Provocative comment: "We take an expansive view of what is relevant 'Whitman' material." Is there a defined threshold point at which the Archive <em>wouldn't</em> include something Whitman-related other than the time, energy, and resources required to include it? I'm thinking of the Disciples section in particular. If this were a comprehensive listing of Whitman's disciples, it would be HUGE! Is there a criteria for deciding (1) who counts as a disciple and (2) how much information about that disciple should be included? The Disciples section is a particularly interesting section of the Archive for me, because it potentially challenges the notion of The Author as a limiting strategy for what to include on the Archive: if we acknowledge that Whitman and his disciples had a reciprocal relationship on one another, where do we stop in our collection of resources that define that relationship? I'm just thinking out loud here. I don't have any suggestions or criticisms other than to say that the Disciples section is a really tantalizing space for testing the boundaries of the "expansive view of what is relevant 'Whitman' material."