 ccrp poll governor and us senate candidate debates   new poll overview governor rick snyder and us senate candidate terri lynn land as of yet have not agreed to any debates with their democrat opponents land of byron center and peters haven t appeared on the same stage since the detroit regional chamber s mackinac policy conference in may peters has stated that to me it is a basic job requirement a basic responsibility to the voters of michigan that if you are going to be a united states senator and want to run for the united states senate you should be willing to stand on a stage and defend the positions that you are taking michigan radio reported that land in a tuesday appearance said she is always willing to talk to voters but was leaving debate talks up to those in her campaign in charge of such things woodtv8 political reporter rick albin said the last time he spoke with governor snyder the governor indicated he had accepted only an invitation to a joint appearance with schauer on the east side of the state but even that could not be worked out between his campaign and the schauer camp governor snyder wanted to hold a joint appearance not necessarily a debate at the detroit economic club but the two sides could not agree on a time and date new poll question should governor snyder and us senate candidate terri lynn land agree to debate their democrat opponents yes no undecided to vote in this poll click on this link should governor snyder and us senate candidate terri lynn land agree to debate their democrat opponents   to enter your comments click on add new comment after you vote previous poll question should the medc s strategic fund have approved the capture of tax authorizations to george matick chevrolet yes 3 no 97 undecided 0 one comment was made on this poll comment 1 brownfield funds for auto dealer i voted no but not because it has anything to do with this being an auto dealer or whether there might be any fairness issue with other auto dealers my question or problem with this is that i haven t heard anything that says that the problem to be redressed have anything to do with a brownfield contamination problem with the property the little bit of description that was included with the question sounded more like a development or redevelopment issue this is the sort of thing we sometimes hear in lansing projects that don t talk about environmental problems on a site that need to be remedied but rather development or redevelopment projects it just strikes me that funds or other benefits under this legislation that can be available under brownfield projects should be exclusively for addressing environmental contamination and funds should be limited to paying for those expenses only regardless of what was there before and regardless of what someone wants to see there in the future in the little bit of info about this dealership mention was made about possible allowable expenses such as asbestos removal and curbs i can agree that asbestos removal might be appropriate regardless of whether the property houses a car dealership or anything else i do not think that should ever be the ability to include funds for curbs for any project there is no possibility that environmentally contaminated curbs were being removed and needing to be replaced with brownfield money i think there has been noticeable misuse of the brownfield legislation   all emails addresses  