a:3:{s:16:"field_story_body";a:1:{i:0;a:2:{s:5:"value";s:1179:"The U.S. Supreme Court is considering arguments regarding the use of warrantless tracking of individuals. <br />
<br />
In 1983 the court previously ruled there is no expectation of privacy on public roads in a case involving the use of beeper technology but now they may consider this new appeal because of the advancement in technology and its ramifications on our privacy.<br />
<br />
<span style="color: rgb(128, 0, 0);"><strong><em>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &ldquo;The justices were taken aback when the lawyer representing the <br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; government said police officers could install GPS devices on the justices' cars and track their <br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; movements without a warrant.&rdquo;</em></strong></span><br />
<br />
For an article on the subject and what is being considered by the court click on the following story link:<br />
<br />
http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D9QSME201.htm<br />";s:6:"format";s:1:"2";}}s:17:"field_story_image";a:1:{i:0;a:10:{s:3:"fid";s:4:"1899";s:4:"list";s:1:"1";s:4:"data";a:3:{s:11:"description";s:0:"";s:3:"alt";s:0:"";s:5:"title";s:0:"";}s:3:"uid";s:1:"1";s:8:"filename";s:16:"gps_tracking.jpg";s:8:"filepath";s:43:"sites/default/files/images/gps_tracking.jpg";s:8:"filemime";s:10:"image/jpeg";s:8:"filesize";s:6:"118498";s:6:"status";s:1:"1";s:9:"timestamp";s:10:"1320858715";}}s:12:"field_weight";a:1:{i:0;a:1:{s:5:"value";N;}}}