavera Contract Manager in a collaborative environment. When explaining how EADOC allows all parties to share and exchange information like submittal comments securely between project participants we find many users believe this functionality is part of Primavera\'s Contract Manager.  This is because Oracle Primavera spends a lot of money marketing Contract Manager as delivering \"project team collaboration\", this is only true if you want every member of the team to have access to every piece of information. Essentially this article concludes that Owners and CM\'s will need to buy or develop their own application for allowing contractors to submit information directly into Contract Manager in order to deliver true collaboration.  Essentially when comparing EADOC\'s project management application to the options below you will save 1-2 FTE on a project using EADOC or $250-$2M on custom software development compared to Primavera contract manager. \r\n\r\nOption A from the article \r\n\"The  Contractor uses same  Contract Management  system as owner. This can be problematic to execute, even when the requirements are clearly spelled out in the contract by the Owner or CM. Contractors and architects will resist using the owner (or CM’s) system to manage the process of creating or reviewing documents. Most will keep this process internal and only enter the final \"official document\" in the owners system.  Contractors  and architects require full “read/write” access to the owners Contract Management environment in order to  originate  any document  or attach any backup documentation. If  a  document (RFI, Submittal) is managed inside a contractors specific project in Contract Management (as opposed to being manually re-entered in the Construction Manager\'s project  by the Owner), <strong>all review comments can be seen by the contractor,</strong>  in addition to the official response. These  two issues (“read/write”  access and the contractor being able to see reviewer’s comments) are often fatal flaws when deploying Contract Management as a project team database.  While  Option A  is a common approach,  our experience is this option does not work well. \"\r\n\r\nOption B from the article (zero cost savings over an excel spreadsheet since the CM or Owner has to enter all data into Contract Manager)\r\n\"The contractor submits an electronic copy of their document.  <strong>The Construction Manager’s staff logs  the document into their  Contract  Management  database  system, routing the document for review and recording  each reviewer’s  comments.</strong> The  advantage to  this approach  is,  the contractor may continue to use whatever system they currently use (you\'d be surprised how many do not have a standard system), to create RFI’s, proposal, submittals (85% of all documents submitted) into a printed  PDF electronic document  (documents cannot be scanned to PDF  - scans are not searchable). The printed document is emailed to the Construction Manager by the contractor.  The  contractor is never given access to  the Owners  Contract Management  System. This prevents the contractor from seeing others comments, which is often an important issue for the owners team. \"\r\n ','Why Primavera Contract Managemer is not a collaborative solution for Owners and Construction Managers',0,'','inherit','open','open','','222-revision-7','','','2010-10-27 13:17:52','2010-10-27 18:17:52','',222,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=230',0,'revision','',0),(231,1,'2010-10-27 13:18:02','2010-10-27 18:18:02','Recently I came across this article \r\n<a href=\'http://www.eadocsoftware.com/pdf/63_MLM_How-Can-the-Contractor-Participate-in-the-Owner-CMs-Environment.pdf\'>How Can the Contractor Participate in the Owner or CMs Environment</a> talking about work arounds for using Primavera Contract Manager in a collaborative environment. When explaining how EADOC allows all parties to share and exchange information like submittal comments securely between project participants we find many users believe this functionality is part of Primavera\'s Contract Manager.  This is because Oracle Primavera spends a lot of money marketing Contract Manager as delivering \"project team collaboration\", this is only true if you want every member of the team to have access to every piece of information. Essentially this article concludes that Owners and CM\'s will need to buy or develop their own application for allowing contractors to submit information directly into Contract Manager in order to deliver true collaboration.  Essentially when comparing EADOC\'s project management application to the options below you will save 1-2 FTE on a project using EADOC or $250-$2M on custom software development compared to Primavera contract manager. \r\n\r\nOption A from the article \r\n\"The  Contractor uses same  Contract Management  system as owner. This can be problematic to execute, even when the requirements are clearly spelled out in the contract by the Owner or CM. Contractors and architects will resist using the owner (or CM’s) system to manage the process of creating or reviewing documents. Most will keep this process internal and only enter the final \"official document\" in the owners system.  Contractors  and architects require full “read/write” access to the owners Contract Management environment in order to  originate  any document  or attach any backup documentation. If  a  document (RFI, Submittal) is managed inside a contractors specific project in Contract Management (as opposed to being manually re-entered in the Construction Manager\'s project  by the Owner), <strong>all review comments can be seen by the contractor,</strong>  in addition to the official response. These  two issues (“read/write”  access and the contractor being able to see reviewer’s comments) are often fatal flaws when deploying Contract Management as a project team database.  While  Option A  is a common approach,  our experience is this option does not work well. \"\r\n\r\nOption B from the article (zero cost savings over an excel spreadsheet since the CM or Owner has to enter all data into Contract Manager)\r\n\"The contractor submits an electronic copy of their document.  <strong>The Construction Manager’s staff logs  the document into their  Contract  Management  database  system, routing the document for review and recording  each reviewer’s  comments.</strong> The  advantage to  this approach  is,  the contractor may continue to use whatever system they currently use (you\'d be surprised how many do not have a standard system), to create RFI’s, proposal, submittals (85% of all documents submitted) into a printed  PDF electronic document  (documents cannot be scanned to PDF  - scans are not searchable). The printed document is emailed to the Construction Manager by the contractor.  The  contractor is never given access to  the Owners  Contract Management  System. This prevents the contractor from seeing others comments, which is often an important issue for the owners team. \"\r\n ','Why Primavera Contract Manager is not a collaborative solution for Owners and Construction Managers',0,'','inherit','open','open','','222-revision-8','','','2010-10-27 13:18:02','2010-10-27 18:18:02','',222,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=231',0,'revision','',0),(233,1,'2010-10-27 13:18:43','2010-10-27 18:18:43','Recently I came across this article \r\n<a href=\'http://www.eadocsoftware.com/pdf/63_MLM_How-Can-the-Contractor-Participate-in-the-Owner-CMs-Environment.pdf\'>How Can the Contractor Participate in the Owner or CMs Environment</a> talking about work arounds for using Primavera Contract Manager in a collaborative environment. Essentially this article concludes that Owners and CM\'s will need to buy or develop their own application for allowing contractors to submit information directly into Contract Manager in order to deliver true collaboration.  Essentially when comparing EADOC\'s project management application to the options below you will save 1-2 FTE on a project using EADOC or $250-$2M on custom software development compared to Primavera contract manager. \r\n\r\nOption A from the article \r\n\"The  Contractor uses same  Contract Management  system as owner. This can be problematic to execute, even when the requirements are clearly spelled out in the contract by the Owner or CM. Contractors and architects will resist using the owner (or CM’s) system to manage the process of creating or reviewing documents. Most will keep this process internal and only enter the final \"official document\" in the owners system.  Contractors  and architects require full “read/write” access to the owners Contract Management environment in order to  originate  any document  or attach any backup documentation. If  a  document (RFI, Submittal) is managed inside a contractors specific project in Contract Management (as opposed to being manually re-entered in the Construction Manager\'s project  by the Owner), <strong>all review comments can be seen by the contractor,</strong>  in addition to the official response. These  two issues (“read/write”  access and the contractor being able to see reviewer’s comments) are often fatal flaws when deploying Contract Management as a project team database.  While  Option A  is a common approach,  our experience is this option does not work well. \"\r\n\r\nOption B from the article (zero cost savings over an excel spreadsheet since the CM or Owner has to enter all data into Contract Manager)\r\n\"The contractor submits an electronic copy of their document.  <strong>The Construction Manager’s staff logs  the document into their  Contract  Management  database  system, routing the document for review and recording  each reviewer’s  comments.</strong> The  advantage to  this approach  is,  the contractor may continue to use whatever system they currently use (you\'d be surprised how many do not have a standard system), to create RFI’s, proposal, submittals (85% of all documents submitted) into a printed  PDF electronic document  (documents cannot be scanned to PDF  - scans are not searchable). The printed document is emailed to the Construction Manager by the contractor.  The  contractor is never given access to  the Owners  Contract Management  System. This prevents the contractor from seeing others comments, which is often an important issue for the owners team. \"\r\n ','Why Primavera Contract Manager is not a collaborative solution for Owners and Construction Managers',0,'','inherit','open','open','','222-revision-10','','','2010-10-27 13:18:43','2010-10-27 18:18:43','',222,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=233',0,'revision','',0),(234,1,'2010-10-27 13:39:21','2010-10-27 18:39:21','Recently I came across this article \n<a href=\'http://www.eadocsoftware.com/pdf/63_MLM_How-Can-the-Contractor-Participate-in-the-Owner-CMs-Environment.pdf\'>How Can the Contractor Participate in the Owner or CMs Environment</a> talking about work arounds for using Primavera Contract Manager in a collaborative environment. Essentially this article concludes that Owners and CM\'s will need to buy or develop their own application for allowing contractors to submit information directly into Contract Manager in order to deliver true collaboration.  Choosing EADOC you will save 1-2 FTE on a project  or $250-$2M on custom software development compared to Primavera contract manager based on the options in the article. \n\n<strong>Option A from the article </strong>\n\"The  Contractor uses same  Contract Management  system as owner. This can be problematic to execute, even when the requirements are clearly spelled out in the contract by the Owner or CM. Contractors and architects will resist using the owner (or CM’s) system to manage the process of creating or reviewing documents. Most will keep this process internal and only enter the final \"official document\" in the owners system.  Contractors  and architects require full “read/write” access to the owners Contract Management environment in order to  originate  any document  or attach any backup documentation. If  a  document (RFI, Submittal) is managed inside a contractors specific project in Contract Management (as opposed to being manually re-entered in the Construction Manager\'s project  by the Owner), <strong>all review comments can be seen by the contractor,</strong>  in addition to the official response. These  two issues (“read/write”  access and the contractor being able to see reviewer’s comments) are often fatal flaws when deploying Contract Management as a project team database.  While  Option A  is a common approach,  our experience is this option does not work well. \"\n\n<strong>Option B from the article</strong> (zero cost savings over an excel spreadsheet since the CM or Owner has to enter all data into Contract Manager)\n\"The contractor submits an electronic copy of their document.  <strong>The Construction Manager’s staff logs  the document into their  Contract  Management  database  system, routing the document for review and recording  each reviewer’s  comments.</strong> The  advantage to  this approach  is,  the contractor may continue to use whatever system they currently use (you\'d be surprised how many do not have a standard system), to create RFI’s, proposal, submittals (85% of all documents submitted) into a printed  PDF electronic document  (documents cannot be scanned to PDF  - scans are not searchable). The printed document is emailed to the Construction Manager by the contractor.  The  contractor is never given access to  the Owners  Contract Management  System. This prevents the contractor from seeing others comments, which is often an important issue for the owners team. \"\n ','Why Primavera Contract Manager is not a collaborative solution for Owners and Construction Managers',0,'','inherit','open','open','','222-revision-11','','','2010-10-27 13:39:21','2010-10-27 18:39:21','',222,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=234',0,'revision','',0),(235,1,'2010-10-27 13:39:57','2010-10-27 18:39:57','Recently I came across this article \r\n<a href=\'http://www.eadocsoftware.com/pdf/63_MLM_How-Can-the-Contractor-Participate-in-the-Owner-CMs-Environment.pdf\'>How Can the Contractor Participate in the Owner or CMs Environment</a> talking about work arounds for using Primavera Contract Manager in a collaborative environment. Essentially this article concludes that Owners and CM\'s will need to buy or develop their own application for allowing contractors to submit information directly into Contract Manager in order to deliver true collaboration.  Choosing EADOC you will save 1-2 FTE on a project  or $250-$2M on custom software development compared to Primavera contract manager based on the options in the article. \r\n\r\n<strong>Option A from the article </strong>\r\n\"The  Contractor uses same  Contract Management  system as owner. This can be problematic to execute, even when the requirements are clearly spelled out in the contract by the Owner or CM. Contractors and architects will resist using the owner (or CM’s) system to manage the process of creating or reviewing documents. Most will keep this process internal and only enter the final \"official document\" in the owners system.  Contractors  and architects require full “read/write” access to the owners Contract Management environment in order to  originate  any document  or attach any backup documentation. If  a  document (RFI, Submittal) is managed inside a contractors specific project in Contract Management (as opposed to being manually re-entered in the Construction Manager\'s project  by the Owner), <strong>all review comments can be seen by the contractor,</strong>  in addition to the official response. These  two issues (“read/write”  access and the contractor being able to see reviewer’s comments) are often fatal flaws when deploying Contract Management as a project team database.  While  Option A  is a common approach,  our experience is this option does not work well. \"\r\n\r\n<strong>Option B from the article</strong> (zero cost savings over an excel spreadsheet since the CM or Owner has to enter all data into Contract Manager)\r\n\"The contractor submits an electronic copy of their document.  <strong>The Construction Manager’s staff logs  the document into their  Contract  Management  database  system, routing the document for review and recording  each reviewer’s  comments.</strong> The  advantage to  this approach  is,  the contractor may continue to use whatever system they currently use (you\'d be surprised how many do not have a standard system), to create RFI’s, proposal, submittals (85% of all documents submitted) into a printed  PDF electronic document  (documents cannot be scanned to PDF  - scans are not searchable). The printed document is emailed to the Construction Manager by the contractor.  The  contractor is never given access to  the Owners  Contract Management  System. This prevents the contractor from seeing others comments, which is often an important issue for the owners team. \"\r\n ','Why Primavera Contract Manager is not a collaborative solution for Owners and Construction Managers',0,'','inherit','open','open','','222-revision-12','','','2010-10-27 13:39:57','2010-10-27 18:39:57','',222,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=235',0,'revision','',0),(236,1,'2010-10-27 13:40:31','2010-10-27 18:40:31','Recently I came across this article \r\n<a href=\'http://www.eadocsoftware.com/pdf/63_MLM_How-Can-the-Contractor-Participate-in-the-Owner-CMs-Environment.pdf\'>How Can the Contractor Participate in the Owner or CMs Environment</a> talking about work arounds for using Primavera Contract Manager in a collaborative environment. Essentially this article concludes that Owners and CM\'s will need to buy or develop their own application for allowing contractors to submit information directly into Contract Manager in order to deliver true collaboration.  Choosing EADOC you will save 1-2 FTE on a project  or $250-$2M on custom software development compared to Primavera contract manager based on the options in the article. \r\n\r\n<strong>Option A from the article </strong>\r\n\"The  Contractor uses same  Contract Management  system as owner. This can be problematic to execute, even when the requirements are clearly spelled out in the contract by the Owner or CM. Contractors and architects will resist using the owner (or CM’s) system to manage the process of creating or reviewing documents. Most will keep this process internal and only enter the final \"official document\" in the owners system.  Contractors  and architects require full “read/write” access to the owners Contract Management environment in order to  originate  any document  or attach any backup documentation. If  a  document (RFI, Submittal) is managed inside a contractors specific project in Contract Management (as opposed to being manually re-entered in the Construction Manager\'s project  by the Owner), <strong>all review comments can be seen by the contractor,</strong>  in addition to the official response. These  two issues (“read/write”  access and the contractor being able to see reviewer’s comments) are often fatal flaws when deploying Contract Management as a project team database.  While  Option A  is a common approach,  our experience is this option does not work well. \"\r\n\r\n<strong>Option B from the article</strong> (zero cost savings over an excel spreadsheet since the CM or Owner has to enter all data into Contract Manager)\r\n\"The contractor submits an electronic copy of their document.  <strong>The Construction Manager’s staff logs  the document into their  Contract  Management  database  system, routing the document for review and recording  each reviewer’s  comments.</strong> The  advantage to  this approach  is,  the contractor may continue to use whatever system they currently use (you\'d be surprised how many do not have a standard system), to create RFI’s, proposal, submittals (85% of all documents submitted) into a printed  PDF electronic document  (documents cannot be scanned to PDF  - scans are not searchable). The printed document is emailed to the Construction Manager by the contractor.  The  contractor is never given access to  the Owners  Contract Management  System. This prevents the contractor from seeing others comments, which is often an important issue for the owners team. \"\r\n ','Primavera Contract Manager is not a collaborative solution for Owners and Construction Managers',0,'','inherit','open','open','','222-revision-13','','','2010-10-27 13:40:31','2010-10-27 18:40:31','',222,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=236',0,'revision','',0),(237,1,'2010-10-27 13:41:15','2010-10-27 18:41:15','Recently I came across this article \r\n<a href=\'http://www.eadocsoftware.com/pdf/63_MLM_How-Can-the-Contractor-Participate-in-the-Owner-CMs-Environment.pdf\'>\"How Can the Contractor Participate in the Owner or CMs Environment\"</a> talking about work arounds for using Primavera Contract Manager as a collaborative project management application. Essentially this article concludes that Owners and CM\'s will need to buy or develop their own application for allowing contractors to submit information directly into Contract Manager in order to deliver true collaboration.  Choosing EADOC you will save 1-2 FTE on a project  or $250-$2M on custom software development compared to Primavera contract manager based on the options in the article. \r\n\r\n<strong>Option A from the article </strong>\r\n\"The  Contractor uses same  Contract Management  system as owner. This can be problematic to execute, even when the requirements are clearly spelled out in the contract by the Owner or CM. Contractors and architects will resist using the owner (or CM’s) system to manage the process of creating or reviewing documents. Most will keep this process internal and only enter the final \"official document\" in the owners system.  Contractors  and architects require full “read/write” access to the owners Contract Management environment in order to  originate  any document  or attach any backup documentation. If  a  document (RFI, Submittal) is managed inside a contractors specific project in Contract Management (as opposed to being manually re-entered in the Construction Manager\'s project  by the Owner), <strong>all review comments can be seen by the contractor,</strong>  in addition to the official response. These  two issues (“read/write”  access and the contractor being able to see reviewer’s comments) are often fatal flaws when deploying Contract Management as a project team database.  While  Option A  is a common approach,  our experience is this option does not work well. \"\r\n\r\n<strong>Option B from the article</strong> (zero cost savings over an excel spreadsheet since the CM or Owner has to enter all data into Contract Manager)\r\n\"The contractor submits an electronic copy of their document.  <strong>The Construction Manager’s staff logs  the document into their  Contract  Management  database  system, routing the document for review and recording  each reviewer’s  comments.</strong> The  advantage to  this approach  is,  the contractor may continue to use whatever system they currently use (you\'d be surprised how many do not have a standard system), to create RFI’s, proposal, submittals (85% of all documents submitted) into a printed  PDF electronic document  (documents cannot be scanned to PDF  - scans are not searchable). The printed document is emailed to the Construction Manager by the contractor.  The  contractor is never given access to  the Owners  Contract Management  System. This prevents the contractor from seeing others comments, which is often an important issue for the owners team. \"\r\n ','Primavera Contract Manager is not a collaborative solution for Owners and Construction Managers',0,'','inherit','open','open','','222-revision-14','','','2010-10-27 13:41:15','2010-10-27 18:41:15','',222,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=237',0,'revision','',0),(238,1,'2010-10-27 13:44:47','2010-10-27 18:44:47','Recently I came across this article \r\n<a href=\'http://www.eadocsoftware.com/pdf/63_MLM_How-Can-the-Contractor-Participate-in-the-Owner-CMs-Environment.pdf\'>\"How Can the Contractor Participate in the Owner or CMs Environment\"</a> talking about work arounds for using Primavera Contract Manager as a collaborative project management application. Essentially this article concludes that Owners and CM\'s will need to buy or develop their own application for allowing contractors to submit information directly into Contract Manager in order to deliver true collaboration.  Choosing EADOC you will save 1-2 FTE on a project  or $250-$2M on custom software development compared to Primavera contract manager based on the options in the article. \r\n\r\n<strong>Option A from the article </strong>\r\n\"The  Contractor uses same  Contract Management  system as owner. This can be problematic to execute, even when the requirements are clearly spelled out in the contract by the Owner or CM. Contractors and architects will resist using the owner (or CM’s) system to manage the process of creating or reviewing documents. Most will keep this process internal and only enter the final \"official document\" in the owners system.  Contractors  and architects require full “read/write” access to the owners Contract Management environment in order to  originate  any document  or attach any backup documentation. If  a  document (RFI, Submittal) is managed inside a contractors specific project in Contract Management (as opposed to being manually re-entered in the Construction Manager\'s project  by the Owner), <strong>all review comments can be seen by the contractor,</strong>  in addition to the official response. These  two issues (“read/write”  access and the contractor being able to see reviewer’s comments) are often fatal flaws when deploying Contract Management as a project team database.  While  Option A  is a common approach,  our experience is this option does not work well. \"\r\n\r\n<strong>Option B from the article</strong> (zero cost savings over an excel spreadsheet since the CM or Owner has to enter all data into Contract Manager)\r\n\"The contractor submits an electronic copy of their document.  <strong>The Construction Manager’s staff logs  the document into their  Contract  Management  database  system, routing the document for review and recording  each reviewer’s  comments.</strong> The  advantage to  this approach  is,  the contractor may continue to use whatever system they currently use (you\'d be surprised how many do not have a standard system), to create RFI’s, proposal, submittals (85% of all documents submitted) into a printed  PDF electronic document  (documents cannot be scanned to PDF  - scans are not searchable). The printed document is emailed to the Construction Manager by the contractor.  The  contractor is never given access to  the Owners  Contract Management  System. This prevents the contractor from seeing others comments, which is often an important issue for the owners team. \"\r\n ','Primavera Contract Manager is not a collaborative solution for Owners and Construction Managers',0,'','inherit','open','open','','222-revision-15','','','2010-10-27 13:44:47','2010-10-27 18:44:47','',222,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=238',0,'revision','',0),(239,1,'2010-10-27 13:44:52','2010-10-27 18:44:52','Recently I came across this article \r\n<a href=\'http://www.eadocsoftware.com/pdf/63_MLM_How-Can-the-Contractor-Participate-in-the-Owner-CMs-Environment.pdf\'>\"How Can the Contractor Participate in the Owner or CMs Environment\"</a> talking about work arounds for using Primavera Contract Manager as a collaborative project management application. Essentially this article concludes that Owners and CM\'s will need to buy or develop their own application for allowing contractors to submit information directly into Contract Manager in order to deliver true collaboration.  Choosing EADOC you will save 1-2 FTE on a project  or $250-$2M on custom software development compared to Primavera contract manager based on the options in the article. \r\n\r\n<strong>Option A from the article </strong>\r\n\"The  Contractor uses same  Contract Management  system as owner. This can be problematic to execute, even when the requirements are clearly spelled out in the contract by the Owner or CM. Contractors and architects will resist using the owner (or CM’s) system to manage the process of creating or reviewing documents. Most will keep this process internal and only enter the final \"official document\" in the owners system.  Contractors  and architects require full “read/write” access to the owners Contract Management environment in order to  originate  any document  or attach any backup documentation. If  a  document (RFI, Submittal) is managed inside a contractors specific project in Contract Management (as opposed to being manually re-entered in the Construction Manager\'s project  by the Owner), <strong>all review comments can be seen by the contractor,</strong>  in addition to the official response. These  two issues (“read/write”  access and the contractor being able to see reviewer’s comments) are often fatal flaws when deploying Contract Management as a project team database.  While  Option A  is a common approach,  our experience is this option does not work well. \"\r\n\r\n<strong>Option B from the article</strong> (zero cost savings over an excel spreadsheet since the CM or Owner has to enter all data into Contract Manager)\r\n\"The contractor submits an electronic copy of their document.  <strong>The Construction Manager’s staff logs  the document into their  Contract  Management  database  system, routing the document for review and recording  each reviewer’s  comments.</strong> The  advantage to  this approach  is,  the contractor may continue to use whatever system they currently use (you\'d be surprised how many do not have a standard system), to create RFI’s, proposal, submittals (85% of all documents submitted) into a printed  PDF electronic document  (documents cannot be scanned to PDF  - scans are not searchable). The printed document is emailed to the Construction Manager by the contractor.  The  contractor is never given access to  the Owners  Contract Management  System. This prevents the contractor from seeing others comments, which is often an important issue for the owners team. \"\r\n ','Primavera Contract Manager is not a collaborative solution for Owners and Construction Managers',0,'','inherit','open','open','','222-revision-16','','','2010-10-27 13:44:52','2010-10-27 18:44:52','',222,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=239',0,'revision','',0),(240,1,'2010-10-27 13:49:41','2010-10-27 18:49:41','Recently I came across this article \r\n<a href=\'http://www.eadocsoftware.com/pdf/63_MLM_How-Can-the-Contractor-Participate-in-the-Owner-CMs-Environment.pdf\'>\"How Can the Contractor Participate in the Owner or CMs Environment\"</a> talking about work arounds for using Primavera Contract Manager as a collaborative project management application. Essentially this article concludes that Owners and CM\'s will need to buy or develop their own application for allowing contractors to submit information directly into Contract Manager or pay staff to manually enter the data.  Choosing EADOC you will save 1-2 FTE on a project  or $250-$2M on custom software development compared to Primavera contract manager based on the options presented in the article. \r\n\r\n<strong>Option A from the article </strong>\r\n\"The  Contractor uses same  Contract Management  system as owner. This can be problematic to execute, even when the requirements are clearly spelled out in the contract by the Owner or CM. Contractors and architects will resist using the owner (or CM’s) system to manage the process of creating or reviewing documents. Most will keep this process internal and only enter the final \"official document\" in the owners system.  Contractors  and architects require full “read/write” access to the owners Contract Management environment in order to  originate  any document  or attach any backup documentation. If  a  document (RFI, Submittal) is managed inside a contractors specific project in Contract Management (as opposed to being manually re-entered in the Construction Manager\'s project  by the Owner), <strong>all review comments can be seen by the contractor,</strong>  in addition to the official response. These  two issues (“read/write”  access and the contractor being able to see reviewer’s comments) are often fatal flaws when deploying Contract Management as a project team database.  While  Option A  is a common approach,  our experience is this option does not work well. \"\r\n\r\n<strong>Option B from the article</strong> (zero cost savings over an excel spreadsheet since the CM or Owner has to enter all data into Contract Manager)\r\n\"The contractor submits an electronic copy of their document.  <strong>The Construction Manager’s staff logs  the document into their  Contract  Management  database  system, routing the document for review and recording  each reviewer’s  comments.</strong> The  advantage to  this approach  is,  the contractor may continue to use whatever system they currently use (you\'d be surprised how many do not have a standard system), to create RFI’s, proposal, submittals (85% of all documents submitted) into a printed  PDF electronic document  (documents cannot be scanned to PDF  - scans are not searchable). The printed document is emailed to the Construction Manager by the contractor.  The  contractor is never given access to  the Owners  Contract Management  System. This prevents the contractor from seeing others comments, which is often an important issue for the owners team. \"\r\n ','Primavera Contract Manager is not a collaborative solution for Owners and Construction Managers',0,'','inherit','open','open','','222-revision-17','','','2010-10-27 13:49:41','2010-10-27 18:49:41','',222,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=240',0,'revision','',0),(241,1,'2010-10-27 13:49:47','2010-10-27 18:49:47','Recently I came across this article \r\n<a href=\'http://www.eadocsoftware.com/pdf/63_MLM_How-Can-the-Contractor-Participate-in-the-Owner-CMs-Environment.pdf\'>\"How Can the Contractor Participate in the Owner or CMs Environment\"</a> talking about work arounds for using Primavera Contract Manager as a collaborative project management application. Essentially this article concludes that Owners and CM\'s will need to buy or develop their own application for allowing contractors to submit information directly into Contract Manager or pay staff to manually enter the data.  Choosing EADOC you will save 1-2 FTE on a project  or $250-$2M on custom software development compared to Primavera contract manager based on the options presented in the article. \r\n\r\n<strong>Option A from the article </strong>\r\n\"The  Contractor uses same  Contract Management  system as owner. This can be problematic to execute, even when the requirements are clearly spelled out in the contract by the Owner or CM. Contractors and architects will resist using the owner (or CM’s) system to manage the process of creating or reviewing documents. Most will keep this process internal and only enter the final \"official document\" in the owners system.  Contractors  and architects require full “read/write” access to the owners Contract Management environment in order to  originate  any document  or attach any backup documentation. If  a  document (RFI, Submittal) is managed inside a contractors specific project in Contract Management (as opposed to being manually re-entered in the Construction Manager\'s project  by the Owner), <strong>all review comments can be seen by the contractor,</strong>  in addition to the official response. These  two issues (“read/write”  access and the contractor being able to see reviewer’s comments) are often fatal flaws when deploying Contract Management as a project team database.  While  Option A  is a common approach,  our experience is this option does not work well. \"\r\n\r\n<strong>Option B from the article</strong> (zero cost savings over an excel spreadsheet since the CM or Owner has to enter all data into Contract Manager)\r\n\"The contractor submits an electronic copy of their document.  <strong>The Construction Manager’s staff logs  the document into their  Contract  Management  database  system, routing the document for review and recording  each reviewer’s  comments.</strong> The  advantage to  this approach  is,  the contractor may continue to use whatever system they currently use (you\'d be surprised how many do not have a standard system), to create RFI’s, proposal, submittals (85% of all documents submitted) into a printed  PDF electronic document  (documents cannot be scanned to PDF  - scans are not searchable). The printed document is emailed to the Construction Manager by the contractor.  The  contractor is never given access to  the Owners  Contract Management  System. This prevents the contractor from seeing others comments, which is often an important issue for the owners team. \"\r\n ','Primavera Contract Manager is not a collaborative solution for Owners and Construction Managers',0,'','inherit','open','open','','222-revision-18','','','2010-10-27 13:49:47','2010-10-27 18:49:47','',222,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=241',0,'revision','',0),(242,1,'2010-10-27 13:54:28','2010-10-27 18:54:28','Recently I came across this article \r\n<a href=\'http://www.eadocsoftware.com/pdf/63_MLM_How-Can-the-Contractor-Participate-in-the-Owner-CMs-Environment.pdf\'>\"How Can the Contractor Participate in the Owner or CMs Environment\"</a> talking about work arounds for using Primavera Contract Manager as a collaborative project management application. Essentially this article concludes that Owners and CM\'s will need to buy or develop their own application for allowing contractors to submit information directly into Contract Manager or pay staff to manually enter the data.  Choosing EADOC you will save 1-2 FTE on a project  or $250-$2M on custom software development compared to Primavera contract manager based on the options presented in the article. \r\n\r\n<strong>Option A from the article </strong>\r\n\"The  Contractor uses same  Contract Management  system as owner. This can be problematic to execute, even when the requirements are clearly spelled out in the contract by the Owner or CM. Contractors and architects will resist using the owner (or CM’s) system to manage the process of creating or reviewing documents. Most will keep this process internal and only enter the final \"official document\" in the owners system.  Contractors  and architects require full “read/write” access to the owners Contract Management environment in order to  originate  any document  or attach any backup documentation. If  a  document (RFI, Submittal) is managed inside a contractors specific project in Contract Management (as opposed to being manually re-entered in the Construction Manager\'s project  by the Owner), <strong>all review comments can be seen by the contractor,</strong>  in addition to the official response. These  two issues (“read/write”  access and the contractor being able to see reviewer’s comments) are often fatal flaws when deploying Contract Management as a project team database.  While  Option A  is a common approach,  our experience is this option does not work well. \"\r\n\r\n<strong>Option B from the article</strong> (zero cost savings over an excel spreadsheet since the CM or Owner has to enter all data into Contract Manager)\r\n\"The contractor submits an electronic copy of their document.  <strong>The Construction Manager’s staff logs  the document into their  Contract  Management  database  system, routing the document for review and recording  each reviewer’s  comments.</strong> The  advantage to  this approach  is,  the contractor may continue to use whatever system they currently use (you\'d be surprised how many do not have a standard system), to create RFI’s, proposal, submittals (85% of all documents submitted) into a printed  PDF electronic document  (documents cannot be scanned to PDF  - scans are not searchable). The printed document is emailed to the Construction Manager by the contractor.  The  contractor is never given access to  the Owners  Contract Management  System. This prevents the contractor from seeing others comments, which is often an important issue for the owners team. \"\r\n \r\nEADOC is the only true collaborative project management application that allows for the complete control of information as it works it\'s way across your project team resulting tremendous cost savings.','Primavera Contract Manager is not a collaborative solution for Owners and Construction Managers',0,'','inherit','open','open','','222-revision-19','','','2010-10-27 13:54:28','2010-10-27 18:54:28','',222,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=242',0,'revision','',0),(243,1,'2010-10-27 13:55:13','2010-10-27 18:55:13','Recently I came across this article \r\n<a href=\'http://www.eadocsoftware.com/pdf/63_MLM_How-Can-the-Contractor-Participate-in-the-Owner-CMs-Environment.pdf\'>\"How Can the Contractor Participate in the Owner or CMs Environment\"</a> talking about work arounds for using Primavera Contract Manager as a collaborative project management application. Essentially this article concludes that Owners and CM\'s will need to buy or develop their own application for allowing contractors to submit information electronically into Contract Manager or pay staff to manually enter the data.  Choosing EADOC will save 1-2 FTE on a project  or $250-$2M on custom software development compared to Primavera contract manager based on the options presented in the article. \r\n\r\n<strong>Option A from the article </strong>\r\n\"The  Contractor uses same  Contract Management  system as owner. This can be problematic to execute, even when the requirements are clearly spelled out in the contract by the Owner or CM. Contractors and architects will resist using the owner (or CM’s) system to manage the process of creating or reviewing documents. Most will keep this process internal and only enter the final \"official document\" in the owners system.  Contractors  and architects require full “read/write” access to the owners Contract Management environment in order to  originate  any document  or attach any backup documentation. If  a  document (RFI, Submittal) is managed inside a contractors specific project in Contract Management (as opposed to being manually re-entered in the Construction Manager\'s project  by the Owner), <strong>all review comments can be seen by the contractor,</strong>  in addition to the official response. These  two issues (“read/write”  access and the contractor being able to see reviewer’s comments) are often fatal flaws when deploying Contract Management as a project team database.  While  Option A  is a common approach,  our experience is this option does not work well. \"\r\n\r\n<strong>Option B from the article</strong> (zero cost savings over an excel spreadsheet since the CM or Owner has to enter all data into Contract Manager)\r\n\"The contractor submits an electronic copy of their document.  <strong>The Construction Manager’s staff logs  the document into their  Contract  Management  database  system, routing the document for review and recording  each reviewer’s  comments.</strong> The  advantage to  this approach  is,  the contractor may continue to use whatever system they currently use (you\'d be surprised how many do not have a standard system), to create RFI’s, proposal, submittals (85% of all documents submitted) into a printed  PDF electronic document  (documents cannot be scanned to PDF  - scans are not searchable). The printed document is emailed to the Construction Manager by the contractor.  The  contractor is never given access to  the Owners  Contract Management  System. This prevents the contractor from seeing others comments, which is often an important issue for the owners team. \"\r\n \r\nEADOC is the only true collaborative project management application that allows for the complete control of information as it works it\'s way across your project team resulting tremendous cost savings.','Primavera Contract Manager is not a collaborative solution for Owners and Construction Managers',0,'','inherit','open','open','','222-revision-20','','','2010-10-27 13:55:13','2010-10-27 18:55:13','',222,'http://blog.eadocsoftware.com/?p=243',0,'revision','',0);

--
-- Table structure for table `wp_term_relationships`
--

CREATE TABLE `wp_term_relationships` (
  `object_id` bigint(20) unsigned NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',
  `term_taxonomy_id` bigint(20) unsigned NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',
  `term_order` int(11) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',
  PRIMARY KEY (`object_id`,`term_taxonomy_id`),
  KEY `term_taxonomy_id` (`term_taxonomy_id`)
) ENGINE=MyISAM DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8;

--
-- Dumping data for table `wp_term_relationships`
--

INSERT INTO `wp_term_relationships` VALUES (1,2,0),(2,2,0),(3,2,0),(4,2,0),(5,2,0),(6,2,0),(7,2,0),(12,1,0),(38,1,0),(30,3,0),(33,1,0),(32,1,0),(34,1,0),(8,1,0),(9,1,0),(2,1,0),(31,1,0),(35,5,0),(14,1,0),(13,1,0),(11,3,0),(15,1,0),(28,1,0),(24,3,0),(27,1,0),(29,1,0),(25,1,0),(26,1,0),(22,1,0),(36,1,0),(37,1,0),(35,3,0),(39,1,0),(40,1,0),(42,1,0),(41,3,0),(43,1,0),(44,1,0),(45,1,0),(46,1,0),(48,1,0),(52,1,0),(49,1,0),(50,1,0),(47,3,0),(51,6,0),(53,1,0),(51,3,0),(51,7,0),(51,8,0),(55,1,0),(54,3,0),(54,9,0),(54,10,0),(54,11,0),(54,12,0),(58,1,0),(150,1,0),(59,13,0),(59,14,0),(59,15,0),(59,16,0),(60,1,0),(61,1,0),(62,1,0),(63,1,0),(59,3,0),(65,1,0),(66,1,0),(67,1,0),(68,1,0),(69,1,0),(71,1,0),(76,1,0),(72,1,0),(73,1,0),(74,1,0),(70,3,0),(146,1,0),(78,1,0),(80,1,0),(79,1,0),(77,3,0),(81,1,0),(82,1,0),(83,1,0),(84,1,0),(85,1,0),(86,1,0),(90,1,0),(88,1,0),(89,1,0),(87,17,0),(91,1,0),(92,1,0),(96,1,0),(94,1,0),(97,1,0),(98,1,0),(99,1,0),(100,1,0),(102,1,0),(101,19,0),(105,1,0),(104,1,0),(103,19,0),(106,1,0),(108,1,0),(109,1,0),(111,1,0),(110,1,0),(107,18,0),(113,1,0),(114,1,0),(116,1,0),(115,1,0),(112,20,0),(117,1,0),(118,1,0),(119,1,0),(120,1,0),(121,1,0),(122,1,0),(123,1,0),(124,3,0),(125,1,0),(126,1,0),(127,1,0),(129,1,0),(133,1,0),(130,1,0),(131,1,0),(128,3,0),(135,1,0),(134,1,0),(132,3,0),(136,1,0),(137,19,0),(138,1,0),(139,1,0),(140,1,0),(141,1,0),(142,1,0),(143,1,0),(144,1,0),(145,1,0),(75,3,0),(147,1,0),(148,1,0),(64,17,0),(151,1,0),(161,1,0),(152,1,0),(153,1,0),(154,1,0),(155,1,0),(156,1,0),(157,1,0),(158,1,0),(159,1,0),(160,1,0),(149,3,0),(162,1,0),(164,1,0),(163,1,0),(166,1,0),(174,1,0),(167,1,0),(168,1,0),(169,1,0),(170,1,0),(171,1,0),(172,1,0),(173,1,0),(165,3,0),(175,1,0),(176,1,0),(177,20,0),(178,1,0),(179,1,0),(180,1,0),(181,1,0),(182,1,0),(183,1,0),(184,1,0),(185,1,0),(186,1,0),(187,1,0),(189,1,0),(192,1,0),(190,1,0),(191,1,0),(188,3,0),(193,1,0),(195,1,0),(218,1,0),(196,1,0),(198,1,0),(197,1,0),(200,1,0),(199,1,0),(201,1,0),(202,17,0),(203,1,0),(205,1,0),(223,1,0),(206,1,0),(208,1,0),(220,1,0),(209,1,0),(210,1,0),(211,1,0),(212,1,0),(213,1,0),(214,1,0),(215,1,0),(216,1,0),(217,1,0),(194,3,0),(219,1,0),(207,3,0),(221,1,0),(204,3,0),(224,1,0),(225,1,0),(226,1,0),(227,1,0),(228,1,0),(229,1,0),(230,1,0),(231,1,0),(232,1,0),(233,1,0),(234,1,0),(235,1,0),(236,1,0),(237,1,0),(238,1,0),(239,1,0),(240,1,0),(241,1,0),(242,1,0),(243,1,0),(222,3,0);

--
-- Table structure for table `wp_term_taxonomy`
--

CREATE TABLE `wp_term_taxonomy` (
  `term_taxonomy_id` bigint(20) unsigned NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
  `term_id` bigint(20) unsigned NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',
  `taxonomy` varchar(32) NOT NULL DEFAULT '',
  `description` longtext NOT NULL,
  `parent` bigint(20) unsigned NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',
  `count` bigint(20) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',
  PRIMARY KEY (`term_taxonomy_id`),
  UNIQUE KEY `term_id_taxonomy` (`term_id`,`taxonomy`),
  KEY `taxonomy` (`taxonomy`)
) ENGINE=MyISAM AUTO_INCREMENT=21 DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8;

--
-- Dumping data for table `wp_term_taxonomy`
--

INSERT INTO `wp_term_taxonomy` VALUES (1,1,'category','',0,1),(2,2,'link_category','',0,7),(3,3,'category','This category is where Eric the Founder of EADOC will be placing his post about the Company and web based project management applications in general.',0,22),(4,4,'category','EADOC engineering is a place for our software engineers and developers to post information about upcoming releases, survey clients and have general discussion about the EADOC application.',0,0),(5,5,'post_tag','',0,1),(6,6,'post_tag','',0,1),(7,7,'post_tag','',0,1),(8,8,'post_tag','',0,1),(9,9,'post_tag','',0,1),(10,10,'post_tag','',0,1),(11,11,'post_tag','',0,1),(12,12,'post_tag','',0,1),(13,13,'post_tag','',0,1),(14,14,'post_tag','',0,1),(15,15,'post_tag','',0,1),(16,16,'post_tag','',0,1),(17,17,'category','',0,3),(18,18,'category','',0,1),(19,19,'category','',0,3),(20,20,'category','',0,2);

--
-- Table structure for table `wp_terms`
--

CREATE TABLE `wp_terms` (
  `term_id` bigint(20) unsigned NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
  `name` varchar(200) NOT NULL DEFAULT '',
  `slug` varchar(200) NOT NULL DEFAULT '',
  `term_group` bigint(10) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',
  PRIMARY KEY (`term_id`),
  UNIQUE KEY `slug` (`slug`),
  KEY `name` (`name`)
) ENGINE=MyISAM AUTO_INCREMENT=21 DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8;

--
-- Dumping data for table `wp_terms`
--

INSERT INTO `wp_terms` VALUES (1,'Uncategorized','uncategorized',0),(2,'Blogroll','blogroll',0),(3,'Words from the Founder','words-from-the-founder',0),(4,'EADOC Engineering','eadoc-engineering',0),(5,'Autodesk Constructware','autodesk-constructware',0),(6,'arra','arra',0),(7,'stimulus','stimulus',0),(8,'buy america','buy-america',0),(9,'construction management','construction-management',0),(10,'cell phone','cell-phone',0),(11,'usage','usage',0),(12,'adoption','adoption',0),(13,'CMAA','cmaa',0),(14,'tradeshow','tradeshow',0),(15,'EADOC','eadoc',0),(16,'Construction Management Association of America','construction-management-association-of-america',0),(17,'Industry News','industry-news',0),(18,'Articles','articles',0),(19,'EADOC Updates','eadoc-updates',0),(20,'Press Releases','press-releases',0);

--
-- Table structure for table `wp_usermeta`
--

CREATE TABLE `wp_usermeta` (
  `umeta_id` bigint(20) unsigned NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
  `user_id` bigint(20) unsigned NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',
  `meta_key` varchar(255) DEFAULT NULL,
  `meta_value` longtext,
  PRIMARY KEY (`umeta_id`),
  KEY `user_id` (`user_id`),
  KEY `meta_key` (`meta_key`)
) ENGINE=MyISAM AUTO_INCREMENT=24 DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8;

--
-- Dumping data for table `wp_usermeta`
--

INSERT INTO `wp_usermeta` VALUES (1,1,'nickname','Eric Law'),(2,1,'rich_editing','true'),(3,1,'comment_shortcuts','false'),(4,1,'admin_color','fresh'),(5,1,'wp_capabilities','a:1:{s:13:\"administrator\";b:1;}'),(6,1,'wp_user_level','10'),(7,1,'wp_usersettings','m0=c&m1=o&m2=o&m3=c&m4=c&m5=c&m6=o&m7=o&m8=c&m9=c&editor=html'),(8,1,'wp_usersettingstime','1270503030'),(9,1,'wp_autosave_draft_ids','a:28:{i:-1235671589;i:11;i:-1239313360;i:24;i:-1239318465;i:28;i:-1240353153;i:30;i:-1248657348;i:41;i:-1248657876;i:47;i:-1249942917;i:51;i:-1252526987;i:54;i:-1254153272;i:57;i:-1260472284;i:70;i:-1260490322;i:75;i:-1260983349;i:77;i:-1267556359;i:124;i:-1267560061;i:128;i:-1268151608;i:132;i:-1268526884;i:137;i:-1268753842;i:149;i:-1274397694;i:163;i:-1274462153;i:165;i:-1279506287;i:177;i:-1280860090;i:188;i:-1284150563;i:194;i:-1284150928;i:197;i:-1284150961;i:199;i:-1285883214;i:202;i:-1285883572;i:204;i:-1285891333;i:207;i:-1288202233;i:222;}'),(10,1,'first_name','Eric'),(11,1,'last_name','Law'),(12,2,'first_name','Hunter'),(13,2,'last_name','Hubby'),(14,2,'nickname','flickerbox'),(15,2,'rich_editing','true'),(16,2,'comment_shortcuts','false'),(17,2,'admin_color','fresh'),(18,2,'wp_capabilities','a:1:{s:13:\"administrator\";b:1;}'),(19,2,'wp_user_level','10'),(20,2,'wp_usersettings','editor=html&m7=o&m9=o'),(21,2,'wp_usersettingstime','1268101407'),(22,1,'description','Eric is the founder and CEO of EADOC. EADOC provides a fast, secure, easy to use web based project management application for reducing client costs on capital projects.'),(23,2,'wp_autosave_draft_ids','a:5:{i:-1266604214;i:87;i:-1266625153;i:101;i:-1266625240;i:103;i:-1266627350;i:107;i:-1266627601;i:112;}');

--
-- Table structure for table `wp_users`
--

CREATE TABLE `wp_users` (
  `ID` bigint(20) unsigned NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
  `user_login` varchar(60) NOT NULL DEFAULT '',
  `user_pass` varchar(64) NOT NULL DEFAULT '',
  `user_nicename` varchar(50) NOT NULL DEFAULT '',
  `user_email` varchar(100) NOT NULL DEFAULT '',
  `user_url` varchar(100) NOT NULL DEFAULT '',
  `user_registered` datetime NOT NULL DEFAULT '0000-00-00 00:00:00',
  `user_activation_key` varchar(60) NOT NULL DEFAULT '',
  `user_status` int(11) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',
  `display_name` varchar(250) NOT NULL DEFAULT '',
  PRIMARY KEY (`ID`),
  KEY `user_login_key` (`user_login`),
  KEY `user_nicename` (`user_nicename`)
) ENGINE=MyISAM AUTO_INCREMENT=3 DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8;

--
-- Dumping data for table `wp_users`
--

INSERT INTO `wp_users` VALUES (1,'admin','d3b1cee2327cfa357dabf0289958c024','21232f297a57a5a743894a0e4a801fc3','eric.law@eadocsoftware.com','http://www.eadocsoftware.com','2009-02-25 21:19:41','',0,''),(2,'admin','d3b1cee2327cfa357dabf0289958c024','flickerbox','hunter@flickerbox.com','http://www.flickerbox.com','2009-02-28 01:49:38','',0,'flickerbox');


