Really, they did create their own problem and it is their responsibility to pay for it. It is not the responsibility of the rest of the state. Yes, they may have to sell some valuable artwork - - maybe just one piece. Aww. And/or sell the water system or real estate. That's the breaks.Yes, they need to move to defined contribution pensions as soon as possible - - but, be careful about this when new labor contracts are entered into - - recall how the unions extended existing contracts for a long time in order to avoid Right to Work. Yes, there needs to be a Commission as described to monitor much of Detroit's fiscal behavior in the next 20 years minimum. (There is always a huge City of Detroit scandal every 20 years, so it might be good for a Commission to run longer with the intention of trying to change that scandal culture so that those accustomed to it will die off and the younger replacements might not be trained in it. Who knows.) I don't recall whether the description of the Commission included appointments to the Pension Board(s) and Commission monitoring of the pension systems - - that has been a real corrupt cess pool and that needs to happen. I'm nervous about the concept that the Commission would not be active during periods of "fiscal health" in Detroit This is a problem. First, accountants can make anything seem like it meets some terms and second, a new "Granholm" as Governor would automatically define anything as "fiscal health" to play games with Detroit, so I think it's a bad and risky idea that should be scrapped. Finally, obviously the discussion of an amount of a bail out is a buy in to get the extended Commission. Ok. Get to a number that is really low.  $1 million.and no more. A million is enough to sound serious and not insulting to Detroiters and not so high that it insults the rest of us. $195 Million is still a huge insult to the rest of us.